Comprehension of the media

Communication and Social Cognition: Theories and Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 319-348

  Roskos Ewoldsen, Beverly ^a   Roskos Ewoldsen, David R ^a   Yang, Moonhee ^a   Lee, Mina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049099212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936313     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. (D. Couling, Trans.) London: Methuen. (Original work published 1982)
2. Bennett, T., & Woolacott, J. (1987). Bond and beyond: The political career of a popular hero. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan Education.
3. Brooker, W. (2000). Batmanunmasked:Analyzing a cultural icon. NewYork: Continuum.
4. Brunsdon, C., & Morley, D. (1999). Eveyday television: Nationwide. In D. Morley & C. Brunsdon (Eds.), The Nationwide television studies (pp. 19-110). London:Routledge. (Original work published 1978)
5. Condit, C. M. (1989). The rhetorical limits of polysemy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 103-122.
6. Crawford, Z. A., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004, April). Dynamic mental models of a movie. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
7. D'Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
8. Dickinson, C., & Givon, T. (1997). Memoryand conversation:Toward an experimental paradigm. In T. Givon (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, communicative, and social perspectives. Typological studies of language (Vol. 34, pp. 91-132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10. Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Evans, W. A. (1990). The interpretative turn in media research: Innovation, iteration, or illusion? Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 147-168.
12. Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. London: Methuen.
13. Fiske, J., & Hartley, J. (1978). Reading television. London: Routledge.
14. Halas, J., & Bachelor, J. (2004). Animal farm[DVD]. Chicago:HomeVision Entertainment.
15. Hall, S. (1994). Reflections upon the encoding/decoding model: An interview with Stuart Hall. In J. Cruz & J. Lewis (Eds.), Viewing, reading, listening: Audiences and cultural reception (pp. 253-274). Boulder, CO: Westview.
16. Hall, S. (2001). Encoding/decoding. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 166-176). Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Original work published 1980)
17. Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 59-69.
18. Hodge, R., & Tripp, D. (1986). Children and television:Asemiotic approach. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
19. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Jancovich, M. (1992). David Morley, the Nationwide studies. In M. Barker & A. Beezer (Eds.), Reading into cultural studies (pp. 134-147). London: Routledge.
21. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Mental models. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 469-499). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
23. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension:The CI perspective. Discourse Processes, 39, 125-128.
25. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1986). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Lee, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2005, November). Combining the landscape and event-indexing models in a conceptual PDP model of story comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Boston.
29. Lee, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004, May). Subtitles, inferences, and movie comprehension:Predictions from the event indexing model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
30. Lee, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2004, May). Mental representations of news stories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
31. Livingstone, S. M. (1987). The implicit representation of characters in Dallas: Amultidimensional scaling approach. Human Communication Research, 13, 399-420.
32. Livingstone, S. M. (1989). Interpretive viewers and structured programs: The implicit representations of soap opera characters. Communication Research, 16, 25-57.
33. Livingstone, S. M. (1990a). Interpreting a television narrative: How different viewers see a story. Journal of Communication, 40(1), 72-85.
34. Livingstone, S. M. (1990b). Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
35. Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwann, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22, 199-224.
36. Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwann, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533-545.
37. Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. McCloskey, M. (1983). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299-324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39. Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences & cultural studies. London: Routledge.
40. Morley, D. (1999). The Nationwide audience: Structure and decoding. In D. Morley & C. Brunsdon (Eds.), The Nationwide television studies (pp. 111-228). London:Routledge. (Original work published 1980)
41. Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299-324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Orwell, G. (1945). Animal farm. London: Penguin.
43. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
45. Parkin, F. (1971). Class inequality and political order. New York: Praeger.
46. Radvansky, G. A., Zwann, R. A., Federico, T., & Franklin, N. (1998). Retrieval from temporally organized situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1224-1237.
47. Radway, J. A. (1991). Reading the romance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
48. Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26-53.
49. Rickheit, G., & Sichelschmidt, L. (1999). Mental models: Some answers, some questions, some suggestions. In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (Eds.), Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning (pp. 9-40). New York: Elsevier.
50. Roloff, M. E., & Berger, C. R. (Eds.). (1982). Social cognition and communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.
52. Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 235-297). New York: Academic.
53. Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Davies, J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implications of the mental models approach for cultivation theory. Communications, 29, 345-363.
54. Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Yang, M., & Crawford, Z. (2003, May-June). Mental models of a movie. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Atlanta, GA.
55. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Dillman Carpentier, F. (2002). Media priming:Asynthesis. In J. B. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 97-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
56. Rowell, J. A., & Moss, P. D. (1986). Mental models of text and film: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Educational Psychology, 6, 321-333.
57. Schvaneveldt, D. W. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
58. Segrin, C., & Nabi, R. L. (2002). Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage? Journal of Communication, 52, 247-263.
59. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Storey, J. (2003). Cultural studies and the study of popular culture (2nd ed.). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
61. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261-292.
62. Thagard, P., & Kunda, Z. (1998). Making sense of people: Coherence mechanisms. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
63. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
64. Turner, G. (1990). British cultural studies: An introduction. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
65. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
66. Tversky, A., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1986). Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces. Psychological Review, 93, 3-22.
67. van den Broek P., Fletcher, C. R., & Risden, K. (1993). Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16, 169-180.
68. van den Broek P., & Gustafson, M. (1990). Comprehension and memory for texts:Three generations of reading research. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence (pp. 15-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
69. van den Broek P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299-316.
70. van den Broek P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A"landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71. vanden Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, Inc.
72. van Dijk, T. A. (1995). On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: A brief personal history of the van Dijk-Kintsch theory. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 383-410). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
73. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York:Academic.
74. Wren-Lewis, J. (1983). The encoding/decoding model: Criticisms and redevelopments for research on decoding. Media, Culture & Society, 5, 179-197.
75. Wyer, R. S. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment: The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
76. Wyer, R. S., & Radvansky, G. A. (1999). The comprehension and validation of social information. Psychological Review, 106, 89-118.
77. Yang, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implications of the landscape model of text memory for brand placement. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion: The psychology of entertainment media (pp. 79-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
78. Yang, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2005, May). The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies: Levels of placements, explicit and implicit memory, and brand choice behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.
79. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.
80. Zwann, R. A. (1999). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 93-111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbuam Associates, Inc.
81. Zwann, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
82. Zwann, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.
83. Zwann, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199-220.