A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 503-508

  Daniilidis, Kiriakos ^a   Tibesku, Carsten O ^b  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b Sporthopaedicum Straubing   (Germany)

Author keywords

Component malalignment; Hip knee ankle angle; Neutral mechanical axis; Patient matched cutting blocks; Standard knee instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VERY ELDERLY; X RAY; ANKLE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICES; HIP; INCIDENCE; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84898842627     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2028-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W (2012) Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty 27:1149-1154
2. Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM, Ford AD, Foreman K, Nunley RM (2012) Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(11 Suppl A):95-99
3. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:682-687
4. Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ (2010) Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol 11:203-209
5. Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kort NP (2012) Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:387-393
6. Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C (2013) A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B:354-359
7. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:372-377
8. Cheng T, Pan XY, Mao X, Zhang GY, Zhang XL (2012) Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Knee 19:237-245
9. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20:618-626
10. Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Engh GA (2007) Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1306-1314
11. Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G, Ferretti A (2012) Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides? Int Orthop 36:1589-1593
12. Daniilidis K, Tibesku CO (2013) Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments. Int Orthop 37:45-50
13. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20:282-288
14. Drummond M, Barbieri M, Cook J, Glick HA, Lis J, Malik F, Reed SD, Rutten F, Sculpher M, Severens J (2009) Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 12:409-418
15. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:152-159
16. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP (2006) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:184-192
17. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P (2003) Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27:366-369
18. Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO (2012) Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. Knee. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.009
19. Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA (2008) Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics 31:857-863
20. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709-714
21. Jenny JY, Miehlke RK, Giurea A (2008) Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 15:80-84
22. Johnson DR (2011) The benefits of customized patient instrumentation to lower-volume joint replacement surgeons: results from practice. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 40(11 Suppl):13-16
23. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH (2007) Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:471-476
24. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ (2008) Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty 23:26-29
25. Koeck FX, Beckmann J, Luring C, Rath B, Grifka J, Basad E (2011) Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 18:294-299
26. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Oussedik SI, Kinzel V, Coolican MR, Parker DA (2013) Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:469-473
27. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, Muratsu H, Kuroda R, Ishimoto K, Tsujimoto K, Shiba R, Yoshiya S (2004) Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:282-285
28. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:236-243
29. Nam D, Maher PA, Rebolledo BJ, Nawabi DH, McLawhorn AS, Pearle AD (2013) Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.009
30. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:99-107
31. Noble JW Jr, Moore CA, Liu N (2012) The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:153-155
32. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:895-902
33. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153-156
34. Sampath SA, Voon SH, Sangster M, Davies H (2009) The statistical relationship between varus deformity, surgeon's experience, BMI and tourniquet time for computer assisted total knee replacements. Knee 16:121-124
35. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7-13
36. Sikorski JM (2008) Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1121-1127
37. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:830-835
38. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF (2009) Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 33:1571-1575
39. Srivastava A, Lee GY, Steklov N, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, D'Lima DD (2012) Effect of tibial component varus on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 19:560-563
40. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:180-186
41. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):90-98
42. Tillett ED, Engh GA, Petersen T (1988) A comparative study of extramedullary and intramedullary alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 230:176-181
43. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ (2005) The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 38:349-355
44. Yaffe MA, Patel A, Mc Coy BW, Luo M, Cayo M, Ghate R, Stulberg SD (2012) Component sizing in total knee arthroplasty: patient-specific guides vs. computer-assisted navigation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 57:277-282
45. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Zuo JL, Tang WM, Ng TP (2008) Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:935-945