No demonstrable benefit for coronal alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 461-468

  Mannan, A ^a   Smith, T O ^b   Sagar, C ^a   London, N J ^c   Molitor, P J A ^a  

^a SCUNTHORPE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c HARROGATE DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Meta analysis; Patient specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ANKLE; ARTICLE; DETSKY QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCORE; HIP; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; META ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTED KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; ROTATION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROTATION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84930181006     PISSN: 18770568     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Green G.V., Berend K.R., Berend M.E., Glisson R.R., Vail T.P. The effects of varus tibial alignment on proximal tibial surface strain in total knee arthroplasty: the poster medial hot spot. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:1033-1039.
2. Liau J.J., Cheng C.K., Huang C.H., Lo W.H. The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses: a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 2002, 17:140-146.
3. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:560-569.
4. Rand J.A., Trousdale R.T., Ilstrup D.M., Harmsen W.S. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 2003, 85:259-265.
5. Sierra R.J., Cooney W.P., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Rand J.A. Reoperations after 3200 revision TKAs: rates, etiology and lessons learned. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 425:200-206.
6. Werner F.W., Ayers D.C., Maletsky L.P., Rullkoetter P.J. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 2000, 38:349-355.
7. Huang N.F., Dowsey M.M., Ee E., Stoney J.D., Babazadeh S., Choong P.F. Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1737-1741.
8. Hernandez-Vaquero D., Suarez-Vasquez A., Iglesias-Fernandez S. Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:3436-3442.
9. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., Beaver R.J. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg 2004, 86:372-377.
10. Laskin R.S. Instrumentation pitfalls: you just can't go on autopilot. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(D):18-22.
11. Hetaimish B.M., Khan M.M., Simunovic N., Al-Habri H.H., Bhandhari M., Zalzal P. Meta-analysis of navigation vs. conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1177-1182.
12. Spencer J.M., Chauhan S.K., Sloan K., Taylor A., Beaver R.J. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:477-480.
13. Michaut M., Beaufils P., Galaud B., Abadie P., Boisrenoult P., Fallet L. Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008, 94:580-584.
14. Lewallen D.G., Bryan R.S., Peterson L.F. Polycentric total knee arthroplasty. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984, 66:1211-1218.
15. Detsky A.S., Naylor C.D., O'Rourke K., McGeer A.J., L'Abbé K.A. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:255-265.
16. Hafez M.A., Cheulule K.L., Seedhom B.B., Sherman K.P. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 444:181-184.
17. Gan Y., Xu D., Lu S., Ding J. Novel patient-specific navigational template for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2011, 16:288-297.
18. Howell S.M., Howell S.J., Kuznik K.T., Cohen J., Hull M.L. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471:1000-1007.
19. Dossett H.G., Swartz G.J., Estrada N.A., LeFevre G.W., Kwasman B.G. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2012, 35:e160-e169.
20. Howell S.M., Papadopoulos S., Kuznik K.T., Hull M.L. Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2271-2280.
21. Koeck F.X., Beckmann J., Luring C., Rath B., Grifka J., Basad E. Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 2011, 18:294-299.
22. Volpi P., Prospero E., Bait C., Cervellin M., Quaglia A., Redaelli A., et al. High accuracy in knee alignment and implant placement in unicompartmental medial knee replacement when using patient-specific instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 10.1007/s00167-013-2794-3.
23. Klatt B.A., Goyal N., Austin M.S., Hozack W.J. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:26-29.
24. Chan K.Y., Teo Y.H. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee replacement verified by computer navigation: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2012, 20:111-114.
25. Mayer S.W., Hug K.T., Hansen B.J., Bolognesi M.P. Total knee arthroplasty in osteopetrosis using patient-specific instrumentation. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1580. [e1-4].
26. Issa K., Rifai A., McGrath M.S., Callaghan J.J., Wright C., Malkani A.L., et al. Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2013, 26:429-433.
27. Conteduca F., Iorio R., Mazza D., Caperna L., Bolle G., Argento G., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2194-2199.
28. Lustig S., Scholes C.J., Oussedik S.I., Kinzel V., Coolican M.R., Parker D.A. Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28:469-473.
29. Thienpont E., Paternostre F., Pietsch M., Hafez M., Howell S. Total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instruments improves function and restores limb alignment in patients with extra-articular deformity. Knee 2013, 20:407-411.
30. Howell S.M., Kuznik K., Hull M.L., Siston R. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopaedics 2008, 31:857-863.
31. Daniilidis K., Tibesku C. Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments. Int Orthop 2013, 37:45-50.
32. Nunley R.M., Zhu J., Howell S.M. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:895-902.
33. Ng V.Y., DeClaire J.H., Berend K.R., Gulick B.C., Lombardi A.V. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:99-107.
34. Boonen B., Schotanus M.G., Kort N.P. Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2012, 83:387-393.
35. Barrack R.L., Ruh E.L., Williams B.M., Ford A.D., Foreman K., Nunley R.M. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(Suppl. A):95-99. [60].
36. Lombardi A.V., Berend K.R., Adams J.B. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008, 31:927-930.
37. Heyse T.J., Tibesku C.O. Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. Knee 2012, 21:268-271.
38. Bali K., Walker P., Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1149-1153.
39. Victor J., Dujardin J., Vandenneucker H., Arnout N., Bellemans J. Patient specific guides do not increase accuracy in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472:263-271.
40. Daniilidis K., Tibesku C.O. A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2014, 33:503-508.
41. Roh Y.W., Kim T.W., Lee S., Seong S.C., Lee M.C. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471:3988-3995.
42. Boonen B., Schotanus G.M., Kerens B., van der Weegen W., van Drumpt R.A.M., Kort N.P. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2206-2212.
43. Chareancholvanich K., Narkbunnam R., Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013, 95-B(3):354-359.
44. Parratte S., Blanc G., Boussemart T., Ollivier M., Le Corroller T., Argenson J.N. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2213-2219.
45. Noble J.W., Moore C.A., Liu N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:153-155.
46. Chen J.Y., Yeo S.J., Soon Yew A.K., Tay D.K., Chia S.L., Lo N.N., et al. The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 22:630-635.
47. Barrett W., Hoeffel D., Dalury D., Mason J.B., Murphy J., Himden S. In vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:343-347.
48. Macdessi S.J., Jang B., Harris I.A., Wheatley E., Bryant C., Chen D.B. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014, 21:406-409.
49. Yaffe M., Luo M., Goyal N., Chan P., Patel A., Cayo M., et al. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2014, 9:837-844.
50. Koch P.P., Müller D., Pisan M., Fucentese S.F. Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2200-2205.
51. Nam D., Maher P.A., Rebolledo B.J., Nawabi D.H., McLawhorn A.S., Pearle A.D. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2013, 20:263-267.
52. Vundelinckx B.J., Bruckers L., De Mulder K., De Schepper J., Van Esbroeck G. Functional and radiographic short-term outcome evaluation of the VISIONAIRE system, a patient-matched instrumentation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28:964-970.
53. Barrack R.L., Schrader T., Bertot A.J., Wolfe M.W., Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:46-55.
54. Thienpont E., Schwab P.E., Fennema P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2014, 96:1052-1061.
55. Burghardt R.D., Hinterwinner S., Burklein D., Baumgart D. Lower limb alignment in the frontal plane: analysis from long standing radiographs and computer tomography scout views: an experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013, 133:29-36.
56. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299:153-156.
57. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73:709-714.
58. Kim Y.H., Park J.W., Kim J.S. Computer navigated vs. conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94:2017-2024.
59. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., Banel D., Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1097-1106.
60. Collier M.B., Engh C.A., McAuley J.P., Engh G.A. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1306-1314.
61. Bedard M., Vince K.G., Redfern J., Collen S.R. Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res 2011, 469:2346-2355.
62. Huddleston J.I., Scott R.D., Wimberley D.W. Determination of neutral tibial rotation alignment in rotating platform TKA. Clin Orthop Related Res 2005, 440:101-106.
63. Matziolis G., Krocker D., Weiss U., Tohtz S., Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:236-243.
64. Lutzner J., Krummenauer F., Wolf C., Gunther K.P., Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1039-1044.
65. Schmitt J., Hauk C., Kienapfel H., Pfeiffer M., Efe T., Fuchs-Winkelmann S., et al. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011, 15:12-16.
66. Jerosch J., Peuker E., Philipps B., Filler T. Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002, 10:194-197.
67. Matsuda S., Miura H., Nagamine R., Urabe K., Hirata G., Iwamoto Y. Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg 2001, 14:152-156.