The MODE Model and Its Implications for Studying the Media

Media Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 312-337

  Ewoldsen, David R ^a   Rhodes, Nancy ^a   Fazio, Russell H ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942895735     PISSN: 15213269     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2014.937440     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. I.Ajzen, (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
2. G.W.Allport, (1935). Attitudes. In C.A.Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 798–844). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.
3. D.Amodio,, & P.G.Devine, (2009). On the interpersonal functions of implicit stereotyping and evaluative race bias: Insights from social neuroscience. In R.E.Petty, R.H.Fazio, & P.Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 193–226). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4. S.M.Anderson,, G.B.Moskowitz,, I.V.Blair,, & B.A.Nosek, (2007). Automatic thought. In A.W.Kruglanski & E.T.Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 138–175). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5. L.Arpan,, N.Rhodes,, & D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen, (2007). Accessibility, persuasion, and behavior. In D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen & J.L.Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods (pp. 351–376). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. S.E.Asch, (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (9, Serial No. 416).
7. M.W.Baldwin,, & J.G.Holmes, (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52, 1087–1098.
8. R.B.Cialdini,, C.A.Kallgren,, & R.R.Reno, (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human conduct. In M.P.Zanna (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 339–359). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. R.B.Cialdini,, R.R.Reno,, & C.A.Kallgren, (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.
10. J.Compton,, & M.Pfau, (2008). Inoculating against pro-plagiarism justifications: Rationale and affective strategies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 98–119.
11. J.Compton,, & M.Pfau, (2009). Spreading inoculation: Inoculation, resistance to influence, and word-of-mouth communication. Communication Theory, 19, 9–28.
12. J.DeHouwer, (2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them? In R.W.Wiers & A.W.Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addition (pp. 11–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. M.Deutsch,, & H.B.Gerard, (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 181–189.
14. P.G.Devine,, E.A.Plant,, D.M.Amodio,, E.Harmon-Jones,, & S.L.Vance, (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 835–848.
15. T.L.Dixon,, & D.Linz, (2000). Overrepresentation and underrpresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 131–154.
16. B.C.Dunton,, & R.H.Fazio (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326.
17. C.A.Eno,, & D.R.Ewoldsen, (2010). The influence of explicitly and implicitly measured prejudice on interpretations of and reactions to black film. Media Psychology, 13, 1–30.
18. D.R.Ewoldsen,, M.E.Ellithorpe,, & R.H.Fazio, (2012, May). Cultivation and racial attitudes: A complex relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
19. L.R.Fabrigar,, J.R.Priester,, R.E.Petty,, & D.T.Wegener, (1998). The impact of attitude accessibility on elaboration of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 339–352.
20. R.H.Fazio, (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R.H.Sorrentino & E.T.Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204–243). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21. R.H.Fazio, (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23; pp. 75–109). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22. R.H.Fazio, (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R.E.Petty & J.A.Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. R.H.Fazio, (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637.
24. R.H.Fazio,, J.Blascovich,, & D.M.Driscoll, (1992). On the functional value of attitudes: The influence of attitude accessibility upon the ease and quality of decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 388–401.
25. R.H.Fazio,, J.R.Jackson,, B.C.Dunton,, & C.J.Williams, (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.
26. R.Fazio,, & M.Olson, (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
27. R.H.Fazio,, & M.A.Olson, (2014). The MODE model: Attitude–behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In J.W.Sherman, B.Gawronski, & Y.Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28. R.H.Fazio,, M.C.Powell,, & C.J.Williams, (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude to behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 280–288.
29. R.H.Fazio,, & D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen, (2005). Acting as we feel: When and how attitudes guide behavior. In T.C.Brock & M.C.Green (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 41–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. R.H.Fazio,, D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, & M.C.Powell, (1994). Attitudes, perception, and attention. In P.M.Niedenthal & S.Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 197–216). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
31. R.H.Fazio,, D.M.Sanbonmatsu,, M.C.Powell,, & F.F.Kardes, (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
32. R.H.Fazio,, & C.J.Williams, (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514.
33. R.H.Fazio,, & M.P.Zanna, (1981). Direct experience and attitude–behavior consistency. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 161–202). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
34. M.Fishbein,, & I.Ajzen, (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35. M.Fishbein,, & M.C.Yzer, (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13, 164–183.
36. M.Gerrard,, F.X.Gibbons,, A.E.Houlihan,, M.L.Stock,, & E.A.Pomery, (2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28, 29–61.
37. M.Gerrard,, F.X.Gibbons,, L.S.Vande Lune,, N.A.Pexa,, & M.L.Gano, (2002). Adolescents' substance-related risk perceptions: Antecedents, mediators and consequences. Risk Decision and Policy, 7, 175–191.
38. C.E.Goodall, (2011). An overview of implicit measures of attitudes: Methods, mechanisms, strengths, and limitations. Communication Methods & Measures, 5, 203–222.
39. C.E.Goodall,, & M.D.Slater, (2010). Automatically activated attitudes as mechanisms for message effects: The case of alcohol advertisements. Communication Research, 37, 620–642.
40. A.G.Greenwald,, & B.A.Nosek, (2009). Attitudinal dissociation: What does it mean? In R.E.Petty, R.H.Fazio, & P.Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 65–82). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
41. E.T.Higgins, (2012). Accessibility theory. In P.A.M.Van Lange, A.W.Kruglanski, & E.T.Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1; pp. 75–96). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
42. D.A.Houston,, & R.H.Fazio, (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51–66.
43. P.D.Jacobson,, P.M.Lantz,, K.E.Warner,, J.Wasserman,, H.A.Pollack,, & A.K.Ahlstrom, (2001). Combatting teen smoking: Research and policy strategies. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
44. C.A.Kallgren,, R.R.Reno,, & R.B.Cialdini, (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012.
45. A.W.Kruglanski,, & D.Sleeth-Keppler, (2007). The principles of social judgment. In A.W.Kruglanski & E.T.Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 116–137). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46. A.W.Kruglanski,, & E.P.Thompson, (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83–109.
47. A.Lang, (2010). The limited capacity model fo motivated mediated message processing. In R.L.Nabi & M.B.Oliver (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 103–204). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
48. C.G.Lord,, L.Ross,, & M.R.Lepper, (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
49. D.Mastro, (2009). Racial/ethnic stereotyping and the media. In R.L.Nabi & M.B.Oliver (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 377–392). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
50. D.Mastro,, & E.Behm-Morawitz, (2005). Latino representation on prime-time television. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 110–130.
51. D.Mastro,, & R.Tukachinsky, (2012). Cultivation of perceptions of marginalized groups. In M.Morgan, J.Shanahan, & N.Signorielli (Eds.), Living with television now: Advances in cultivation theory & research (pp. 38–60). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
52. S.Mollen,, R.N.Rimal,, & M.K.Lapinski, (2010). What is normative in Health Communication research on norms? A review and recommendations for future scholarship. Health Communication, 25, 544–547.
53. D.Morley, (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
54. M.A.Olson,, & R.H.Fazio, (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In R.E.Petty, R.H.Fazio, & P.Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19–63). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
55. J.Peters, (Producer), & J.Singleton, (Producer/Director). (1997). Rosewood [Motion Picture]. Burbank, CA: Warner Bros.
56. R.E.Petty,, P.Briñol,, & J.R.Priester, (2009). In J.Bryant & M.B.Oliver (Eds.), Media effects Advances in theory and research (pp. 125–164). New York, NY: Routledge.
57. R.E.Petty,, R.H.Fazio,, & P.Briñol, (2009). The new implicit measures: An overview. In R.E.Petty, R.H.Fazio, & P.Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
58. M.Pfau,, J.Compton,, K.A.Parker,, E.M.Wittenberg,, C.An,, M.Ferguson,, … Y.Malyshev, (2004). The traditional explanation for resistance versus attitude accessibility: Do they trigger distinct or overlapping processes of resistance? Human Communication Research, 30, 329–360.
59. M.Pfau,, D.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, M.Wood,, S.Yin,, J.Cho,, K.-H.Lu,, & L.Shen, (2003). Attitude accessibility as an alternative explanation for how inoculation confers resistance. Communication Monographs, 70, 39–51.
60. J.A.Rada,, & K.T.Wulfemeyer, (2005). Color coded: Racial descriptors in television coverage of intercollegiate sports. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49(1), 65–85.
61. R.R.Reno,, R.B.Cialdini,, & C.A.Kallgren, (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112.
62. N.Rhodes,, & D.R.Ewoldsen, (2009). Attitude and norm accessibility and cigarette smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2355–2372.
63. N.Rhodes,, & D.R.Ewoldsen, (2013). Outcomes of persuasion: Cognitive, behavioral and social. In J.Dillard & L.Shen (Eds.), Handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. N.Rhodes,, D.R.Ewoldsen,, L.Shen,, J.L.Monahan,, & C.Eno, (2014). The accessibility of family and peer norms as predictors of young adolescent risk behavior. Communication Research, 41, 3–26.
65. N.Rhodes,, & N.Hestevold, (2008). Predictors of adolescent smoking. Unpublished raw data.
66. N.Rhodes,, D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, A.Edison,, & B.Bradford, (2008). Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages. Health Psychology, 27, S224–S232.
67. R.N.Rimal, (2008). Modeling the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors: A test and extension of the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB). Health Communication, 23, 103–116.
68. R.N.Rimal,, & K.Real, (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13, 184–203.
69. B.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, M.Yang,, & M.Lee, (2007). Comprehension of the media. In D.R.Ewoldsen & J.Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods (pp. 319–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70. D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen, (1997). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactive model. In B.Burleson's (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 185–225). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
71. D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen, (2009, May). Implicit associations test: Just what is the IAT measuring? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
72. D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, J.Bichsel,, & K.Hoffman, (2002). The influence of accessibility of source likability on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 137–143.
73. D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, & R.H.Fazio, (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198–211.
74. D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, & R.H.Fazio, (1997). The role of belief accessibility in attitude formation. Southern Communication Journal, 62, 107–116.
75. D.Roskos-Ewoldsen,, H.J.Yu,, & N.Rhodes, (2004). Fear appeal messages effect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors. Communication Monographs, 71, 49–69.
76. D.M.Sanbonmatsu,, & R.H.Fazio, (1990). The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 614–622.
77. R.A.Schuette,, & R.H.Fazio, (1995). Attitude accessibility and motivation as determinants of biased processing: A test of the MODE model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 704–710.
78. L.Shen,, J.L.Monahan,, N.Rhodes,, & D.R.Roskos-Ewoldsen, (2009). The impact of attitude accessibility and decision style on adolescents' biased processing of health-related public service announcements. Communication Research, 36, 104–128.
79. L.J.Shrum, (2009). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J.Bryant & M.B.Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 50–73). New York, NY: Routledge.
80. N.Tal-Or,, J.Cohen,, Y.Tsfati,, & A.C.Gunther, (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37, 801–824.
81. J.Toole,, L.M.Arpan,, & N.Rhodes, (2012, May). Ecotainment: Effects on attitude accessibility, norm accessibility, and behavior correlates. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
82. N.Vidmar,, & M.Rokeach, (1974). Archie Bunker's bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication, 1974, 24, 36–47.
83. M.Weisbuch,, K.Pauker,, & N.Ambady, (2009). The subtle transmission of race bias via televised nonverbal behavior. Science, 326, 1711–1714.
84. K.M.White,, M.A.Hogg,, & D.J.Terry, (2002). Improving attitude-behavior correspondence through exposure to normative support from a salient ingroup. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 91–103.
85. A.W.Wicker, (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78.
86. T.D.Wilson,, S.Lindsey,, & T.Y.Schooler, (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.
87. B.Wittenbrink,, & N.Schwarz, (2007). Introduction. In B.Wittenbrink & N.Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
88. I.Yanovitzky,, & R.N.Rimal, (2006). Communication and normative influence: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory, 16, 1–6.
89. A.I.Young,, & R.H.Fazio, (2013). Attitude accessibility as a determinant of object construal and evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 404–418.
90. M.P.Zanna,, & R.H.Fazio, (1982). The attitude–behavior relation: Moving toward a third generation of research. In M.P.Zanna, E.T.Higgins, & C.P.Herman (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 283–301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.