Long-term total negative effects of school-average ability on diverse educational outcomes: Direct and indirect effects of the big-fish-little-pond effect

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 51-72

  Marsh, Herbert W ^a   O'Mara, Alison J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

(m abil); Academic self concept (asc); Achievement; Big fish little pond effect (bflpe); Educational aspirations; Educational attainment; Longitudinal designs; School average ability

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951855761     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000004     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alexander, K. L., & Eckland, B. K. (1975). Contextual effects in high school attainment process. American Sociological Review, 40, 402-416.
2. Alicke, M.D., Zell, E., & Bloom, D. L. (2009). Mere categorization and the Frog-Pond Effect (under review).
3. Alwin, D. F., & Otto, L. B. (1977). High school context effects on aspirations. Sociology of Education, 50, 259-273.
4. Ammons, R. B., & Ammons, C. H. (1962). The quick test (QT): Provisional manual. Psychological Reports, 11, 1-7. (Monograph Supplement 7-V11).
5. Bachman, J. G. (2001). Volume II of the documentation manual. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
6. Bachman, J. G. (2002). Volume I of the documentation manual. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
7. Bachman, J. G.,&O'Malley, P.M. (1986). Self-concepts, self-esteem, and educational experiences: The frogpond revisited (again). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 33-46.
8. Branden, N. (1994). Six pillars of self-esteem. New York: Bantam.
9. Byrne, B.M. (1996). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In B.A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social and clinical considerations (pp. 287-316). NewYork:Wiley.
10. Chanal, J. P., Marsh, H.W., Sarrazin, P. G. & Bois, J.E. (2005). The big-fish-little-pond effect on gymnastics self-concept: Generalizability of social comparison effects to a physical setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27, 53-70.
11. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of theory of relative deprivation to career decisions for college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17-31.
12. Diener, E. & Fujita, F. (1997). Social comparison and subjective well-being. In B. P. Buunk & F.X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping, and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 329-358). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
14. Enders, C. K. (2005). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In G. R. Hancock & R.O. Mueller (Eds.), Struc- tural equation modeling: A second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
15. Espenshade, T. J., Hale, L. E., & Chung, C.Y. (2005). The frog pond revisited: High school academic context, class rank, and elite college admission. Sociology of Education, 78, 269-293.
16. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
17. Gates, A. I. (1958). Gates Reading Survey-Form I. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.
18. Hattie, J. A. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper amp;& Row.
20. Hyman, H. (1942). The psychology of subjective status. Psychological Bulletin, 39, 473-474.
21. Jöreskog, K.G. (1979). Statistical estimation of structural models in longitudinal investigations. In J.R. Nesselroade & B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 303-351). New York: Academic Press.
22. Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish-little-pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 263-285.
23. Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H.W., Robitzsch, A., & Trautwein, U. (2010). A 2 × 2 taxonomy of multilevel latent covariate models: Accuracy and bias trade-offs in full and partial error-correction models. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Developmen.
24. Marsh, H.W. (1974). Judgmental anchoring: Stimulus and response variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
25. Marsh, H.W. (1984a). Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results. Australian Journal of Education, 28, 165-181.
26. Marsh, H.W. (1984b). Self-concept, social comparison, and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 799-806.
27. Marsh, H.W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295.
28. Marsh,H.W. (1989). Sex differences in the development of verbal and math constructs: The High School and Beyond study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 191-225.
29. Marsh, H.W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172.
30. Marsh, H.W. (1991). The failure of high ability high schools to deliver academic benefits: The importance of ASC and educational aspirations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 445-480.
31. Marsh, H.W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Marsh, H.W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self concept in educational psychology - 25th Vernon-Wall lecture series. London: British Psychological Society.
33. Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. G. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131-198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
34. Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. G. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big fish little pond effect. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. II, pp. 83-123). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
35. Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of selfconcept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163.
36. Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K.T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit: Is parsimony always desirable? Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364-390.
37. Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K.T. (2003). Big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept: A crosscultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364-376.
38. Marsh,H.W.,&Hau, K.T. (2007). Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151-170.
39. Marsh, H.W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East andWest German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321-350.
40. Marsh, H.W., Kong, C.-K., & Hau, K.-T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 337-349.
41. Marsh, H.W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov. T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (in press). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764-802.
42. Marsh, H.W., & O'Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542-552.
43. Marsh, H.W., & Parker, J. (1984). Determinants of student selfconcept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213-231.
44. Marsh, H.W., & Peart, N. (1988). Competitive and cooperative physical fitness training programs for girls: Effects on physical fitness and on multidimensional self-concepts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 390-407.
45. Marsh, H.W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K.T., O'Mara, A. J.,&Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350.
46. Marsh, H.W., Smith, I. D., Barnes, J. & Butler, S. (1983). Selfconcept: Reliability, stability, dimensionality, validity and the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 772-790.
47. Marsh, H.W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J. & Köller, O. (2007). Big fish little pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 631-669.
48. Marsh, H.W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O. & Baumert, J. (2005). ASC, interest, grades and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76, 297-416.
49. Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: The effects of academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-720.
50. Meyer, J.W. (1970). High school effects on college intentions. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 59-70.
51. Morse, S. & Gergen, K. J. (1970). Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 16, 148-156.
52. Muij, R. D. (1997). Symposium: Self-perception and performance predictors of academic achievement and academic and ASC: A longitudinal perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 263-277.
53. Muthén, B., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 216-316.
54. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B. O. (2006-2008). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Author.
55. O'Mara, A. J., & Marsh, H.W. (2007). Big-fish-little-pond effect: The negative effects of academically selective schools. The Psychology of Education Review, 31, 2-7.
56. Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Parducci, A., Perrett, D., & Marsh, H.W. (1969). Assimilation and contrast as range frequency effects of anchors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 281-288.
58. Rogers, S. (1941). The anchoring of absolute judgments. Archives of Psychology, 37, 1-42.
59. Seaton, M. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect under the grill: Tests of its universality, a search for moderators, and the role of social comparison. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney, Australia.
60. Seaton, M., Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a Pan-Human Theory: Universality of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE) across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403-419.
61. Seaton, M., Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R. G. (in press). Big-fishlittle-pond effect: Generalizability and moderation - Two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal.
62. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, No. 187.
63. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C.W. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
64. Soares, A.T., & Soares, L.M. (1969). Self-perceptions of culturally disadvantaged children. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 31-45.
65. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R.M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustments during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
66. Suls, J. M. (1977). Social comparison theory and research: An overview from 1954. In J.M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
67. Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2000). A selective history of classic and neo-social comparison theory. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. (pp. 3-19). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
68. Trautwein, U., Gerlach, E., & Lüdtke, O. (2008). Athletic classmates, physical self-concept, and free-time physical activity: A longitudinal study of frame of reference effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 988-1001.
69. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H.W., Köller, O. & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788-806.
70. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H.W., & Nagy, G. (2009). Within-school social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 853-866.
71. Trowbridge, N. (1972). Self concept and socio-economic status in elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 525-537.
72. U. S. Department of Labor. (1962). Guide to the use of the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington, DC: Author.
73. Upshaw, H. S. (1969). The personal reference scale: An approach to social judgment. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 315-370.
74. Valentine, J. C. & DuBois, D. L. (2005). Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice-versa: Separating the chicken from the egg. In H.W. Marsh, R. G. Craven & D.M. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 2, pp. 53-78). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
75. Volkman, J. (1951). Scales of judgment and their implications for social psychology. In J.H. Loher & M. Sherif (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads (pp. 273-294). New York: Harper.
76. Wedell, D.H., & Parducci, A. (2000). Social comparison: Lessons frombasic research on judgment. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. The Plenum series in social/clinical psychology (pp. 223-252). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
77. Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
78. Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, J. (1998). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305-329.
79. Zell, E., & Alicke, M.D. (2009). Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 467-482.