Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: Rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Schmitt, Jan ^a   Hauk, Carsten ^a   Kienapfel, Heino ^b   Pfeiffer, Michael ^c   Efe, Turgay ^a   Fuchs Winkelmann, Susanne ^a   Heyse, Thomas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^b Auguste Viktoria Klinik   (Germany)

^c HELIOS Rosmann Klinik   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INCISION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EQUIPMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; ROTATION; STANDARD;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; ROTATION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 78651370281     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-16     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Survivorship analysis of 3234 primary knee arthroplasties implanted over a 26-year period: a study of eight different implant designs. NR Pradhan A Gambhir ML Porter, Knee 2006 13 7 11 10.1016/j.knee.2005.06.004 16125939
2. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? PF Sharkey WJ Hozack RH Rothman S Shastri SM Jacoby, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002 7 13 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003 12439231
3. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. RA Berger LS Crossett JJ Jacobs HE Rubash, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 144 153 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021 9917679
4. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. RA Berger HE Rubash MJ Seel WH Thompson LS Crossett, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993 40 47 8425366
5. Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. J Jerosch E Peuker B Philipps T Filler, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002 10 194 197 10.1007/s00167-001-0271-x 12012038
6. Transepicondylar axis accuracy in computer assisted knee surgery: a comparison of the CT-based measured axis versus the CAS-determined axis. van der Linden HM van der Zwaag ER Valstar AJ van der Molen RG Nelissen, Comput Aided Surg 2008 13 200 206 18622794
7. [CT-based and CT-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty - a prospective comparative study with respects to clinical and radiological results]. A Martin A von Strempel, Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005 143 323 328 10.1055/s-2005-836568 15977122
8. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. JY Jenny C Boeri, Comput Aided Surg 2001 6 217 220 10.3109/10929080109146086 11835617 (Pubitemid 34118302)
9. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. JB Mason TK Fehring R Estok D Banel K Fahrbach, J Arthroplasty 2007 22 1097 1106 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.001 18078876
10. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? M Tingart C Luring H Bathis J Beckmann J Grifka L Perlick, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008 16 44 50 10.1007/s00167-007-0399-4 17899009
11. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. PF Choong MM Dowsey JD Stoney, J Arthroplasty 2009 24 560 569 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 18534397
12. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. LM Longstaff K Sloan N Stamp M Scaddan R Beaver, J Arthroplasty 2009 24 570 578 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002 18534396
13. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? YD Kamat KM Aurakzai AR Adhikari D Matthews Y Kalairajah RE Field, Int Orthop 2008 19034445
14. Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. JK Seon SJ Park KB Lee G Li M Kozanek EK Song, Int Orthop 2008
15. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. L Molfetta D Caldo, Knee 2008 15 75 79 10.1016/j.knee.2007.12.006 18234498
16. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989 13 14 2805470
17. The management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. RW Hsu, Chang Gung Med J 2006 29 448 457 17214388
18. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. M Sparmann B Wolke H Czupalla D Banzer A Zink, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003 85 830 835 12931800
19. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks. PM Bonutti D Dethmers SD Ulrich TM Seyler MA Mont, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008 466 2756 2762 10.1007/s11999-008-0429-7 18815850
20. [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study]. D Saragaglia F Picard C Chaussard E Montbarbon F Leitner P Cinquin, Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001 87 18 28 11240534
21. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. SK Chauhan RG Scott W Breidahl RJ Beaver, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004 86 372 377 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14643 15125124
22. [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation - preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique]. RK Mielke U Clemens JH Jens S Kershally, Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001 139 109 116 10.1055/s-2001-15040 11386098
23. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. R Hart M Janecek A Chaker P Bucek, Int Orthop 2003 27 366 369 10.1007/s00264-003-0501-6 12942197
24. [CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study]. M Oberst C Bertsch S Wurstlin U Holz, Unfallchirurg 2003 106 941 948 14634738
25. Accuracy of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation. C Restrepo WJ Hozack F Orozco J Parvizi, Comput Aided Surg 2008 13 167 172 10.1080/10929080802045640 18432416
26. Computer assisted knee replacement. SL Delp SD Stulberg B Davies F Picard F Leitner, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 49 56 10.1097/00003086-199809000-00007 9755763
27. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. SD Stulberg P Loan V Sarin, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002 84-A Suppl 2 90 98 12479344
28. [The accuracy of palpation from orientation points for the navigated implantation of knee prostheses]. R Fuiko B Kotten R Zettl P Ritschl, Orthopade 2004 33 338 343 10.1007/s00132-003-0570-7 15007558
29. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. JY Jenny C Boeri, Acta Orthop Scand 2004 75 74 77 10.1080/00016470410001708150 15022812
30. How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? J Victor D Van Doninck L Labey B Innocenti PM Parizel J Bellemans, Knee 2009 19195896