On the use of the hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 445-455

  Røed, Willy ^a   Mosleh, Ali ^b   Vinnem, Jan Erik ^c   Aven, Terje ^c  

^a Proactima   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Barrier analysis; Bayesian belief network; Hybrid causal logic method; Offshore industry

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; DRILLING PLATFORMS; GAS INDUSTRY; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OFFSHORE OIL WELL PRODUCTION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISKS; SAFETY FACTOR; SENSOR NETWORKS;

ANALYSIS METHODS; AVIATION INDUSTRIES; BARRIER ANALYSIS; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORK; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; CAUSAL LOGICS; DECISION SUPPORTS; HYBRID CAUSAL LOGIC METHOD; NEW APPROACHES; OFFSHORE; OFFSHORE INDUSTRIES; OFFSHORE INDUSTRY; OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRIES; OPERATIONAL RISKS; ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS; PROBABILITY ASSIGNMENTS; RESEARCH PROJECTS; RISK ANALYSIS TOOLS;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 54149108582     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Paté-Cornell ME, Murphy DM. Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent applications, 1996.
2. Goldfeiz E, Mosleh A. A model for analysis of organizational factors in probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. In: Proceedings of the international topical meeting on computer-based human support systems: technology, methods, and future, Philadelphia, June 1995.
3. Papazoglou I.A., Bellamy L.J., Hale A.R., Aneziris O.N., Ale B.J.M., Post J.G., and Oh J.I.H. I-Risk: development of an integrated technical and management risk methodology for chemical installations. J Loss Prev Process Ind 16 (2003) 575-591
4. Barrier and operational risk analysis-BORA. Operational risk analysis-total analysis of physical and non-physical barriers. H2.6 Quantification of leak frequency with BBD methodology, Eldfisk B case study, draft 0, rev. 10, 29. April 2005.
5. Sklet S, Aven T, Hauge S, Vinnem JE. Incorporating human and organizational factors in risk analysis for offshore installations. In: Proceeding of the European safety and reliability conference ESREL 2005, vol. 2. Tri city, Poland, 27-30 June, 2005. p. 1839-47.
6. Vinnem JE, Seljelid J, Haugen S, Sklet S, Aven T. Generalised methodology for operational risk analysis. In: Proceedings of the ESREL 2007 conference, Stavanger, 2007a.
7. Jensen F.V. Bayesian networks and decision graphs (2001), Springer, Berlin. 0-387-95259-4
8. Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference (1988), Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA Revised second printing 2001
9. Groen F, Mosleh A. An algorithm for the quantification of hybrid causal models. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM8), New Orleans, Louisiana, May 14-18, 2006.
10. Mosleh A, Dias A, Eghbali G, Fazen K. An integrated framework for identification, classification, and assessment of aviation systems hazards. In: Proceeding of the international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management PSAM7 and European safety and reliability conference ESREL 2004, Berlin, Germany, 14-18, June 2004. pp 2384-90.
11. Wang C., and Mosleh A. Procedures for qualitative and quantitative analysis of risk models based on hybrid causal logic methodology. Technical report (2005), Centre for Risk and Reliability, University of Maryland
12. Fenton N.E., Neil M., and Caballero J.G. Using ranked nodes to model qualitative judgements in Bayesian networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19 10 (2007) 1420-1432
13. Bedford T, Cooke R. Probabilistic risk analysis: foundations and methods, Cambridge, 2001, ISBN:0-521-77320-2.
14. Murphy KP. An introduction to graphical models, Departments of Computer Science and statistics, University of British Columbia, 10 May 2001. 〈http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Papers/intro_gm.pdf〉.
15. Groen F., Smidts C., and Mosleh A. QRAS-the quantitative risk assessment system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf (2005)
16. Thomassen O., and Sørum M. Mapping and monitoring the safety level. SPE 73923 (2002), Society of Petroleum Engineers
17. Vinnem JE, Seljelid J, Haugen S, Sklet S, Kongsvik T, Thomassen O, Steen S. Operational safety condition-concept development. In: Proceedings of the ESREL 2007 conference, Stavanger, 2007b.
18. Groth K, Zhu D, Mosleh A. User's guide for the integrated risk information system, IRIS. Prepared by the Center for Risk and Reliability for the US Federal Aviation Administration, July 2007.
19. Hugin Expert A/S, computer software tools utilizing Bayesian belief network technology, Aalborg, Denmark, 2006. 〈http://www.hugin.com〉.
20. Norsys Software Corporation. Netica: Bayesian belief network development software, Vancouver, Canada, 2006. 〈http://www.norsys.com/index.html〉.
21. Relcon risk management. RiskSpectrum: computer software for risk and availability analyses, Stockholm, Sweden, 2006. 〈http://www.relcon.se〉.
22. Item Software, QRAS: quantitative risk assessment system, Anaheim, California, USA. 〈http://www.itemsoft.com/qras.shtml〉.
23. Swain AD, Guttermann HE. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, final report, NUREG/CR-1278, SAND80-0200, US NRC, 1983.
24. Haimes Y.Y. Risk modelling, assessment, and management. 2nd ed (2004), Wiley, N.J.
25. Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention (2004), Ashgate Publishers, Aldershot
26. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) (1998), Elsevier, Amsterdam
27. Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci 42 (2004) 237-270
28. Leveson N. Modeling and analyzing risk in complex socio-technical systems. NeTWork workshop, Berlin 27-29 September 2007.