Sugar reduction of skim chocolate milk and viability of alternative sweetening through lactose hydrolysis

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1455-1466

  Li, X E ^a   Lopetcharat, K ^b   Qiu, Y ^a   Drake, M A ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Nouveau Centric Co Ltd   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Chocolate milk; Lactose hydrolysis; Power function; Sugar reduction

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; LACTOSE; SWEETENING AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL; CACAO; CALORIC INTAKE; CHILD; COLOR; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD HANDLING; HUMAN; HYDROLYSIS; MALE; MILK; PILOT STUDY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL MODEL; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; CACAO; CARBOHYDRATES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COLOR; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD HANDLING; HUMANS; HYDROLYSIS; LACTOSE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MILK; PILOT PROJECTS; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924087362     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8490     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adhikari K., Dooley L.M., Chambers E., Bhumiratana N. Sensory characteristics of commercial lactose-free milks manufactured in the United States. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol. 2010, 43:113-118.
2. Anonymous. 2003. Tools for innovation: Dairy foods for today's pre-teens. Accessed May 2013. http://http://www.dairyfoods.com/articles/tools-for-innovation-dairy-foods-for-today-s-pre-teens.
3. ASTM International. 1991 ASTM E679-91 (Reapproved 1997): Standard practice for determination of odor and taste thresholds by forced-choice ascending concentration series method of limits. Pages 36-40. ASTM International, West Conschohocken, PA.
4. Bayarri S., Carbonell I., Barrios E.X., Costell E. Impact of sensory differences on consumer acceptability of yoghurt and yoghurt-like products. Int. Dairy J. 2011, 21:111-118.
5. Berkey C.S., Rockett H.R., Field A.E., Gillman M.W., Colditz G.A. Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obes. Res. 2004, 12:778-788.
6. Boor K.J. Fluid dairy product quality and safety: Looking to the future. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84:1-11.
7. Chollet M., Gille D., Schmid A., Walther B., Piccinali P. Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:5501-5511.
8. de Melo L.L.M.M., Bolinia H.M.A., Efraim P. Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates. Food Qual. Prefer. 2009, 20:138-143.
9. Desor J.A., Greene L.J., Maller O. Preferences for sweet and salty in 9-15 year old and adult humans. Science 1975, 190:686-687.
10. Drake M.A., Civille G.V. Flavor lexicons. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety 2003, 2:33-40.
11. Drake S.L., Lopetcharat K., Drake M.A. Salty taste in dairy foods: Can we reduce the salt?. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:636-645.
12. Frankowski K.M., Miracle R.E., Drake M. The role of sodium in salty taste of permeate. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97:5356-5370.
13. Fujimaru T., Park J.H., Lim J. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77:S323-S328.
14. Geiselman P.J., Smith C.F., Williamson D.A., Champagne C.M., Bray G.A., Ryan D.H. Perception of sweetness intensity determines women's hedonic and other perceptual responsiveness to chocolate food. Appetite 1998, 31:37-48.
15. Guinard J.X. Sensory and consumer testing with children. Food Sci. Technol. (Campinas.) 2000, 11:273-283.
16. Hoag, C. 2011. Flavored milk banned in LA schools. Accessed July 2013. http://http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/15/la-schoolsflavored-milk_n_877282.html?view=print&comm_ref=false.
17. Horner T.W., Dunn M.L., Eggett D.L., Ogden L.V. β-galactosidase activity of commercial lactase samples in raw and pasteurized milk at refrigerated temperatures. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:3242-3249.
18. Dairy Facts 2012, International Dairy Foods Association, International Dairy Foods Association, Washington, DC. 2012.
19. Keast R.S.J., Breslin P.A.S., Beauchamp G.K. Suppression of bitterness using sodium salts. Chimia (Aarau) 2001, 55:441-447.
20. Kim M.K., Lopetcharat K., Drake M.A. Influence of packaging information on consumer liking of chocolate milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:4843-4856.
21. Kim S.H., Lim K.P., Kim H.S. Differences in the hydrolysis of lactose and other substrates by β-D-Galactosidase from Kluyveromyces lactis. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:2264-2269.
22. Kroll B.J. Evaluating rating scales for sensory testing with children. Food Technol. 1990, 44:78-80. 82, 84, and 86.
23. Lawless H.T., Hartono C., Hernandez S. Threshold and suprathreshold intensity functions for capsaisin in oil and aqueous-based carriers. J. Sens. Stud. 2000, 15:437-477.
24. Leksrisompong P., Barbano D.M., Foegeding A., Gerard P., Drake M.A. The roles of fat and pH on the detection thresholds and partition coefficients of three compounds: Diacetyl, δ-decalactone and furaneol. J. Sens. Stud. 2010, 25:347-370.
25. Leksrisompong P., Gerard P., Lopetcharat K., Drake M. Bitter taste inhibiting agents for whey protein hydrolysate and whey protein hydrolysate beverages. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77:S282-S287.
26. Li B., Hayes J.E., Ziegler G.R. Just-about-right and ideal scaling provide similar insights into the influence of sensory attributes on liking. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 37:71-78.
27. Li X.E., Campbell R.E., Fox A.J., Gerard P.D., Drake M.A. Influence of storage, heat treatment, and solids composition on the bleaching of whey with hydrogen peroxide. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77:C798-C804.
28. Malik V.S., Schulze M.B., Hu F.B. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: A systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84:274-288.
29. Meilgaard M.M., Civille G.V., Carr B.T. Selection and training of panel members. Sensory Evaluation Techniques 1999, 135-183. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd.
30. Mojet J., Christ-Hazelhof E., Heidema J. Taste perception with age: Pleasantness and its relationships with threshold sensitivity and supra-threshold intensity of five taste qualities. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16:413-423.
31. Monneuse M.O., Bellisle F., Louis-Sylvestre J. Impact of sex and age on sensory evaluation of sugar and fat in dairy products. Physiol. Behav. 1991, 50:1111-1117.
32. Murphy M.M., Douglass J.S., Johnson R.K., Spence L.A. Drinking flavored or plain milk is positively associated with nutrient intake and is not associated with adverse effects on weight status in US children and adolescents. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2008, 108:631-639.
33. NDC (National Dairy Council). 2010. Top five reasons to raise your hand for flavored milk. Accessed March 2014. http://http://efnep.ucanr.edu/files/98997.pdf.
34. Plotto A., Margaría C.A., Goodner K.L., Goodrich R., Baldwin E.A. Odor and flavor thresholds for key aroma components in an orange juice matrix: terpenes and aldehydes. Flavour Fragrance J. 2004, 19:491-498.
35. Popper R., Kroll J.J. Conducting sensory research with children. J. Sens. Stud. 2005, 20:75-87.
36. Quann E.E., Adams D. Impact on milk consumption and nutrient intakes from eliminating flavored milk in elementary schools. Nutr. Today 2013, 48:127-134.
37. Schiffman S.S., Booth B.J., Losee M.L., Pecore S.D., Warwick Z.S. Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration. Brain Res. Bull. 1995, 36:505-513.
38. Thompson J.L., Drake M.A., Lopetcharat K., Yates M.D. Preference mapping of commercial chocolate milks. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69:406-413.
39. Thompson J.L., Gerard P.D., Drake M.A. Chocolate milk and the Hispanic consumer. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72:S666-S675.
40. Upreti P., McKay L.L., Metzger L.E. Influence of calcium and phosphorus, lactose, and salt-to-moisture ratio on Cheddar cheese quality: Changes in residual sugars and water-soluble organic acids during ripening. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:429-443.
41. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010, USDA-HHS (USDA-Department of Health and Human Services), USDA-HHS, Washington, DC. 7th.
42. Zandstra E.H., de Graaf C. Sensory perception and pleasantness of orange beverages from childhood to old age. Food Qual. Prefer. 1998, 9:5-12.