Supporting the selection of process and plant design options by Inherent Safety KPIs

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 830-842

  Tugnoli, Alessandro ^a   Landucci, Gabriele ^b   Salzano, Ernesto ^c   Cozzani, Valerio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accident scenarios; Hazard identification; Inherent safety; Key performance indicators; Metrics

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; INHERENT SAFETY; KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; METRICS;

ACCIDENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; HAZARDS;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 84865532805     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Al-Mutairi E.M., Suardin J.A., Mannan M.S., El-Halwagi M.M. An optimization approach to the integration of inherently safer design and process scheduling. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2008, 21(5):543-549.
2. American Petroleum Institute (API) Risk-bases inspection base resource document 2000, API Publication 581, API Publication, Washington. 1st ed.
3. American Petroleum Institute (API) Security vulnerability assessment methodology for the petroleum and petrochemical industries 2004, API Publication, Washington. 2nd ed.
4. Anastas P.T., Zimmerman J.B. Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37(5):94A-101A.
5. Bollinger R.E., Clark D.G., Dowell A.M., Ewbank R.M., Hendershot D.C., Lutz W.K., et al. Inherently safer chemical processes: A life cycle approach 1996, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York.
6. van den Bosh C.J.H., Weterings R.A.P.M. Methods for the calculation of physical effects (yellow book) 1997, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, Netherlands.
7. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis 2000, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York. 2nd ed.
8. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures 2008, Wiley/AIChE, New York. 3rd ed.
9. Christou M.D., Amendola A., Smeder M. The control of major accident hazards: the land-use planning issue. Journal of Hazardous Materials 1999, 65:151-178.
10. Cowley L.T., Johnson A.D. Oil and gas fires: Characteristics and impact 1992, Offshore Technology Information (OTI) 92596, HSE Books.
11. Cozzani V., Tugnoli A., Salzano E. The development of an inherent safety approach to the prevention of domino accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2009, 41:1216-1227.
12. Delvosalle C., Fievez C., Pipart A., Debray B. ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 130:200-219.
13. Dow Chemical Company Dow's chemical exposure index guide 1993, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York. 2nd ed.
14. Dow Chemical Company Fire & explosion index hazard classification guide 1994, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York. 7th ed.
15. Edwards D.W., Lawrence D. Assessing the inherent safety of chemical process routes: is there a relation between plant cost and inherent safety?. Transactions of IChemE 1993, 71(Pt B):252-258.
16. Etowa C.B., Amyotte P.R., Pegg M.J., Khan F.I. Quantification of inherent safety aspects of the Dow indices. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2002, 15:477-487.
17. Gentile M., Rogers W.J., Mannan M.S. Development of an inherent safety index based on fuzzy logic. AIChE Journal 2003, 49(4):959-968.
18. Gonzales M.A., Smith R.L. A methodology to evaluate process sustainability. Environmental Progress 2003, 19(4):269-276.
19. Gupta J.P., Edwards D.W. A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2003, 104:15-30.
20. Hassim M.H., Hurme M. Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2010, 23(1):127-138.
21. Heikkilä A. Inherent safety in process plant design 1999, [dissertation n. 384], VTT Publications, Espoo (Finland).
22. Hendershot D.C. Inherently safer chemical process design. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1997, 10(3):151-157.
23. Hightower M., Gritzo L., Luketa-Hanlin A., Covan J., Tieszen S., Wellman G., et al. Guidance on risk analysis and safety implications of a large liquefied natural gas (LNG) spill over water 2004, REPORT SAND2004-6258, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque.
24. Hurme M., Rahman M. Implementing inherent safety throughout process lifecycle. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2005, 18(4-6):238-244.
25. ICI Mond Division The Mond index 1985, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Explosion Hazards Section, Technical Department, Winnington, Nortwich, Cheshire, (UK). 2nd ed.
26. INSIDE Project The INSET toolkit November 2001, Integrated version.
27. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Petroleum and natural gas industries - Offshore production installations - Guidelines on tools and techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment 2000, ISO standard 17776, ISO.
28. Khan F.I., Sadiq R., Amyotte P.R. Evaluation of available indices for inherently safer design options. Process Safety Progress 2003, 22(2):83-97.
29. Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R. How to make inherent safety practice a reality. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 2003, 81:2-16.
30. Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R. Integrated inherent safety index (I2SI): a tool for inherent safety evaluation. Process Safety Progress 2004, 23(2):136-148.
31. Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R. I2SI: a comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2005, 18:310-326.
32. Kletz T.A. What you don't have, can't leak. Chemistry and Industry 1978, 6:287-292.
33. Kletz T.A. Plant design for safety, a user-friendly approach 1991, Hemisphere - Taylor & Francis, New York.
34. Kletz T.A., Amyotte P. Process plants: A handbook for inherent safer design 2010, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd ed.
35. Koller G., Fischer U., Hungerbuhler K. Assessing safety, health, and environmental impact early during process development. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2000, 39(4):960-972.
36. Koller G., Fischer U., Hungerbühler K. Comparison of methods suitable for assessing the hazard potential of chemical processes during early design phases. Transactions of IChemE 2001, 79(Pt B):157-166.
37. Kumar S., Kwon H.T., Choi K.H., Hyun Cho J., Lim W., Moon I. Current status and future projections of LNG demand and supplies: a global prospective. Energy Policy 2011, 39:4097-4104.
38. Landucci G., Tugnoli A., Cozzani V. Inherent safety key performance indicators for hydrogen storage systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 159:554-566.
39. Lane M.K., Nierenberg A. Energy Bridge™ LNG projects: technological innovation to date and into the future. Proceedings of the offshore technology conference - Special session 2006, OTC 18397, OTC, Houston, 2006 May 1-4; Houston, USA.
40. Leong C.T., Shariff A.M. Process route index (PRI) to assess level of explosiveness for inherent safety quantification. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2009, 22(2):216-221.
41. Licari F.A., Weimer C.D. Risk-based siting considerations for LNG terminals: comparative perspectives of United States & Europe. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2011, 24:736-752.
42. Luketa-Hanlin A. A review of large-scale LNG spills: experiments and modeling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, A132:119-140.
43. Mannan S. Lees' loss prevention in the process industries 2005, Elsevier, Oxford, UK. 3rd ed.
44. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap Handboek kanscijfers: voor het opstellen van een veiligheidsrapport 2004, ver. 2.0., Heirman JP, AMINAL, Brussel, Belgium.
45. OREDA Project Offshore reliability data handbook (OREDA) 2002, SINTEF Technology and Society, Høvik, Norway. 4th ed.
46. Palaniappan C., Srinivasan R., Tan R. Expert system for the design of inherently safer processes. 1-route selection stage & 2-flowsheet development stage. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2002, 41(26):6698-6722.
47. Paltrinieri N., Tugnoli A., Bonvicini S., Cozzani V. Atypical scenarios identification by the DyPASI procedure: application to LNG. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2011, 24:1171-1176.
48. Planas E., Arnaldos J., Silvetti B., Vallée A., Casal J. A risk severity index for industrial plants and sites. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 130:242-250.
49. Shah K., Wong J., Minton B., Kvaerner A. Considerations for ambient air based technologies for LNG regasification terminals. Proceedings of the AIChE spring meeting 2008, AIChE, New York, 2008 Apr 6-10; New Orleans, USA.
50. Shariff A.M., Rusli R., Leong C.T., Radhakrishnan V.R., Buang A. Inherent safety tool for explosion consequences study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19:409-418.
51. Shariff A.M., Zaini D. Toxic release consequence analysis tool (TORCAT) for inherently safer design plant. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010, 182:394-402.
52. Sikdar S.K. Journey towards sustainable development: a role for chemical engineers. Environmental Progress 2003, 22(4):227-232.
53. Stör-fall Kommission (SFK) Report of the German hazardous incident commission 2002, SFK-GS-38, Stör-fall Kommission, Bonn, Available from. http://www.sfk-taa.de.
54. The Netherlands Organization of Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Methods for the determination of possible damage to people and objects resulting from releases of hazardous materials (green book) 1992, TNO, Voorburg, Netherlands.
55. Tugnoli A., Cozzani V., Landucci G. A consequence based approach to the quantitative assessment of inherent safety. AIChE Journal 2007, 53(12):3171-3182.
56. Tugnoli A., Khan F., Amyotte P. Inherent safety implementation throughout the process design lifecycle. Proceedings from the ninth international Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (PSAM 9) 2008, 24-31. Edge Publication Group Limited, Hong Kong, 2008 May 18-23; Hong Kong.
57. Tugnoli A., Khan F., Amyotte P., Cozzani V. Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective - part 1 - guideword applicability and method description. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 160:100-109.
58. Tyler B.J. Using the Mond index to measure inherent hazards. Plant/Operations Progress 1985, 4:172-175.
59. Uijt de Haag P.A.M., Ale B.J.M. Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment (purple book) 1999, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, Netherlands.