Closing the human-AI team-mate gap: How changes to displayed information impact player behavior towards computer teammates

Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 433-439

  Ong, Christopher ^a   McGee, Kevin ^a   Chuah, Teong Leong ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

artificial teammates; representation; teammate games

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL AGENTS; ARTIFICIAL TEAMMATES; COMPUTER-MEDIATED ENVIRONMENT; COOPERATIVE GAME; PLAYER BEHAVIOR; REPRESENTATION; TEAMMATE GAMES;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84872295805     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2414536.2414604     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. E. Fantino and A. Kennelly. Sharing the wealth: factors influencing resource allocation in the sharing game. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 91(3):337-354, May 2009.
2. L. Gong. How social is social responses to computers? the function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4):1494-1509, 2008. (Pubitemid 351551477)
3. K. J. Haley and D. M. T. Fessler. Nobody's watching? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3):245-256, May 2005.
4. A. Kennelly and E. Fantino. The Sharing Game: Fairness in resource allocation as a function of incentive, gender, and recipient types. Judgement and Decision Making, 2(3):204-216, June 2007.
5. S. Kiesler, L. Sproull, and K. Waters. A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(1):47-65, Jan. 1996. (Pubitemid 126420661)
6. T. Koda and P. Maes. Agents with faces: the effect of personification. Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pages 189-194, 1996.
7. E.-J. Lee and C. Nass. Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 28(3):349-381, 2002.
8. S. Lim and B. Reeves. Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(1-2):57-68, Jan. 2010.
9. T. Merritt. A Failure of Imagination: How andWhy People Respond Differently to Human and Computer Team-mates. PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, 2012.
10. T. Merritt, T. L. Chuah, C. Ong, and K. McGee. Choosing human team-mates: perceived identity as a moderator of player preference and enjoyment. In the proceedings of the 2011 Foundations of Digital Games Conference. Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games (SASDG), ACM Press, June 2011.
11. T. Merritt, C. Ong, T. L. Chuah, and K. McGee. Did you notice? Artificial team-mates take risks for players. In 11th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, Sept. 2011.
12. T. R. Merritt, K. B. Tan, C. Ong, A. Thomas, T. L. Chuah, and K. McGee. Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW '11, pages 685-688, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
13. J. A. Toth. The effects of interactive graphics and text on social influence in computer-mediated small groups. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW '94, pages 299-310, New York, NY, USA, 1994. ACM.
14. D.Weibel, B. Wissmath, S. Habegger, Y. Steiner, and R. Groner. Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5):2274-2291, Sept. 2008.