Rational design and evolutional fine tuning of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for biomass breakdown

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 29, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-9

  Hasunuma, Tomohisa ^a   Ishii, Jun ^a   Kondo, Akihiko ^a,b  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RIKEN   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; FUNGAL DNA; FUNGAL ENZYME; LIGNOCELLULOSE; RNA; TOXIC SUBSTANCE; LIGNIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL STRESS; ENZYME RELEASE; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MICROBIAL DEGRADATION; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SACCHARIFICATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SECRETORY PATHWAY; GENETICS; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOMASS; CELLULASE; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; LIGNIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84934958749     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: 18790402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Bozell J.J., Peterson G.R. Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates - the US Department of Energy's "Top 10" revisited. Green Chem 2010, 12:539-554.
2. Choi S., Song C.W., Shin J.H., Lee S.Y. Biorefineries for the production of top building block chemicals and their derivatives. Metab Eng 2015, 28:223-239.
3. Buijs N., Siewers V., Nielsen J. Advanced biofuel production by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013, 17:480-488.
4. Gronenberg L.S., Marcheschi R.J., Liao J.C. Next generation biofuel engineering in prokaryotes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013, 17:462-471.
5. Menon V., Rao M. Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept. Progr Energ Combust Sci 2012, 38:522-550.
6. Grabber J.H. How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies. Crop Sci 2005, 45:820-831.
7. Pauly M., Gille S., Liu L., Mansoori N., de Souza A., Schultink A., Xiong G. Hemicellulose biosynthesis. Planta 2013, 238:627-642.
8. Hasunuma T., Hori Y., Sakamoto T., Ochiai M., Hatanaka H., Kondo A. Development of a GIN11/FRT-based multiple-gene integration technique affording inhibitor-tolerant, hemicellulolytic, xylose-utilizing abilities to industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from undetoxified lignocellulosic hemicelluloses. Microb Cell Fact 2014, 13:145.
9. Chandel A.K., Chandrasekhar G., Silva M.B., Silvério da Silva S. The realm of cellulases in biorefinery development. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2012, 32:187-202.
10. Medve J., Karlsson J., Lee D., Tjerneld F. Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei: adsorption, sugar production pattern, and synergism of the enzymes. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998, 59:621-634.
11. den Haan R., Kroukamp H., van Zyl J.H.D., van Zyl W.H. Cellobiohydrolase secretion by yeast: current state and prospects for improvement. Process Biochem 2013, 48:1-12.
12. Palonen H., Tenkanen M., Linder M. Dynamic interaction of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases Cel6A and Cel7A and cellulose at equilibrium and during hydrolysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65:6-11.
13. Pimenova N.V., Hanley T.R. Effect of corn stover concentration on rheological characteristics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2004, 114:347-360.
14. den Haan R., van Rensburg E., Rose S.H., Görgens J.F., van Zyl W.H. Progress and challenges in the engineering of non-cellulolytic microorganisms for consolidated bioprocessing. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015, 33:32-38.
15. Lambertz C., Garvey M., Klinger J., Heesel D., Klose H., Fischer R., Commandeur U. Challenges and advances in the heterologous expression of cellulolytic enzymes: a review. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014, 7:135.
16. Jönsson L.J., Alriksson B., Nilvebrant N. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:16.
17. Hasunuma T., Kondo A. Development of yeast cell factories for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose to bioethanol through cell surface engineering. Biotechnol Adv 2012, 30:1207-1218.
18. Dragosits M., Mattanovich D. Adaptive laboratory evolution - principles and application for biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact 2013, 12:64.
19. Demeke M.K., Dietz H., Li Y., Foulquié-Moreno M.R., Mutturi S., Deprez S., Abt T.D., Bonini B.M., Liden G., Dumortier F., et al. Development of a D-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering. Biotechnol Biofuel 2013, 6:89.
20. Demeke M.K., Dumortier F., Li Y., Broeckx T., Foulquié-Moreno M.R., Thevelein J.M. Combining inhibitor tolerance and d-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuel 2013, 6:120.
21. Xiao H., Zhao H. Genome-wide RNAi screen reveals the E3 SUMO-protein ligase gene SIZ1 as a novel determinant of furfural tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014, 7:78.
22. Kim I.K., Roldão A., Siewers V., Nielsen J. A systems-level approach for metabolic engineering of yeast cell factories. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12:228-248.
23. Young C.L., Robinson A.S. Protein folding and secretion: mechanistic insights advancing recombinant protein production in S. cerevisiae. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2014, 30:168-177.
24. Huang G.L., Anderson T.D., Clubb R.T. Engineering microbial surfaces to degrade lignocellulosic biomass. Bioengineered 2015, 5:96-106.
25. Yamada R., Hasunuma T., Kondo A. Endowing non-cellulolytic microorganisms with cellulolytic activity aiming for consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol Adv 2013, 31:754-763.
26. Kroukamp H., den Haan R., van Wyk N., van Zyl W.H. Overexpression of native PSE1 and SOD1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improved heterologous cellulase secretion. Appl Energ 2013, 102:150-156.
27. Xu L., Shen Y., Hou J., Peng B., Tang H., Bao X. Secretory pathway engineering enhances secretion of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 2014, 117:45-52.
28. van Zyl J.H.D., den Haan R., van Zyl W.H. Over-expression of native Saccharomyces cerevisiae exocytic SNARE genes increased heterologous cellulase secretion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:5567-5578.
29. Wang T., Huang C., Chen H., Ho P., Ke H., Cho H., Ruan S., Hung K., Wang I., Cai Y., et al. Systematic screening of glycosylation- and trafficking-associated gene knockouts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies mutants with improved heterologous exocellulase activity and host secretion. BMC Biotechnol 2013, 13:71.
30. van Rensburg E., den Haan R., Smith J., van Zyl W.H., Görgens J.F. The metabolic burden of cellulase expression by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y294 in aerobic batch culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012, 96:197-209.
31. Liu Z., Hou J., Martínez J.L., Petranovic D., Nielsen J. Correlation of cell growth and heterologous proteins production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:8955-8962.
32. Bae J., Kuroda K., Ueda M. Proximity effect among cellulose-degrading enzymes displayed on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015, 81:59-66.
33. Matano Y., Hasunuma T., Kondo A. Cell recycle batch fermentation of high-solid lignocellulose using a recombinant cellulase-displaying yeast strain for high yield ethanol production in consolidated bioprocessing. Bioresour Technol 2013, 135:403-409.
34. Matano Y., Hasunuma T., Kondo A. Simultaneous improvement of saccharification and ethanol production from crystalline cellulose by alleviation of irreversible adsorption of cellulase with a cell surface-engineered yeast strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:2231-2237.
35. Nakatani Y., Yamada R., Ogino C., Kondo A. Synergetic effect of yeast cell-surface expression of cellulase and expansin-like protein on direct ethanol production from cellulose. Microb Cell Fact 2013, 12:66.
36. Fan L., Zhang Z., Yu X., Xue Y., Tan T. Self-surface assembly of cellulosomes with two miniscaffoldins on Saccharomyces cerevisiae for cellulosic ethanol production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:13260-13265.
37. Inokuma K., Hasunuma T., Kondo A. Efficient yeast cell-surface display of exo- and endo-cellulase using the SED1 anchoring region and its original promoter. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014, 7:8.
38. Suzuki H., Imaeda T., Kitagawa T., Kohda K. Deglycosylation of cellulosomal enzyme enhances cellulosome assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 2012, 157:64-70.
39. Matsuoka H., Hashimoto K., Saijo A., Takada Y., Kondo A., Ueda M., Ooshima H., Tachibana T., Azuma M. Cell wall structure suitable for surface display of proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2014, 31:67-76.
40. Ling H., Teo W., Chen B., Leong S.S.J., Chang M.W. Microbial tolerance engineering toward biochemical production: from lignocellulose to products. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2014, 29:99-106.
41. Zhou Q., Liu Z.W., Ning K., Wang A., Zeng X., Xu J. Genomic and transcriptome analyses reveal that MAPK- and phosphatidylinositol-signaling pathways mediate tolerance to 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde for industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep 2014, 4:6556.
42. Ding M., Wang X., Liu W., Cheng J., Yang Y., Yuan Y. Proteomic research reveals the stress response and detoxification of yeast to combined inhibitors. PLOS ONE 2012, 7:e43474.
43. Hasunuma T., Sanda T., Yamada R., Yoshimura K., Ishii J., Kondo A. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 2011, 10:2.
44. Wei N., Quarterman J., Kim S.R., Cate J.H.D., Jin Y.S. Enhanced biofuel production through coupled acetic acid and xylose consumption by engineered yeast. Nat Commun 2013, 4:2580.
45. Sato T.K., Liu T., Parreiras L.S., Williams D.L., Wohlbach D.J., Bice B.D., Ong I.M., Breuer R.J., Qin L., Busalacchi D., et al. Harnessing genetic diversity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fermentation of xylose in hydrolysates of alkaline hydrogen peroxide-pretreated biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014, 80:540-554.
46. Almario M.P., Reyes L.H., Kao K.C. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced tolerance to hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013, 110:2616-2623.
47. Ito Y., Yamanishi M., Ikeuchi A., Matsuyama T. A highly tunable system for the simultaneous expression of multiple enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol 2015, 4:12-16.
48. Kim B., Du J., Eriksen D.T., Zhao H. Combinatorial design of a highly efficient xylose-utilizing pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of cellulosic biofuels. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013, 79:931-941.
49. Yamada R., Taniguchi N., Tanaka T., Ogino C., Fukuda H., Kondo A. Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials using a diploid strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with optimized cellulase expression. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011, 4:8.
50. Ishii J., Kondo T., Makino H., Ogura A., Matsuda F., Kondo A. Three gene expression vector sets for concurrently expressing multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2014, 14:399-411.
51. Liang J., Ning J.C., Zhao H. Coordinated induction of multi-gene pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:e54.
52. Nair N.U., Zhao H. Mutagenic inverted repeat assisted genome engineering (MIRAGE). Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:e9.
53. Kim D., Hahn J.S. Roles of the Yap1 transcription factor and antioxidants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae's tolerance to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, which function as thiol-reactive electrophiles generating oxidative stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013, 79:5069-5077.
54. Aouida M., Piatek M.J., Bangarusamy D.K., Mahfouz M.M. Activities and specificities of homodimeric TALENs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 2014, 60:61-74.
55. Li T., Huang S., Zhao X., Wright D.A., Carpenter S., Spalding M.H., Weeks D.P., Yang B. Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:6315-6325.
56. DiCarlo J.E., Norville J.E., Mali P., Rios X., Aach J., Church G.M. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:4336-4343.
57. Farzadfard F., Perli S.D., Lu T.K. Tunable and multifunctional eukaryotic transcription factors based on CRISPR/Cas. ACS Synth Biol 2013, 2:604-613.
58. Ryan O.W., Skerker J.M., Maurer M.J., Li X., Tsai J.C., Poddar S., Lee M.E., DeLoache W., Dueber J.E., Arkin A.P., et al. Selection of chromosomal DNA libraries using a multiplex CRISPR system. eLife 2014, 3:e03703.
59. Ryan O.W., Cate J.H. Multiplex engineering of industrial yeast genomes using CRISPRm. Methods Enzymol 2014, 546:473-489.
60. Jakočiunas T., Bonde I., Herrgård M., Harrison S.J., Kristensen M., Pedersen L.E., Jensen M.K., Keasling J.D. Multiplex metabolic pathway engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 2015, 28:213-222.