What triggers social responses to flattering computers? Experimental tests of anthropomorphism and mindlessness explanations

Communication Research

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 191-214

  Lee, Eun Ju ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Computers are social actors (CASA); Flattery; Human computer interaction (HCI); Mindlessness

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949361752     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650209356389     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bailenson, J.N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., & Loomis, J.M. (2001). Equilibrium revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence, 10, 583-598.
2. Berger, C.R., Johnson, J.T., & Lee, E.-J. (2003). Antidotes for anthrax anecdotes: The role of rationality and base-rate data in assuaging apprehension. Communication Research, 30, 198-223.
3. Berger, C.R., Lee, E.-J., & Johnson, J.T. (2003). Gender, rationality, and base-rate explanations for increasing trends. Communication Research, 30, 737-765.
4. Cassell, J., & Thorisson, K.R. (1999). The power of a nod and a glance: Envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 519-538.
5. Chanowitz, B., & Langer, E. (1981). Premature cognitive commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1051-1063.
6. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
7. Dolinski, D., Ciszek, M., Godlewski, K., & Zawadzki, M. (2002). Fear-then-relief, mindlessness, and cognitive deficits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 435-447.
8. Dutta-Bergman, M.J. (2004). The impact of completeness and Web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication, 54, 253-269.
9. Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1975). An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 32, 136-144.
10. Epstein, S. (1994). An integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
11. Epstein, S., & Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462-482). New York: Guilford.
12. Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M.J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of Web-based information. New Media & Society, 9, 319-342.
13. Fogg, B.J., & Nass, C. (1997). Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 551-561.
14. Gilbert, D.T., & Hixon, J.G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
15. Gilbert, D.T., Pelham, B.W., & Krull, D.S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
16. Hinds, P.J., Roberts, T.L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 151-181.
17. Johnson, D., Gardner, J., & Wiles, J. (2004). Experience as a moderator of the media equation: The impact of flattery and praise. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 237-258.
18. Kramer, R.M. (1994). The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 199-230.
19. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46-70.
20. Langer, E.J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137-173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Langer, E.J. (1992). Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 1, 289-305.
22. Langer, E.J., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of placebic information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635-642.
23. Langer, E.J., & Imber, L. (1979). When practice makes imperfect: The debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2014-2025.
24. Langer, E.J., & Weinman, C. (1981). When thinking disrupts intellectual performance: Mindfulness on an overlearned task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 240-243.
25. Lee, E.-J. (2008). Gender stereotyping of computers: Resource depletion or reduced attention? Journal of Communication, 58, 301-320.
26. Lee, K.M., Park, N., & Song, H. (2005). Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot's long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people's social responses toward it. Human Communication Research, 31, 538-563.
27. Main, K.J., Dahl, D.W., & Darke, P.R. (2007). Deliberative and automatic bases of suspicion: Empirical evidence of the sinister attribution error. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 59-69.
28. Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 323-339.
29. Moon, Y., & Nass, C. (1996). How real are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23, 651-674.
30. Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669-678.
32. Nass, C., & Lee, K.M. (2001). Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 171-181.
33. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103.
34. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 864-876.
35. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
36. Parise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., & Waters, K. (1999). Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 123-142.
37. Park, S., & Catrambone, R. (2007). Social facilitation effects of virtual humans. Human Factors, 49, 1054-1060.
38. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
39. Pollock, C.L., Smith, S.D., Knowles, E.S., & Bruce, H.J. (1998). Mindfulness limits compliance with the that's-not-all technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1153-1157.
40. Powers, A., & Kiesler, S. (2006). The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction. Salt Lake City, UT.
41. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., & Walker, J.H. (1996). When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 97-124.
43. Sundar, S.S. (2004). Loyalty to computer terminals: Is it anthropomorphism or consistency? Behaviour & Information Technology, 23, 107-118.
44. Sundar, S.S., & Nass, C. (2000). Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, net-worker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27, 683-703.
45. Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M.D. (2002). The heuristic-systematic model of social information processing. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 195-211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Warnick, B. (2004). Online ethos: Source credibility in an authorless environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 256-265.
47. Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N., & Rickertsen, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces (Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [ACM SIGCHI]). New York: ACM Press.
48. Zajonc, R.B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.