Protecting artificial team-mates: More seems like less

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 2793-2802

  Merritt, Tim ^a   McGee, Kevin ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

CASA; CSCP; Team mate

Indexed keywords

CASA; COOPERATIVE GAME; COOPERATIVE SYSTEMS; CSCP; TEAM-MATE;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84862066915     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2208680     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Abraham, A. T., and McGee, K. AI for dynamic team-mate adaptation in games. In Proc. CIG '10 (Aug. 2010), 419-426.
2. Beaton, B., Harrison, S., and Tatar, D. Digital drumming: a study of co-located, highly coordinated, dyadic collaboration. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 1417-1426.
3. Blascovich, J. A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments. In Proc. CVE '02, ACM Press (2002), 25-30.
4. Fehr, E., and Rockenbach, B. Human altruism: economic, neural, and evolutionary perspectives. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 6 (Dec. 2004), 784-790.
5. Gajadhar, B., de Kort, Y., and IJsselsteijn, W. Influence of social setting on player experience of digital games. In Proc. of CHI EA '08, ACM Press (2008), 3099-3104.
6. Hayashi, Y., and Miwa, K. Cognitive and emotional characteristics of communication in Human-Human/Human-Agent interaction. In Proc. CogSci '09, Springer-Verlag (2009), 267-274.
7. Johnson, D., and Gardner, J. The media equation and team formation: Further evidence for experience as a moderator. IJHCS 65, 2 (2007), 111-124.
8. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., and Waters, K. A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 1 (Jan. 1996), 47-65.
9. Kuziemko, I., Buell, R. W., Reich, T., and Norton, M. I. "last-place aversion": Evidence and redistributive implications. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (July 2011), 17234+.
10. Lim, S., and Reeves, B. Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. IJHCS 68, 1-2 (January 2010), 57-68.
11. Mandryk, R. L., Inkpen, K. M., and Calvert, T. W. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behav. Inform. Technol. 25, 2 (Apr. 2006), 141-158.
12. Merritt, T., Chuah, T. L., Ong, C., and McGee, K. Choosing human team-mates: higher enjoyment and preference for human vs. AI team-mates in cooperative games. In Proc. FDG '11, ACM Press (2011).
13. Merritt, T., Ong, C., Chuah, T., and McGee, K. Did you notice? artificial Team-Mates take risks for players intelligent virtual agents. vol. 6895 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2011, ch. 37, 338-349.
14. Merritt, T. R., Tan, K. B., Ong, C., Thomas, A., Chuah, T. L., and McGee, K. Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games. In Proc. CSCW '11, ACM Press (2011), 685-688.
15. Miwa, K., and Terai, H. Analysis of human-human and human-computer agent interactions from the viewpoint of design of and attribution to a partner. In Proc. CogSci '06, Springer-Verlag (2006), 597-602.
16. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., and Moon, Y. Can computers be teammates? IJHCS 45, 6 (December 1996), 669-678.
17. Nass, C., Isbister, K., and Lee, E. Truth is beauty: Researching embodied conversational agents. In Embodied conversational agents, J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill, Eds. MIT Press, Apr. 2000, 374-402.
18. Nowak, K. L., and Biocca, F. The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism of users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence-Teleop. Virt. 12 (Oct. 2003), 481-494.
19. Oviatt, S., and Adams, B. Designing and evaluating conversational interfaces with animated characters. In Embodied conversational agents, J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill, Eds. MIT Press, Apr. 2000, 319-345.
20. Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M., and Kivikangas, M. Spatial Presence and Emotions during Video Game Playing: Does It Matter with Whom You Play? Presence-Teleop. Virt. 15 (August 2006), 381-392.
21. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge U. Press, 1996.
22. Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., and Cohen, J. D. The neural basis of economic Decision-Making in the ultimatum game. Science 300, 5626 (June 2003), 1755-1758.
23. Shechtman, N., and Horowitz, L. M. Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people. In Proc. CHI '03, ACM Press (2003), 281-288.
24. Tankersley, D., Stowe, C. J., and Huettel, S. A. Altruism is associated with an increased neural response to agency. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 2 (Jan. 2007), 150-151.
25. Turkle, S. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. The MIT Press, Sept. 2005.
26. von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Gratch, J., and Kang, S.-H. "it doesn't matter what you are!" explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 6 (Nov. 2010), 1641-1650.
27. Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y., and Groner, R. Playing online games against computervs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 5 (Sept. 2008), 2274-2291.
28. Williams, R. Aggression, competition and computer games: computer and human opponents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 18, 5 (Sept. 2002), 495-506.