Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Volumn 98, Issue , 2015, Pages 116-147

  Khan, Faisal ^a   Rathnayaka, Samith ^a   Ahmed, Salim ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accident model; Dynamic risk; Inherent safety; Process safety; Risk assessment; Safety management

Indexed keywords

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

ACCIDENT MODELS; DYNAMIC RISKS; INHERENT SAFETY; PROCESS SAFETY; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84948177399     PISSN: 09575820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005     Document Type: Review

References (343)

1. T. Abbasi, and S.A. Abbasi Dust explosions - cases, causes, consequences, and control J. Hazard. Mater. 140 1-2 2007 7 44
2. B. Abdolhamidzadeh, T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, and S.A. Abbasi A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry J. Hazard. Mater. 182 1-3 2010 416 426
3. A. Acikalin Integration of safety management effectiveness into QRA calculations Process Saf. Prog. 28 4 2009 331 337
4. R. Alexander, and T. Kelly Supporting systems of systems hazard analysis using multi-agent simulation Saf. Sci. 51 1 2013 302 318
5. G.V. Alexeeff, D.J. Shusterman, R.A. Howd, and R.J. Jackson Dose-response assessment of airborne methyl isothiocyanate (MITC) following a metam sodium spill Risk Anal. 14 2 1994 191 198
6. F.D. Alonso, E.G. Ferradás, J.F.S. Pérez, A.M. Aznar, J.R. Gimeno, and M.D. Miñarro Consequence analysis to determine damage to buildings from vapour cloud explosions using characteristic curves J. Hazard. Mater. 159 2-3 2008 264 270
7. F.D. Alonso, E.G. Ferradás, T.D.J.J. Sánchez, A.M. Aznar, J.R. Gimeno, and J.M. Alonso Consequence analysis to determine the damage to humans from vapour cloud explosions using characteristic curves J. Hazard. Mater. 150 1 2008 146 152
8. G.K. Al-Sharrah, D. Edwards, and G. Hankinson A new safety risk index for use in petrochemical planning Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 85 6 2007 533 540
9. A. Andrijievskij, V. Fthenakis, A. Loukashevich, and A. Trifonov LOCADIS - a model and numerical code for simulating local aerosol dispersion J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14 1 2001 61 67
10. T. Aven A semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis, as an alternative to QRAs Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 2008 768 775
11. T. Aven, and V. Kristensen Perspectives on risk: review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 90 1 2005 1 14
12. T. Aven, S. Sklet, and J.E. Vinnem Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release). Part I. Method description J. Hazard. Mater. 137 2 2006 681 691
13. D.F. Bagster, and S.A. Schubach The prediction of jet-fire dimensions J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 9 3 1996 241 245
14. N. Bahr System Safety Engineering and Risk assessment: A Practical Approach first ed. 1997 Taylor & Francis Group Washington, DC
15. M.R. Baum Rocket missiles generated by failure of a high pressure liquid storage vessel J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 11 1 1998 11 24
16. M.R. Baum The velocity of large missiles resulting from axial rupture of gas pressurised cylindrical vessels J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14 3 2001 199 203
17. M.R. Baum Failure of a horizontal pressure vessel containing a high temperature liquid: the velocity of end-cap and rocket missiles J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12 2 1999 137 145
18. P. Baybutt Layers of protection analysis for human factors (LOPA-HF) Process Saf. Prog. 21 2 2002 119 129
19. P. Baybutt Major hazards analysis: an improved method for process hazards analysis Process Saf. Prog. 22 1 2003 21 26
20. P. Baybutt An improved risk graph approach for determination of safety integrity levels (SILs) Process Saf. Prog. 26 1 2007 66 76
21. P. Baybutt Using risk tolerance criteria to determine safety integrity levels for safety instrumented functions J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 6 2012 1000 1009
22. T. Bedford, and R. Cooke Probabilistic Risk Analysis Foundations and Methods 2001 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
23. J. Belanger, P. Topalovic, G. Krantzberg, and J. West Responsible care: history & development Report 2009
24. M. Bensi, A.D. Kiureghian, and D. Straub Efficient Bayesian network modeling of systems Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 112 2013 200 213
25. F. Bird Management Guide to Loss Control 1974 Internatioanl Loss Control Institute Atlanta
26. A. Bobbio, L. Portinale, M. Minichino, and E. Ciancamerla Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71 3 2001 249 260
27. M. Bouissou, and J.L. Bon A new formalism that combines advantages of fault-trees and Markov models: Boolean logic driven Markov processes Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 82 2 2003 149 163
28. P. Bricard, and L. Friedel Two-phase jet dispersion J. Hazard. Mater. 59 2-3 1998 287 310
29. F. Brissaud, A. Barros, and C. Bérenguer Handling parameter and model uncertainties by continuous gates in fault tree analyses J. Risk Reliab. 224 4 2010 253 265
30. L. Brockhoff, H.J.S. Petersen, and P. Haastrup A consequence model for chlorine and ammonia based on a fatality index approach J. Hazard. Mater. 29 1992 405 425
31. E. Cagno, F. Caron, and M. Mancini Risk analysis in plant commissioning: the Multilevel Hazop Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 77 3 2002 309 323
32. B. Cai, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Q. Fan, Z. Liu, and X. Tian A dynamic Bayesian networks modeling of human factors on offshore blowouts J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 4 2013 639 649
33. C. Catino, and L.H. Ungar Model-based approach to automated hazards identifcation of chemical plants Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 41 1 1995 97 109
34. CCPS Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes 1993 American Institute of Chemical Engineers New York, NY
35. CCPS Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis second ed. 2000 American Institute of Chemical Engineers
36. CCPS Guidelines for Risk-Based Process Safety 2007 John Wiley & Sons New Jersey
37. CCPS Guideline for Hazard Evaluation Procedures third ed. 2008 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY
38. M. Čepin, and B. Mavko A dynamic fault tree Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 75 1 2002 83 91
39. C.Y. Chen, K.C. Chang, C.C. Lu, and G.B. Wang Study of high-tech process furnace using inherently safer design strategies (II). Deposited film thickness model J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 1 2013 225 235
40. C.Y. Chen, K.C. Chang, and G.B. Wang Study of high-tech process furnace using inherently safer design strategies (I) temperature distribution model and process effect J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 6 2013 1198 1211
41. H. Chen, T. Moan, and H. Verhoeven Safety of dynamic positioning operations on mobile offshore drilling units Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 7 2008 1072 1090
42. P. Cherubin, S. Pellino, and A. Petrone Baseline risk assessment tool: a comprehensive risk management tool for process safety Process Saf. Prog. 30 3 2011 251 260
43. J.G. Cho, and B.J. Yum Development and evaluation of an uncertainty importance measure in fault tree analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 57 2 1997 143 157
44. J.S. Choi, and N.Z. Cho A practical method for accurate quantification of large fault trees Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 7 2007 971 982
45. J.E. Cockshott Probability bow-ties: a trabsparent risk management tool Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 83 4 2005 307 316
46. D. Codetta-Raiteri Integrating several formalisms in order to increase fault trees' modeling power Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 5 2011 534 544
47. M. Considine, and S.M. Hall The major accident risk (MAR) process - developing the profile of major accident risk for a large multi national oil company Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 87 1 2009 59 63
48. S. Contini A new hybrid method for fault tree analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 49 1 1995 13 21
49. F.P.A. Coolen Non-parametric prediction of unobserved failure modes J. Risk Reliab. 221 3 2007 207 216
50. F.P.A. Coolen On probabilistic safety assessment in the case of zero failures J. Risk Reliab. 220 2 2006 105 114
51. V.T. Covello, and J. Mumpower Risk analysis and risk management: an historical perspective Risk Anal. 5 2 1985 103 120
52. S.J. Cox, and A.J.T. Cheyne Assessing safety culture in offshore environments Saf. Sci. 34 2000 111 129
53. V. Cozzani, and E. Salzano The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models J. Hazard. Mater. 107 3 2004 67 80
54. D.A. Crowl, and J.F. Louvar Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals With Application third ed. 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. USA
55. L. Cui, J. Zhao, T. Qiu, and B. Chen Layered digraph model for HAZOP analysis of chemical processes Process Saf. Prog. 27 4 2008 293 305
56. L. Cui, J. Zhao, and R. Zhang The integration of HAZOP expert system and piping and instrumentation diagrams Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 88 5 2010 327 334
57. G. Curcurù, G.M. Galante, and C.M. La Fata Epistemic uncertainty in fault tree analysis approached by the evidence theory J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 4 2012 667 676
58. S.G. Davis, P.C. Hinze, O.R. Hansen, and K. Van Wingerden Does your facility have a dust problem: methods for evaluating dust explosion hazards J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24 6 2011 837 846
59. T. Deacon, P.R. Amyotte, and F.I. Khan Human error risk analysis in offshore emergencies Saf. Sci. 48 6 2010 803 818
60. C. Delvosalle, C. Fievez, A. Pipart, and B. Debray ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries J. Hazard. Mater. 130 3 2006 200 219
61. M. Demichela, N. Piccinini, I. Ciarambino, and S. Contini On the numerical solution of fault trees Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 82 2 2003 141 147
62. V. Dianous, and C. Fiévez ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance J. Hazard. Mater. 130 3 2006 220 233
63. G. Dong, L. Xue, Y. Yang, and J. Yang Evaluation of hazard range for the natural gas jet released from a high-pressure pipeline: a computational parametric study J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 4 2010 522 530
64. A.M. Dowell, and T.R. Williams Layer of protection analysis: Generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data Process Saf. Prog. 24 1 2005 38 44
65. E.L. Droguett, and A. Mosleh Integrated treatment of model and parameter uncertainties through a Bayesian approach J. Risk Reliab. 227 1 2013 41 54
66. D. Duarte, and T. Pires Hazard identification using new logic diagrams and descriptors Process Saf. Prog. 20 2 2001 157 167
67. N.J. Duijm Safety-barrier diagrams J. Risk Reliab. 222 3 2008 439 448
68. N.J. Duijm Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 2 2009 332 341
69. H.B. Duisault The Evolution and Practical Applications of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis 1983 Rome Air Development Center NY
70. A.G. Eleye-Datubo, A. Wall, and J. Wang Marine and offshore safety assessment by incorporative risk modeling in a fuzzy-Bayesian network of an induced mass assignment paradigm Risk Anal. 28 1 2008 95 112
71. R. Elhdad, N. Chilamkurti, and T. Torabi An ontology-based framework for process monitoring and maintenance in petroleum plant J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 1 2013 104 116
72. H.C. Elke Application of the process safety management standard in Canada Report 2013
73. C.A. Ericson Fault tree analysis-a history The 17th International Syatem Safety Conference (1-9) USA 1999
74. C.A. Ericson Event tree analysis Hazards Analysis Techniques for System Safety first ed. 2005 John Wiley & Sons 223 234
75. J.A. Fay Model of large pool fires J. Hazard. Mater. 136 2 2006 219 232
76. R. Ferdous, F. Khan, R. Sadiq, P. Amyotte, and B. Veitch Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 87 5 2009 283 292
77. R. Ferdous, F. Khan, R. Sadiq, P. Amyotte, and B. Veitch Fault and event tree analyses for process systems risk analysis: uncertainty handling formulations Risk Anal. 31 1 2011 86 107
78. R. Ferdous, F. Khan, R. Sadiq, P. Amyotte, and B. Veitch Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 1 2012 8 19
79. R. Ferdous, F. Khan, R. Sadiq, P. Amyotte, and B. Veitch Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: an innovative approach Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91 1-2 2013 1 18
80. R. Ferdous, F. Khan, B. Veitch, and P.R. Amyotte Methodology for computer-aided fault tree analysis Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 85 1 2007 70 80
81. R. Ferdous, F. Khan, B. Veitch, and P.R. Amyotte Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 7 April 2009 217L 226
82. E.G. Ferradás, F.D. Alonso, M.D. Miñarro, A.M. Aznar, J.R. Gimeno, and J.F.S. Pérez Consequence analysis by means of characteristic curves to determine the damage to humans from bursting spherical vessels Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 86 2 2008 121 129
83. R. Flage, P. Baraldi, E. Zio, and T. Aven Probability and possibility-based representations of uncertainty in fault tree analysis Risk Anal. 33 1 2013 121 133
84. R.R. Freeman Procedural-based controls in layer of protection analysis Process Saf. Prog. 27 4 2008 306 312
85. R.R. Freeman Simplified uncertainty analysis of layer of protection analysis results Process Saf. Prog. 32 4 2013 351 360
86. V.M. Fthenakis, U.S. Rohatgi, and B.D. Chung A simple model for predicting the release of a liquid-vapor mixture from a large break in a pressurized container J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 16 1 2003 61 72
87. C.J. Garrett, and G.E. Apostolakis Automated hazard analysis of digital control systems Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 77 1 2002 1 17
88. P.R. Garvey, and Z.F. Lansdowne Risk matrix: an approach for identifying, assessing, and ranking program risks Air Force J. Logistics 22 1 1998 16 23
89. M. Gentile, W.J. Rogers, and M.S. Mannan Development of a fuzzy logic-based inherent safety index Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 81 6 2003 444 456
90. R. Gerrard, and A. Tsanakas Failure probability under parameter uncertainty Risk Anal. 31 5 2011 727 744
91. S.G. Giannissi, A.G. Venetsanos, N. Markatos, and J.G. Bartzis Numerical simulation of LNG dispersion under two-phase release conditions J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 1 2013 245 254
92. N. Gibson Process safety - A subject for scientific research Trans. IChemE 77 1999 153 179
93. L.H.J. Goossens, and R.M. Cooke Applications of some risk assessment techniques: formal expert judgment and accident sequnce precursors Saf. Sci. 26 1997 35 47
94. R. Gordon, R. Flin, and K. Mearns Designing and evaluating a human factors investigation tool (HFIT) for accident analysis Saf. Sci. 43 3 2005 147 171
95. G. Gubinelli, and V. Cozzani Assessment of missile hazards: evaluation of the fragment number and drag factors J. Hazard. Mater. 161 1 2009 439 449
96. G. Gubinelli, and V. Cozzani Assessment of missile hazards: identification of reference fragmentation patterns J. Hazard. Mater. 163 2-3 2009 1008 1018 (d)
97. J.P. Gupta, and D.W. Edwards A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety J. Hazard. Mater. 104 1-3 2003 15 30
98. D.F. Haasl Advanced concepts in fault tree analysis System Safety Symposium Washington 1965
99. A.R. Hale, B.H.J. Heming, J. Catfhey, and B. Kirwan Modeling of safety management systems Saf. Sci. 26 1997 121 140
100. R.K.S. Hankin, and R.E. Brittter Materials the health and safety laboratory' s shallow layer model for heavy gas dispersion Part 1. Mathematical basis and physical assumptions J. Hazard. Mater. 66 3 1999 211 226
101. R.K.S. Hankin, and R.E. Brittter Hazardous materials the health and safety laboratory' s shallow layer model for heavy gas dispersion Part 2: Outline and validation of the computational scheme J. Hazard. Mater. 66 3 1999 227 237
102. R.K.S. Hankin, and R.E. Brittter twodee: the Health and Safety Laboratory's shallow layer model for heavy gas dispersion Part 3: Experimental validation (Thorney Island) J. Hazard. Mater. 66 3 1999 239 261
103. F. Harrou, M.N. Nounou, H.N. Nounou, and M. Madakyaru Statistical fault detection using PCA-based GLR hypothesis testing J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 1 2013 129 139
104. M.H. Hassim, and M. Hurme Inherent occupational health concept for chemical processes: a new perspective Inst. Eng. Malaysia 71 3 2010 56 64
105. U. Hauptmanns A procedure for analyzing the flight of missiles from explosions of cylindrical vessels J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14 5 2001 395 402
106. U. Hauptmanns Semi-quantitative fault tree analysis for process plant safety using frequency and probability ranges J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 17 5 2004 339 345
107. W.H. Heinrich Industrial Accident Prevention 1941 McGraw-Hill New York, NY
108. D.C. Hendershot An overview of inherently safer design Process Saf. Prog. 25 2 2006 98 107
109. H.Z. Huang, X. Tong, and M.J. Zuo Posbist fault tree analysis of coherent systems Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 84 2 2004 141 148
110. M. Hurme, and M. Rahman Implementing inherent safety throughout process lifecycle J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18 4-6 2005 238 244
111. Y. Hwang, L.R. Chow, and H.C. Huang A knowledge-based approach to the evaluation of fault trees Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 52 1 1996 77 85
112. R.L. Iman, J.C. Helton, and J.D. Johnson A methodology for grouping source terms for consequence calculations in probabilistic risk assessments Risk Anal. 10 4 1990 507 520
113. R.L. Imanl, and J.C. Helton The repeatability of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses for complex probabilistic risk assessments Risk Anal. 11 4 1991 591 606
114. S.E. Jalali, and M. Noroozi Determination of the optimal escape routes of underground mine networks in emergency cases Saf. Sci. 47 8 2009 1077 1082
115. A. Jamshidi, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, S.H. Yakhchali, and S. Khaleghi Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 1 2013 197 208
116. Y. Jo, and D.A. Crowl Flame growth model for confined gas explosion Process Saf. Prog. 28 2 2009 141 146
117. Y.D. Jo, and B.J. Ahn A simple model for the release rate of hazardous gas from a hole on high-pressure pipelines J. Hazard. Mater. 97 1-3 2003 31 46
118. W.G. Johnson MORT Safety Assurance Systems 1980 Marcel Dekker NY
119. W.S. Jung, S.H. Han, and J. Ha A fast BDD algorithm for large coherent fault trees analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83 3 2004 369 374
120. F. Kadri, E. Châtelet, and G. Chen Method for quantitative assessment of the domino effect in industrial sites Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91 6 2013 452 462
121. M. Kalantarnia, F. Khan, and K. Hawboldt Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 5 2009 600 606
122. C.S. Kao, Y. Duh, T.J.H. Chen, and S.W. Yuc An index-based method for assessing exothermic runaway risk Process Saf. Prog. 21 4 2002 294 304
123. I. Karvonen, P. Heino, and J. Suokas Knowledge-based approach to support HAZOP studies Research Report 1990 Technical Research Center of Finland
124. N. Kasai, S. Matsuhashi, and K. Sekine Accident occurrence model for the risk analysis of industrialfacilities Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 114 2013 71 74
125. P. Katsakiori, G. Sakellaropoulos, and E. Manatakis Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models Saf. Sci. 47 7 2009 1007 1015
126. R. Kennedy, and B. Kirwan Development of a hazard and operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems Saf. Sci. 30 3 1998 249 274
127. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 8 2011 925 932
128. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 104 2012 36 44
129. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91 1-2 2013 46-53. d
130. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach Saf. Sci. 57 2013 108 117
131. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 109 2013 5 17
132. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, and V. Cozzani Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks Risk Anal. 33 2 2013 292 306 (An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis)
133. M. Khalil, M.S. Abdou, M.S. Mansour, H.A. Farag, and M.E. Ossman A cascaded fuzzy-LOPA risk assessment model applied in natural gas industry J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 6 2012 877 882
134. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi OptHAZOP - an effective and optimum approach for HAZOP study J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10 3 1997 191 204
135. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi TOPHAZOP: a knowledge-based software tool for conducting HAZOP in a rapid, efficient yet inexpensive manner J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10 5-6 1997 333 343
136. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Accident Hazard Index: a multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 75 4 1997 217 224
137. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Mathematical model time estimation for HAZOP study J. Hazard. Mater. 10 4 1997 249 251
138. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 11 4 1998 261 277
139. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system Process Saf. Prog. 17 3 1998 157 170
140. F. Khan, and S. Abbasi DOMIFFECT (DOMIno eFFECT): user-friendly software for domino effect analysis Environ. Modell. Softw. 13 2 1998 163 177
141. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries Process Saf. Prog. 17 2 1998 107 123
142. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Major accidents in process industries and an analysis of causes and consequences J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12 5 1999 361 378
143. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi HAZDIG: a new software package for assessing the risks of accidental release of toxic chemicals J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12 2 1999 167 181
144. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi PROFAT: a user friendly system for probabilistic Fault tree analysis Process Saf. Prog. 18 1 1999 42 49
145. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi TORAP - a new tool for conducting rapid risk assessment in petroleum refineries and petrochemical industries J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12 4 1999 299 313
146. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Modelling and control of the dispersion of hazardous heavy gases J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12 3 1999 235 244
147. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Towards automation of HAZOP with a new tool EXPERTOP Environ. Modell. Softw. 15 2000 67 77
148. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: A new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries J. Hazard. Mater. 75 1 2000 1 27
149. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14 1 2001 43 59
150. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15 6 2002 467 475
151. F. Khan, H. Abunada, D. John, and T. Benmosbah Development of risk-based process safety indicators Process Saf. Prog. 29 2 2010 133 143
152. F.I. Khan, and P.R. Amyotte Integrated inherent safety index (I2SI): a tool for inherent safety evaluation Process Saf. Prog. 23 2 2004 136 148
153. F.I. Khan, and P.R. Amyotte I2SI: a comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18 4-6 2005 310 326
154. F.I. Khan, P.R. Amyotte, and D.G. DiMattia HEPI: a new tool for human error probability calculation for offshore operation Saf. Sci. 44 4 2006 313 334
155. F.I. Khan, T. Husain, and S.A. Abbasi Safety weighted hazard index (SWeHI) - a new user-friendly tool for swift yet comprehensive hazard Identification and safety evaluation in chemical industry Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 79 2 2001 65 80
156. F.I. Khan, T. Husain, and S.A. Abbasi Design and evaluation of safety measures using a newly proposed methodology SCAP J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15 2 2002 129 146
157. F. Khan, A. Iqbal, and S.A. Abbasi Rapid risk assessment of a fertilizer industry using recently developed computer-automated tool TORAP J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 14 5 2001 413 427
158. F.I. Khan, A. Iqbal, N. Ramesh, and S.A. Abbasi SCAP: a new methodology for safety management based on feedback from credible accident-probabilistic fault tree analysis system J. Hazard. Mater. 87 1-3 2001 23 56
159. B.K. Kim, D. Ng, R.A. Mentzer, and M.S. Mannan Key parametric analysis on designing an effective forced mitigation system for LNG spill emergency J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 6 2013 1670 1678
160. D. Kim, I. Moon, Y. Lee, and D. Yoon Automatic generation of accident scenarios in domain specific chemical plants J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 16 2003 121 132
161. J. Kim, J. Kim, Y. Lee, W. Lim, and I. Moon Application of TRIZ creativity intensification approach to chemical process safety J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 6 2009 1039 1043
162. C. Kirchsteiger Towards harmonising risk-informed decision making: the ARAMIS and compass projects J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15 3 2002 199 203
163. J.A. Klein Two centuries of process safety at DuPont Process Saf. Prog. 28 2 2009 114 122
164. T.A. Kletz Inherently safer plants Plant Oper. Prog. 4 3 1985 164 167
165. T.A. Kletz Piper Alpha: latest chapter in a long history Chem. Eng. 4 1988 277
166. T.A. Kletz The origins and history of loss prevention Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 77 B 1999 109L 116
167. T.A. Kletz The history of process safety J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 5 2012 763 765
168. T. Kohda, and W. Cui Risk-based reconfiguration of safety monitoring system using dynamic Bayesian network Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 12 2007 1716 1723
169. S.P. Kourniotis, C.T. Kiranoudis, and N.C. Markatos Statistical analysis of domino chemical accidents J. Hazard. Mater. 71 1-3 2000 239 252
170. M.F. Kujath, P.R. Amyotte, and F.I. Khan A conceptual offshore oil and gas process accident model J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 2 2010 323 330
171. J. Kukkonen, and J. Nikmo Modelling heavy gas cloud transport in sloping terrain J. Hazard. Mater. 31 2 1992 155 176
172. J. Labovský, Z. Švandová, J. Markoš, and L. Jelemenský Model-based HAZOP study of a real MTBE plant J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 20 3 2007 230 237
173. G. Landucci, A. Tugnoli, and V. Cozzani Inherent safety key performance indicators for hydrogen storage systems J. Hazard. Mater. 159 2-3 2008 554 566
174. A. Laskova, and M. Tabas Method for the systematical hazard identification Process Saf. Prog. 27 4 2008 289 292
175. S.M. Lavasani, Z. Yang, J. Finlay, and J. Wang Fuzzy risk assessment of oil and gas offshore wells Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 89 5 2011 277 294
176. H.G. Lawley Operability studies and hazard analysis Chem. Eng. Prog. 70 4 1974 45 56
177. T. Lee, and K. Harrison Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations Saf. Sci. 34 1-3 2000 61 97
178. C.T. Leong, and A.M. Shariff Inherent safety index module (ISIM) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 86 2 2008 113 119
179. C.T. Leong, and A.M. Shariff Process route index (PRI) to assess level of explosiveness for inherent safety quantification J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 2 2009 216 221
180. M. Lehto, and G. Salvendy Models of accident causation and their application: review and reappraisal J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 8 1991 173 205
181. N. Leveson A new accident model for engineering safer systems Saf. Sci. 42 2004 237 270
182. J.L. Lewthwaite, J.D. Andrews, S.J. Dunnett, C.A.J. Gregory, and R. Smith Risk modelling of fires and explosions in open-sided offshore platform modules J. Risk Reliab. 220 2 2006 123 135
183. W. Liang, and L. Zhang A wave change analysis (WCA) method for pipeline leak detection using Gaussian mixture model J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 1 2012 60 69
184. H.J. Liaw, C.C. Yur, and Y.F. Lin A mathematical model for predicting thermal hazard data J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 13 6 2000 499 507
185. T. Licu, F. Cioran, B. Hayward, and A. Lowe EUROCONTROL - systemic occurrence analysis methodology (SOAM) - a reason-based organisational methodology for analysing incidents and accidents Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 2007 1162 1169
186. P. Limbourg, R. Savić, J. Petersen, and H.D. Kochs Modelling uncertainty in fault tree analyses using evidence theory J. Risk Reliab. 222 3 2008 291 302
187. C. Lin, and M.J. Wang Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 58 3 1998 205 213
188. T.S. Liu, and S.B. Chiou The application of Petri nets to failure analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 57 2 1997 129 142
189. D.M. Liverman, and J.P. Wilson The Mississauga train derailment and evacuation Can. Geogr. 25 4 1981
190. J. Long, and B. Fischhoff Setting risk priorities: a formal model Risk Anal. 20 3 2000 339 351
191. M. Macza A Canadian perspective of the history of process safety management legislation 8th Internationale Symposium of Programmable Electronic System in Safety-Related Application (Vol. 81) Cologne, Germany 2008
192. P.K. Marhavilas, D. Koulouriotis, and V. Gemeni Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000-2009 J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24 5 2011 477 523
193. A.S. Markowski exLOPA for explosion risks assessment J. Hazard. Mater. 142 3 2007 669 676
194. A.S. Markowski, and A. Kotynia Bow-tie model in layer of protection analysis Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 89 4 2011 205 213
195. A.S. Markowski, and M.S. Mannan Fuzzy risk matrix J. Hazard. Mater. 159 1 2008 152 157
196. A.S. Markowski, and M.S. Mannan Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA) J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 6 2009 921 927
197. A.S. Markowski, M.S. Mannan, and A. Bigoszewska Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 6 2009 695 702
198. A.S. Markowski, M.S. Mannan, A. Kotynia (Bigoszewska), and D. Siuta Uncertainty aspects in process safety analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 3 2010 446 454
199. A.S. Markowski, and S.M. Mannan ExSys-LOPA for the chemical process industry J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 6 2010 688 696
200. M. Maroño, J.A. Peña, and J. Santamaría The PROCESO index: a new methodology for the evaluation of operational safety in the chemical industry Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 3 2006 349 361
201. M. Marseguerra, M. Ricotti, and E. Zio Approaching system evolution in dynamic PSA by neural networks Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 49 1 1995 91 99
202. M. Marseguerra, E. Zio, and M. Librizzi Human reliability analysis by fuzzy CREAM Risk Anal. 27 1 2007 137 154
203. Marsh The 100 largest losses: 1972-2011 Large Property Damage Lossess in the Hydrocarbon Industry 22nd ed. 2012 Marsh & McLennan Companies New York, USA
204. D.W.R. Marsh, and G. Bearfield Generalizing event trees using Bayesian networks J. Risk Reliab. 222 2 2008 105 114
205. C.S. Matthias Dispersion of a dense cylindrical cloud in calm air J. Hazard. Mater. 24 1 1990 39 65
206. C.S. Matthias Dispersion of a dense cylindrical cloud in a turbulent atmosphere J. Hazard. Mater. 30 2 1992 117 150
207. S.A. McCoy, S.J. Wakeman, F.D. Larkin, P.W.H. Chung, A.G. Rushton, and F.P. Lees HAZID, A computer aided for hazard identification 2. Unit model system Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 77 1999 328 334
208. S.A. McCoy, S.J. Wakeman, F.D. Larkin, P.W.H. Chung, A.G. Rushton, and F.P. Lees HAZID, a computer aid for hazard identification: 4. Learning set, main study system, output quality, and validation trials Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 78 2000 91 119
209. S.A. McCoy, S.J. Wakeman, F.D. Larkin, P.W.H. Chung, A.G. Rushton, and F.P. Lees HAZID, a computer aid hazard identification: 5. Future development topics and conclusions Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 78 2000 120 142
210. S.A. McCoy, S.J. Wakeman, F.D. Larkin, M.L. Jefferson, P.W.H. Chung, A.G. Rushton, F.P. Lees, and P.M. Heino HAZID, A computer aid for hazard identification 1. The STOPHAZ Package and the HAZID Code: an overview, the issues and the structure Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 77 1999 317 327
211. McCoy, S.J. Wakeman, F.D. Larkin, P.W.H. Chung, F.P. Lees, and P.M. Heino HAZID, a computer aid for hazard identification 3. The fluid model and consequence evaluation systems Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 77 1999 335 353
212. A. Mébarki, F. Mercier, Q.B. Nguyen, and R.A. Saada Structural fragments and explosions in industrial facilities. Part I: Probabilistic description of the source terms J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 4 2009 408 416
213. A. Mébarki, Q.B. Nguyen, and F. Mercier Structural fragments and explosions in industrial facilities: Part II - Projectile trajectory and probability of impact J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 4 2009 417 425
214. W. Mechri, C. Simon, F. Bicking, and K. Ben Othman Fuzzy multiphase Markov chains to handle uncertainties in safety systems performance assessment J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 4 2013 594 604
215. G. Merle, J.M. Roussel, and J.J. Lesage Algebraic determination of the structure function of dynamic fault trees Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 2 2011 267 277
216. Z. Mohaghegh, and A. Mosleh Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems: principles and theoretical foundations Saf. Sci. 47 8 2009 1139 1158
217. D.M. Murphy, and M.E. Paté-Cornell The SAM framework: modeling the effects of management factors on human behavior in risk analysis Risk Anal. 16 4 1996 501 515
218. K.P. Murphy Dynamic Bayesian networks Report 2002
219. F. Mushtaq, and P.W.H. Chung A systematic Hazop procedure for batch processes, and its application to pipeless plants J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 13 1 2000 41 48
220. H. Ni, A. Chen, and N. Chen Some extensions on risk matrix approach Saf. Sci. 48 10 2010 1269 1278
221. L. Ni, J. Jiang, and Y. Pan Leak location of pipelines based on transient model and PSO-SVM J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 6 2013 1085 1093
222. O. Nývlt, and M. Rausand Dependencies in event trees analyzed by Petri nets Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 104 2012 45 57
223. K. Eien, I.B. Utne, and I.A. Herrera Building Safety indicators: Part 1 - Theoretical foundation Saf. Sci. 49 2 2011 148 161
224. K. Eien, I.B. Utne, R.K. Tinmannsvik, and S. Massaiu Building safety indicators: Part 2 - Application, practices and results Saf. Sci. 49 2 2011 162 171
225. A. Di Padova, A. Tugnoli, V. Cozzani, T. Barbaresi, and F. Tallone Identification of fireproofing zones in oil&gas facilities by a risk-based procedure J. Hazard. Mater. 191 1-3 2011 83. d 93. d
226. C. Palmer, and P.W.H. Chung A computer tool for batch hazard and operability studies J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 21 5 2008 537 542
227. C. Palmer, and P.W.H. Chung An automated system for batch hazard and operability studies Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 6 2009 1095 1106
228. N. Paltrinieri, A. Tugnoli, J. Buston, M. Wardman, and V. Cozzani Dynamic procedure for atypical scenarios identification (DyPASI): a new systematic HAZID tool J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 4 2013 683 695
229. H. Pasman, and W. Rogers Bayesian networks make LOPA more effective, QRA more transparent and flexible, and thus safety more definable! J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 3 2013 434 442
230. M.J. Pattison, R. Martini, and S. Banerjee Modeling of dispersion of two-phase releases: Part 2 - Numarical solution scheme and validation Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 76 1 1998 41 49
231. M.J. Pattison, R. Martini, S. Banerjee, and G.F. Hewitt Modeling of dispersion of two-phase releases: Part 1 - Conservation equations and closure relationships Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 76 1 1998 31 40
232. N. Pedroni, and E. Zio Uncertainty analysis in fault tree models with dependent basic events Risk Anal. 33 6 2013 1146 1173 (An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis)
233. L. Peng-cheng, C. Guo-hua, D. Li-cao, and Z. Li A fuzzy Bayesian network approach to improve the quantification of organizational influences in HRA frameworks Saf. Sci. 50 7 2012 1569 1583
234. E. Planas, J. Arnaldos, R.M. Darbra, M. Muñoz, E. Pastor, and J.a. Vílchez Historical evolution of process safety and major-accident hazards prevention in Spain. Contribution of the pioneer Joaquim Casal J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 28 2014 109 117
235. E. Planas-Cuchi, J.M. Salla, and J. Casal Calculating overpressure from BLEVE explosions J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 17 6 2004 431 436
236. P.S. Price, J. Sample, and R. Strieter Determination of less-than-lifetime exposures to point source emissions Risk Anal. 12 3 1992 367 382
237. R. Pula, F.I. Khan, B. Veitch, and P.R. Amyotte A grid based approach for fire and explosion consequence analysis Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 84 2 2006 79 91
238. R. Pula, F.I. Khan, B. Veitch, and P.R. Amyotte A model for estimating the probability of missile impact: missiles originating from bursting horizontal cylindrical vessels Process Saf. Prog. 26 2 2007 129 139
239. J. Quigley, and M. Revie Estimating the probability of rare events: addressing zero failure data Risk Anal. 31 7 2011 1120 1132 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01568.x
240. R. Quintana, M. Camet, and B. Deliwala Application of a predictive safety model in a combustion testing environment Saf. Sci. 38 3 2001 183 209
241. M. Rahman, A.M. Heikkilä, and M. Hurme Comparison of inherent safety indices in process concept evaluation J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18 4-6 2005 327 334
242. S. Rahman, F. Khan, B. Veitch, and P. Amyotte ExpHAZOP+: knowledge-based expert system to conduct automated HAZOP analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 4 2009 373 380
243. S.N. Rai, and D. Krewski Uncertainty and variability analysis in multiplicative risk models Risk Anal. 18 1 1998 37 45
244. N. Ramzan, F. Compart, and W. Witt Methodology for the generation and evaluation of safety system alternatives based on extended Hazop Process Saf. Prog. 26 1 2007 35 42
245. K. Durga Rao, V. Gopika, V.V.S. Sanyasi Rao, H.S. Kushwaha, A.K. Verma, and A. Srividya Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 4 2009 872 883
246. B. Rasmussen, and C.D. Grtinberg Accident and risk control J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10 1997 325 332
247. S. Rathnayaka, F. Khan, and P. Amayotte Accident modeling and risk assessment framework for safety critical decision-making: application to deepwater drilling operation J. Risk Reliab. 227 1 2013 86 105
248. S. Rathnayaka, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 89 3 2011 151 164
249. S. Rathnayaka, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 89 2 2011 75 88
250. S. Rathnayaka, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Accident modeling approach for safety assessment in an LNG processing facility J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 2 2012 414 423
251. A. Rauzy New algorithms for faulttree analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 40 1993 203 211
252. J. Reason Human Error 1990 University Press Cambridge
253. K.A. Reay, and J.D. Andrews A fault tree analysis strategy using binary decision diagrams Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 78 1 2002 45 56
254. R. Remenyte, and J.D. Andrews Qualitative analysis of complex modularized fault trees using binary decision diagrams J. Risk Reliab. 220 1 2006 45 53
255. R. Remenyte, and J. Andrews Analysis of non-coherent fault trees using ternary decision diagrams J. Risk Reliab. 222 2 2008 127 138
256. G. Reniers An optimizing hazard/risk analysis review planning (HARP) framework for complex chemical plants J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 2 2009 133 139
257. P.J. Rew, W.G. Hulbert, and D.M. Deaves Modeling of thermal radiation from external hydrocarbon pool fires Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 75 2 1997 81 89
258. W. Røed, A. Mosleh, J.E. Vinnem, and T. Aven On the use of the hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 2 2009 445 455
259. L. Rosenberg Algorithm for finding minimal cut sets in a fault tree Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 53 1 1996 67 71
260. M. Roser, A. Vogl, S. Radandt, W. Malalasekera, and R. Parkin Investigations of flame front propagation between interconnected process vessels. Development of a new flame front propagation time prediction model J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 12 5 1999 421 436
261. R. Rosness Risk influence analysis: a methodology for identification and assessment of risk reduction stratergies Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 60 1998 60
262. V. Rouhiainen QUASA: a method for assessing the quality of safety analysis Saf. Sci. 15 1992 155 172
263. A.G. Rushton, and D.A. Carter Total risk of death - towards a common and usable basis for consequence assessment Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 7 2008 21 25
264. R. Rusli, and M.A. Shariff Qualitative assessment for inherently safer design (QAISD) at preliminary design stage J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 1 2010 157 165
265. R. Rusli, A.M. Shariff, and F.I. Khan Evaluating hazard conflicts using inherently safer design concept Saf. Sci. 53 2013 61 72
266. O. Salvi, and B. Debray A global view on ARAMIS, a risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of the SEVESO II directive J. Hazard. Mater. 130 3 2006 187 199
267. J. Santos-Reyes, and A.N. Beard A systemic approach to managing safety J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 21 1 2008 15 28
268. J. Santos-Reyes, and A.N. Beard A SSMS model with application to the oil and gas industry J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 6 2009 958 970
269. C.J. Scarrott, and A. MacDonald Extreme-value-model-based risk assessment for nuclear reactors J. Risk Reliab. 224 4 2010 239 252
270. S. Schubach A modified computer hazard and operability study procedure J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10 5 1997 303 307
271. J.H. Scobel, T.G. Theofanous, and S.W. Sorrell Application of the risk oriented accident analysis methodology (ROAAM) to severe accident management in the AP600 advanced light water reactor Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 62 1-2 1998 51 58
272. A. Shafaghi Equipment failure rate updating-Bayesian estimation J. Hazard. Mater. 159 1 2008 87 91
273. S. Shah, U. Fischer, and K. Hungerbuhler A hierarchical approach for the evaluation of chemical process aspects from the perspective of inherent safety Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 81 2003 430 443
274. S. Shah, U. Fischer, and K. Hungerbühler Assessment of chemical process hazards in early design stages J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18 4-6 2005 335 352
275. D.M. Shalev, and J. Tiran Condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA): a new method for improved fault tree analysis (FTA), reliability and safety calculations Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 9 2007 1231 1241
276. A.M. Shariff, and C.T. Leong Inherent risk assessment - a new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 87 6 2009 371 376
277. A.M. Shariff, and D. Zaini Toxic release consequence analysis tool (TORCAT) for inherently safer design plant J. Hazard. Mater. 182 1-3 2010 394 402
278. A.M. Shariff, and D. Zaini Inherent risk assessment methodology in preliminary design stage: a case study for toxic release J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 4 2013 605 613
279. A. Shariff, R. Rusli, C.T. Leong, V.R. Radhakrishnan, and A. Buang Inherent safety tool for explosion consequences study J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 19 5 2006 409 418
280. H. Si, H. Ji, and X. Zeng Quantitative risk assessment model of hazardous chemicals leakage and application Saf. Sci. 50 7 2012 1452 1461
281. M.P. Singh, M. Mohan, T.S. Panwar, and H.V. Chopra Estimation of vulnerable zones due to accidental release of toxic materials resulting in dense gas clouds Risk Anal. 11 3 1991 425 440
282. R.M. Sinnamon, and J.D. Andrews New approaches to evaluating fault trees Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 8 2 1997 89 96
283. S. Sklet Hydrocarbon releases on oil and gas production platforms: release scenarios and safety barriers J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 19 5 2006 481 493
284. S. Sklet, J.E. Vinnem, and T. Aven Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release). Part II: Results from a case study J. Hazard. Mater. 137 2 2006 692 708
285. R. Srinivasan, and S. Natarajan Developments in inherent safety: a review of the progress during 2001-2011 and opportunities ahead Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 90 5 2012 389 403
286. R. Srinivasan, and N.T. Nhan A statistical approach for evaluating inherent benign-ness of chemical process routes in early design stages Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 86 3 2008 163 174
287. N. Stanton, and C. Baber A systems approach to human error identification Saf. Sci. 22 1-3 1996 215 228
288. J. Suardin, S.M. Mannan, and M. El-Halwagi The integration of Dow's fire and explosion index (F&EI) into process design and optimization to achieve inherently safer design J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 20 1 2007 79 90
289. A.E. Summers Introduction to layers of protection analysis J. Hazard. Mater. 104 1-3 2003 163 168
290. B. Sun, and K. Guo LNG accident dynamic simulation: application for hazardous consequence reduction J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 6 2013 1246 1256
291. D. Sun, J. Jiang, M. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Huang, and J. Qiao Parametric approach of the domino effect for structural fragments J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 1 2012 114 126
292. I. Svedung, and J. Rasmussen Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents Saf. Sci. 40 2002 397 417
293. O. Svenson The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries Risk Anal. 11 3 1991 499 507 (An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis)
294. S. Swaminathan, and C. Smidts The event sequence diagram framework for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 63 1 1999 73 90
295. S. Swaminathan, and C. Smidts The mathematical formulation for the event sequence diagram framework Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 65 2 1999 103 118
296. S.M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, and S.A. Abbasi Development of a new chemical process-industry accident database to assist in past accident analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24 4 2011 426 431
297. A.E. Theis, and C.F. Askonas Inherently safer design concepts applied to laboratories Process Saf. Prog. 32 2 2013 142 145
298. T.G. Theofanous On the proper formulation of safety goals and assessment of safety margins for rare and high-consequence hazards Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 54 2-3 1996 243 257
299. R. Tommasini The classification of hazardous areas where explosive gas atmospheres may be present Saf. Sci. 58 2013 53 58
300. S.R. Tramell, and B.J. Davis Engineering Management for Applied Technology Proceedings. 2nd International Workshop on EMAT 2001 2001
301. T.L. Triplett, Y. Zhou, and M.S. Mannan Application of chain of events analysis to process safety management Process Saf. Prog. 23 2 2004 132 135
302. A. Tugnoli, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, and V. Cozzani Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 1 - Guideword applicability and method description J. Hazard. Mater. 160 1 2008 100 109
303. A. Tugnoli, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, and V. Cozzani Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study J. Hazard. Mater. 160 1 2008 110 121
304. A. Tugnoli, G. Landucci, E. Salzano, and V. Cozzani Supporting the selection of process and plant design options by Inherent Safety KPIs J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 5 2012 830 842
305. V. Tulsiani, Y.Y. Haimes, and D. Lil Distribution analyzer and risk evaluator (DARE) using fault trees Risk Anal. 10 4 1990 521 538
306. R. Vaidhyanathan, and V. Venkatasubramanian Digraph-based models for automated HAZOP analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 50 1995 33 49
307. R. Vaidhyanathan, and V. Venkatasubramanian A semi-quantitative reasoning methodology for filtering and ranking HAZOP results in HAZOPExpert Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 53 2 1996 185 203
308. S. Vandroux-Koenig, and G. Berthoud Modelling of a two phase momentum jet close to the breach, in the containment vessel of a liquefied gas J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10 1 1997 17 29
309. J. Vatn Finding minimal cut sets in a fault tree Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 36 1 1992 59 62
310. A.G. Venetsanos, J.G. Bartzis, J. Würtz, and D.D. Papailiou DISPLAY-2: a two-dimensional shallow layer model for dense gas dispersion including complex features J. Hazard. Mater. 99 2 2003 111 144
311. V. Venkatasubramanian, and R. Vaidhyanathan A knowldge-based framework for automating HAZOP analysis Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 40 3 1994 496 505
312. P. Verlicchi, P. Leonelli, and G. Spadoni Accidental releases of two-phase multicomponent critical flow from horizontal pipes Process Saf. Prog. 19 4 2000 191 198
313. W.E. Vesely, F. Goldberg, N. Roberts, and D. Haasl Fault Tree HandBook 1981 System and Reliability Research, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC
314. J.A. Vílchez, V. Espejo, and J. Casal Generic event trees and probabilities for the release of different types of hazardous materials J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24 3 2011 281 287
315. J.E. Vinnem, T. Aven, T. Husebø, J. Seljelid, and O.J. Tveit Major hazard risk indicators for monitoring of trends in the Norwegian offshore petroleum sector Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 7 2006 778 791
316. J.E. Vinnem, J. Seljelid, S. Haugen, S. Sklet, and T. Aven Generalized methodology for operational risk analysis of offshore installations J. Risk Reliab. 223 1 2009 87 97
317. F. Wang, and J. Gao A novel knowledge database construction method for operation guidance expert system based on HAZOP analysis and accident analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 6 2012 905 915
318. F. Wang, J. Gao, and H. Wang A new intelligent assistant system for HAZOP analysis of complex process plant J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 3 2012 636 642
319. H. Wang, B. Chen, X. He, Q. Tong, and J. Zhao SDG-based HAZOP analysis of operating mistakes for PVC process Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 87 1 2009 40 46
320. Y.F. Wang, M. Xie, K.S. Chin, and X.J. Fu Accident analysis model based on Bayesian network and evidential reasoning approach J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 1 2013 10 21
321. Y.F. Wang, M. Xie, M.S. Habibullah, and K.M. Ng Quantitative risk assessment through hybrid causal logic approach J. Risk Reliab. 225 3 2011 323 332
322. WASH-1400 Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plantd (Vol. 1400) 1975
323. Y.S. Way, and D.Y. Hsia A simple component-connection method for building binary decision diagrams encoding a fault tree Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 70 1 2000 59 70
324. D.M. Webber, S.J. Jones, and D. Martin A model of the motion of a heavy gas cloud released on a uniform slope J. Hazard. Mater. 33 1 1993 101 122
325. C. Wei, W.J. Rogers, and M.S. Mannan Layer of protection analysis for reactive chemical risk assessment J. Hazard. Mater. 159 1 2008 19 24
326. C. Wu, X. Xu, B. Zhang, and Y. Na Domain ontology for scenario-based hazard evaluation Saf. Sci. 60 2013 21 34
327. J. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Liang, and J. Hu A novel failure mode analysis model for gathering system based on multilevel flow modeling and HAZOP Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 91 1-2 2013 54 60
328. Q. Xu, L. Zhang, and W. Liang Acoustic detection technology for gas pipeline leakage Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 91 4 2013 253 261
329. L. Xue, J. Fan, M. Rausand, and L. Zhang A safety barrier-based accident model for offshore drilling blowouts J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 1 2013 164 171
330. K. Yang Technical note failure probability evaluation for normally distributed load-strength model with unknown parameters Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 51 1996 115 118
331. X. Yang, W.J. Rogers, and M.S. Mannan Uncertainty reduction for improved mishap probability prediction: application to level control of distillation unit J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 1 2010 149 156
332. X. You, and F. Tonon Event-tree analysis with imprecise probabilities Risk Anal. 32 2 2012 330 344
333. R.W. Youngblood Applying risk models to formulation of safety cases Risk Anal. 18 4 1998 433 444
334. M. Yu, T. Lejarraga, and C. Gonzalez Context-specific, scenario-based risk scales Risk Anal. 32 12 2012 2166 2181
335. T. Yuge, and S. Yanagi Quantitative analysis of a fault tree with priority AND gates Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 11 2008 1577 1583
336. D. Yuhua, and Y. Datao Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18 2 2005 83 88
337. D. Yuhua, G. Huilin, and F. Yaorong Evaluation of gas release rate through holes in pipelines J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15 6 2002 423 428
338. G. Yun, W.J. Rogers, and M.S. Mannan Risk assessment of LNG importation terminals using the Bayesian-LOPA methodology J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 1 2009 91 96
339. O. Zadakbar, S. Imtiaz, and F. Khan Dynamic risk assessment and fault detection using a multivariate technique Proc. Saf. Prog. 32 4 2013 365 375
340. X. Zhang, and G. Chen The analysis of domino effect impact probability triggered by fragments Saf. Sci. 47 7 2009 1026 1032
341. C. Zhao, M. Bhushan, and V. Venkatasubramanian PHASuite: an automated HAZOP analysis tool for chemical processes Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 83 6 2005 509 532
342. C. Zhao, M. Bhushan, and V. Venkatasubramanian PHASuite: an automated HAZOP analysis tool for chemical processes Proc. Saf. Environ. Prot. 83 6 2005 533 548
343. J. Zhou SPA-fuzzy method based real-time risk assessment for major hazard installations storing flammable gas Saf. Sci. 48 6 2010 819 822