An overview of implicit measures of attitudes: Methods, mechanisms, strengths, and limitations

Communication Methods and Measures

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 203-222

  Goodall, Catherine E ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052570014     PISSN: 19312458     EISSN: 19312466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2011.596992     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bessenoff, G. R., & Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled component of prejudice toward face people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329-353.
2. Brendl, M. C., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760-773.
3. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
4. De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the implicit association test. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 37, 443-451.
5. De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
6. De Houwer, J. (2008). Comparing measures of attitudes at the functional and structural level: Analysis and implications. In R. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Brinol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures.
7. De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., & Moors, A. (2007). Novel attitudes can be faked on the implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 972-978.
8. Dijsterhuis, A., Aarts, H., Bargh, J. A., & van Knipenberg, A. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 521-544.
9. Dovidio, J., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). The nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
10. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75-109.
11. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115-141.
12. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
13. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
14. Gawronski, B. (2002). What does the implicit association test measure? A test of convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171-180.
15. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
16. Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the implicit association test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85-93.
17. Han, H. A., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). The influence of experimentally created extrapesonal associations on the implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 259-272.
18. Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2001). A time course analysis of the affective priming effect. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 143-165.
19. Jordan, C. H., Logel, C., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Whitfield, M. L. (2008). The heterogeneity of self-esteem: Exploring the interplay between implicit and explicit self-esteem. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Brinol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774-788.
21. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32.
22. Klauer, K. C., & Mierke, J. (2005). Task set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the implicit association test effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208-217.
23. Livingston, R. W., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). What are we really priming? Cue-based versus category- based priming of facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 5-18.
24. Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85-93.
25. Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming, with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723-739.
26. Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-664.
27. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J.A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 265-292). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2003). Relations between implicit measures of prejudice: What are we measuring? Psychological Science, 14, 636-639.
29. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the implicit association test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 86,653-667.
30. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421-433.
31. Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
32. Payne, B. K., Govorun, O., & Arbuckle, N. L. (2008). Automatic attitudes and alcohol: Does implicit liking predict drinking? Social Cognition, 22, 238-271.
33. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Motivational factors in consumer response to advertisements. In R. G. Geen, W. M. Beatty, & R. M. Arkin (Eds.), Human motivation: Physiological, behavioral, and social approaches (pp. 418-454). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
34. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (1997). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactive model. In B. Burelson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 185-225).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Figure ground asymmetries in the implicit association test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94-106.
37. Shrum, L. J. (2002). Media consumption and effects of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Spalding, L. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1999). Unconscious unease and self-handicapping: Behavioral consequences of individual differences in implicit and explicit self-esteem. Psychological Science, 10, 535-539.
39. Steffens, M. C. (2004). Is the implicit association test immune to faking? Experimental Psychology, 51,165-179.
40. Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58.
41. Tiege, S., Schnabel, K., Banse, R., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2004). Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the extrinsic affective simon task (EAST). European Journal of Personality, 18, 495-520.