Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 92-124

  Adamson, David ^a   Dyke, Gregory ^b   Jang, Hyeju ^a   Rosé, Carolyn Penstein ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Automatic collaborative learning process analysis; Dynamic support for collaborative learning

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

AGILE APPROACHES; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROCESS; CONVERSATION ANALYSIS; CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS; DYNAMIC COLLABORATIONS; ENGINEERING DESIGN; LEARNING TECHNOLOGY;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84928378005     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40593-013-0012-6     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adamson, D., & Rosé, C. (2012). Coordinating multi-dimensional support in collaborative conversational agents. In Proceedings of intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 346-351). Berlin: Springer.
2. Adamson, D., Ashe, C., Jang, H., Yaron, D., & Rosé, C. (2013). Intensification of group knowledge exchange with academically productive talk agents. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Madison Wisconsin, July 2013.
3. Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1993). An exploration of long-term far-transfer effects following an extended intervention program in the high school science curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 11(1), 1-29.
4. Ai, H., Kumar, R., Nguyen, D., Nagasunder, A., Rosé, C. P. (2010). Exploring the effectiveness of social capabilities and goal alignment in computer supported collaborative learning. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science volume 6095, pp 134-143.
5. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202-221.
7. Berkowitz, M., & Gibbs, J. (1979). A Preliminary Manual for Coding Transactive Features of Dyadic Discussion. Unpublished manuscript, Marquette University.
8. Berkowitz, M., & Gibbs, J. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 399-410.
9. Bill, V. L., Leer, M. N., Reams, L. E., & Resnick, L. B. (1992). From cupcakes to equations: the structure of discourse in a primary mathematics classroom. Verbum, 1(2), 63-85.
10. Chapin, S., & O'Connor, C. (2004). Project challenge: identifying and developing talent in mathematics within low-income urban schools Boston University School of Education Research Report No (vol. 1, pp. 1-6).
11. Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Joshi, M., Terrell, E., Higgs, F., Aleven, V., et al. (2008). It's not easy being green: supporting collaborative green design learning. Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS).
12. Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Howley, I., & Rosé, C. P. (2009). Engaging collaborative learners with helping agents. In Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modeling (pp. 365-372). IOS Press.
13. Clarke, S., Chen, G., Stainton, K., Katz, S., Greeno, J., Resnick, L., et al. (2013). The impact of CSCL beyond the online environment. CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings, 1, 105-112.
14. de Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of Piagetian Theory for peer learning. In A.M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
16. Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5-23.
17. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (189-211).
18. Diziol, D., Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). Using intelligent tutor technology to implement adaptive support for student collaboration. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 89-102.
19. Dyke, G., Adamson, D., Howley, I., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). Enhancing scientific reasoning and explanation skills with conversational agents. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(3), 240-247.
20. Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008). Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 447-470.
21. Fernando, S., & Stevenson, M. (2008). A semantic similarity approach to paraphrase detection. Computational Linguistics UK (CLUK 2008) 11th Annual Research Colloquium.
22. Graesser, A., VanLehn, K., the TRG, & the NLT. (2002). Why2 Report: Evaluation of Why/Atlas, Why/AutoTutor, and Accomplished Human Tutors on Learning Gains for Qualitative Physics Problems and Explanations. LRDC Tech Report, University of Pittsburgh.
23. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning, 1(1), 21-39.
24. Hohenwarter, M., & Preiner, J. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications, 7, article 1448.
25. Howley, I., Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Mayfiled, E., Beuth, J., & Rosé, C. P. (2012). Group composition and intelligent dialogue tutors for impacting students' self-efficacy, ITS 2012 Proceedings of the 11th International conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science volume 7315, Springer-Verlag, pp 551-556.
26. Howley, I., Kumar, R., Mayfield, E., Dyke, G., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). Gaining insights from sociolinguistic style analysis for redesign of conversational agent based support for collaborative learning. In D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. P. Rosé, C. Teplovs, N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions, edited volume, Springer.
27. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31-42.
28. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 211-224.
29. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaborative scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.
30. Kumar, R., & Rosé, C. P. (2011). Architecture for building conversational agents that support collaborative learning. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 4(1), 21-34.
31. Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., & Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial dialogue as adaptive collaborative learning support. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 383-390.
32. Kumar, R., Ai, H., Beuth, J., & Rosé, C. P. (2010). Socially-capable conversational tutors can be effective in collaborative learning situations. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science volume 6095, pp 156-164.
33. Lison, P. (2011). Multi-policy dialogue management. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011, pp. 294-300. Association for Computational Linguistics.
34. McLaren, B., Scheuer, O., De Laat, M., Hever, R., de Groot, R. & Rosé, C. P. (2007). Using machine learning techniques to analyze and support mediation of student E-discussions. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, IOS Press, pp. 331-338.
35. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283-297.
36. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., & Strapparava, C. (2006). Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006), Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 775-780.
37. Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C. P., & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 285-305.
38. Mühlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. In Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL '2005).
39. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
40. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). GLLAMM Manual. University of California, Berkely. U. C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, Paper 160.
41. Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3-4), 347-364.
42. Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. A., & Clarke, S. N. (2013). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Reserach Association.
43. Rosé C., & VanLehn, K. (2005). An evaluation of a hybrid language understanding approach for robust selection of tutoring goals. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(4), 325-355.
44. Rosé, C. P., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., & Weinstein, A. (2001). Interactive conceptual tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In Proceedings of AI in Education 2001 Conference, 151-153.
45. Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., et al. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 237-271.
46. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge-building discourse. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 37-41.
47. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy, and technology. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, pp. 97-115.
48. Schwartz, D. (1998). The productive agency that drives collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Bingley, UK: Emrald Group Publishing.
49. Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2000). Modeling the process of collaborative learning. Proceedings of the International Workshop on New Technologies in Collaborative Learning. Japan: Awaiji-Yumebutai.
50. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for inter-subjective meaning making: a research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315-337.
52. Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaborations? In L. B. Resnick, C. Pontecorvo, & R. Saljo (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Situated cognition and technologically supported environments. Heidelberg: Springer.
53. Topping, K. J., & Trickey, S. (2007). Collaborative philosophical inquiry for schoolchildren: Cognitive gains at 2-year follow-up. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 787-796.
54. Webb, N. M., & Palinscar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Prentice Hall.
55. Wecker, C., Fischer, F. (2007). Fading scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of distributed monitoring. CSCL'07 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Computer supported Collaborative Learning, 764-772.
56. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493-516.
57. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95.
58. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL Book Series volume 6, chapter 6, pp 191-211.
59. Wiemer-Hastings, P., Graesser, A., Harter, D., & the Tutoring Research Group. (1998). The foundations and architecture of AutoTutor. In B. Goettl, H. Halff, C. Redfield, & V. Shute (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 4th International Conference (ITS '98) (pp. 334-343). Berlin: Springer.
60. Zinn, C., Moore, J. D., & Core, M. G. (2002). A 3-tier planning architecture for managing tutorial dialogue. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2002 (pp. 574-584). Berlin: Springer Verlag.