Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?

Applied Linguistics Review

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 317-342

  Paran, Amos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bilingual Education; CLIL; Educational Transfer; Language Education; Policy Borrowing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937197400     PISSN: 18686303     EISSN: 18686311     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2013-0014     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Admiraal, Wilfried, Gerard Westhoff & Kees de Bot. 2006. Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in The Netherlands: Students' language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation 12(1). 75—93.
2. Agolli, Renata. 2013. A penetrating Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) praxis in Italian mainstream education: Stemming novelties and visions. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning 4(1). 138—157.
3. Alonso, Esmeralda, Jésus Grisaleña & Alejandro Campo. 2008. Plurilingual education in secondary schools: Analysis of results. International CLIL Research Journal 1(1). 36—49. http://www.icrj.eu/11/article3.html (accessed 28 February 2013).
4. Apsel, Carsten. 2012. Coping with CLIL: Dropouts from CLIL streams in Germany. International CLIL Research Journal 1(4). 47—56. http://www.icrj.eu/14/article5.html (accessed 28 February 2013).
5. Arkoudis, Sophie. 2006. Teaching English as a Second Language in science classes: Incommensurate epistemologies? Language and Education 17(3). 161—173.
6. Auguste, Byron, Paul Kihn & Matt Miller. 2010. Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top-third graduates to careers in teaching. An international and market research-based perspective. McKinsey and Company. http://mckinseyonsociety.com/closing-the-talentgap/ (accessed 1 March 2013).
7. Banfi, Cristina & Silvia Rettaroli. 2008. Staff profiles and minority and prestigious bilingual education contexts in Argentina. In Christine Hélot & Anne-Marie de Mejía (eds.), Forging multilingual spaces: Integrated perspectives on majority and minority bilingual education, 140—180. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
8. Banfi, Cristina & Raymond Day. 2004. The evolution of bilingual schools in Argentina. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7(5). 398—411.
9. Bentley, Kay. 2010. The TKT (Teaching Knowledge Test) Course: CLIL Module. Cambridge: CUP.
10. Breidbach, Stephan & Britta Viebrock with Peeter Mehisto. 2012. Editorial. International CLIL Research Journal 1(4) n.p. http://www.icrj.eu/14/editorial.html (accessed 3 March 2013).
11. Breidbach, Stephan & Britta Viebrock. 2012. CLIL in Germany: Results from recent research in a contested field of education. International CLIL Research Journal 1(4). 5—16. http://www.icrj.eu/14/article1.html (accessed 3 March 2013).
12. Bruton, Anthony. 2011(a). Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal & Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics 32(2). 236—241.
13. Bruton, Anthony. 2011(b). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System 39(4). 523—532.
14. Buchholz, Barbara. 2007. Reframing young learners' classroom discourse structure as a preliminary requirement for a CLIL-based ELT approach. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit (eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, 51—77. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
15. Cambridge ESOL: TKT CLIL. https://www.teachers.cambridgeesol.org/ts/teachingqualifications/ clil (accessed 19 February 2013).
16. Chung, Jennifer H. 2010. Finland, PISA, and the implications of international achievement studies on education policy. In Alexander W. Wiseman (ed.), International perspectives on education and society. Vol. 13, The impact of international achievement studies on national education policymaking. pp. 267—294. Emerald.
17. Cleary, M. 2008. World Around: An intercultural journey through English speaking countries. Helbling Languages.
18. Coonan, Carmel Mary. 2007. How are students engaged in subject learning through the foreign language? Activities for learning in a CLIL environment. In David Marsh & Dieter Wolff (eds.), Diverse Contexts — Converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, 153—169. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
19. Coyle, Do. 2007. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10(5). 543—562.
20. Coyle, Do. 2008. CLIL — A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In Nelleke van Deusen-Scholl & Nancy H. Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education, 2nd edn, Vol 4: Second and foreign language education, 97—111. New York: Springer.
21. Coyle, Do, Philip Hood & David Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
22. Dafouz, Emma & Michelle C. Guerrini (eds.). 2009. CLIL across educational levels. Experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary contexts. Madrid: Richmond Publishing.
23. Dafouz, Emma, Begoña Nuñez, Carmen Sancho & Diana Foran. 2007. Integrating CLIL at the tertiary level: Teachers' and students' reactions. In David Marsh & Dieter Wolff (eds.), Diverse Contexts — Converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, 91—101. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
24. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2011. Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31. 182—204.
25. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Ute Smit. 2007. Introduction. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit (eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, 7—23. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
26. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Tarja Nikula & Ute Smit 2010. Language use and language learning in CLIL. Current findings and contentious issues. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula & Ute Smit (eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms, 279—291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. de Courcy, Michele & Monique Burston. 2000. Learning mathematics through French in Australia. Language and Education 14(2). 75—95.
28. Dobson, Alan, María Dolores Pérez Murillo & Richard Johnstone. 2010. Bilingual Education Project Spain Evaluation Report. Spain: British Council.
29. Duff, Patricia A. 1997. Immersion in Hungary: An EFL experiment. In Robert Keith Johnson & Merrill Swain (eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives, 19—43.Cambridge: CUP.
30. Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.
31. Eurydice: The information network on education in Europe. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice Unit. http://www.eurydice.org (accessed 7 March 2010).
32. Feryok, Anne. 2008. The impact of TESOL on maths and science teachers. ELT Journal 62(2). 123—130.
33. Gierlinger, Erwin M. (2007). Modular CLIL in lower secondary education: some insights from a research project in Austria. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit (eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, 79—118. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
34. Graddol, David. 2006. English Next. British Council.
35. Guazzieri, Annavaleria. 2007. Participation in CLIL: Cooperative learning in CLIL. In David Marsh & Dieter Wolff (eds.), Diverse Contexts — Converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, 171—184. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
36. Hashim, Azirah. 2009. Not plain sailing. Malaysia's language choice in policy and education. In Lisa Lim & Ee-Ling Low (eds.), Multilingual, globalizing Asia: Implications for policy and education. (AILA Review 22), 36—51. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
37. Heng, Chan Swee & Helen Tan. 2006. English for mathematics and science: Current Malaysian language-in-education policies and practices. Language and Education 20(4). 306—321.
38. Hill, David. A. & Andrew C. Rouse. 2012. Traditional Folk Songs. 15 folk songs from Britain and Ireland to liven up your lessons. Helbling Languages.
39. Hornberger, Nancy H. 2009. Multilingual education policy and practice: Ten certainties (grounded in Indigenous experience). Language Teaching 42(2). 197—211.
40. Hüttner, Julia & Angelika Rieder-Bünemann. 2010. A cross-sectional analysis of oral narratives by children with CLIL and non-CLIL instruction. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula & Ute Smit (eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms, 62—79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. Idris, Noraini, Loh Sau Cheong, Norjoharuddeen Mohd. Nor, Ahmad Zabidi Abdul Razak & Rahimi Md. Saad. 2007. The professional preparation of Malaysian teachers in the implementation of teaching and learning of mathematics and science in English. European Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 3(2). 101—110.
42. Jäppinen, Aini-Kristiina 2005. Thinking and content learning of mathematics and science as cognitional development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language and Education 19(2). 148—169.
43. Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In Randolph Quirk & Henry G. Widdowson (eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 11—30. Cambridge: CUP.
44. Kiely, Richard. 2011. Understanding CLIL as an innovation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 1(1). 153—171. http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pl/images/stories/ volume.1/SSLLT_11_153–171_Kiely.pdf (accessed 19 February 2013).
45. Knell, Ellen, Linda S. Siegel, Qiang Haiyan, Zhao Lin, Pei Miao, Zhao Wei & Chi Yanping. 2007. Early English immersion and literacy in Xi'an, China. The Modern Language Journal 91(3). 395—417.
46. Langé, G. 2007. Postscript to CLIL 2006 and future action. In David Marsh & Dieter Wolff (eds.), Diverse Contexts — Converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, 351—354. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
47. Lasagabaster, David & Juan Manuel Sierra. 2010. Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities. ELT Journal 64(4). 367—375.
48. Littlejohn, Andrew. 1998. The analysis of language teaching materials: inside the Trojan Horse. In Brian Tomlinson (ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching, 190—216. Cambridge: CUP.
49. Littlejohn, Andrew & Scott Windeatt. 1989. Beyond language learning: perspectives on materials design. In: Robert Keith Johnson (ed.), The Second Language Curriculum, 155—175. Cambridge: CUP.
50. Lorenzo, Francisco. (2007). An Analytical Framework of Language Integration in L2 Content-based courses: The European Dimension. Language and Education 21(6). 502—514.
51. Lorenzo, Francisco, Sonia Casal & Pat Moore. 2010. The effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics 31(3). 418—442.
52. Lyster, Roy & Susan Ballinger. 2011. Content-based language teaching: convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language Teaching Research 15(3). 279—288.
53. Marsh, Herbert W., Kit-Tai Hau, & Chit-Kwong Kong. 2000. Late immersion and language of Instruction in Hong Kong High Schools: Achievement Growth in Language and Nonlanguage Subjects. Harvard Educational Review 70(3). 302—346.
54. Mearns, Tessa L. 2012. Using CLIL to enhance pupils' experience of learning and raise attainment in German and health education: a teacher research project. The Language Learning Journal 40(2). 175—192.
55. Met, Myriam. 1998. Curriculum decision-making in content-based language teaching. In Jasone Cenoz & Fred Genesee (eds.), Beyond Bilingualism: Multilingualism and Multilingual Education, 35—63. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
56. Mewald, Claudia. 2007. A comparison of oral foreign language performance of learners in CLIL and in mainstream classes at lower secondary level in Lower Austria. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit (eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, 139—177. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
57. Muñoa Barredo, Inmaculada. 2011. Key factors to be considered by CLIL teachers. In Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe, Juan Manuel Sierra & Francisco Gallardo del Puerto (eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts, 293—314. Bern: Peter Lang.
58. Niemi, Hannele. 2012. Teacher education for high quality professionals: An analysis from the Finnish perspective. In: Oon-Seng Tan (ed.), Teacher education frontiers: International perspectives on policy and practice for building new teacher competencies, 43—69. Singapore: CENGAGE Learning.
59. Nikula, Tarja. 2007. Speaking English in Finnish content-based classrooms. World Englishes 26(2). 206—223.
60. Nikula, Tarja. 2010. Effects of CLIL on a teacher's classroom language use. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula & Ute Smit (eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms, 105—123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
61. Norris, John M., & Lourdes Ortega (eds.). 2006. Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
62. Ojeda Alba, Julieta. 2009. Themes and vocabulary in CLIL and non-CLIL instruction. In Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe & Rosa María Jiménez Catalán (eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from research in Europe, 130—156. Bristol: Multilingual Mattters.
63. Paran, Amos. 2010. Between Scylla and Charybdis: The dilemmas of testing language and literature. In Amos Paran & Lies Sercu (eds.), Testing the untestable in language education, 143—164. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
64. Paran, Amos. 2012. Language skills: Questions for teaching and learning. ELT Journal 67(4). 450—458.
65. Paran, Amos. 2013. Review of CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning by D. Coyle, P. Hood & D. Marsh. ELT Journal 67(1). 137—141.
66. Paran, Amos & Eddie Williams. 2007. Editorial: reading and literacy in developing countries. Journal of Research in Reading 30(1). 1—6.
67. Pérez-Vidal, Carmen. 2009. The integration of content and language in the classroom: A European approach to education (the second time around). In Emma Dafouz & Michelle C. Guerrini (eds.), CLIL across educational levels. Experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary contexts, 3—16. Madrid: Richmond Publishing.
68. Phillips, David & Kimberly Ochs. 2003. Processes of policy borrowing in education: some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education 39(4). 451—461.
69. Qiang, Haiyan & Yeqin Kang. 2011. English immersion in China as a case of educational transfer. Frontiers of Education in China 6(1). 8—36.
70. Reuters. 2009. Malaysia to end teaching math and science in English. http://in.reuters.com/article/2009/07/08/idINIndia-40896120090708 (accessed 2 February 2010).
71. Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda. 2008. CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal 1(1). 60—73. http://www.icrj.eu/11/article5.html (accessed 19 February 2013).
72. Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda, Juan Manuel Sierra & Francisco Gallardo del Puerto (eds.). 2011. Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts. Bern: Peter Lang.
73. Sahlberg, P. 2012. The most wanted. Teachers and teacher education in Finland. In Linda Darling-Hammond & Ann Lieberman (eds.), Teacher Education around the World. Changing policies and practices, 1—21. London and New York: Routledge.
74. Seikkula-Leino, Jaana. 2007. CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education 21(4). 328—341.
75. Serra, Cecilia. 2007. Assessing CLIL at primary school: A longitudinal study. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10(5). 582—602.
76. Sierra, Juan Manuel, Francisco Gallardo del Puerto & Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe. 2011. Good practices and future actions in CLIL: Learning and pedagogy. In Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe, Juan Manuel Sierra & Francisco Gallardo del Puerto (eds.), Content and foreign language
77. integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts, 317—338. Bern: Peter Lang.
78. Somers, Thomas & Jill Surmont. 2012. CLIL and immersion: how clear-cut are they? ELT Journal 66(1). 113—116.
79. Spiro, Jane. 1991. Assessing literature: Four papers. In Christopher Brumfit (ed.), Assessment in literature teaching, Review of ELT 1(3), 16—83. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
80. Swain, Merrill and Robert Keith Johnson. 1997. Immersion education: A category within bilingual education. In Robert Keith Johnson & Merrill Swain (eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives, 1—16. Cambridge: CUP.
81. Swiss Confederation Federal Statistical Office. 2011. Education Statistics 2010. Neuchatel: Swiss Confederation Federal Statistical Office. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/dienstleistungen/publikationen_statistik/publikationskatalog. html?publicationID=4352 (accessed 20 February 2013).
82. Tan, May. 2011. Mathematics and science teachers' beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research. 15(3). 325—342.
83. Téllez, Kip & Hersh C. Waxman. 2006. A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on effective teaching practices for English Language Learners. In John M. Norris & Lourdes Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, 245—277. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
84. Ting, Y. L. Teresa. 2011. CLIL and neuroscience: How are they related? In Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe, Juan Manuel Sierra & Francisco Gallardo del Puerto (eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts, 75—101. Bern: Peter Lang.
85. Van de Craen, Piet, Evy Ceuleers & Katrien Mondt. 2007. Cognitive development and bilingualism in primary schools: teaching maths in a CLIL environment. In David Marsh & Dieter Wolff (eds.), Diverse Contexts — Converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, 185—200. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
86. Waldow, Florian. 2010. Der Traum vom ‘skandinavisch schlau Werden’ — Drei Thesen zur Rolle Finnlands als Projektionsfläche in der gegenwärtigen Bildungsdebatte [The dream of ‘becoming smart in a Scandinavian way’: Three theses about the role of Finland as an object for projection in the current educational debate]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik [Journal of Pedagogy] 56(4). 497—511.
87. Wiesemes, Rolf. 2007. Developing a methodology for CLIL classroom research: a case study of a CLIL classroom where the Holocaust is taught. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit (eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, 275—289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
88. Wilhelmer, Nadja. 2008. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching mathematics in English. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.
89. Willig, Ann C. 1985. A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research, 55(3). 269—317.
90. Ziegelwagner, Monika. 2007. Chancen und Probleme des CLIL-Geschichtsunterrichts. Sichtweisen aus der LehrerInnen-Praxis [Opportunities and problems of CLIL history teaching: Perspectives from teacher praxis]. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Ute Smit (eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, 291—325. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
91. Zydatiβ, Wolfgang. 2012. Linguistic thresholds in the CLIL classroom? The Threshold Hypothesis revisited. International CLIL Research Journal. 1(4). 17—28. http://www.icrj.eu/14/article2. html (accessed 20 February 2013).