Attitude and norm accessibility and cigarette smoking

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2355-2372

  Rhodes, Nancy ^a   Ewoldsen, David R ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b School of Communication   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349690157     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00529.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl J. Beckmann (Eds. Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11 39). New York : Springer-Verlag.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179 211.
3. Ajzen, I. Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.
4. Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M. Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 142 161.
5. Arpan, L, Rhodes, N. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2007). Attitude accessibility: Theory, methods, and future directions. In D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen J. Monahan (Eds. Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods (pp. 351 376). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (9, Whole No. 416).
7. Berkowitz, A. D. (1997). From reactive to proactive prevention: Promoting an ecology of health on campus. In P. C. Rivers E. R. Shore (Eds. Substance abuse on campus: A handbook for college and university personnel (pp. 119 139). Westport, CT : Greenwood.
8. Borsari, B. Carey, K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 331 341.
9. Brinberg, D. Durand, J. (1983). Eating at fast-food restaurants: An analysis using two behavioral intention models. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 459 472.
10. Chassin, L. A., Presson, C. C., Montello, D., Sherman, J. McGrew, J. (1986). Changes in peer and parent influence during adolescence: Longitudinal versus cross-sectional perspectives on smoking initiation. Developmental Psychology, 22, 327 334.
11. Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Sherman, S. J., Corty, E. Olshavsky, R. W. (1984). Predicting the onset of cigarette smoking in adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 224 243.
12. Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105 109.
13. Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Basic social influence is underestimated. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 158 161.
14. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A. Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human conduct. In M. P. Zanna (Ed. The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 339 359). New York : Academic Press.
15. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015 1026.
16. th ed., pp. 151 192). Boston : McGraw-Hill.
17. Elek, E., Miller-Day, M. Hecht, M. L. (2006). Influences of personal, injunctive, and descriptive norms on early adolescent substance abuse. Journal of Drug Issues, 36, 147 172.
18. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. H. Sorrentino E. T. Higgins (Eds. The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204 243). New York : Guilford.
19. Fazio, R. H. (1990a). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. Zanna (Ed. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75 109). Orlando, FL : Academic Press.
20. Fazio, R. H. (1990b). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick M. S. Clark (Eds. Research methods in personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74 97). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
21. nd ed., pp. 41 62). New York : Allyn & Bacon.
22. Fazio, R. H., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. Powell, M. C. (1994). Attitudes, perception, and attention. In P. M. Niedenthal S. Kitayama (Eds. The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 197 216). Orlando, FL : Academic Press.
23. Fazio, R. H. Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505 514.
24. Fishbein, M. Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
25. Flay, B. R., Phil, D., Hu, F. B. Richardson, J. (1998). Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students. Preventive Medicine, 27, A9 A18.
26. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). The influence of autonomous and controlling motives on physical activity intentions within the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 283 297.
27. Haines, M. P. (1996). A social norms approach to preventing binge drinking at colleges and universities. Newton, MA : Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention.
28. Houston, D. A. Fazio, R. H. (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51 66.
29. Jacobson, P. D., Lantz, P. M., Warner, K. E., Wasserman, J., Pollack, H. A. Ahlstrom, A. K. (2001). Combating teen smoking: Research and policy strategies. Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press.
30. Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R. Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002 1012.
31. Kypri, K. Langley, J. D. (2003). Perceived social norms and their relation to university student drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 829 834.
32. Lapinski, M. K. Rimal, R. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127 147.
33. Mackie, D. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720 728.
34. Miller, D. T., Monin, B. Prentice, D. A. (2000). Pluralistic ignorance and inconsistency between private attitudes and public behaviors. In D. J. Terry M. A. Hogg (Eds. Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 95 113). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Perkins, H. W. (2002). Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Suppl. 14 164 172.
36. Prentice, D. A. Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243 256.
37. Ratcliff, R. (1983). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510 532.
38. Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B. Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The trans-situational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104 112.
39. Rhodes, N., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Edison, A. Bradford, B. (2008). Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages. Health Psychology, 27, S224 S232.
40. Rimal, R. N. Real, K. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13, 184 203.
41. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (1997). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactive model. In B. Burleson (Ed. Communication Yearbook 20 (pp. 185 225). Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
42. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Bichsel, J. Hoffman, K. (2002). The influence of accessibility of source likability on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 137 143.
43. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198 211.
44. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Ralstin, L. A. St. Pierre, J. (2002). The quick and the strong: Implications of attitude accessibility for persuasion. In J. P. Dillard M. Pfau (Eds. Persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 39 61). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
45. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Yu, J. Rhodes, N. (2004). Fear appeal messages affect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J. Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325 343.
47. Smith, K. H. Stutts, M. A. (1999). Factors that influence adolescents to smoke. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33, 321 357.
48. Steffian, G. (1999). Correction of normative misperceptions: An alcohol abuse prevention program. Journal of Drug Education, 29, 115 138.
49. Terry, D. J. Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776 793.
50. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1994). Preventing tobacco use among young people: A report of the Surgeon General (Pub. No. S/N 017-001-00491-0). Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.