The kinetochore encodes a mechanical switch to disrupt spindle assembly checkpoint signalling

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 868-879

  Aravamudhan, Pavithra ^a   Goldfarb, Alan A ^a   Joglekar, Ajit P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CELL PROTEIN; DAM1 PROTEIN; MPS1 PROTEIN; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; SPC105 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; AURORA KINASE; DAM1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; IPL1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MAD1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; MPS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NDC80 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NOCODAZOLE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PHOTOPROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; RAPAMYCIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SPC105 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; TUBULIN MODULATOR;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME INHIBITION; KINETOCHORE MICROTUBULE; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; DRUG EFFECTS; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPINDLE APPARATUS; TIME LAPSE IMAGING;

AURORA KINASES; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; LUMINESCENT PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; NOCODAZOLE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIROLIMUS; SPINDLE APPARATUS; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING; TUBULIN MODULATORS;

EID: 84934439568     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3179     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Sacristan, C., Kops, G. J. Joined at the hip: kinetochores, microtubules, and spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 21-28 (2014).
2. Foley, E. A., Kapoor, T. M. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 25-37 (2013).
3. Funabiki, H., Wynne, D. J. Making an effective switch at the kinetochore by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Chromosoma 122, 135-158 (2013).
4. McIntosh, J. R. Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 56, 613-619 (1991).
5. Maresca, T. J., Salmon, E. D. Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J. Cell Biol. 184, 373-381 (2009).
6. Wan, X. et al. Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell 137, 672-684 (2009).
7. Uchida, K. S. et al. Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 184, 383-390 (2009).
8. Santaguida, S., Musacchio, A. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28, 2511-2531 (2009).
9. Haruki, H., Nishikawa, J., Laemmli, U. K. The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol. Cell 31, 925-932 (2008).
10. Jelluma, N., Dansen, T. B., Sliedrecht, T., Kwiatkowski, N. P., Kops, G. J. Release of Mps1 from kinetochores is crucial for timely anaphase onset. J. Cell Biol. 191, 281-290 (2010).
11. Ito, D., Saito, Y., Matsumoto, T. Centromere-tethered Mps1 pombe homolog (Mph1) kinase is a sufficient marker for recruitment of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub1, but not Mad1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 209-214 (2012).
12. London, N., Ceto, S., Ranish, J. A., Biggins, S. Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 22, 900-906 (2012).
13. Pinsky, B. A., Kung, C., Shokat, K. M., Biggins, S. The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 78-83 (2006).
14. Biggins, S. et al. The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13, 532-544 (1999).
15. Heinrich, S., Windecker, H., Hustedt, N., Hauf, S. Mph1 kinetochore localization is crucial and upstream in the hierarchy of spindle assembly checkpoint protein recruitment to kinetochores. J. Cell Sci. 125, 4720-4727 (2012).
16. Yeong, F. M., Lim, H. H., Padmashree, C. G., Surana, U. Exit from mitosis in budding yeast: biphasic inactivation of the Cdc28-Clb2 mitotic kinase and the role of Cdc20. Mol. Cell 5, 501-511 (2000).
17. Palframan, W. J., Meehl, J. B., Jaspersen, S. L., Winey, M., Murray, A. W. Anaphase inactivation of the spindle checkpoint. Science 313, 680-684 (2006).
18. Rosenberg, J. S., Cross, F. R., Funabiki, H. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 21, 942-947 (2011).
19. Pinsky, B. A., Nelson, C. R., Biggins, S. Protein phosphatase 1 regulates exit from the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 19, 1182-1187 (2009).
20. Joglekar, A. P., Bloom, K., Salmon, E. D. In vivo protein architecture of the eukaryotic kinetochore with nanometer scale accuracy. Curr. Biol. 19, 694-699 (2009).
21. Aravamudhan, P., Felzer-Kim, I., Joglekar, A. P. The budding yeast point centromere associates with two Cse4 molecules during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 23, 770-774 (2013).
22. Joglekar, A. P., Bouck, D. C., Molk, J. N., Bloom, K. S., Salmon, E. D. Molecular architecture of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment site. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 581-585 (2006).
23. Aravamudhan, P., Felzer-Kim, I., Gurunathan, K., Joglekar, A. P. Assembling the protein architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore-microtubule attachment using FRET. Curr. Biol. 24, 1437-1446 (2014).
24. Howell, B. J. et al. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14, 953-964 (2004).
25. Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003).
26. Liu, X., Winey, M. The MPS1 family of protein kinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 561-585 (2012).
27. Ramey, V. H. et al. Subunit organization in the Dam1 kinetochore complex and its ring around microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4335-4342 (2011).
28. Shimogawa, M. M. et al. Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase. Curr. Biol. 16, 1489-1501 (2006).
29. Cheeseman, I. M., Enquist-Newman, M., Muller-Reichert, T., Drubin, D. G., Barnes, G. Mitotic spindle integrity and kinetochore function linked by the Duo1p/Dam1p complex. J. Cell Biol. 152, 197-212 (2001).
30. Goh, P. Y., Kilmartin, J. V. NDC10: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 121, 503-512 (1993).
31. Fraschini, R., Beretta, A., Lucchini, G., Piatti, S. Role of the kinetochore protein Ndc10 in mitotic checkpoint activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266, 115-125 (2001).
32. Kemmler, S. et al. Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. EMBO J. 28, 1099-1110 (2009).
33. Nijenhuis, W. et al. A TPR domain-containing N-terminal module of MPS1 is required for its kinetochore localization by Aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 201, 217-231 (2013).
34. Primorac, I. et al. Bub3 reads phosphorylated MELT repeats to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. eLife 2, e01030 (2013).
35. Joglekar, A. P., Chen, R., Lawrimore, J. G. A sensitized emission based calibration of FRET efficiency for probing the architecture of macromolecular machines. Cell Mol. Bioeng. 6, 369-382 (2013).
36. Guimaraes, G. J., Dong, Y., McEwen, B. F., Deluca, J. G. Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr. Biol. 18, 1778-1784 (2008).
37. Maldonado, M., Kapoor, T. M. Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 475-482 (2011).
38. Hewitt, L. et al. Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J. Cell Biol. 190, 25-34 (2010).
39. Tipton, A. R. et al. Monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1) kinase promotes production of closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) conformer and assembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 35149-35158 (2013).
40. Kim, S. et al. Phosphorylation of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates its conformational transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19772-19777 (2010).
41. London, N., Biggins, S. Mad1 kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 28, 140-152 (2014).
42. Li, Y. et al. The mitotic spindle is required for loading of the DASH complex onto the kinetochore. Genes Dev. 16, 183-197 (2002).
43. Ciferri, C. et al. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133, 427-439 (2008).
44. Wang, H. W. et al. Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 383, 894-903 (2008).
45. Tien, J. F. et al. Kinetochore biorientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a tightly folded conformation of the Ndc80 complex. Genetics 198, 1483-1493 (2014).
46. Wei, R. R. et al. Structure of a central component of the yeast kinetochore: the Spc24p/Spc25p globular domain. Structure 14, 1003-1009 (2006).
47. Pagliuca, C., Draviam, V. M., Marco, E., Sorger, P. K., De Wulf, P. Roles for the conserved Spc105p/Kre28p complex in kinetochore-microtubule binding and the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS ONE 4, e7640 (2009).
48. Espeut, J., Cheerambathur, D. K., Krenning, L., Oegema, K., Desai, A. Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 196, 469-482 (2012).
49. Hardwick, K. G., Weiss, E., Luca, F. C., Winey, M., Murray, A. W. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 273, 953-956 (1996).
50. McCleland, M. L. et al. The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity. Genes Dev. 17, 101-114 (2003).
51. DeLuca, J. G. et al. Nuf2 and Hec1 are required for retention of the checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 13, 2103-2109 (2003).
52. Howell, B. J. et al. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1159-1172 (2001).
53. Ballister, E. R., Riegman, M., Lampson, M. A. Recruitment of Mad1 to metaphase kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 204, 901-908 (2014).
54. Kuijt, T. E., Omerzu, M., Saurin, A. T., Kops, G. J. Conditional targeting of MAD1 to kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the spindle assembly checkpoint in metaphase. Chromosoma 123, 471-480 (2014).
55. McEwen, B. F., Heagle, A. B., Cassels, G. O., Buttle, K. F., Rieder, C. L. Kinetochore fiber maturation in PtK1 cells and its implications for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J. Cell Biol. 137, 1567-1580 (1997).
56. Zhang, G. et al. The Ndc80 internal loop is required for recruitment of the Ska complex to establish end-on microtubule attachment to kinetochores. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3243-3253 (2012).
57. Daum, J. R. et al. Ska3 is required for spindle checkpoint silencing and the maintenance of chromosome cohesion in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 19, 1467-1472 (2009).
58. Varma, D. et al. Recruitment of the human Cdt1 replication licensing protein by the loop domain of Hec1 is required for stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 593-603 (2012).
59. Hsu, K-S., Toda, T. Ndc80 internal loop interacts with Dis1/TOG to ensure proper kinetochore-spindle attachment in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 21, 214-220 (2011).
60. Zhou, H. X. Polymer models of protein stability, folding, and interactions. Biochemistry 43, 2141-2154 (2004).
61. Petrovic, A. et al. Modular assembly of RWD domains on the Mis12 complex underlies outer kinetochore organization. Mol. Cell 53, 591-605 (2014).
62. Scott, R. J., Lusk, C. P., Dilworth, D. J., Aitchison, J. D., Wozniak, R. W. Interactions between Mad1p and the nuclear transport machinery in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 4362-4374 (2005).
63. Wei, R. R., Sorger, P. K., Harrison, S. C. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5363-5367 (2005).
64. Gillett, E. S., Espelin, C. W., Sorger, P. K. Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 164, 535-546 (2004).
65. Jones, M. H. et al. Chemical genetics reveals a role for Mps1 kinase in kinetochore attachment during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 15, 160-165 (2005).
66. Norden, C. et al. The NoCut pathway links completion of cytokinesis to spindle midzone function to prevent chromosome breakage. Cell 125, 85-98 (2006).
67. Nakajima, Y. et al. Ipl1/Aurora-dependent phosphorylation of Sli15/INCENP regulates CPC-spindle interaction to ensure proper microtubule dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 194, 137-153 (2011).
68. Marco, E. et al. S. cerevisiae chromosomes biorient via gradual resolution of syntely between S phase and anaphase. Cell 154, 1127-1139 (2013).
69. Sprague, B. L. et al. Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle. Biophys. J. 84, 3529-3546 (2003).