Proximity effect among cellulose-degrading enzymes displayed on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 59-66

  Bae, Jungu ^a   Kuroda, Kouichi ^a   Ueda, Mitsuyoshi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL MEMBRANES; CELLULOSE; ENZYMES; SACCHARIFICATION; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

CELLOBIOHYDROLASES; CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; DEGRADING ACTIVITIES; DEGRADING ENZYMES; FLUORESCENCE PROTEINS; PROXIMITY EFFECTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE CELLS; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT;

YEAST;

CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINITY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FLUORESCENCE; GENOME; PROTEIN; YEAST;

CELLS; CELLULOSE; CONCENTRATION; ENZYMES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BETA GLUCOSIDASE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BETA-GLUCOSIDASE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4-BETA-CELLOBIOSIDASE; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84917738216     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02864-14     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. 2005. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44: 3358-3393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587.
2. Carroll A, Somerville C. 2009. Cellulosic biofuels. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:165-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092125.
3. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002.
4. Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Hamilton R, Himmel M, Keller M, McMillan JD, Sheehan J, Wyman CE. 2008. How biotech can transform biofuels. Nat Biotechnol 26:169-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0208-169.
5. Jalak J, Kurasin M, Teugjas H, Valjamae P. 2012. Endo-exo synergism in cellulose hydrolysis revisited. J Biol Chem 287:28802-28815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.381624.
6. Tamaru Y, Karita S, Ibrahim A, Chan H, Doi RH. 2000. A large gene cluster for the Clostridium cellulovorans cellulosome. J Bacteriol 182: 5906-5910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.20.5906-5910.2000.
7. Lamed R, Setter E, Bayer EA. 1983. Characterization of a cellulosebinding, cellulase-containing complex in Clostridium thermocellum. J Bacteriol 156:828-836.
8. Johnson EA, Sakajoh M, Halliwell G, Madia A, Demain AL. 1982. Saccharification of complex cellulosic substrates by the cellulase system from Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1125-1132.
9. Fierobe HP, Bayer EA, Tardif C, Czjzek M, Mechaly A, Belaich A, Lamed R, Shoham Y, Belaich JP. 2002. Degradation of cellulose substrates by cellulosome chimeras. Substrate targeting versus proximity of enzyme components. J Biol Chem 277:49621-49630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M207672200.
10. Morais S, Barak Y, Caspi J, Hadar Y, Lamed R, Shoham Y, Wilson DB, Bayer EA. 2010. Cellulase-xylanase synergy in designer cellulosomes for enhanced degradation of a complex cellulosic substrate. mBio 1(5): e00285-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00285-10.
11. Fujita Y, Ito J, Ueda M, Fukuda H, Kondo A. 2004. Synergistic saccharification, and direct fermentation to ethanol, of amorphous cellulose by use of an engineered yeast strain codisplaying three types of cellulolytic enzyme. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1207-1212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.2.1207-1212.2004.
12. Nakanishi A, Kuroda K, Ueda M. 2012. Direct fermentation of newspaper after laccase-treatment using yeast codisplaying endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase, and β-glucosidase. Renew Energ 44:199-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.078.
13. Matsui K, Kuroda K, Ueda M. 2009. Creation of a novel peptide endowing yeasts with acid tolerance using yeast cell-surface engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:105-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1761-2.
14. Zhang YH, Cui J, Lynd LR, Kuang LR. 2006. A transition from cellulose swelling to cellulose dissolution by o-phosphoric acid: evidence from enzymatic hydrolysis and supramolecular structure. Biomacromolecules 7:644-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm050799c.
15. Nakatani Y, Yamada R, Ogino C, Kondo A. 2013. Synergetic effect of yeast cell-surface expression of cellulase and expansin-like protein on direct ethanol production from cellulose. Microb Cell Fact 12:66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-66.
16. Shibasaki S, Ueda M, Iizuka T, Hirayama M, Ikeda Y, Kamasawa N, Osumi M, Tanaka A. 2001. Quantitative evaluation of the enhanced green fluorescent protein displayed on the cell surface of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by fluorometric and confocal laser scanning microscopic analyses. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55:471-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002530000539.
17. Sakai A, Shimizu Y, Hishinuma F. 1990. Integration of heterologous genes into the chromosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a delta sequence of yeast retrotransposon Ty. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:302-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00164526.
18. Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A. 2010. Cocktail δ-integration: a novel method to construct cellulolytic enzyme expression ratio-optimized yeast strains. Microb Cell Fact 9:32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-32.
19. Shimoi H, Kitagaki H, Ohmori H, Iimura Y, Ito K. 1998. Sed1p is a major cell wall protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the stationary phase and is involved in lytic enzyme resistance. J Bacteriol 180:3381-3387.
20. Kuroda K, Matsui K, Higuchi S, Kotaka A, Sahara H, Hata Y, Ueda M. 2009. Enhancement of display efficiency in yeast display system by vector engineering and gene disruption. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:713-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1808-4.
21. Kotaka A, Sahara H, Kuroda K, Kondo A, Ueda M, Hata Y. 2010. Enhancement of β-glucosidase activity on the cell-surface of sake yeast by disruption of SED1. J Biosci Bioeng 109:442-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.11.003.
22. Matsuoka H, Hashimoto K, Saijo A, Takada Y, Kondo A, Ueda M, Ooshima H, Tachibana T, Azuma M. 2014. Cell wall structure suitable for surface display of proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 31:67-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.2995.
23. Inokuma K, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. 2014. Efficient yeast cell-surface display of exo-and endo-cellulase using the SED1 anchoring region and its original promoter. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-8.
24. Krauss J, Zverlov VV, Schwarz WH. 2012. In vitro reconstitution of the complete Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome and synergistic activity on crystalline cellulose. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4301-4307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07959-11.
25. Vazana Y, Barak Y, Unger T, Peleg Y, Shamshoum M, Ben-Yehezkel T, Mazor Y, Shapiro E, Lamed R, Bayer EA. 2013. A synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-182.
26. Molinier AL, Nouailler M, Valette O, Tardif C, Receveur-Brechot V, Fierobe HP. 2011. Synergy, structure and conformational flexibility of hybrid cellulosomes displaying various inter-cohesins linkers. J Mol Biol 405:143-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.013.
27. Bae J, Morisaka H, Kuroda K, Ueda M. 2013. Cellulosome complexes: natural biocatalysts as arming microcompartments of enzymes. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 23:370-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000351358.