Novel patient-specific navigational template for total knee arthroplasty

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 288-297

  Gan, Yudong ^a   Xu, Dachuan ^a   Lu, Sheng ^b   Ding, Jing ^b  

^a SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b KUNMING GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Custom template; Navigation; Rapid prototyping; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMUR; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; VALIDATION STUDY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CADAVER; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; OSTEOTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80054028167     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929088.2011.621214     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Rodricks DJ, Patil S, Pulido P, Colwell CW Jr. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty: Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89-A:89-95. (Pubitemid 46059147)
2. Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;452:28-34. (Pubitemid 44690638)
3. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciatesacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:635-640. (Pubitemid 32751451)
4. Mihalko WM, Boyle J, Clark LD, Krackow KA. The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:25-28. (Pubitemid 40127100)
5. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;356:144-153. (Pubitemid 29019483)
6. Mihalko WM, Krackow KA. Difference between extramedullary, intramedullary, and computer-aided surgery tibial alignment techniques for total knee atrthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006;19:33-36.
7. Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2276-2280. (Pubitemid 41407554)
8. Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T. Interindividual reproducibility in preoperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002;10:194-197.
9. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intraoperative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:74-77. (Pubitemid 38264929)
10. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988;3:67-72.
11. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;416:177-184. (Pubitemid 37413637)
12. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lü ring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:682-687. (Pubitemid 39077216)
13. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized trial comparing computernavigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:282-288. (Pubitemid 40460792)
14. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86-B:372-377. (Pubitemid 38559489)
15. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;354:49-56. (Pubitemid 28424045)
16. Laskin RS. Instrumentation pitfalls: You just can't go on autopilot! J Arthroplasty 2003;18(Suppl 1):18-22. (Pubitemid 36542553)
17. Novotny J, Gonzalez MH, Amirouche FM, Li YC. Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:641-647. (Pubitemid 32751452)
18. Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, Zimolong A, Kaspers G, Rau G, Staudte HW. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;354:28-38. (Pubitemid 28424043)
19. Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM, Ryken TC. Rapid prototype patient-specific drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aided Surg 2007;12(5):303-308. (Pubitemid 350034902)
20. Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Xie L, Guo H, Li DP. A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws. Eur Spine J 2009;18(9):1379-1385.
21. Lu S, Xu YQ, Lu WW, Ni GX, Li YB, Shi JH, Li DP, Chen GP, Chen YB, Zhang YZ. A novel patient-specific navigational template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Spine 2009;34(26):E959-E964.
22. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leightly R, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg RG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;299:31-43. (Pubitemid 24051697)
23. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59-A:77-79. (Pubitemid 8030304)
24. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Ikai M, Sasama T, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T. Accuracy evaluation of a shape-based navigation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2003;16:98-105.
25. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis appropriates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356:111-118. (Pubitemid 29019478)
26. Olcott CW, Scott RD. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;367:39-42. (Pubitemid 29503676)
27. Olcott CW, Scott RD. Determining proper femoral component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2000;13:166-168.
28. Hood RW, Vanni M, Insall JN. The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;229:32-43.
29. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee: A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77-A:1331-1334.
30. Eckhoff DG, Piatt BE, Gnadinger CA, Blaschko RC. Assessing rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;318:176-181.
31. Ritter MA, Fans PM, Keating EM. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;299:153-158.
32. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:7-13. (Pubitemid 35351042)
33. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Okazaki K, Akasaki Y, Iwamoto Y. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1025-1031.
34. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell Jr CW. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;321:106-110.
35. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:709-713.
36. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C, Ragone V. Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison. Acta Orthop Belg 2005; 71:703-709. (Pubitemid 43088380)
37. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer-navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in the functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89-B:477-480. (Pubitemid 46851126)
38. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 2003;27:366-369. (Pubitemid 38044256)
39. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89-B:471-476.
40. Casino D, Zaffagnini S, Martelli S, Lopomo N, Bignozzi S, Iacono F, Russo A, Marcacci M. Intraoperative evaluation of total knee replacement: Kinematic assessment with a navigation system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009;17:369-373.
41. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:236-243. (Pubitemid 46214339)
42. Lionberger R. The attraction of electromagnetic computerassisted navigation in orthopaedic surgery. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann W, and Hacker R, editors. Navigation and MIS in Orthopaedic Surgery. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2006. pp 44-53.
43. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;433:152-159. (Pubitemid 40489263)
44. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90-B:1039-1044.
45. Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA. Determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:301-305. (Pubitemid 32303848)