Methodology for the generation and evaluation of safety system alternatives based on extended hazop

Process Safety Progress

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 35-42

  Ramzan, Naveed ^a   Compart, Fred ^a   Witt, Werner ^a  

^a BRANDENBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Disturbance simulation; Process safety; Risk potential matrix

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PLANTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROCESS ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DISTURBANCE SIMULATION; EXTENDED HAZOP; PROCESS SAFETY; RISK POTENTIAL MATRIX;

SECURITY SYSTEMS;

CHEMICAL PLANTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROCESS ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

EID: 33847710689     PISSN: 10668527     EISSN: 15475913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prs.10161     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. F.I. Khan and S.A. Abbasi, Risk analysis of a petrochemical industry using ORA (Optimal Risk Analysis) procedure, Process Safety Prog 20 (2001), 95-110.
2. D.A. Crowl and J.F. Louvar, Chemical process safety: Fundamentals with applications, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999, pp. 471-508.
3. A.C. Caputo, M. Palumbo, and R. Tartaglia, Fault tree analysis for risk assessment in the Borexino experiment, Process Safety Prog 23 (2004), 121-131.
4. B. Skeleton, Process safety analysis: An introduction, Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, UK, 1997.
5. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures, CCPS, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1992, pp. 131-151.
6. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, CCPS, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 2000, pp. 297-387.
7. G. Wells, Hazard identification and risk assessment, Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, UK, 1996.
8. J. Tixier, G. Dussere, O. Salvi, and D. Gaston, Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants, J Loss Prev Process Ind 15 (2002), 291-303.
9. N.J. Bahr, System safety engineering and risk assessment: A practical approach, Taylor & Francis, New York, 1997.
10. G. Deerberg, S. Schlüter, A. Steiff, and W. Witt, Simulation of operational failures in two-phase semi batch processes, Chem Eng Sci 51 (1996), 3113-3118.
11. U. Can, M. Jimoh, J. Steinbach, and G. Wözny, Simulation and experimental analysis of operational failures in a distillation column, Sep Purif Technol 29 (2002), 163-170.
12. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) - Application guide (Document IEC 61882), IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
13. G. Grossman and D. Fromm, HAZOP-proof ammonia plant: A new way of defining a safe and reliable design, Plant/Oper Prog 10 (1991), 223-227.
14. F.I. Khan and S.A. Abbasi, OptHAZOP: An optimal and effective procedure to conduct HAZOP Study, J Loss Prev Process Ind 10 (1997), 191-201.
15. N. Ramzan, F. Compart, and W. Witt, Application of extended Hazop and event tree analysis for investigating operational failures and safety optimization of distillation column unit, Process Safety Prog 25 (2006), 000-000.
16. A.M. Schreiber, Using event trees and fault trees, Chem Eng 8 (1982), 115-120.
17. Conservation of Clean Air and Water in Europe (CONCAWE), Methodologies for hazard analysis and risk assessment in the petroleum refining and storage industry, Report No. 10/82, CONCAWE, Den Haag, The Netherlands, 1982.
18. T.A. Kletz, Hazop - Past and future, Reliab Eng Syst Safety, 55 (1997), 263-266.