Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010)

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 236-241

  Bruton, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953841449     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: 1477450X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amr007     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Alonso, E., J. Grisaleña, and A. Campo. 2008. 'Plurilingual education in secondary schools: Analysis of results,' International CLIL Journal 1/1: 36-49.
2. Carless, D. 2004. 'Issues in teachers' reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools,' TESOL Quarterly 38: 639-62.
3. Carless, D. 2007. 'The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong,' System 35: 595-608.
4. Casal, S. and P. Moore. 2009. 'The Andalusian Bilingual Sections Scheme: Evaluation and consultancy,' International CLIL Research Journal 1/2: 36-46.
5. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated (CLIL) Classrooms. John Benjamins.
6. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2008. 'Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated (CLIL) learning: current research in Europe' in W. Delanoy and L. Volkmann (eds): Future Perspectives in English Language Teaching. Carl Winter, pp. 7-23.
7. Hawkey, R. 2006. 'Teacher and learner perceptions of language learning activity,' ELT Journal 60: 242-52. (Pubitemid 43941831)
8. Jarvis, H. and S. Atsilarat. 2004. 'Shifting paradigms: from communicative to a context-based approach,' Asian EFL Journal 6/4. Retrieved from http://asian-efl-journal.com.
9. Karavas-Doukas, E. 1996. 'Using attitude scales to investigate teachers' attitudes to the communicative approach,' ELT Journal 50: 187-98.
10. Lasagabaster, D. and J. M. Sierra. 2009. 'Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes,' International CLIL Research 1/2: 4-17.
11. Lorenzo, F. 2008. 'Evaluación de competencias lingüí sticas en centros bilingües. Datos de incidencia,' Jornadas sobre Competencia en comunicacio ́n lingüística: El curriculum integrado de lenguas27-28 November, 2008
12. Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, and P. Moore. 2010. 'The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: key findings from the Andalusian sections evaluation project,' Applied Linguistics 31: 418-42.
13. Navé s, T. and M. Victori. 2010. 'CLIL in Catalonia: an overview of research studies' in D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (eds): CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 30-54.
14. Orafi, S. M. S. and S. Borg. 2009. 'Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform,' System 37: 243-53.
15. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. and D. Lasagabaster. 2010. 'CLIL in a bilingual community: The Basque autonomous community' in D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (eds): CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 12-29.
16. San Isidro, X. 2010. 'An insight into Galician CLIL: Provision and results' in D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (eds): CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 55-78.
17. Villarreal Olaizola, I. and M. P. García Mayo. 2009. 'Tense and agreement morphology in the interlanguage of Basque/ Spanish bilinguals: CLIL versus non-CLIL' in Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and R. M. Jiménez Catalán (eds): Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Multilingual Matters, pp. 157-75.