Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 31, Issue , 2011, Pages 182-204

  Dalton Puffer, Christiane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861652346     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: 14716356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190511000092     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students' language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 75-93.
2. Airey, J. (2009). Estimating undergraduate bilingual scientific literacy in Sweden. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 26-35.
3. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2006). Language and the experience of learning university physics in Sweden. European Journal of Physics, 27, 553-560.
4. Badertscher, H.,&Bieri, T. (2009). Wissenserwerb im content-and-language integrated learning. Bern-Stuttgart-Wien, Switzerland: Haupt.
5. Bonnet, A. (2004). Chemie im bilingualen Unterricht. Kompetenzerwerb durch Interaktion. Opladen Germany: Leske +Budrich.
6. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (2008). Content-based second language instruction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1989)
7. Bruthiaux, P. (2009). Multilingual Asia: Looking back, looking across, looking forward. In L. Lim & E.-L. Low (Eds.), Multilingual, globalizing Asia (pp. 120-130). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
8. Canagarajah, S. A. (1995). Functions of code switching in ESL classrooms: Socialising bilingualism in Jaffna. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 173-195.
9. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis. A functional perspective. London, UK: Continuum.
11. Coetzee-Lachmann, D. (2009). Assessment of subject-specific task performance of bilingual geography learners (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Osnabr̈uck, Germany.
12. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Crandall, J. (1992). Content-centered learning in the U.S. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 110-126.
14. Cromdal, J. (2005). Bilingual order in collaborative word processing: On creating an English text in Swedish. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 329-353.
15. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16. Cummins, J. (1991). Conversational and academic language proficiency in bilingual context. AILA Review, 8, 75-89.
17. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18. Dafouz, E., N'unez, B., & Sancho, C. (2007). Analyzing stance in a CLIL university context: Non-native speaker use of personal pronouns and modal verbs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 647-662.
19. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007a). Academic language functions in a CLIL environment. In D.Marsh & D.Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts -converging goals (pp. 201-210). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
20. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007b). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
21. Dalton-Puffer, C., Ḧuttner, J., Jexenflicker, S., Schindelegger, V., & Smit, U. (2008). Content and language integrated learning an ̈ Osterreichs Ḧoheren Technischen Lehranstalten. Forschungsbericht. Vienna, Austria: Universiẗat Wien & Bundesministerium f̈ur Unterricht, Kultur und Kunst.
22. Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27, 241-267.
23. Day, E. M., & Shapson, S. M. (1996). Studies in immersion education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
24. de Graaff, R., Koopman, G. J., Anikina, Y., & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 603-624.
25. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Douglas, D. (2004). Discourse domains: The cognitive context of speaking. In D. Boxer & A. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 25-48).
27. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Duff, P. (1995). An ethnography of communication in immersion classrooms in Hungary. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 505-537.
28. Escobar Urmeneta, C. (2010). Pre-service CLIL teacher-education in Catalonia. Expert and novice practitioners teaching and reflecting together. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. (p. 188-218). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
29. European Commission. (1995). White paper on education and training. Teaching and learning: Towards the learning society. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/documents/comm/white-papers/pdf/com95-590-en.pdf
30. European Commission. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004-2006, 1-29. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/ education/doc/official/keydoc/actlang/act-lang-en.pdf
31. European Commission. (2008). Multilingualism: An asset for Europe and a shared ommitment. Communication of the European Commission, 1-15. Retrieved from http://ec. europa.eu/education/languages/pdf/com/2008-0566-en.pdf
32. Eurydice Network. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa. eu/education/eurydice/thematic-studies-archives-en.php
33. Ferguson, G. (2006). Language planning and education. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
34. Fern'andez, D. J. et al. (Eds.). (2008). Proceedings selection from XXXIII FAAPI Conference: Using the language to learn. Learning to use the language: What's next in Latin America. Santiago del Estero, Argentina: British Council.
35. Fern'andez Fontecha, A. (2009). Spanish CLIL: Research and official actions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jim'enez Catal'an (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 3-21). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
36. Gajo, L. (2007). Linguistic knowledge and subject knowledge: How does bilingualism contribute to subject development? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 563-579.
37. Gallardo del Puerto, F., Garćia Lecumberri, M., & Ǵomez Lacabex, E. (2009). Testing the effectiveness of content and language integrated learning in foreign language contexts: Assessment of English pronunciation. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiḿenez Cataĺan (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215-234). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
38. Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. A guide to languages in the European Union. (2008, September). EUBusiness.com. Retrieved from: http://www.eubusiness.com/topics/Languages/eu-languages-guide/
39. Hajer, M. (2000). Creating a language-promoting classroom: Content-area teachers at work. In J. K. Hall & L. Stoops Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 265-285). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93-116.
41. Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (1990). The development of second language proficiency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Ḧuttner, J., & Rieder-B̈unemann, A. (2010). A cross-sectional analysis of oral narratives by children with CLIL and non-CLIL instruction. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 61-80). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
43. J̈appinen, A.-K. (2005). Thinking and content learning of mathematics and science as cognitional development in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language and Education, 19, 148-169.
44. J̈arvinen, H.-M. (2010). Language as a meaning making resource in learning and teaching content: Analysing historical writing in content and language integrated learning. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 145-168). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
45. Jexenflicker, S., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2010). The CLIL differential: Comparing the writing of CLIL and non-CLIL students in higher colleges of technology. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 169-190). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
46. Johnson, K., & Swain, M. (Eds.). 1997. Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Kiraz, A., G̈uneyli, A., Baysen, E., G̈und̈uz, S., & Baysen, F. (2010). Effect of science and technology learning with foreign language on the attitude and success of students. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4130-4136.
48. Kong, S. (2009). Content-based instruction: What can we learn from content-trained teachers' and language-trained teachers' pedagogies? Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 233-267.
49. Krampitz, S. (2007). Spracharbeit im bilingualen Unterricht. Ergebnisse einer Befragung von LehrerInnen und Lehrern. In D. Caspari, W. Hallet, A. Wegner, & W. Zydatiß (Eds.), Bilingualer Unterricht macht Schule: Beitr̈age aus der Praxisforschung (pp. 133-146). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
50. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. Issues and implications. London, UK: Longman.
51. Lantolf, J. P. (2002). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 104-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53. Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated learning. Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31-42.
54. Lasagabaster, D., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (Eds.). (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
55. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International Journal of CLIL Research, 1, 4-17.
56. Li, D. C. S. (2002). Hong Kong parents' preference for English-medium education: Passive victims of imperialism or active agents of pragmatism? In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), Englishes in Asia: Communication, identity, power, & education (pp. 29-62). Melbourne, Australia: Language Australia.
57. Lim, L., & Low, E.-L. (Eds.). (2009). Multilingual, globalizing Asia: Implications for policy and education. AILA Review, 22.
58. Lim Falk, M. (2008). Svenska i engelskspr°akig skolmilj̈o. ̈Amnesrelaterat spr°akbruk i tv°a gymnasieklasser [Swedish in an English classroom environment. Language use in two grammar school classes]. Stockholm, Sweden: Eddy. (Reprinted from Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis [Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology], 46)
59. Llinares, A., & Whittaker, R. (2009). Teaching and learning history in secondary CLIL classrooms: From speaking to writing. In E. Dafouz & M. Guerrini (Eds.), CLIL across educational levels: Experiences from primary, secondary and tertiary contexts (pp. 73-88). Madrid, Spain: Richmond.
60. Llinares, A., & Whittaker, R. (2010). Writing and speaking in the history class: A comparative analysis of CLIL and first language contexts. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 125-144). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
61. Lo, Y.-Y., & Murphy, V. A. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge and growth in immersion and regular language-learning programmes in Hong Kong. Language and Education, 24, 215-238.
62. Lochtmann, K. (2007). Die m̈undliche Fehlerkorrektur in CLIL und im traditionellen Fremdsprachenunterricht: Ein Vergleich. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse -CLIL: Empirische Untersuchungen zum Unterrichtsdiskurs (pp. 119-138). Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.
63. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
64. Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2005). Orientaciones para la elaboraci'on del curr'iculo integrado de las lengaus en los centros biling̈ues. Seville, Spain: Consejer'ia de Educaci'on (Junta de Andaluc'ia).
65. Lorenzo, F., & Moore, P. (2010). On the natural emergence of language structures in CLIL: Towards a theory of European educational bilingualism. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 23-38). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
66. Lose, J. (2007). The language of scientific discourse: Ergebnisse einer empirischdeskriptiven Interaktionsanalyse zur Verwendung fachbezogener Diskursfunktionen im bilingualen Biologieunterricht. In D. Caspari, W. Hallet, A. Wegner, & W. Zydatiß (Eds.), Bilingualer Unterricht macht Schule: Beitr̈age aus der Praxisforschung (pp. 97-107). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
67. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
68. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
69. Maillat, D. (2010). The pragmatics of L2 in CLIL. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL (pp. 39-60). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
70. Maljers, A., Marsh, D., & Wolff, D. (Eds.). (2007). Windows on CLIL. Content and language integrated learning in the spotlight. The Hague, the Netherlands: European Platform for Dutch Education.
71. Mariotti, C. (2006). Negotiated interactions and repair. VIEWS Vienna English Working Papers, 15, 33-41. Retrieved from http://anglistik.univie.ac.at/ views/archive/
72. Marsh, D., & Frigols, M.-J. (2007). CLIL as a catalyst for change in language education. Babylonia, 3, 33-37.
73. Mart́inez Adrían,M., & GutíerrezMangado, M. J. (2009). The acquisition of English syntax by CLIL learners in the Basque country. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiḿenez Cataĺan (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 176-196). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
74. McDougald, J. S. (2009). The state of language and content instruction in Colombia. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2, 44-48.
75. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.
76. Mewald, C. (2007). A comparison of oral language performance of learners in CLIL and mainstream classes at lower secondary level in Lower Austria. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 139-178). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
77. Mohan, B., & Beckett, G.H. (2001). A functional approach to research on content-based language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 133-155.
78. Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Davison, C. (Eds.). (2001). English as a second language in the mainstream. London, UK: Pearson Education.
79. Moore, P. (2007). Enhancing classroom discourse: A modeling potential for content teachers. Revista Espanola de Ling̈u'istica Aplicada. Ejemplar: Models and Practice in CLIL, 1, 141-152.
80. Moore, P. (2009). On the emergence of L2 oracy in bilingual education: A comparative analysis of CLIL and mainstream learner talk (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain.
81. Morton, T. (2010). Using a genre-based approach to integrating content and language in CLIL: The example of secondary history. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 81-104). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
82. Nikula, T. (2007). Speaking English in Finnish content-based classrooms. World Englishes, 26, 206-223.
83. Nikula, T. (2008). Learning pragmatics in content-based classrooms. In E. Alc ́on Soler & A. Mart'inez Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. (pp. 94-113). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
84. Nikula, T. (2010). On effects of CLIL on a teacher's language use. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 105-124). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
85. N'unez Perucha, B., & Dafouz Milne, E. (2007). Lecturing through the foreign language in a CLIL university context: Linguistic and pragmatic implications. VIEWS Vienna English Working Papers, 16, 36-42. Retrieved from http://anglistik.univie.ac.at/views/archive/
86. Paesani, K. (2011). Research in language-literature instruction: Meeting the call for change? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, this volume.
87. P'erez Vidal, C. (2009). The integration of content and language in the classroom: A European approach to education (the second time around). In E. Dafouz & M. Guerrini (Eds.), CLIL across educational levels (pp. 3-16). Madrid, Spain: Richmond.
88. Pessoa, S., Hendry, H., Donato, R., Tucker, R. G., & Lee, H. (2007). Content-based instruction in the foreign language classroom: A discourse perspective. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 102-121.
89. Pistorio, Maria Ińes. (2009).Teacher training and competences for effective CLIL teaching in Argentina. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 2(2), 37-43.
90. Prinsloo, M., & Baynham, M. (Eds.). (2008). AILA Applied Linguistics: Series 2. Literacies, global and local. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
91. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 60-73.
92. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2010). Written production and CLIL: An empirical study. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 191-212). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
93. Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M., & Orte'iza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly 38, 67-93.
94. Schleppegrell, M., & O'Hallaron, C. (2011). Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, this volume.
95. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London, UK: Routledge.
96. Snow, M. A. (1998). Trends and issues in content-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 243-267.
97. Spanos, G. (1989) On the integration of language and content instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 227-240.
98. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
99. Stoller, F. L. (2004). Content-based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 264-283.
100. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
101. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
102. Sylv'en, L. K. (2004). Teaching in English or English teaching? On the effects of content and language integrated learning on Swedish learners' incidental vocabulary acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). G̈oteborg University, G̈oteborg, Sweden.
103. Tarone, E., & Swain, M. (1995). A sociolinguistic perspective on second-language use in immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 79, 166-178.
104. Tollefson, J. W., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
105. Tsui, A. B. M., & Tollefson, J. W. (Eds.). (2007). Language policy, culture and identity in Asian contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
106. van de Craen, P., Ceuleers, E.,& Mondt, K. (2007). Cognitive development and bilingualism in primary schools: Teachingmaths in a CLIL environment. InD.Marsh&D.Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts -converging goals: CLIL in Europe (pp. 185-200). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Lang.
107. Villarreal, I., & Garc'ia Mayo, M. (2009). Tense and agreement morphology in the nterlanguage of Basque-Spanish bilinguals: Content-based learning vs. the learning of English as a school subject. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jim'enez Catal'an (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215-234). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
108. Vollmer, H. J., Heine, L., Troschke, R., Coetzee, D., & K̈uttel, V. (2006, August). Subjectspecific competence and language use of CLIL learners: The case of geography in grade 10 of secondary schools in Germany. Paper presented at the ESSE8 Conference, London, UK.
109. Walker, E. (2010). Evaluation of a support intervention for senior secondary school English immersion. System, 38, 50-62.
110. Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A. (2009). CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jim'enez Catal'an (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215-234). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
111. Widdowson, H. (1980). Reading and thinking in English 1-4. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
112. Wolff, D. (2007). CLIL: Bridging the gap between school and working life. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts -converging goals. CLIL in Europe (pp. 15-25). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
113. Zuengler, J. (1993). Encouraging learners' conversational participation: The effect of content knowledge. Language Learning, 43, 403-432.
114. Zydatiß, W. (2007). Deutsch-Englische Z̈uge in Berlin (DEZIBEL). Eine Evaluation des bilimgualen Sachfachunterrichts in Gymnasien: Kontext, Kompetenzen, Konsequenzen. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.