The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp coordinates resection at DNA double strand breaks

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 5017-5032

  Ngo, Greg H P ^a   Lydall, David ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HELICASE; NUCLEASE; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA HELICASE; DNA2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; FUNGAL DNA; MEC3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN RAD9; RECQ HELICASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SGS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE 9-1-1 CHECKPOINT SLIDING CLAMP; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE LOCUS; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TELOMERE; WESTERN BLOTTING; DNA REPAIR; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE DELETION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPAIR; DNA, FUNGAL; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; GENE DELETION; PROTEIN BINDING; RECQ HELICASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TELOMERE;

EID: 84931291784     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv409     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Finn, K., Lowndes, N.F. and Grenon, M. (2012) Eukaryotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 69, 1447-1473.
2. Ciccia, A. and Elledge, S.J. (2010) The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell, 40, 179-204.
3. Symington, L.S. and Gautier, J. (2011) Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet., 45, 247-271.
4. Zimmermann, M., Lottersberger, F., Buonomo, S.B., Sfeir, A. and de Lange, T. (2013) 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5' end resection. Science, 339, 700-704.
5. Mimitou, E.P. and Symington, L.S. (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature, 455, 770-774.
6. Huertas, P., Cortes-Ledesma, F., Sartori, A.A., Aguilera, A. and Jackson, S.P. (2008) CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature, 455, 689-692.
7. Ira, G., Pellicioli, A., Balijja, A., Wang, X., Fiorani, S., Carotenuto, W., Liberi, G., Bressan, D., Wan, L., Hollingsworth, NM. et al. (2004) DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature, 431, 1011-1017.
8. Jazayeri, A., Falck, J., Lukas, C, Bartek, J., Smith, G.C, Lukas, J. and Jackson, S.P (2006) ATM-and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol, 8, 37-45.
9. Gravel, S., Chapman, J.R., Magill, C. and Jackson, S.P (2008) DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev., 22, 2767-2772.
10. Shiotani, B. and Zou, L. (2009) Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Mol. Cell, 33, 547-558.
11. Cannavo, E. and Cejka, P (2014) Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks. Nature, 514, 122-125.
12. Maringele, L. and Lydall, D (2002) EXO1-dependent single-stranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Delta mutants. Genes Dev., 16, 1919-1933.
13. Ngo, H.P. and Lydall, D. (2010) Survival and growth of yeast without telomere capping by Cdc13 in the absence of Sgs1, Exo1, and Rad9. PLoS Genet., 6, e1001072.
14. Roberts, S.A., Sterling, J., Thompson, C., Harris, S., Mav, D., Shah, R., Klimczak, L.J., Kryukov, G.V., Malc, E., Mieczkowski, P.A. et al. (2012) Clustered mutations in yeast and in human cancers can arise from damaged long single-strand DNA regions. Mol. Cell, 46, 424-435.
15. Morin, I., Ngo, H.P., Greenall, A., Zubko, M.K., Morrice, N. and Lydall, D. (2008) Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J., 27, 2400-2410.
16. Segurado, M. and Diffey, J.F. (2008) Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev., 22, 1816-1827.
17. Yang, Y., Sterling, J., Storici, F., Resnick, M.A. and Gordenin, D.A. (2008) Hypermutability of damaged single-strand DNA formed at double-strand breaks and uncapped telomeres in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet., 4, e1000264.
18. Kondo, T., Wakayama, T., Naiki, T., Matsumoto, K. and Sugimoto, K. (2001) Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science, 294, 867-870.
19. Melo, J.A., Cohen, J. and Toczyski, D.P. (2001) Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev., 15, 2809-2821.
20. Navadgi-Patil, V.M. and Burgers, P.M. (2011) Cell-cycle-specifc activators of the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 39, 600-605.
21. Lydall, D. and Weinert, T. (1995) Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science, 270, 1488-1491.
22. Jia, X., Weinert, T. and Lydall, D. (2004) Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics, 166, 753-764.
23. Zubko, M.K., Guillard, S. and Lydall, D. (2004) Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics, 168, 103-115.
24. Ngo, G.H., Balakrishnan, L., Dubarry, M., Campbell, J.L. and Lydall, D. (2014) The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp stimulates DNA resection by Dna2-Sgs1 and Exo1. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 10516-10528.
25. Lee, S.E., Moore, J.K., Holmes, A., Umezu, K., Kolodner, R.D. and Haber, J.E. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell, 94, 399-409.
26. Aylon, Y. and Kupiec, M. (2003) The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 6585-6596.
27. Dubrana, K., van Attikum, H., Hediger, F. and Gasser, S.M. (2007) The processing of double-strand breaks and binding of single-strand-binding proteins RPA and Rad51 modulate the formation of ATR-kinase foci in yeast. J. Cell Sci., 120, 4209-4220.
28. Dewar, J.M. and Lydall, D. (2012) Simple, non-radioactive measurement of single-stranded DNA at telomeric, sub-telomeric, and genomic loci in budding yeast. Methods Mol. Biol., 920, 341-348.
29. Holstein, E.M. and Lydall, D. (2012) Quantitative amplifcation of single-stranded DNA. Methods Mol. Biol., 920, 323-339.
30. van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O., Hohn, B. and Gasser, S.M. (2004) Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell, 119, 777-788.
31. Aparicio, O., Geisberg, J.V. and Struhl, K. (2004) Chromatin immunoprecipitation for determining the association of proteins with specifc genomic sequences in vivo. Curr. Protoc. Cell. Biol., Chapter 17, Unit 17.7.
32. Weinert, T.A., Kiser, G.L. and Hartwell, L.H. (1994) Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev., 8, 652-665.
33. Lazzaro, F., Sapountzi, V., Granata, M., Pellicioli, A., Vaze, M., Haber, J.E., Plevani, P., Lydall, D. and Muzi-Falconi, M. (2008) Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J., 27, 1502-1512.
34. Clerici, M., Trovesi, C., Galbiati, A., Lucchini, G. and Longhese, M.P. (2014) Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single-stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends. EMBO J., 33, 198-216.
35. Pellicioli, A., Lee, S.E., Lucca, C., Foiani, M. and Haber, J.E. (2001) Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol. Cell, 7, 293-300.
36. Paciotti, V., Lucchini, G., Plevani, P. and Longhese, M.P. (1998) Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J., 17, 4199-4209.
37. Booth, C., Griffth, E., Brady, G. and Lydall, D. (2001) Quantitative amplifcation of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 4414-4422.
38. Zhu, Z., Chung, W.H., Shim, E.Y., Lee, S.E. and Ira, G. (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell, 134, 981-994.
39. Zierhut, C. and Diffey, J.F. (2008) Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication infuence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J., 27, 1875-1885.
40. Ferrari, M., Dibitetto, D., De Gregorio, G., Eapen, V.V., Rawal, C.C., Lazzaro, F., Tsabar, M., Marini, F., Haber, J.E. and Pellicioli, A. (2015) Functional Interplay between the 53BP1-Ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 Complex Regulates Resection, End-Tethering and Repair of a Double-Strand Break. PLoS Genet., 11, e1004928.
41. Sugawara, N., Wang, X. and Haber, J.E. (2003) In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell, 12, 209-219.
42. Tavormina, P.A., Wang, Y. and Burke, D.J. (1997) Differential requirements for DNA replication in the activation of mitotic checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 3315-3322.
43. Vodenicharov, M.D. and Wellinger, R.J. (2006) DNA degradation at unprotected telomeres in yeast is regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) cell-cycle kinase. Mol. Cell, 24, 127-137.
44. Naiki, T., Wakayama, T., Nakada, D., Matsumoto, K. and Sugimoto, K. (2004) Association of Rad9 with double-strand breaks through a Mec1-dependent mechanism. Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 3277-3285.
45. Chen, X., Cui, D., Papusha, A., Zhang, X., Chu, C.D., Tang, J., Chen, K., Pan, X. and Ira, G. (2012) The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature, 489, 576-580.
46. Kim, J.A., Kruhlak, M., Dotiwala, F., Nussenzweig, A. and Haber, J.E. (2007) Heterochromatin is refractory to gamma-H2AX modifcation in yeast and mammals. J. Cell. Biol., 178, 209-218.
47. Takahashi, Y.H., Schulze, J.M., Jackson, J., Hentrich, T., Seidel, C., Jaspersen, S.L., Kobor, M.S. and Shilatifard, A. (2011) Dot1 and histone H3K79 methylation in natural telomeric and HM silencing. Mol. Cell, 42, 118-126.
48. Szilard, R.K., Jacques, P.E., Laramee, L., Cheng, B., Galicia, S., Bataille, A.R., Yeung, M., Mendez, M., Bergeron, M., Robert, F. et al. (2010) Systematic identifcation of fragile sites via genome-wide location analysis of gamma-H2AX. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 17, 299-305.
49. Bunting, S.F., Callen, E., Wong, N., Chen, H.T., Polato, F., Gunn, A., Bothmer, A., Feldhahn, N., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Cao, L. et al. (2010) 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-defcient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell, 141, 243-254.
50. Mantiero, D., Clerici, M., Lucchini, G. and Longhese, M.P. (2007) Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep., 8, 380-387.
51. Panier, S. and Boulton, S.J. (2014) Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 7-18.
52. Carneiro, T., Khair, L., Reis, C.C., Borges, V., Moser, B.A., Nakamura, T.M. and Ferreira, M.G. (2010) Telomeres avoid end detection by severing the checkpoint signal transduction pathway. Nature, 467, 228-232.
53. Bonetti, D., Villa, M., Gobbini, E., Cassani, C., Tedeschi, G. and Longhese, M.P. (2015) Escape of Sgs1 from Rad9 inhibition reduces the requirement for Sae2 and functional MRX in DNA end resection. EMBO Rep., 16, 351-361.
54. Shim, E.Y., Chung, W.H., Nicolette, M.L., Zhang, Y., Davis, M., Zhu, Z., Paull, T.T., Ira, G. and Lee, S.E. (2010) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J., 29, 3370-3380.
55. Chen, H., Lisby, M. and Symington, L.S. (2013) RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins. Mol. Cell, 50, 589-600.
56. Lisby, M., Barlow, J.H., Burgess, R.C. and Rothstein, R. (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell, 118, 699-713.
57. Puddu, F., Granata, M., Di Nola, L., Balestrini, A., Piergiovanni, G., Lazzaro, F., Giannattasio, M., Plevani, P. and Muzi-Falconi, M. (2008) Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol., 28, 4782-4793.
58. Navadgi-Patil, V.M. and Burgers, P.M. (2009) The unstructured C-terminal tail of the 9-1-1 clamp subunit Ddc1 activates Mec1/ATR via two distinct mechanisms. Mol. Cell, 36, 743-753.
59. Andreadis, C., Nikolaou, C., Fragiadakis, G.S., Tsiliki, G. and Alexandraki, D. (2014) Rad9 interacts with Aft1 to facilitate genome surveillance in fragile genomic sites under non-DNA damage-inducing conditions in S. cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 12650-12667.
60. Pandita, R.K., Sharma, G.G., Laszlo, A., Hopkins, K.M., Davey, S., Chakhparonian, M., Gupta, A., Wellinger, R.J., Zhang, J., Powell, S.N. et al. (2006) Mammalian Rad9 plays a role in telomere stability, Sand G2-phase-specifc cell survival, and homologous recombinational repair. Mol. Cell. Biol., 26, 1850-1864.
61. An, L., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, X., Liu, C., Hu, Z., He, W., Song, W. and Hang, H. (2010) Rad9 is required for B cell proliferation and immunoglobulin class switch recombination. J. Biol. Chem., 285, 35267-35273.
62. Broustas, C.G. and Lieberman, H.B. (2012) Contributions of Rad9 to tumorigenesis. J. Cell. Biochem., 113, 742-751.