Progress in material design for biomedical applications

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 47, 2015, Pages 14444-14451

  Tibbitt, Mark W ^a   Rodell, Christopher B ^b   Burdick, Jason A ^b   Anseth, Kristi S ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

Author keywords

Biocomplex; Biomaterials; Dynamics; Feature control; Soft materials

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 2; ELASTASE; HEPARIN BINDING PROTEIN; HYALURONIC ACID; MACROGOL; MESSENGER RNA; MICRORNA; NANOCARRIER; NANOMATERIAL; NANOPARTICLE; NITINOL; PLASMIN; POLOXAMER; POLYMER; POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; TITANIUM;

ADDITION REACTION; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; CATALYSIS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CERAMICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COVALENT BOND; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG RELEASE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENE EXPRESSION; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; IONIC STRENGTH; MAGNETIC FIELD; MECHANICAL STRESS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; OSSIFICATION; PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RNA INTERFERENCE; TEMPERATURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VASCULAR STENT; WOUND HEALING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; HUMANS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84948410667     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516247112     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. US NSaTC (2011) Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness (Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC).
2. marketsandmarkets.com (2013) Biomaterials Market [By Products (Polymers, Metals, Ceramics, Natural Biomaterials) & Applications (Cardiovascular, Orthopedic, Dental, Plastic Surgery, Wound Healing, Tissue Engineering, Ophthalmology, Neurology Disorders)]-Global Forecasts to 2017. Report Code BT 1556. Available at www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/biomaterials-393.html. Accessed August 15, 2015.
3. Azagarsamy MA, Anseth KS (2013) Bioorthogonal click chemistry: An indispensable tool to create multifaceted cell culture scaffolds. ACS Macro Lett 2(1):5-9.
4. Lehn JM (1988) Supramolecular chemistry-scope and perspectives molecules, supermolecules, and molecular devices (Nobel Lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 27(1):89-112.
5. Service RF (2005) How far can we push chemical self-assembly? Science 309(5731):95-95.
6. Wang NX, Von Recum HA (2011) Affinity-based drug delivery. Macromol Biosci 11(3):321-332.
7. Ma X, Zhao Y (2015) Biomedical applications of supramolecular systems based on host-guest interactions. Chem Rev 115(15):7794-7839.
8. Purcell BP, et al. (2014) Injectable and bioresponsive hydrogels for on-demand matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat Mater 13(6):653-661.
9. Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI (2001) Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science 294(5547):1684-1688.
10. Stendahl JC, Rao MS, Guler MO, Stupp SI (2006) Intermolecular forces in the self-assembly of peptide amphiphile nanofibers. Adv Funct Mater 16(4):499-508.
11. Wang H, Heilshorn SC (2015) Adaptable hydrogel networks with reversible linkages for tissue engineering. Adv Mater 27(25):3717-3736.
12. Thoniyot P, Tan MJ, Karim AA, Young DJ, Loh XJ (2015) Nanoparticle-hydrogel composites: Concept, design, and applications of these promising, multi-functional materials. Adv Sci 2(1-2):1400010.
13. Wade RJ, Burdick JA (2014) Advances in nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications: From electrospinning to self-assembly. Nano Today 9(6):722-742.
14. Li W-J, Mauck RL, Cooper JA, Yuan X, Tuan RS (2007) Engineering controllable anisotropy in electrospun biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. J Biomech 40(8):1686-1693.
15. Rocco KA, Maxfield MW, Best CA, Dean EW, Breuer CK (2014) In vivo applications of electrospun tissue-engineered vascular grafts: A review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 20(6):628-640.
16. Sill TJ, Von Recum HA (2008) Electrospinning: Applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29(13):1989-2006.
17. Caliari SR, Harley BAC (2011) The effect of anisotropic collagen-GAG scaffolds and growth factor supplementation on tendon cell recruitment, alignment, and metabolic activity. Biomaterials 32(23):5330-5340.
18. Somo SI, et al. (2015) Pore interconnectivity influences growth factor-mediated vascularization in sphere-templated hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 21(8):773-785.
19. Wade RJ, Bassin EJ, Gramlich WM, Burdick JA (2015) Nanofibrous hydrogels with spatially patterned biochemical signals to control cell behavior. Adv Mater 27(8):1356-1362.
20. Wylie RG, et al. (2011) Spatially controlled simultaneous patterning of multiple growth factors in three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater 10(10):799-806.
21. Khetan S, et al. (2013) Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater 12(5):458-465.
22. Gramlich WM, Kim IL, Burdick JA (2013) Synthesis and orthogonal photopatterning of hyaluronic acid hydrogels with thiolnorbornene chemistry. Biomaterials 34(38):9803-9811.
23. Kloxin AM, Kasko AM, Salinas CN, Anseth KS (2009) Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 324(5923):59-63.
24. Chang SCN, Tobias G, Roy AK, Vacanti CA, Bonassar LJ (2003) Tissue engineering of autologous cartilage for craniofacial reconstruction by injection molding. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(3):793-799, discussion 800-801.
25. Ballyns JJ, et al. (2008) Image-guided tissue engineering of anatomically shaped implants via MRI and micro-CT using injection molding. Tissue Eng Part A 14(7):1195-1202.
26. Hudalla GA, Koepsel JT, Murphy WL (2011) Surfaces that sequester serum-borne heparin amplify growth factor activity. Adv Mater 23(45):5415-5418.
27. Bowden N, Terfort A, Carbeck J, Whitesides GM (1997) Self-assembly of mesoscale objects into ordered two-dimensional arrays. Science 276(5310):233-235.
28. Whitesides GM, Boncheva M (2002) Beyond molecules: Self-assembly of mesoscopic and macroscopic components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(8):4769-4774.
29. Tasoglu S, et al. (2014) Guided and magnetic self-assembly of tunable magnetoceptive gels. Nat Commun 5:4702.
30. Miller JS, et al. (2012) Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat Mater 11(9):768-774.
31. Kolesky DB, et al. (2014) 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater 26(19):3124-3130.
32. Highley CB, Rodell CB, Burdick JA (2015) Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv Mater 27(34):5075-5079.
33. Pillai CK, Sharma CP (2010) Review paper: Absorbable polymeric surgical sutures: Chemistry, production, properties, biodegradability, and performance. J Biomater Appl 25(4):291-366.
34. Ulery BD, Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2011) Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci, B, Polym Phys 49(12):832-864.
35. Kohane DS, Langer R (2008) Polymeric biomaterials in tissue engineering. Pediatr Res 63(5):487-491.
36. Metters AT, Anseth KS, Bowman CN (2000) Fundamental studies of a novel, biodegradable PEG-b-PLA hydrogel. Polymer (Guildf) 41(11):3993-4004.
37. Martens P, Holland T, Anseth KS (2002) Synthesis and characterization of degradable hydrogels formed from acrylate modified poly (vinyl alcohol) macromers. Polymer (Guildf) 43(23):6093-6100.
38. Jo S, Shin H, Mikos AG (2001) Modification of oligo (poly (ethylene glycol) fumarate) macromer with a GRGD peptide for the preparation of functionalized polymer networks. Biomacromolecules 2(1):255-261.
39. Sahoo S, Chung C, Khetan S, Burdick JA (2008) Hydrolytically degradable hyaluronic acid hydrogels with controlled temporal structures. Biomacromolecules 9(4):1088-1092.
40. Bryant SJ, Anseth KS (2003) Controlling the spatial distribution of ECM components in degradable PEG hydrogels for tissue engineering cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res A 64(1):70-79.
41. Anseth KS, et al. (2002) In situ forming degradable networks and their application in tissue engineering and drug delivery. J Control Release 78(1-3):199-209.
42. Nguyen EH, Schwartz MP, Murphy WL (2011) Biomimetic approaches to control soluble concentration gradients in biomaterials. Macromol Biosci 11(4):483-492.
43. Kraehenbuehl TP, et al. (2008) Three-dimensional extracellular matrix-directed cardioprogenitor differentiation: Systematic modulation of a synthetic cell-responsive PEG-hydrogel. Biomaterials 29(18):2757-2766.
44. Lutolf MP, et al. (2003) Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices. Nat Biotechnol 21(5):513-518.
45. Gobin AS, West JL (2002) Cell migration through defined, synthetic extracellular matrix analogues. FASEB J 16(3):751.
46. Khetan S, Katz JS, Burdick JA (2009) Sequential crosslinking to control cellular spreading in 3-dimensional hydrogels. Soft Matter 5(8):1601-1606.
47. Lutolf MP, Raeber GP, Zisch AH, Tirelli N, Hubbell JA (2003) Cellresponsive synthetic hydrogels. Adv Mater 15(11):888.
48. Seliktar D, Zisch AH, Lutolf MP, Wrana JL, Hubbell JA (2004) MMP-2 sensitive, VEGF-bearing bioactive hydrogels for promotion of vascular healing. J Biomed Mater Res A 68(4):704-716.
49. Hanjaya-Putra D, et al. (2011) Controlled activation of morphogenesis to generate a functional human microvasculature in a synthetic matrix. Blood 118(3):804-815.
50. Sakiyama-Elbert SE, Panitch A, Hubbell JA (2001) Development of growth factor fusion proteins for cell-triggered drug delivery. FASEB J 15(7):1300-1302.
51. Burrage PS, Mix KS, Brinckerhoff CE (2006) Matrix metalloproteinases: Role in arthritis. Front Biosci 11:529-543.
52. Kerkelä E, Saarialho-Kere U (2003) Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor progression: Focus on basal and squamous cell skin cancer. Exp Dermatol 12(2):109-125.
53. Spinale FG (2007) Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases: Influence on cardiac form and function. Physiol Rev 87(4):1285-1342.
54. Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ (2008) Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 14(2):149-165.
55. Li Y, Rodrigues J, Tomás H (2012) Injectable and biodegradable hydrogels: Gelation, biodegradation and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 41(6):2193-2221.
56. Grayson AC, et al. (2004) Differential degradation rates in vivo and in vitro of biocompatible poly (lactic acid) and poly (glycolic acid) homo- and co-polymers for a polymeric drug-delivery microchip. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 15(10):1281-1304.
57. Kim GY, et al. (2007) Resorbable polymer microchips releasing BCNU inhibit tumor growth in the rat 9L flank model. J Control Release 123(2):172-178.
58. Garg S, Serruys PW (2010) Coronary stents: Looking forward. J Am Coll Cardiol 56 (10, Suppl):S43-S78.
59. Hoffman AS (2013) Stimuli-responsive polymers: Biomedical applications and challenges for clinical translation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65(1):10-16.
60. Ulijn RV (2006) Enzyme-responsive materials: A new class of smart biomaterials. J Mater Chem 16(23):2217-2225.
61. Miyata T, Asami N, Uragami T (1999) A reversibly antigenresponsive hydrogel. Nature 399(6738):766-769.
62. Murphy WL (2011) Emerging area: Biomaterials that mimic and exploit protein motion. Soft Matter 7(8):3679-3688.
63. Horbett TA, Klumb LA (1992) Design of insulin delivery devices based on glucose sensitive membranes. J Control Release 18(1):59-80.
64. King WJ, Toepke MW, Murphy WL (2011) Facile formation of dynamic hydrogel microspheres for triggered growth factor delivery. Acta Biomater 7(3):975-985.
65. Salimath AS, et al. (2012) Dual delivery of hepatocyte and vascular endothelial growth factors via a protease-degradable hydrogel improves cardiac function in rats. PLoS One 7(11):e50980.
66. Molla MR, Prasad P, Thayumanavan S (2015) Protein-induced supramolecular disassembly of amphiphilic polypeptide nanoassemblies. J Am Chem Soc 137(23):7286-7289.
67. Lowman AM, Morishita M, Kajita M, Nagai T, Peppas NA (1999) Oral delivery of insulin using pH-responsive complexation gels. J Pharm Sci 88(9):933-937.
68. Ebara M, et al. (2003) Copolymerization of 2-carboxyisopropylacrylamide with N-isopropylacrylamide accelerates cell detachment from grafted surfaces by reducing temperature. Biomacromolecules 4(2):344-349.
69. Kloxin AM, Benton JA, Anseth KS (2010) In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. Biomaterials 31(1):1-8.
70. Guvendiren M, Burdick JA (2012) Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics. Nat Commun 3:792.
71. Gillette BM, Jensen JA, Wang M, Tchao J, Sia SK (2010) Dynamic hydrogels: Switching of 3D microenvironments using twocomponent naturally derived extracellular matrices. Adv Mater 22(6):686-691.
72. Jiang FX, Yurke B, Schloss RS, Firestein BL, Langrana NA (2010) The relationship between fibroblast growth and the dynamic stiffnesses of a DNA crosslinked hydrogel. Biomaterials 31(6):1199-1212.
73. Hillel AT, et al. (2011) Photoactivated composite biomaterial for soft tissue restoration in rodents and in humans. Sci Transl Med 3(93):93ra67.
74. Lee TT, et al. (2015) Light-triggered in vivo activation of adhesive peptides regulates cell adhesion, inflammation and vascularization of biomaterials. Nat Mater 14 (3) 352-360.
75. Epstein-Barash H, et al. (2010) A microcomposite hydrogel for repeated on-demand ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Biomaterials 31(19):5208-5217.
76. Huebsch N, et al. (2014) Ultrasound-triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly cross-linked hydrogels for drug delivery and enhanced chemotherapy Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(27):9762-9767.
77. Santini JT, Jr, Cima MJ, Langer R (1999) A controlled-release microchip. Nature 397 (6717) 335-338.
78. Lendlein A, Behl M, Hiebl B, Wischke C (2010) Shape-memory polymers as a technology platform for biomedical applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 7 (3) 357-379.
79. Serrano MC, Ameer GA (2012) Recent insights into the biomedical applications of shape-memory polymers. Macromol Biosci 12(9):1156-1171.
80. Lendlein A, Langer R (2002) Biodegradable, elastic shapememory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science 296(5573):1673-1676.
81. Gref R, et al. (1994) Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science 263(5153):1600-1603.
82. Rodriguez PL, et al. (2013) Minimal "Self" peptides that inhibit phagocytic clearance and enhance delivery of nanoparticles. Science 339(6122):971-975.
83. Hannon GJ (2002) RNA interference. Nature 418(6894):244-251.
84. Sahin U, Karikó K, Türeci Ö (2014) mRNA-based therapeutics: Developing a new class of drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13(10):759-780.
85. Whitehead KA, Langer R, Anderson DG (2009) Knocking down barriers: Advances in siRNA delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8(2):129-138.
86. Kanasty R, Dorkin JR, Vegas A, Anderson D (2013) Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics. Nat Mater 12(11):967-977.
87. Coelho T, et al. (2013) Safety and efficacy of RNAi therapy for transthyretin amyloidosis. N Engl J Med 369(9):819-829.
88. Dahlman JE, et al. (2014) In vivo endothelial siRNA delivery using polymeric nanoparticles with low molecular weight. Nat Nanotechnol 9(8):648-655.
89. Davis ME, Chen ZG, Shin DM (2008) Nanoparticle therapeutics: An emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(9):771-782.
90. Sahay G, et al. (2013) Efficiency of siRNA delivery by lipid nanoparticles is limited by endocytic recycling. Nat Biotechnol 31(7):653-658.
91. Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS (2009) Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(4):655-663.
92. Gilbert PM, et al. (2010) Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329(5995):1078-1081.
93. Kobel S, Lutolf M (2010) High-throughput methods to define complex stem cell niches. Biotechniques 48(4): ix-xxii.
94. Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS (2012) Dynamic microenvironments: the fourth dimension. Sci Transl Med 4(160):160ps24.
95. Bian L, Guvendiren M, Mauck RL, Burdick JA (2013) Hydrogels that mimic developmentally relevant matrix and N-cadherin interactions enhance MSC chondrogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(25):10117-10122.
96. Yang C, Tibbitt MW, Basta L, Anseth KS (2014) Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater 13(6):645-652.
97. Dingal PCDP, et al. (2015) Fractal heterogeneity in minimal matrix models of scars modulates stiff-niche stem-cell responses via nuclear exit of a mechanorepressor. Nat Mater 14(9):951-960.
98. Young JL, Engler AJ (2011) Hydrogels with time-dependent material properties enhance cardiomyocyte differentiation in vitro. Biomaterials 32(4):1002-1009.
99. Huh D, Hamilton GA, Ingber DE (2011) From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol 21(12):745-754.
100. Ali OA, Emerich D, Dranoff G, Mooney DJ (2009) In situ regulation of DC subsets and T cells mediates tumor regression in mice. Sci Transl Med 1(8):8ra19.
101. Irvine DJ, Swartz MA, Szeto GL (2013) Engineering synthetic vaccines using cues from natural immunity. Nat Mater 12(11):978-990.
102. Culver JC, et al. (2012) Three-dimensional biomimetic patterning in hydrogels to guide cellular organization. Adv Mater 24(17):2344-2348.
103. Wang X, et al. (2009) Growth factor gradients via microsphere delivery in biopolymer scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. J Control Release 134(2):81-90.
104. Caliari SR, et al. (2015) Collagen scaffolds incorporating coincident gradations of instructive structural and biochemical cues for osteotendinous junction engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 4(6):831-837.
105. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20(2):86-100.
106. Ratner BD, Bryant SJ (2004) Biomaterials: Where we have been and where we are going. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 6(1):41-75.
107. Morris AH, Kyriakides TR (2014) Matricellular proteins and biomaterials. Matrix Biol 37:183-191.
108. Zhang L, et al. (2013) Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction. Nat Biotechnol 31(6):553-556.
109. Madden LR, et al. (2010) Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(34):15211-15216.
110. National Science Foundation (2012) Biomaterials: Important Areas for Future Investment (National Science Foundation, Washington, DC).
111. Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA (2005) Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 23(1):47-55.
112. Li D, Wang YL, Xia YN (2004) Electrospinning nanofibers as uniaxially aligned arrays and layer-by-layer stacked films. Adv Mater 16(4):361-366.
113. Lee S-H, Moon JJ, West JL (2008) Three-dimensional micropatterning of bioactive hydrogels via two-photon laser scanning photolithography for guided 3D cell migration. Biomaterials 29(20):2962-2968.
114. De Forest CA, Anseth KS (2012) Photoreversible patterning of biomolecules within click-based hydrogels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51(8):1816-1819.
115. Lutolf MP, et al. (2003) Synthetic matrix metalloproteinasesensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: Engineering cell-invasion characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(9):5413-5418.
116. Hribar KC, Metter RB, Ifkovits JL, Troxler T, Burdick JA (2009) Light-induced temperature transitions in biodegradable polymer and nanorod composites. Small 5(16):1830-1834.