Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 837-844

  Yaffe, Mark ^a   Luo, Michael ^a   Goyal, Nitin ^a   Chan, Philip ^a   Patel, Anay ^a   Cayo, Max ^a   Stulberg, S David ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Customized instrumentation; Patient specific instruments; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE PAIN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANUAL INSTRUMENTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VERY ELDERLY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT POSITIONING; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84910113163     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0968-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP (2006) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:184
2. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):99
3. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):895
4. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF (2009) Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 33(6):1571
5. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, Williams BM, Foreman K, Ford AD, Barrack RL (2012) Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):889
6. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86(5):682
7. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86(3): 372
8. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN (2005) Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplast 20(5):618
9. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplast 20(3):282
10. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:152
11. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87(7):645
12. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised, study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85(6):830
13. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O (2004) Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:180
14. Hiscox CM, Bohm ER, Turgeon TR, Hedden DR, Burnell CD (2011) Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Arthroplast 26(8):1259
15. Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ (2011) Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing two navigation systems. J Arthroplast 26(8):1285
16. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ (2009) Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty surgical technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):116
17. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S (2011) Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(12):3436
18. Barrett WP, Mason JB, Moskal JT, Dalury DF, Oliashirazi A, Fisher DA (2011) Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery versus conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26(8):1273
19. Martin A, Wohlgenannt O, Prenn M, Oelsch C, von Strempel A (2007) Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 460:178
20. Martin A, von Strempel A (2006) Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 449:275
21. Victor J, Hoste D (2004) Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:131
22. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(2):236
23. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE (2009) Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop 33(6):1567
24. Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15(2):75
25. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ (2007) Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at 2 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(4):477
26. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:156
27. Stulberg SD, Yaffe MA, Koo SS (2006) Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):47
28. Goebel D, Schultz W (2012) The Columbus knee system: 4-year results of a new deep flexion design compared to the NexGen full flex implant. Arthritis 2012:213817
29. Yaffe M, Chan P, Goyal N, Luo M, Cayo M, Stulberg SD (2013) Computer-assisted versus manual TKA: no difference in clinical or functional outcomes at 5-year follow-up. Orthopedics 36(5):e627
30. Yaffe MA, Koo SS, Stulberg SD (2008) Radiographic and navigation measurements of TKA limb alignment do not correlate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2736–2744
31. Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Brouwer KH, Verhaar JA (2007) Pitfalls in determining knee alignment: a radiographic cadaver study. J Knee Surg 20(3):210
32. Hunt MA, Fowler PJ, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR, Giffin JR (2006) Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment. Can J Surg 49(6):401
33. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA (1996) Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:102
34. Senden R (2012) High variability in Knee Society Score between studies: how reliable is the Knee Society Score? In: AAOS 2012 annual meeting. San Francisco, CA
35. Ghanem E, Pawasarat I, Lindsay A, May L, Azzam K, Joshi A, Parvizi J (2010) Limitations of the Knee Society Score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(14):2445