Avatars versus agents: A meta-analysis quantifying the effect of agency on social influence

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 401-432

  Fox, Jesse ^a   Ahn, Sun Joo Grace ^b   Janssen, Joris H ^c   Yeykelis, Leo ^d   Segovia, Kathryn Y ^d   Bailenson, Jeremy N ^d  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE TASKS; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; DESIGN IMPLICATIONS; INTERACTION EFFECT; OBJECTIVE MEASURE; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; VIRTUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84931444625     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2014.921494     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ahn, S. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2011). Self-endorsing versus other-endorsing in virtual environments: The effect on brand preference. Journal of Advertising, 40, 93-106. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367400207
2. Ahn, S. J., Fox, J., Dale, K. R., & Avant, J. A. (in press). Framing virtual experiences: Effects on environmental efficacy and behavior over time. Communication Research. Retrieved from http://crx.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/05/27/0093650214534973
3. Allport, G. (1985). The historical background of social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 1-46). New York, NY: Random House.
4. Appel, J., von der Pütten, A., Krämer, N. C., & Gratch, J. (2012). Does humanity matter? Analyzing the importance of social cues and the perceived agency of a computer system for the emergence of social reactions during human-computer interaction. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. Article ID 324694. doi:10.1155/2012/324694
5. Arena, D. A., Schwartz, D. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Effects of social belief on spatial learning in virtual reality. Proceedings of the Games, Learning,&Society Conference 5.0. Madison, WI. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00019-9
6. Assaf, M., Kahn, I., Pearlson, G. D., Johnson, M. R., Yeshurun, Y., Calhoun, V. D., & Hendler, T. (2009). Brain activity dissociates mentalization from motivation during an interpersonal competitive game. Brain Imaging & Behavior, 3, 24-37. doi:10.1007/s11682-008-9047-
7. Bailenson, J. N., Aharoni, E., Beall, A. C., Guadagno, R. E., Dimov, A., & Blascovich, J. (2004). Comparing behavioral and self-report measures of embodied agents' social presence in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Workshop on PRESENCE. Valencia, Spain. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95
8. Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 819-833. doi:10.1177/0146167203029007002
9. Bailenson, J. N., Patel, K., Nielsen, A., Bajcsy, R., Jung, S., & Kurillo, G. (2008). The effect of interactivity on learning physical actions in virtual reality. Media Psychology, 11, 354-376. doi:10.1177/0146167203029007002
10. Bellotti, V., & Edwards, K. (2001). Intelligibility and accountability: Human considerations in context-aware systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 193-212. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI16234-05
11. Benford, S., Bowers, J., Fahlén, L. E., Greenhalgh, C., & Snowdon, D. (1997). Embodiments, avatars, clones, and agents for multi-user, multi-sensory virtual worlds. Multimedia Systems, 5, 93-104. doi:10.1007/s005300050045
12. Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34, 287-318. doi:10.1002/ab.20279
13. Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2005). Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In J. C. J. Kuppevelt, L. Dybkjaer, & N. O. Bernson (Eds.), Advances in natural multimodal dialogue systems (pp. 1-32). New York, NY: Springer.
14. Blascovich, J. (2002). Social influence within immersive virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 127-145). London, UK: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
15. Blascovich, J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2011). Infinite reality: Avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolution. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
16. Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 103-124. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1302-01
17. Bracken, C. C., & Skalski, P. D. (2010). Immersed in media: Telepresence in everyday life. New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., & Churchill, E. F. (Eds.). (2000). Embodied conversational agents. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19. Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the efforts towards learning. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 18, 334-352. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9180-4
20. Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21. D'Mello, S. K., Graesser, A., & King, B. (2010). Toward spoken human-computer tutorial dialogues. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 289-323. doi:10/1080/07370024.2010.499850
22. Eastin, M. S. (2006). Video game violence and the female game player: Self and opponent gender effects on presence and aggressive thoughts. Human Communication Research, 31, 351-372. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9180-4
23. Eastin, M. S., & Griffiths, R. P. (2006). Beyond the shooter game: Examining presence and hostile outcomes among male game players. Communication Research, 33, 448-466. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00279
24. Eastwick, P. W., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Is it a game? Evidence for social influence in the virtual world. Social Influence, 4, 18-32. doi:10.1177/0093650206293249
25. Fan, X., McNeese, M., & Yen, J. (2010). NDM-based cognitive agents for supporting decisionmaking teams. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 195-234. doi:10.1080/07370020903586720
26. Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 95-113. doi:10.1080/15534510802254087
27. Fox, J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychology, 12, 1-25. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95
28. Fox, J., Bailenson, J. N., & Tricase, L. (2013). The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 930-938. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.027
29. Gajadhar, B. J., de Kort, Y. A. W., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2008). Shared fun is doubled fun: Player enjoyment as a function of social setting. Proceedings of the FnG 2008 International Conference on Fun and Games. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
30. Gajadhar, B. J., Nap, H. H., de Kort, Y. A. W., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2010). Out of sight, out of mind: Co-player effects on seniors' player experience. Proceedings of the FnG 2010 International Conference on Fun and Games. New York, NY: ACM.
31. Gerhard, M., Moore,D. J., & Hobbs,D. J. (2001, January). Continuous presence in collaborative virtual environments: Towards a hybrid avatar-agent model for user representation. In Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 137-155). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
32. Gong, L., & Nass, C. (2007). When a talking-face computer agent is half-human and halfhumanoid: Human identity and consistency preference. Human Communication Research, 33, 163-193. doi:10.1080/15213260801906489
33. Gratch, J., Morency, P., Scherer, S., Stratou, G., Boberg, J., Koenig, S., Adamson, T., & Rizzo, A. (2013). User-state sensing for virtual health agents and telehealth applications. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 184, 151-157. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-209-7-151.
34. Gratch, J., Rickel, J., André, E., Cassell, J., Petajan, E., & Badler, N. (2002). Creating interactive virtual humans: Some assembly required. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 54-63. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00295.x
35. Guadagno, R. E., Blascovich, J., Bailenson, J. N., & McCall, C. (2007). Virtual humans and persuasion: The effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology, 10, 1-22. doi:10.1109/MIS.2002.1024753
36. Guadagno, R. E., Swinth, K. R., & Blascovich, J. (2011). Social evaluations of embodied agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2380-2385. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.017
37. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
38. Hoyt, C. L., Blascovich, J., & Swinth, K. R. (2003). Social inhibition in virtual environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12, 183-195. doi:10.1080/15213260701300865
39. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. doi:10.1162/105474603321640932
40. Ivory, J. D., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2007). The effects of technological advancement and violent content in video games on players' feelings of presence, involvement, physiological arousal, and aggression. Journal of Communication, 57, 532-555. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00356.x
41. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78. doi:10.2307/2746461
42. Kiesler, S., Powers, A., Fussell, S. R., & Torrey, C. (2008). Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Social Cognition, 26, 169-181. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.169
43. Lee, E.-J. (2010). What triggers social responses to flattering computers? Experimental tests of anthropormorphism and mindlessness explanations. Communication Research, 37, 191-214. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00386.x
44. Lee, J.-E. R., Nass, C., Brave, S. B., Morishima, Y., Nakajima, H., & Yamada, R. (2007). The case for caring colearners: The effects of a computer-mediated colearner agent on trust and learning. Journal of Communication, 57, 183-204. doi:10.1177/0093650209356389
45. Levine, T. R., Asada, K. J., & Carpenter, C. (2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analyses: Evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings. Communication Monographs, 76, 286-302. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
46. Lim, S., & Reeves, B. (2010). Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 57-68. doi:10.1080/03637750903074685
47. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.008. Available from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
48. Mandryk, R. L., Inkpen, K. M., & Calvert, T. W. (2006). Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25, 141-158. doi:10.1080/01449290500331156
49. McFarlane, D. C., & Latorella, K. A. (2002). The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 1-61. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1701-1
50. Merritt, T., & McGee, K. (2012). Protecting artificial team-mates: More seems like less. Proceedings of the CHI 2012 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
51. Merritt, T., McGee, K., Chuah, T. L., & Ong, C. (2011). Choosing human team-mates: Perceived identity as a moderator of player preference and enjoyment. Proceedings of the FDG 2011 International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games. New York, NY: ACM.
52. Merritt, T., Ong, C., Chuah, T. L., & McGee, K. (2011, January). Did you notice? Artificial team-mates take risks for players. In Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 338-349). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
53. Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
54. Morkes, J., Kernal, H. K., & Nass, C. (1999). Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 395-435. doi:10.1207/S15327051hci1404-2
55. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669-678. doi:10.1080/01449290500331156
56. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073
57. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 864-876. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153
58. Nowak, K. (2004). The influence of anthropomorphism and agency on social judgment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(2). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00311.x. Available from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue2/nowak.html
59. Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12, 481-494. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00284.x
60. Okita, S. Y., Bailenson, J. N., & Schwartz, D. L. (2008). The mere belief in social interaction improves learning. Proceedings of the ICSL 2008 International Conference on International Conference for the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Ong, C., McGee, K., & Chuah, T. L. (2012). Closing the human-AI team-mate gap: how changes to displayed information impact player behavior towards computer teammates. Proceedings of the CHI 2012 Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. New York, NY: ACM.
62. Persky, S., & Blascovich, J. (2007). Immersive virtual environments versus traditional platforms: Effects of violent and nonviolent video game playing. Media Psychology, 10, 135-156. doi:10.1080/15213260701301236
63. Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (1995). Understanding and using meta-analysis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 18, 315-335. doi:10.1080/15213260701301236
64. Ravaja, N. (2009). The psychophysiology of digital gaming: The effect of a non co-located opponent. Media Psychology, 12, 268-294. doi:10.1177/016327879501800306
65. Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M., & Kivikangas, M. (2006). Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? PRESENCE: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 15, 381-392. doi:10.1080/15213260903052240
66. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge.
67. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analysis: A review. Psychosomatic Medicine, 53, 247-271.
68. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59.
69. Segovia, K. Y. & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtually true: Children's acquisition of false memories in virtual reality. Media Psychology, 12, 371-393. doi:10.1080/15213260903287267
70. Segovia, K. Y., & Bailenson, J. N. Virtual first impressions and their persistence in the physical world. Unpublished manuscript.
71. Sherry, J. L. (2001). The effects of violent video games on aggression: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 27, 409-431. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00787.x
72. Skalski, P., & Tamborini, R. (2007). The role of social presence in interactive agent-based persuasion. Media Psychology, 10, 385-413. doi:10.1080/15213260701533102
73. Slater, M. (2004). How colorful was your day? Why questionnaires cannot assess presence in virtual environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 13, 484-493. doi:10.1162/1054746041944849
74. Staiano, A. E., & Calvert, S. L. (2011). Wii tennis play for low-income African American adolescents' energy expenditure. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 1.
75. Swinth, K. R., & Blascovich, J. (2001, June). Conformity to group norms in an immersive virtual environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
76. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
77. Takayama, L. (2012). Perspectives on agency: Interacting with and through personal robots. In M. Zacarias & J. V. Oliveira (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: The agency perspective (pp. 111-132). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
78. Tinwell, A., Grimshaw, M., & Abdel-Nabi, D. (2011). Effect of emotion and articulation of speech on the uncanny valley in virtual characters. In Affective computing & intelligent interaction (pp. 557-566). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
79. von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Gratch, J., & Kang, S.-H. (2010). "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1641-1650. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012
80. Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y., & Groner, R. (2008). Playing online games against computer vs. human-controlled opponents. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2274-2291. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.11.002
81. Williams, R. B., & Clippinger, C. A. (2002). Aggression, competition and computer games: Computer and human opponents. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 495-506. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00009-2
82. Yee,N., Bailenson, J. N., & Rickertsen, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. Proceedings of the CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
83. Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, selfesteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560-567. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006
84. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.