Big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability and moderation-two sides of the same coin

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 390-433

  Seaton, Marjorie ^a   Marsh, Herbert W ^b   Craven, Rhonda G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic ability; Academic achievement; Big fish little pond effect; Individual differences in learning; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953695511     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831209350493     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Aharony, N. (2006). The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as a foreign language in an Internet environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 851-866.
2. Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Bachman, J.G., & O'Malley, P.M. (1986). Self-concepts, self-esteem, and educational experiences: The frog pond revisited (again). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 35-46.
4. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
5. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E.M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.
6. Chapell, M.S., Blanding, Z.B., Silverstein, M.E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A.,et al.(2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 268-274.
7. Cho, M., & Jonassen, D. (2009). Development of the human interaction dimension of the self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 117-138.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cokley, K.O., Bernard, N., Cunningham, D., & Motoike, J. (2001). A psychometric investigation of the academic motivation scale using a United States sample. Measuring and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 34, 109-119.
10. Coleman, J.M., & Fults, B.A. (1985). Special class placement, level of intelligence, and the self-concept of gifted children: A social comparison perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 7-11.
11. Craven, R.G., Marsh, H.W., & Print, M. (2000). Gifted, streamed and mixed-ability programs for gifted students: Impact on self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 44(1), 51-75.
12. Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M.K., & Elder, G.H., Jr. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77(1), 60-81.
13. Dai, D.Y., & Rinn, A.N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 283-317.
14. Davis, J. (1966). The campus as a frogpond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions for college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17-31.
15. Espenshade, T.J., Hale, L.E., & Chung, C.Y. (2005). The frog pond revisited: High school academic context, class rank, and elite college admission. Sociology of Education, 78, 269-293.
16. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
17. Ginsburg, G.S., & Bronstein, P. (1993). Family factors related to children's intrinsic/ extrinsic motivational orientation and academic performance. Child Development, 64, 1461-1474.
18. Gottfried, A.E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 631-645.
19. Gottfried, A.E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525-538.
20. Greguras, G.J., & Diefendorff, J.M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465-477.
21. Gröbel, J., & Schwarzer, R. (1982). Social comparison, expectations, and emotional reactions in the classroom. School Psychology International, 3(1), 49-56.
22. Ha, M., Marsh, H.W., & Halse, C. (2004, July). What you see is not always Paper presented at the SELF Research Biennial International Conference, Berlin.
23. Hardre, P.L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 347-356.
24. Hau, K.-T., & Hui, H.-F. (1996, August). Theories of intelligence, achievement goals and learning strategies of Chinese students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
25. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
26. Howell, D.C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H.W., Regner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J.,et al.(2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 156-170.
29. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Lepper, M.R., Corpus, J.H., & Iyengar, S.S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
31. Loukas, A., Suzuki, R., & Horton, K.D. (2006). Examining school connectedness as a mediator of school climate effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 491-502.
32. Marsh, H.W. (1984). Self-concept, social comparison, and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 799-806.
33. Marsh, H.W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280-295.
34. Marsh, H.W. (1990). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 646-656.
35. Marsh, H.W. (1991). Failure of high ability schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 445-480.
36. Marsh, H.W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Marsh, H.W. (2005). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(3), 141-144.
38. Marsh, H.W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology-25th Vernon-Wall lecture series. London: British Psychological Society.
39. Marsh, H.W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 285-319.
40. Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R.G. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big-fish-little-pond-effect. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. 2, pp. 83-123). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
41. Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond-effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364-376.
42. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J.L. (2006). OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
43. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K., & Craven, R.G. (2004). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny. American Psychologist, 59, 268-271.
44. Marsh, H.W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 321-350.
45. Marsh, H.W., Kong, C.K., & Hau, K. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 337-349.
46. Marsh, H.W., & Parker, J.W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213-231.
47. Marsh, H.W., & Peart, N.D. (1988). Competitive and cooperative physical fitness training programs for girls: Effects on physical fitness and multidimensional self-concept. Journal of Sport & Exercise, 10(4), 390-407.
48. Marsh, H.W., & Perry, C. (2005). Self-concept contributes to winning gold medals: Causal ordering of self-concept and elite swimming performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27(1), 71-91.
49. Marsh, H.W., & Rowe, K.J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept: An application of multilevel modeling. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65-87.
50. Marsh, H.W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K., O'Mara, A.J.,et al.(2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350.
51. Marsh, H.W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Big fish little pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 631-669.
52. Marsh, H.W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Köller, O. (2008). Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: Role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 510-524.
53. Martin, A.J. (2003). The student motivation scale: Further testing of an instrument that measures school students' motivation. Australian Journal of Education, 47(1), 88-106.
54. McCaslin, M. (1996). The problem of problem representation: The summit's conception of student. Educational Researcher, 25, 13-15.
55. McCaslin, M., & Good, T.L. (1996). The informal curriculum. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 622-670). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
56. McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D.T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227-252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Meece, J.L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrolment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60-70.
58. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training, and Youth Affairs. (1999). The Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. New South Wales, Australia: Author.
59. Morse, S., & Gergen, K.J. (1970). Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 16, 148-156.
60. Mulkey, L.M., Catsambis, S., Steelman, L.C., & Crain, R.L. (2005). The long-term effects of ability grouping in mathematics: A national investigation. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 137-177.
61. Multon, K.D., Brown, S.D., & Lent, R.W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30-38.
62. O'Mara, A.J., Marsh, H.W., Craven, R.G., & Debus, R.L. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 181-206.
63. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
64. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris: Author.
65. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005a). PISA 2000 data analysis manual: SPSS users. Paris: Author.
66. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005b). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris: Author.
67. Ozer, E.J. (2005). The impact of violence on urban adolescents: Longitudinal effects of perceived school connection and family support. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(2), 167-192.
68. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
69. Pong, S.-L., & Ju, D.-B. (2000). The effects of change in family structure and income on dropping out of middle and high school. Journal of Family Issues, 21(2), 147-169.
70. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., & Congdon, R. (2005). HLM6 for Windows. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
72. Reuman, D.A. (1989). How social comparison mediates the relation between ability-grouping practices and students' achievement expectancies in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 178-189.
73. Rogers, C.R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
74. Rowe, K. (2005). Practical multilevel analysis with MLwiN & LISREL. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
75. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
76. Seaton, M., Marsh, H.W., & Craven, R.G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 403-419.
77. Seaton, M., Marsh, H.W., Dumas, F., Huguet, P., Monteil, J., Regner, I.,et al.(2008). In search of the big fish: Investigating the coexistence of the big-fish-little-pond effect with the positive effects of upward comparisons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 73-103.
78. Slavin, R.E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429-445.
79. Swalander, L., & Taube, K. (2007). Influences of family based prerequisites, reading attitude, and self-regulation on reading ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 206-230.
80. Trautwein, U., Gerlach, E., & Lüdtke, O. (2008). Athletic classmates, physical self-concept, and free-time physical activity: A longitudinal study of frame of reference effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 988-1001.
81. Tymms, P. (2004). Effect sizes in multilevel models. In I. Schagen & K. Elliot (Eds.), But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research (pp. 55- 66). London: National Foundation for Educational Research.
82. Valas, H., & Sovik, N. (1993). Variables affecting students' intrinsic motivation for school mathematics: Two empirical studies based on Deci and Ryan's theory on motivation. Learning and Instruction, 3, 281-298.
83. Warr, P., & Downing, J. (2000). Learning strategies, learning anxiety and knowledge acquisition. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 311-333.
84. Wentzel, K.R. (1999). Social motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76-97.
85. White, K.R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461-481.
86. Woolley, M.E., Kol, K.L., & Bowen, G.L. (2009). The social context of school success for Latino middle school students: Direct and indirect influences of teachers, family, and friends. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 43-70.
87. Wu, M.L., & Adams, R.J. (2002, April). Plausible values: Why are they important? Paper presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop, New Orleans, LA.
88. Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, J. (1998). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 305-329.
89. Zell, E., & Alicke, M.D. (in press). Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frogpond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
90. Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73-86.
92. Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.
93. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
94. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.