Hydrocarbon releases on oil and gas production platforms: Release scenarios and safety barriers

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 481-493

  Sklet, Snorre ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Hydrocarbon release; Loss of containment; Major accident; Risk analysis; Safety barrier

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; HYDROCARBONS; OFFSHORE OIL FIELDS;

HYDROCARBON RELEASE; LOSS OF CONTAINMENT; MAJOR ACCIDENT; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY BARRIER;

PRODUCTION PLATFORMS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; HYDROCARBONS; OFFSHORE OIL FIELDS; PRODUCTION PLATFORMS;

EID: 33745852741     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aven, T., Sklet, S., & Vinnem, J. E. (2005). Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release); Part I. Method description. Journal of Hazardous Materials, submitted for publication.
2. Bellamy, L. J., Papazoglou, I. A., Hale, A. R., Aneziris, O. N., Ale, B. J. M., Morris, M. I. et al. (1999). I-RISK-development of an integrated technical and management risk control and monitoring methodology for managing and quantifying on-site and off-site risks. Main Report, Contract No: ENVA-CT96-0243.
3. Botnevik, R., Berge, O., & Sklet, S. (2004). Standardised procedures for work permits and safe job analysis on the Norwegian continental shelf. SPE paper number 86629, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
4. CCPS. Inherently safer chemical processes: A life cycle approach (1996), Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
5. CCPS. Layer of protection analysis simplified process risk assessment (2001), Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
6. Davoudian K., Wu J.-S., and Apostolakis G.E. Incorporating organisational factors into risk assessment through the analysis of work processes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 45 (1994) 85-105
7. DNV and RF (2002). Analysis of causes of process leaks. Pre study, The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Rev. no. 01, Stavanger, Norway, Det Norske Veritas report no. DNV 2002-4019 (in Norwegian).
8. Duijm, N. J., & Goossens, L. (2005). Quantifying the influence of safety management on the reliability of safety barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, in press, doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.014
9. Glittum E. Offshore leak frequencies (2001), Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Porsgrunn, Norway (in Norwegian)
10. Glittum E. Analysis of leak causes on Norsk Hydro's platforms (2001), Porsgrunn, Norway, Norsk Hydro Research Centre (in Norwegian)
11. HSE (2001). HSE report: OSD hydrocarbon release reduction campaign, report on the HC release incident investigation project-1/4/2000-31/3/2001, UK.
12. HSE (2002). HSE offshore hydrocarbon releases statistics and analysis 2002, UK.
13. Hurst N.W., Bellamy L.J., Geyer T.A.W., and Astley J.A. A classification scheme for pipework failures to include human and sociotechnical errors and their contribution to pipework failure frequencies. Journal of Hazardous Materials 26 2 (1991) 159-186
14. ISO/CD:14224 (2004). Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries-collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment. Rev 2, Date: 2004-05-13, International Standardization Organization.
15. ISO:10418. Petroleum and natural gas industries-offshore production installations-basic surface process safety systems (2003), International Standardization Organization
16. Khan F.I., and Abbasi S.A. A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 15 (2002) 467-475
17. OLF. Recommendations to operators to reduce hydrocarbon leaks (2004), The Norwegian Oil Industry Association, Stavanger
18. Olson, J., Chockie, A. D., Geisendorfer, C. L., Vallario, R. W., & Mullen, M. F. (1988). Development of programmatic performance indicators. NUREG/CR-5241, PNL-6680, BHARC-700/88/022, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA.
19. Papazoglou I.A., Aneziris O.N., Post J.G., and Ale B.J.M. Technical modeling in integrated risk assessment of chemical installations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 16 (2003) 575-591
20. PSA. The risk level on the Norwegian Continental Shelf 2002 (2003), The Petroleum Safety Authority, Stavanger
21. PSA. Trends in risk levels-summary report Phase 5 (2004) (2005), The Petroleum Safety Authority, Stavanger
22. Sklet, S. (2005). Safety barriers; definition, classification, and performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, accepted for publication.
23. Sklet S., and Hauge S. Safety barriers to prevent release of hydrocarbons during production of oil and gas (2004), SINTEF Industrial Management Safety and Reliability, Trondheim
24. Sklet, S., Steiro, T., Tjelta, O., (2005). Qualitative analysis of human, technical and operational barrier elements during well interventions. ESREL 2005, Tri City, Poland: Balkema.
25. Sklet, S., Vinnem, J. E., & Aven, T. (2005). Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release); Part II. Results from a case study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, submitted for publication.
26. Vinnem J.E., Aven T., Hauge S., Seljelid J., and Veire G. Integrated barrier analysis in operational risk assessment in offshore petroleum operations. PSAM7-ESREL'04 (2004), Springer, Berlin
27. Øien K. Risk indicators as a tool for risk control. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 74 2 (2001) 129-145