Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research

System

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 523-532

  Bruton, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Communicative approach; Communicative Language Teaching (CLT); Content and Language Integrated learning (CLIL); ELT syllabus and methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555165775     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Admiraal W., Westhoff G., de Bot K. Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: students' language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation 2006, 12(1):75-93.
2. Alonso E., Grisaleña J., Campo A. Plurilingual education in secondary schools: analysis of results. International CLIL Research Journal 2008, 1(1):36-49.
3. Barwell R. Critical issues for language and content in mainstream classrooms: introduction. Linguistics and Education 2005, 16:143-150.
4. Bruton A. Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore. Applied Linguistics 2011, 32:236-241.
5. Casal S., Moore P. The Andalusian bilingual sections scheme: evaluation and consultancy. International CLIL Research Journal 2009, 1(2):36-46.
6. Coonan C.M. Insider views of the CLIL class through teacher self-observation-introspection. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 2007, 10:625-646.
7. Coyle D., Hood P., Marsh D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Dalton-Puffer C. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated (CLIL) Classrooms 2007, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
9. Dalton-Puffer C. Outcomes and Processes in Content and Language Integrated (CLIL) Learning: Current Research in Europe. Future Perspectives in English Language Teaching 2008, 7-23. Carl Winter, Heidelberg. W. Delanoy, L. Volkmann (Eds.).
10. García Mayo M.P., Lázaro Ibarrola A., Liceras J.M. Placeholders in the interlanguage of bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children. Language Learning 2005, 55(3):445-489.
11. Hüttner J., Rieder-Bünemann A. The effects of CLIL instruction on children's narrative competence. Views 2007, 16(3):20-27.
12. Lasagabaster D. Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 2008, 1:30-41.
13. Lasagabaster D., Sierra J.M. Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal 2009, 1(2):4-17.
14. Lasagabaster D., Sierra J.M. Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities. ELT Journal 2010, 64:367-375.
15. Leung C. Language and content in bilingual education. Linguistics and Education 2005, 16:238-252.
16. Lorenzo F. Evaluación de competencias lingüísticas en centros bilingües. Datos de incidencia. Jornadas sobre Competencia en comunicación lingüística: El curriculum integrado de lenguas 2008, Carmona, Spain. 27-28 November, 2008.
17. Lorenzo F. CLIL in Andalusia. CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training 2010, 2-11. Cambridge Scholars Publishers, Newcastle. D. Lasagabaster, Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.).
18. Lorenzo F., Casal S., Moore P. The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: key findings from the Andalusian sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics 2010, 31:418-442.
19. Lorenzo F., Moore P., Casal S. On complexity in bilingual research: the causes, effects, and breadth of content and language integrated learning - a reply to Bruton (2011). Applied Linguistics 2011, 32:450-455.
20. Lucietto S. A model for quality CLIL provision. International CLIL Research Journal 2008, 1(1):83-92.
21. Marsh, D., The relevance and potential of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) for achieving MT+2 in Europe. Retrieved: http://http//web.fu-berlin.de/elc/bulletin/9/en/marsh.html.
22. Marsh H.W., Hau K.T., Kong C.K. Late immersion and language of instruction in Hong Kong high schools: achievement growth in language and non-language subjects. Harvard Educational Review 2000, 70:302-346.
23. Mehisto P. CLIL counterweights: recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal 2008, 1(1):93-119.
24. Muñoz C. Accuracy orders, rate of learning and age in morphological acquisition. Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning 2006, 107-126. Multingual Matters, Clevedon, UK. C. Muñoz (Ed.).
25. Navés T., Victori M. CLIL in Catalonia: an overview of research studies. CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training 2010, 30-54. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle. D. Lasagabaster, Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.).
26. Netten J., Germain C. The future of intensive French. Canadian Modern Language Review 2009, 65:757-786.
27. Rothman J., Guijarro-Fuentes P. Input quality matters: some comments on input type and age-effects in adult SLA. Applied Linguistics 2010, 31(2):301-306.
28. Ruiz de Zarobe Y. CLIL in a bilingual community: similarities and differences with learning English as a foreign language. View[z] 2007, 16(3):47-52.
29. Ruiz de Zarobe Y. CLIL and foreign language learning: a longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal 2008, 1(1):60-73.
30. Ruiz de Zarobe Y., Lasagabaster D. CLIL in a bilingual community: the basque autonomous community. CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training 2010, 12-29. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle. D. Lasagabaster, Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.).
31. San Isidro X. An insight into Galician CLIL: provision and results. CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training 2010, 55-78. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle. D. Lasagabaster, Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.).
32. Seikkula-Leino J. CLIL learning: achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education 2007, 21(4):328-341.
33. Serra C. Assessing CLIL in primary school: a longitudinal study. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 2007, 10:582-602.
34. Villarreal Olaizola I., García Mayo M.P. Tense and agreement morphology in the interlanguage of Basque/Spanish bilinguals: CLIL versus non-CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe 2009, 157-175. Multilingual Matters, Bristol. Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, R.M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.).