Selective school systems and academic self-concept: How explicit and implicit school-level tracking relate to the big-fish-little-pond effect across cultures

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 405-423

  Salchegger, Silvia ^a  

^a Federal Institute for Educational Research   (Austria)

Author keywords

Between school achievement variance; Big fish little pond effect; Pisa; School level tracking; Social segregation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939856648     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: 19392176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000063     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adams, R., & Wu, M. (Eds.). (2003). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): PISA 2000 Technical Report. Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264199521-en
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3. Becker, M., Neumann, M., Tetzner, J., Böse, S., Knoppick, H., Maaz, K.,... Lehmann, R. (2014). Is early ability grouping good for high-achieving students' psychosocial development? Effects of the transition into academically selective schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 555-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035425
4. Bruneforth, M., Weber, C., & Bacher, J. (2012). Chancengleichheit und garantiertes Bildungsminimum in Österreich. [Equal opportunity and a guaranteed minimum education in Austria]. In B. Herzog-Punzenberger (Ed.), Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2012 (Vol. 2, pp. 189-228). Graz, Austria: Leykam.
5. Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.6.474
6. Card, N. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7. Chan, J. C. Y., & Lam, S. F. (2008). Effects of competition on students' self-efficacy in vicarious learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 95-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709907X185509
8. Cheung, M. W.-L. (2008). A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 13, 182-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013163
9. Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015). Meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
10. Chmielewski, A. K., Dumont, H., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type: An international comparison of mathematics self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 925-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831213489843
11. Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Martin, J. M., Peeke, L. G., Seroczynski, A. D., Tram, J. M.,... Maschman, T. (2001). The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design. Child Development, 72, 1723-1746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00375.
12. Dupriez, V., Dumay, X., & Vause, A. (2008). How do school systems manage pupils' heterogeneity? Comparative Education Review, 52, 245-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/528764
13. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.
14. Guay, F., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2004). Academic self-concept and educational attainment level: A ten-year longitudinal study. Self and Identity, 3, 53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13576500342000040
15. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116, C63-C76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x
16. Harter, S. (2012). Emerging self-processes during childhood and adolescence. In M. Leary & J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 680-715). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17. Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 505-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001
18. Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2014). Academic self-concept in science: Multidimensionality, relations to achievement measures, and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 11-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.003
19. Kenny, D. A. (2012). Mediation. [Personal web page, last update April 3, 2012]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm
20. Köller, O., Zeinz, H., & Trautwein, U. (2008). Class-average achievement, marks, and academic self-concept in German primary schools. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential (pp. 331-352). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
21. LeTendre, G., Hofer, B., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the U. S., Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 43-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001043
22. Levelt, N., & the Drenth Committees. (November, 2012). Flawed science: The fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel. Retrieved from www.commissielevelt.nl
23. Liem, G. A. D., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., McInerney, D. M., & Yeung, A. S. (2013). The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 326-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831212464511
24. Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish-little-pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 263-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.002.
25. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
26. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280.
27. Marsh, H. W. (1991). The failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312028002445.
28. Marsh, H. W. (1992). The content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 35-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.35
29. Marsh, H. W. (2005). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 119-127.
30. Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abu-Hilal, M. M., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., Leung, K. C.,... Parker, P. (2013). Factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of Arab and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 108-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029907
31. Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P., Abdelfattah, F., Nagengast, B., & Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2015). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability of social comparison processes over two age cohorts from Western, Asian, and Middle Eastern Islamic countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 258-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037485
32. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.366
33. Marsh, H. W., Cheng, J., & Martin, A. J. (2008). How we judge ourselves from different perspectives: Contextual influences on self-concept formation. In M. L. Maehr, S. A. Karabenick, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Social Psychological perspectives (1st ed.): Vol. 15 Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 315-356). Bingley, United Kingdom: JAI Press.
34. Marsh, H., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effect of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312032002285
35. Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children's self-concepts: A multicohort-multioccasion study. Child Development, 69, 1030-1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06159.x
36. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376.
37. Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002321.
38. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C.-K., & Hau, K.-T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 337-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.337
39. Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Seaton, M. (2014). Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: Integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory and substantive implications. Learning and Instruction, 33, 50-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.002
40. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abdelfattah, F., & Jansen, M. (2015). Dimensional Comparison Theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domains. Learning and Instruction, 35, 16-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.005.
41. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273170903333665
42. Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. J. (2008). Self-concept is as multidisciplinary as it is multidimensional: A review of theory, measurement, and practice in self-concept research. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential (pp. 87-115). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
43. Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. J. (2010). Long-term total negative effects of school-average ability on diverse educational outcomes: Direct and indirect effects of the big-fish-little-pond effect. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 51-72.
44. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.
45. Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1.
46. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312034004691
47. Meeus, W., van de Schoot, R., Keijsers, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Branje, S. (2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development, 81, 1565-1581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x
48. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
49. Nagengast, B., & Marsh, H. W. (2011). The negative effect of school-average ability on science self-concept in the UK, the UK countries, and the world: The big-fish-little-pond-effect for PISA 2006. Educational Psychology, 31, 629-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.586416.
50. Nagengast, B., & Marsh, H. W. (2012a). Big fish in little ponds aspire more: Mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1033-1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027697
51. Nagengast, B., & Marsh, H. W. (2012b). Big fish in little ponds aspire more: Mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science-Supplemental Materials. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027697.supp
52. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264006416-en
53. OECD. (2005a). Education at a glance. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
54. OECD. (2005b). PISA 2003 Technical Report. Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264010543-en
55. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006-Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World (Vol. 1). Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264040014-en
56. OECD. (2008). PISA 2006-Data (Vol. 2). Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264040151-en
57. OECD. (2009). PISA 2006 Technical Report. Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264048096-en
58. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background. Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. II). Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en
59. OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en
60. OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices (Vol. IV). Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201156-1-en
61. OECD. (2013c). Synergies for better learning. An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
62. OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Technical Report. Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2012-technical-report-final.pdf
63. Olson, J. F., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2008). TIMSS 2007 Technical Report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
64. Parker, P. D., Schoon, I., Tsai, Y.-M., Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Achievement, agency, gender, and socioeconomic background as predictors of postschool choices: A multicontext study. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1629-1642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029167
65. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
66. Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
67. Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN Version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
68. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
69. Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013838
70. Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability and moderation-two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 390-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831209350493.
71. Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (2005). Competition, cooperation, and the effects of others on me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 1029-1038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.1029
72. Suchań, B., & Bergmüller, S. (2010). Leistungsunterschiede zwischen Schulen. [Achievement differences between schools]. In B. Suchań, C. Wallner-Paschon, & C. Schreiner (Eds.), TIMSS 2007. Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft in der Grundschule (pp. 214-231). Graz, Austria: Leykam.
73. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788
74. Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
75. Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Mijs, J. J. B. (2010). Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 407-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102538
76. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Applications using Mplus. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118356258