Kinetochore biorientation in saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a tightly folded conformation of the Ndc80 complex

Genetics

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1483-1493

  Tien, Jerry F ^a,e   Umbreit, Neil T ^a,f   Zelter, Alex ^a   Riffle, Michael ^a,b   Hoopmann, Michael R ^c   Johnson, Richard S ^b   Fonslow, Bryan R ^d   Yates, John R ^d   MacCoss, Michael J ^b   Moritz, Robert L ^c   Asbury, Charles L ^b   Davis, Trisha N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (United States)

^d SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^f DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NDC80 COMPLEX; NDC80 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CELL VIABILITY; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENE MUTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS INHIBITION; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; YEAST CELL; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ALLELES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84915747999     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.167775     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akiyoshi, B., K. K. Sarangapani, A. F. Powers, C. R. Nelson, S. L. Reichow et al., 2010 Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 468: 576-579.
2. Alushin, G. M., V. H. Ramey, S. Pasqualato, D. A. Ball, N. Grigorieff et al., 2010 The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature 467: 805-810.
3. Anderson, M., J. Haase, E. Yeh, and K. Bloom, 2009 Function and assembly of DNA looping, clustering, and microtubule attachment complexes within a eukaryotic kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell 20: 4131-4139.
4. Aravamudhan, P., I. Felzer-Kim, K. Gurunathan, and A. P. Joglekar, 2014 Assembling the protein architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore-microtubule attachment using FRET. Curr. Biol. 24: 1437-1446.
5. Biggins, S., and A. W. Murray, 2001 The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15: 3118-3129.
6. Biggins, S., N. Bhalla, A. Chang, D. L. Smith, and A. W. Murray, 2001 Genes involved in sister chromatid separation and segregation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159: 453-470.
7. Cane, S., A. A. Ye, S. J. Luks-Morgan, and T. J. Maresca, 2013 Elevated polar ejection forces stabilize kinetochoremicrotubule attachments. J. Cell Biol. 200: 203-218.
8. Ciferri, C., S. Pasqualato, E. Screpanti, G. Varetti, S. Santaguida et al., 2008 Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133: 427-439.
9. De Wulf, P., A. D. McAinsh, and P. K. Sorger, 2003 Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Genes Dev. 17: 2902-2921.
10. Franck, A. D., A. F. Powers, D. R. Gestaut, T. N. Davis, and C. L. Asbury, 2010 Direct physical study of kinetochore-microtubule interactions by reconstitution and interrogation with an optical force clamp. Methods 51: 242-250.
11. Hauf, S., 2013 The spindle assembly checkpoint: progress and persistent puzzles. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41: 1755-1760.
12. Herzog, F., A. Kahraman, D. Boehringer, R. Mak, A. Bracher et al., 2012 Structural probing of a protein phosphatase 2A network by chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Science 337: 1348-1352.
13. Honts, J. E., T. S. Sandrock, S. M. Brower, J. L. O'Dell, and A. E. Adams, 1994 Actin mutations that show suppression with fimbrin mutations identify a likely fimbrin-binding site on actin. J. Cell Biol. 126: 413-422.
14. Janke, C., J. Ortiz, J. Lechner, A. Shevchenko, M. M. Magiera et al., 2001 The budding yeast proteins Spc24p and Spc25p interact with Ndc80p and Nuf2p at the kinetochore and are important for kinetochore clustering and checkpoint control. EMBO J. 20: 777-791.
15. Joglekar, A. P., K. Bloom, and E. D. Salmon, 2009 In vivo protein architecture of the eukaryotic kinetochore with nanometer scale accuracy. Curr. Biol. 19: 694-699.
16. Kall, L., J. D. Canterbury, J. Weston, W. S. Noble, and M. J. Mac- Coss, 2007 Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 4: 923-925.
17. Larkin, M. A., G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown, R. Chenna, P. A. McGettigan et al., 2007 Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948.
18. Liu, D., G. Vader, M. J. Vromans, M. A. Lampson, and S. M. Lens, 2009 Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 323: 1350-1353.
19. Lupas, A. N., and M. Gruber, 2005 The structure of alpha-helical coiled coils. Adv. Protein Chem. 70: 37-78.
20. Maiolica, A., D. Cittaro, D. Borsotti, L. Sennels, C. Ciferri et al., 2007 Structural analysis of multiprotein complexes by crosslinking, mass spectrometry, and database searching. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6: 2200-2211.
21. Malvezzi, F., G. Litos, A. Schleiffer, A. Heuck, K. Mechtler et al., 2013 A structural basis for kinetochore recruitment of the Ndc80 complex via two distinct centromere receptors. EMBO J. 32: 409-423.
22. Muller, E. G. D., B. E. Snydsman, I. Novik, D. W. Hailey, D. R. Gestaut et al., 2005 The organization of the core proteins of the yeast spindle pole body. Mol. Biol. Cell 16: 3341-3352.
23. Nasmyth, K. A., and K. Tatchell, 1980 The structure of transposable yeast mating type loci. Cell 19: 753-764.
24. Nicklas, R. B., and C. A. Koch, 1969 Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of maloriented chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 43: 40-50.
25. Nishimura, K., T. Fukagawa, H. Takisawa, T. Kakimoto, and M. Kanemaki, 2009 An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6: 917-922.
26. Nishino, T., F. Rago, T. Hori, K. Tomii, I. M. Cheeseman et al., 2013 CENP-T provides a structural platform for outer kinetochore assembly. EMBO J. 32: 424-436.
27. Osborne, M. A., G. Schlenstedt, T. Jinks, and P. A. Silver, 1994 Nuf2, a spindle pole body-associated protein required for nuclear division in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125: 853-866.
28. Pinsky, B. A., C. Kung, K. M. Shokat, and S. Biggins, 2006 The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 78-83.
29. Powers, A. F., A. D. Franck, D. R. Gestaut, J. Cooper, B. Gracyzk et al., 2009 The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell 136: 865-875.
30. Tanaka, T. U., N. Rachidi, C. Janke, G. Pereira, M. Galova et al., 2002 Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore- spindle pole connections. Cell 108: 317-329.
31. Tien, J. F., N. T. Umbreit, D. R. Gestaut, A. D. Franck, J. Cooper et al., 2010 Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 189: 713-723.
32. Tien, J. F., K. K. Fong, N. T. Umbreit, C. Payen, A. Zelter et al., 2013 Coupling unbiased mutagenesis to high-throughput DNA sequencing uncovers functional domains in the Ndc80 kinetochore protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195: 159-170.
33. Wang, H. W., S. Long, C. Ciferri, S. Westermann, D. Drubin et al., 2008 Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 383: 894-903.
34. Waterhouse, A. M., J. B. Procter, D. M. Martin, M. Clamp, and G. J. Barton, 2009 Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25: 1189- 1191.
35. Wei, R. R., P. K. Sorger, and S. C. Harrison, 2005 Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 5363-5367.
36. Wei, R. R., J. Al-Bassam, and S. C. Harrison, 2007 The Ndc80/ HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14: 54-59.
37. Wigge, P. A., and J. V. Kilmartin, 2001 The Ndc80p complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains conserved centromere components and has a function in chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 152: 349-360.
38. Wigge, P. A., O. N. Jensen, S. Holmes, S. Soues, M. Mann et al., 1998 Analysis of the Saccharomyces spindle pole by matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. J. Cell Biol. 141: 967-977.
39. GEISER, J. R., H. A. SUNDBERG, B. H. CHANG, E. G. MULLER and T. N. DAVIS, 1993 The essential mitotic target of calmodulin is the 110-kilodalton component of the spindle pole body in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 13: 7913- 7924.
40. GREENLAND, K. B., H. DING, M. COSTANZO, C. BOONE and T. N. DAVIS, 2010 Identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body remodeling factors. PLoS One 5: e15426.
41. MCDONNELL, A. V., T. JIANG, A. E. KEATING and B. BERGER, 2006 Paircoil2: improved prediction of coiled coils from sequence. Bioinformatics 22: 356-358.
42. WARGACKI, M. M., J. C. TAY, E. G. MULLER, C. L. ASBURY and T. N. DAVIS, 2010 Kip3, the yeast kinesin-8, is required for clustering of kinetochores at metaphase. Cell Cycle 9: 2581-2588.