Quantitative risk assessment through hybrid causal logic approach

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability

Volumn 225, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 323-332

  Wang, Y F ^a,b   Xie, M ^a   Habibullah, M S ^c   Ng, K M ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Fuzzy fault tree; Hybrid causal logic

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL LOGIC; CAUSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS; FUZZY FAULT TREE; INFERENCE TECHNIQUES; OFFSHORE OIL PRODUCTION; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEM ELEMENTS; TAKAGI-SUGENO MODELS; TRANSLATION RULES;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FORESTRY; MODAL ANALYSIS; OFFSHORE OIL FIELDS; OFFSHORE OIL WELL PRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

FAST FOURIER TRANSFORMS;

FORESTRY; OIL; PRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84863040356     PISSN: 1748006X     EISSN: 17480078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1748006X10397370     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Røed, W., Mosleh, A., Vinnem, J. E., and Terje, A. On the use of the hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2009, 94, 445-455.
2. Mosleh, A., Dias, A., Eghbali, G., and Fazen, K. An integrated framework for identification, classification, and assessment of aviation systems hazards. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic safety assessment and management, Berlin, Germany, 14-18 June 2004, pp. 2384-2390, Springer-Verlag London Ltd, Sweetapple House Catteshall Rd Farncombe, Godalming GU7 1NH, Surrey, UK.
3. Wang, C. and Mosleh, A. Procedures for qualitative and quantitative analysis of risk models based on hybrid causal logic methodology, technical report, Centre for Risk and Reliability, University of Maryland, 2005.
4. Celik, M., Lavasani, S. M., and Wang, J. A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation. Saf. Sci., 2010, 48, 18-27.
5. Tanaka, H., Fan, L. T., Lai, F. S., and Toguchi, K. Fault tree analysis by fuzzy probability. IEEE Trans. Reliab., 1983, 32, 453-457. (Pubitemid 14650658)
6. Singer, D. A fuzzy set approach to fault tree and reliability analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1990, 34, 145-155.
7. Chen, L., Wang, G. L., and Meng, H. R. Fault tree analysis of an oil well pump. Acta Petrol. Sinica, 1995, 16, 145-151.
8. Huang, H. Z., Tong, X., and Zuo, M. Posbist fault tree analysis of coherent systems. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2004, 84, 141-148.
9. Shu, M. H., Cheng, C. H., and Chang, J. R. Using intuitionistic fuzzy fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly. Microelectron. Reliab., 2006, 46, 2139-2148.
10. Ping, H., Zhang Hung, H., and Zuo, M. J. Fault tree analysis based on fuzzy logic. In Proccedings of the Annual Reliability and maintainability symposium, Orlando FL, 22-25 January 2007, pp. 77-82 (IEEE, New York, USA). (Pubitemid 47133002)
11. Song, H. and Zhang, H. Y. Fuzzy fault tree analysis based on T-S model with application to INS/GPS navigation system. Soft Comput., 2009, 13, 31-40.
12. Lampis, M. and Andrews, J. D. Bayesian belief networks for system fault diagnostics. Qual. Reliab. Engng Int., 2009, 25, 409-426.
13. Cheng, H. and Hadjisophocleous, G. V. The modeling of fire spread in buildings by Bayesian network. Fire Saf. J., 2009, 44, 901-908.
14. Doguc, O. and Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2009, 94, 542-550.
15. Fontana, M. and Maag, T. Fire risk assessment based on Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the Fifth SFPE Conference on Performance-based codes and fire safety design methods, Luxembourg, 6-8 October 2004, pp. 238-249, SFPE.
16. Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., and Ciancamerla, E. Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2001, 71, 249-260. (Pubitemid 32077203)
17. Marquez, D., Neil, M., and Fenton, N. Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2009, 95(4), 412-425.
18. Bashari, H., Smith, C., and Bosch, O. J. H. Developing decision support tools for rangeland management by combining state and transition models and Bayesian belief networks. Agric. Syst., 2008, 99, 23-34.
19. Boudali, H. and Dugan, J. B. A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2005, 87(3), 337-349.
20. Groth, K., Wang, C. D., and Mosleh, A. Hybrid causal methodology and software platform for probabilistic risk assessment and safety monitoring of socio-technical systems. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2010, 95, 1276-1285.
21. Takagi, T. and Sugeno, M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1985, 15(1), 116-132.
22. Wang, L. X. Adaptive fuzzy systems and control: design stability analysis, 1994, pp. 1-10 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
23. Detcher, R. and Mateescu, R. Mixtures of deterministic-probabilistic networks and their search space. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Banff, Canada, July, 2004, pp. 120-129 (AUAI Press Arlington, Virginia, US).
24. Shijun, Q., Agogino, A. M., Song, S., Wu, J., and Sitarama, S. A fusion of Bayesian and fuzzy analysis for print faults diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers and their applications, Seattle, Wash, 2001, pp. 229-232, IEEE Computer SOC, 10662 Los Vaqueros Circle, PO Box 3014, Los Alamitos, CA 90720-1314.
25. Williamson, J. Bayesian nets and causality: philosophical and computational foundations, 2005 (Oxford University Press, New York).
26. Trucco, P., Cagno, E., and Ruggeri, F. A Bayesian belief network modeling of organizational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation. Reliab. Engng Syst. Saf., 2008, 93, 823-834.