Does humanity matter? Analyzing the importance of social cues and perceived agency of a computer system for the emergence of social reactions during human-computer interaction

Advances in Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 2012, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Appel, Jana ^a   Von Der Pütten, Astrid ^a   Krämer, Nicole C ^a   Gratch, Jonathan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866163430     PISSN: 16875893     EISSN: 16875907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2012/324694     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Quintanar L., Crowell C., Pryor J., Adampoulos J., Human computer interaction: a preliminary social psychological analysis. Behaviour Research Methods & Instrumentation 1982 14 2 210 220
2. Nass C., Tauber E., Reeder H., Anthropomorphism, agency and ethopoeia: computers as social actors. Proceeding of the International Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '93) 1993 111 112
3. Reeves B., Nass C. I., The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places 1996 New York, NY, USA Cambridge University Press
4. Nass C., Steuer J., Tauber E. R., Computer are social actors. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94) April 1994 New York, NY, USA ACM Press 72 78 2-s2.0-0028014961
5. Nass C., Moon Y., Carney P., Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1999 29 5 1093 1110 2-s2.0-0033121347
6. Nass C., Moon Y., Green N., Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1997 27 10 864 876 2-s2.0-0031574796
7. Nass C., Steuer J., Henriksen L., Dryer D. C., Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to self- or other- evaluations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1994 40 3 543 559 2-s2.0-0028383315 10.1006/ijhc.1994.1025
8. Nass C., Fogg B. J., Moon Y., Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1996 45 6 669 678 2-s2.0-0030380243 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073 (Pubitemid 126374567)
9. Bailenson J. N., Blascovich J., Avatars. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction 2004 Berkshire Publishing Group 64 68
10. Blascovich J., Loomis J., Beall A. C., Swinth K. R., Hoyt C. L., Bailenson J. N., Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 2002 13 2 103 124 2-s2.0-0036375333 (Pubitemid 36704071)
11. Morkes J., Kernal H. K., Nass C., Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: a direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction 1999 14 4 395 435 2-s2.0-0033344347 (Pubitemid 30558575)
12. Hoyt C. L., Blascovich J., Swinth K. R., Social inhibition in immersive virtual environments. Presence 2003 12 2 183 195 2-s2.0-0037650077 10.1162/105474603321640932 (Pubitemid 36573740)
13. Guadagno R. E., Blascovich J., Bailenson J. N., McCall C., Virtual humans and persuasion: the effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology 2007 10 1 1 22 2-s2.0-34547410940 10.108/15213260701300865
14. von der Pütten A., Krämer N. C., Gratch J., Kang S.-H., 'It doesn't matter what you are!' explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behaviour 2010 26 6 1641 1650 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012
15. Nass C., Moon Y., Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 2000 56 1 81 103 2-s2.0-0033933096 (Pubitemid 30442265)
16. Gratch J., Okhmatovskaia A., Lamothe F., Marsella S., Morales M., van der Werf R. J., Virtual rapport. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents 2006 Marina Del Rey, Calif, USA Springer
17. Gratch J., Wang N., Gerten J., Fast E., Duffy R., Pelachaud C., Martin J.-C., André E., Chollet G., Karpouzis K., Pelé D., Creating rapport with virtual agents. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA '07) 2007 Paris, France LNAI 4722 Springer 125 138 (Pubitemid 350271480)
18. Gratch J., Wang N., Okhmatovskaia A., Lamothe F., Morales M., Morency L.-P., Jacko J., Can virtual humans be more engaging than real ones? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments, Part III (HCII '07) 2007 Beijing, China LNCS 4552 Springer 286 297
19. Bailenson J. N., Blascovich J., Beall A. C., Loomis J. M., Equilibrium theory revisited: mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence 2001 10 6 583 598 2-s2.0-0038421876 10.1162/105474601753272844 (Pubitemid 33580002)
20. Bailenson J. N., Blascovich J., Beall A. C., Loomis J. M., Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003 29 7 819 833 2-s2.0-0037865879 10.1177/0146167203029007002 (Pubitemid 36776872)
21. Langer E. J., Matters of mind: mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition 1992 1 3 289 305 2-s2.0-38249011020
22. Langer E. J., Mindfulness 1989 Reading, Mass, USA Addison-Wesley
23. Langer E. J., Moldoveanu M., The construct of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues 2000 56 1 1 9 2-s2.0-0033936665 (Pubitemid 30442260)
24. Rossen B., Johnson K., Deladisma A., Lind S., Lok B., Prendinger H., Lester J., Ishizuka M., Virtual humans elicit skin-tone bias consistent with real-world skin-tone biases. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA '08) 2008 Tokyo, Japan LNAI 5208 Springer 237 244
25. Hoffmann L., Krämer N. C., Lam-chi A., Kopp S., Ruttkay Z., Media equation revisited: do users show polite reactions towards an embodied agent? Proceeding of 9th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA '09) 2009 Amsterdam, Netherlands LNAI 5773 Springer 159 165
26. Dehn D. M., van Mulken S., The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2000 52 1 1 22 2-s2.0-0033895129 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0325 (Pubitemid 30558463)
27. Bente G., Krämer N. C., Petersen A., de Ruiter J. P., Computer animated movement and person perception: methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2001 25 3 151 166 2-s2.0-0035629595 10.1023/A:1010690525717
28. Parise S., Kiesler S. B., Sproull L., Waters K., Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior 1999 15 2 123 142 2-s2.0-0032675279 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00035-1
29. Sproull L., Subramani M., Kiesler S., Walker J. H., Waters K., When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction 1996 11 2 97 124 2-s2.0-0029710413 (Pubitemid 126706063)
30. Rickenberg R., Reeves B., The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00) April 2000 49 56 2-s2.0-0033702306
31. Krämer N. C., Bente G., Piesk J., Bieber G., Kirste T., The ghost in the machine. The influence of Embodied Conversational Agents on user expectations and user behaviour in a TV/VCR application. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mobile Computing, Assistance, Mobility, Applications (IMC '03) Rostock, Germany 121 128
32. Aharoni E., Fridlund A. J., Social reactions toward people vs. computers: how mere lables shape interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 2007 23 5 2175 2189 2-s2.0-33947576210 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.019 (Pubitemid 46483976)
33. Nass C., Isbister K., Lee E.-J., Cassell J., Sullivan J., Prevost S., Churchill E., Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents. Embodied Conversational Agents 2000 Cambridge, Mass, USA The MIT Press 374 401
34. Nowak K., Biocca F., The influence of agency and the virtual body on presence, social presence and copresence in a computer mediated interaction. Proceedings of the 3rd International Presence Workshop 2001 Philadelphia, Pa, USA
35. Morency L. P., Sidner C., Darrell T., Towards context-based visual feedback Recognition for Embodied Agents. Proceedings of the Symposium on Conversational Informatics for Supporting Social Intelligence and Interaction 2005 Hatfield, UK AISB 69 72
36. Watson D., Tellegen A., Clark L. A., Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988 54 6 1063 1070 2-s2.0-0024023344
37. Short J., Williams E., Christie B., The Social Psychology of Telecommunications 1976 London, UK John Wiley & Sons
38. Biocca F., Harms C., Gouveia F. R., Biocca F., Defining and measuring social presence: contribution to the net-worked minds theory and measure. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Presence 2002 7 36
39. Biocca F., Harms C., Burgoon J. K., Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence 2003 12 5 456 480 2-s2.0-0942300756 10.1162/105474603322761270 (Pubitemid 38137120)
40. Biocca F., Harms C., Gregg J., The networked minds measure of social presence: pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence May 2001 Philadelphia, Pa, USA
41. Tickle-Degnen L., Rosenthal R., The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry 1990 1 4 285 293 2-s2.0-0000925204
42. Manning T. R., Goetz E. T., Street R. L., Signal delay effects on rapport in telepsychiatry. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2000 3 2 119 127 2-s2.0-0034002612 10.1089/109493100315978 (Pubitemid 30225250)
43. Mayring P., Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken 1996 3rd Weinheim, Germany Psychologie Verlags Union
44. Leiner D., ofb.msd-media.de. 2009