Coronal Alignment Correlates With Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Five-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1737-1741

  Huang, Nathaniel F R ^a,b   Dowsey, Michelle M ^a,b   Ee, Eric ^b   Stoney, James D ^a,b   Babazadeh, Sina ^a   Choong, Peter F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Alignment; Computer assisted surgery; Function; Knee arthroplasty; Pain; Patient quality of life

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONAL ALIGNMENT; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MENTAL HEALTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 12; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866380222     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.058     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sikorski J.M. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1121.
2. Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:682.
3. Hart R., Janecek M., Chaker A., et al. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 2003, 27:366.
4. Fehring T.K., Odum S.M., Griffin W.L., et al. The obesity epidemic: its effect on total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6 Suppl 2):71.
5. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:261.
6. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008.
7. Moher D., Schulz K.F., Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001, 285:1987.
8. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 13.
9. Gandek B., Ware J.E., Aaronson N.K., et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:1171.
10. Seon J.K., Park S.J., Lee K.B., et al. Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int Orthop 2009, 33:987.
11. Nilsdotter A.K., Toksvig-Larsen S., Roos E.M. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:601.
12. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:282.
13. Ek E.T., Dowsey M.M., Tse L.F., et al. Comparison of functional and radiological outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-control retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008, 16:192.
14. Spencer J.M., Chauhan S.K., Sloan K., et al. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:477.
15. Rissanen P., Aro S., Sintonen H., et al. Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study. Qual Life Res 1996, 5:56.
16. Matziolis G., Adam J., Perka C. Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010, 130:1487.
17. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:2143.
18. Astephen Wilson J.L., Wilson D.A., Dunbar M.J., et al. Preoperative gait patterns and BMI are associated with tibial component migration. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:478.
19. Baker P.N., van der Meulen J.H., Lewsey J., et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:893.
20. Woolhead G.M., Donovan J.L., Dieppe P.A. Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005, 44:1032.