The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 630-635

  Chen, Jerry Yongqiang ^a   Yeo, Seng Jin ^a   Yew, Andy Khye Soon ^a   Tay, Darren Keng Jin ^a   Chia, Shi Lu ^a   Lo, Ngai Nung ^a   Chin, Pak Lin ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Implant placement; Lower limb alignment; Patient specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MECHANICAL TORSION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TORSION, MECHANICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893962562     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2638-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D (2007) Navigated total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(2): 261-269.
2. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J (2011) Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 35(3): 331-339.
3. Chandrasekaran S, Molnar RB (2008) Minimally invasive imageless computer-navigated knee surgery: initial results. J Arthroplasty 23(3): 441-445.
4. Chin PL, Foo LS, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2007) Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6): 800-806.
5. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20(5): 618-626.
6. Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G, Ferretti A (2012) Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10. 1007/s00167-012-2098-z.
7. Coughlin KM, Incavo SJ, Churchill DL, Beynnon BD (2003) Tibial axis and patellar position relative to the femoral epicondylar axis during squatting. J Arthroplasty 18(8): 1048-1055.
8. Desai AS, Dramis A, Kendoff D, Board TN (2011) Critical review of the current practice for computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement surgery: cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4(1): 11-15.
9. Duparc J, Massare C (1967) Radiological measurement of the angular deviation of the knee in the frontal plane. Ann Radiol (Paris) 10(9): 635-656.
10. Eckhoff D, Hogan C, DiMatteo L, Robinson M, Bach J (2007) Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461: 238-244.
11. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Flannery NM (2005) Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 2): 71-80.
12. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24(Suppl 6): 39-43.
13. Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG (1993) The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290: 259-268.
14. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(5): 709-714.
15. Kharwadkar N, Kent RE, Sharara KH, Naique S (2006) 5° to 6° of distal femoral cut for uncomplicated primary total knee arthroplasty: is it safe? Knee 13(1): 57-60.
16. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24(4): 570-578.
17. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59(1): 77-79.
18. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Oussedik SI, Kinzel V, Coolican MR, Parker DA (2013) Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28(3): 469-473.
19. Marx RG, Grimm P, Lillemoe KA, Robertson CM, Ayeni OR, Lyman S, Bogner EA, Pavlov H (2011) Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(10): 1693-1698.
20. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, Williams BM, Foreman K, Ford AD, Barrack RL (2012) Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470: 889-894.
21. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470: 895-902.
22. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 153-156.
23. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6): 830-835.
24. Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471: 169-174.
25. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299: 31-43.