An Integrative Breakage Model of genome architecture, reshuffling and evolution: The Integrative Breakage Model of genome evolution, a novel multidisciplinary hypothesis for the study of genome plasticity

BioEssays

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 479-488

  Farré, Marta ^a,c   Robinson, Terence J ^b   Ruiz Herrera, Aurora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^c ROYAL VETERINARY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epigenome; Evolution; Genome reshuffling; Nucleome; Recombination; Selection

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CONFORMATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRUCTURE; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENEALOGY; GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; INTEGRATIVE BREAKAGE MODEL; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PLASTICITY; PURIFYING SELECTION; ANIMAL; DNA SHUFFLING; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HUMAN; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA SHUFFLING; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME; HUMANS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84927699805     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400174     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Peng Q, Pevzner PA, Tesler G. 2006. The fragile breakage versus random breakage models of chromosome evolution. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e14.
2. Postlethwait JH, Woods IG, Ngo-Hazelett P, Yan YL, et al. 2000. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res 10: 1890-902.
3. Kohn M, Hogel J, Vogel W, Minich P, et al. 2006. Reconstruction of a 450-My-old ancestral vertebrate protokaryotype. Trends Genet 22: 203-10.
4. Nakatani Y, Takeda H, Kohara Y, Morishita S. 2007. Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res 17: 1254-65.
5. Uno Y, Nishida C, Tarui H, Ishishita S, et al. 2012. Inference of the protokaryotypes of amniotes and tetrapods and the evolutionary processes of microchromosomes from comparative gene mapping. PLoS ONE 7: 53027.
6. Ruiz-Herrera A, Farré M, Robinson TJ. 2012. Molecular cytogenetic and genomic insights into chromosomal evolution. Heredity 108: 28-36.
7. Amemiya CT, Alfoldi J, Lee AP, Fan S, et al. 2013. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496: 311-6.
8. Nadeau JH, Taylor BA. 1984. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 814-8.
9. Nadeau JH, Sankoff D. 1998. Counting on comparative maps. Trends Genet 14: 495-501.
10. Pevzner P, Tesler G. 2003. Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes. Genome Res 13: 37-45.
11. Pevzner P, Tesler G. 2003. Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7672-7.
12. Froenicke L. 2005. Origins of primate chromosomes-as delineated by Zoo-FISH and alignments of human and mouse draft genome sequences. Cytogenet Genome Res 108: 122-38.
13. Ruiz-Herrera A, Garcia F, Mora L, Egozcue J, et al. 2005. Evolutionary conserved chromosomal segments in the human karyotype are bounded by unstable chromosome bands. Cytogenet Genome Res 108: 161-74.
14. Robinson TJ, Ruiz-Herrera A, Froenicke L. 2006. Dissecting the mammalian genome-new insights into chromosomal evolution. Trends Genet 22: 297-301.
15. Froenicke L, Caldes MG, Graphodatsky A, Muller S, et al. 2006. Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes. Genome Res 16: 306-10.
16. Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Bourque G, et al. 2005. Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309: 613-7.
17. Ruiz-Herrera A, Castresana J, Robinson TJ. 2006. Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility. Genome Biol 7: R115.
18. Larkin DM, Pape G, Donthu R, Auvil L, et al. 2009. Breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks in chromosomes have different evolutionary histories. Genome Res 19: 770-7.
19. Farré M, Bosch M, López-Giráldez F, Ponsà M, et al. 2011. Assessing the role of tandem repeats in shaping the genomic architecture of great apes. PLoS ONE 6: e27239.
20. Bailey JA, Eichler EE. 2006. Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat Rev Genet 7: 552-64.
21. Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Cooper DN. 2008. Molecular mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangement during primate evolution. Chromosome Res 16: 41-56.
22. Zhao H, Bourque G. 2009. Recovering genome rearrangements in the mammalian phylogeny. Genome Res 19: 934-42.
23. Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Sandig C, Chuzhanova N, Goidts V, et al. 2005. Breakpoint analysis of the pericentric inversion distinguishing human chromosome 4 from the homologous chromosome in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Hum Mutat 25: 45-55.
24. Carbone L, Harris RA, Vessere GM, Mootnick AR, et al. 2009. Evolutionary breakpoints in the gibbon suggest association between cytosine methylation and karyotype evolution. PLoS Genet 5: e1000538.
25. Longo MS, Carone DM, Program NCS, Green ED, et al. 2009. Distinct retroelement classes define evolutionary breakpoints demarcating sites of evolutionary novelty. BMC Genomics 10: 334.
26. Bourque G. 2009. Transposable elements in gene regulation and in the evolution of vertebrate genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19: 607-12.
27. Bailey JA, Baertsch R, Kent WJ, Haussler D, et al. 2004. Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution. Genome Biol 5: R23.
28. Cordaux R, Batzer MA. 2009. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Genet 10: 691-703.
29. Lee J, Han K, Meyer TJ, Kim HS, et al. 2008. Chromosomal inversions between human and chimpanzee lineages caused by retrotransposons. PloS ONE 3: e4047.
30. Groenen MA, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, Tuggle CK, et al. 2012. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 491: 393-8.
31. Caceres M, Ranz JM, Barbadilla A, Long M, et al. 1999. Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element. Science 285: 415-8.
32. Armour JA. 2006. Tandemly repeated DNA: why should anyone care. Mutat Res 598: 6-14.
33. Catasti P, Chen X, Mariappan SV, Bradbury EM, et al. 1999. DNA repeats in the human genome. Genetica 106: 15-36.
34. Usdin K, Grabczyk E. 2000. DNA repeat expansions and human disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 57: 914-31.
35. Shaw CJ, Lupski JR. 2004. Implications of human genome architecture for rearrangement-based disorders: the genomic basis of disease. Hum Mol Genet 13 Spec No 1: R57-64.
36. Kelkar YD, Tyekucheva S, Chiaromonte F, Makova KD. 2008. The genome-wide determinants of human and chimpanzee microsatellite evolution. Genome Res 18: 30-38.
37. Bacolla A, Larson JE, Collins JR, Li J, et al. 2008. Abundance and length of simple repeats in vertebrate genomes are determined by their structural properties. Genome Res 18: 1545-53.
38. Zhao J, Bacolla A, Wang G, Vasquez KM. 2010. Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 43-62.
39. Bailey JA, Eichler EE. 2003. Genome-wide detection and analysis of recent segmental duplications within mammalian organisms. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 68: 115-24.
40. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409: 860-921.
41. González J, Casals F, Ruiz A. 2007. Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila. Genetics 175: 167-77.
42. Lobo NF, Sangaré DM, Regier AA, Reidenbach KR, et al. 2010. Breakpoint structure of the Anopheles gambiae 2Rb chromosomal inversion. Malar J 9: 293.
43. dela Paz JS, Stronghill PE, Douglas SJ, Saravia S, et al. 2012. Chromosome fragile sites in Arabidopsis harbor matrix attachment regions that may be associated with ancestral chromosome rearrangement events. PLoS Genet 8: e1003136.
44. Darling AE, Miklós I, Ragan MA. 2008. Dynamics of genome rearrangement in bacterial populations. PLoS Genet 4: e1000128.
45. Mongin E, Dewar K, Blanchette M. 2009. Long-range regulation is a major driving force in maintaining genome integrity. BMC Evol Biol 9: 203.
46. Becker TS, Lenhard B. 2007. The random versus fragile breakage models of chromosome evolution: a matter of resolution. Mol Genet Genom 278: 487-91.
47. Kikuta H, Laplante M, Navratilova P, Komisarczuk AZ, et al. 2007. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res 17: 545-55.
48. Lemaitre C, Zaghloul L, Sagot MF, Gautier C, et al. 2009. Analysis of fine-scale mammalian evolutionary breakpoints provides new insight into their relation to genome organisation. BMC Genomics 10: 335.
49. Kemkemer C, Kohn M, Cooper DN, Froenicke L, et al. 2009. Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution. BMC Evol Biol 9: 84.
50. Lindblad-Toh K, Garber M, Zuk O, Lin M, et al. 2011. A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature 478: 476-82.
51. Simakov O, Marletaz F, Cho S-J, Edsinger-Gonzales E, et al. 2013. Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes. Nature 493: 526-31.
52. Irimia M, Maeso I, Roy SW, Fraser HB. 2013. Ancient cis-regulatory constraints and the evolution of genome architecture. Trends Genet 29: 521-8.
53. Ullastres A, Farré M, Capilla L, Ruiz-Herrera A. 2014. Unraveling the effect of genomic structural changes in the rhesus macaque - implications for the adaptive role of inversions. BMC Genomics 15: 530.
54. Puig M, Caceres M, Ruiz A. 2004. Silencing of a gene adjacent to the breakpoint of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposon-induced antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9013-8.
55. Guillen Y, Ruiz A. 2012. Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution. BMC Genomics 13: 53.
56. Avelar AT, Perfeito L, Gordo I, Ferreira MG. 2013. Genome architecture is a selectable trait that can be maintained by antagonistic pleiotropy. Nat Commun 4: 2235.
57. Marquès-Bonet T, Cáceres M, Bertranpetit J, Preuss TM, et al. 2004. Chromosomal rearrangements and the genomic distribution of gene-expression divergence in humans and chimpanzees. Trends Genet 20: 524-9.
58. Muñoz A, Sankoff D. 2012. Detection of gene expression changes at chromosomal rearrangement breakpoints in evolution. BMC Bioinformatics 13: S6.
59. Gazave E, Darre F, Morcillo-Suarez C, Petit-Marty N, et al. 2011. Copy number variation analysis in the great apes reveals species-specific patterns of structural variation. Genome Res 21: 1626-39.
60. Marques-Bonet T, Girirajan S, Eichler EE. 2009. The origins and impact of primate segmental duplications. Trends Genet 25: 443-54.
61. Orozco LD, Cokus SJ, Ghazalpour A, Ingram-Drake L, et al. 2009. Copy number variation influences gene expression and metabolic traits in mice. Hum Mol Genet 18: 4118-29.
62. Chaignat E, Yahya-Graison EA, Henrichsen CN, Chrast J, et al. 2011. Copy number variation modifies expression time courses. Genome Res 21: 106-13.
63. Lowe CB, Haussler D. 2012. 29 Mammalian genomes reveal novel exaptations of mobile elements for likely regulatory functions in the human genome. PLoS ONE 7: e43128.
64. Farre M, Micheletti D, Ruiz-Herrera A. 2013. Recombination rates and genomic shuffling in human and chimpanzee-a new twist in the chromosomal speciation theory. Mol Biol Evol 30: 853-64.
65. Noor MA, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Reiland J. 2001. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 12084-8.
66. Rieseberg LH. 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 351-8.
67. Faria R, Navarro A. 2010. Chromosomal speciation revisited: rearranging theory with pieces of evidence. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 660-9.
68. Navarro A, Betran E, Barbadilla A, Ruiz A. 1997. Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes. Genetics 146: 695-709.
69. Romanov MN, Farré M, Lithgow PE, Fowler KE, et al. 2014. Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor. BMC Genomics 15: 1060.
70. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375-84.
71. Pratto F, Brick K, Khil P, Smagulova F, et al. 2014. DNA recombination. Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes. Science 346: 1256442.
72. Ubeda F, Wilkins JF. 2011. The Red Queen theory of recombination hotspots. J Evol Biol 24: 541-53.
73. Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2010. Comparative genomics reveals birth and death of fragile regions in mammalian evolution. Genome Biol 11: R117.
74. Green CM, Almouzni G. 2002. When repair meets chromatin First in series on chromatin dynamics. EMBO Rep 3: 28-33.
75. Gontijo AMdMC, Green CM, Almouzni G. 2003. Repairing DNA damage in chromatin. Biochimie 85: 1133-47.
76. Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh T-Y, et al. 2007. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129: 823-37.
77. Campos EI, Reinberg D. 2009. Histones: annotating chromatin. Annu Rev Genet 43: 559-99.
78. Terrenoire E, McRonald F, Halsall JA, Page P, et al. 2010. Immunostaining of modified histones defines high-level features of the human metaphase epigenome. Genome Biol 11: R110.
79. Consortium EP, Bernstein BE, Birney E, Dunham I, et al. 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489: 57-74.
80. Gangadharan S, Mularoni L, Fain-Thornton J, Wheelan SJ, et al. 2010. DNA transposon Hermes inserts into DNA in nucleosome-free regions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 21966-72.
81. Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, et al. 2013. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10: 1213-8.
82. Carbone L, Harris RA, Gnerre S, Veeramah KR, et al. 2014. Gibbon genome and the fast karyotype evolution of small apes. Nature 513: 195-201.
83. Muller S, Wienberg J. 2001. "Bar-coding" primate chromosomes: molecular cytogenetic screening for the ancestral hominoid karyotype. Hum Genet 109: 85-94.
84. Capozzi O, Carbone L, Stanyon RR, Marra A, et al. 2012. A comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome rearrangements in gibbons. Genome Res 22: 2520-8.
85. Pennisi E. 2015. Genomics. Inching toward the 3D genome. Science 347: 10.
86. Cremer T, Cremer C. 2001. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2: 292-301.
87. Cremer T, Cremer M. 2010. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a003889.
88. Tanabe H, Müller S, Neusser M, von Hase J, et al. 2002. Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 4424-9.
89. Mora L, Sánchez I, Garcia M, Ponsà M. 2006. Chromosome territory positioning of conserved homologous chromosomes in different primate species. Chromosoma 115: 367-75.
90. Pombo A, Branco MR. 2007. Functional organisation of the genome during interphase. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 451-5.
91. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. 2002. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295: 1306-11.
92. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA. 2013. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet 14: 390-403.
93. Phillips-Cremins JE. 2014. Unraveling architecture of the pluripotent genome. Curr Opin Cell Biol 28: 96-104.
94. Nora EP, Dekker J, Heard E. 2013. Segmental folding of chromosomes: a basis for structural and regulatory chromosomal neighborhoods?. BioEssays 35: 818-28.
95. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, et al. 2012. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485: 376-80.
96. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, et al. 2012. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485: 381-85.
97. Sexton T, Kurukuti S, Mitchell JA, Umlauf D, et al. 2012. Sensitive detection of chromatin coassociations using enhanced chromosome conformation capture on chip. Nat Protoc 7: 1335-50.
98. Woltering JM, Noordermeer D, Leleu M, Duboule D. 2014. Conservation and divergence of regulatory strategies at Hox Loci and the origin of tetrapod digits. PLoS Biol 12: e1001773.
99. Ghavi-Helm Y, Klein FA, Pakozdi T, Ciglar L, et al. 2014. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 512: 96-100.
100. Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, et al. 2014. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159: 1665-80.
101. Ruiz-Herrera A, Farre M, Ponsa M, Robinson TJ. 2010. Selection against Robertsonian fusions involving housekeeping genes in the house mouse: integrating data from gene expression arrays and chromosome evolution. Chromosome Res 18: 801-8.
102. Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. 2009. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science 324: 522-8.
103. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, et al. 2009. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326: 289-93.
104. Veron AS, Lemaitre C, Gautier C, Lacroix V, et al. 2011. Close 3D proximity of evolutionary breakpoints argues for the notion of spatial synteny. BMC Genomics 12: 303.
105. Zhang Y, McCord RP, Ho YJ, Lajoie BR, et al. 2012. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148: 908-21.
106. Al-Shahrour F, Minguez P, Marques-Bonet T, Gazave E, et al. 2010. Selection upon genome architecture: conservation of functional neighborhoods with changing genes. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000953.
107. Schmidt D, Schwalie PC, Wilson MD, Ballester B, et al. 2012. Waves of retrotransposon expansion remodel genome organization and CTCF binding in multiple mammalian lineages. Cell 148: 335-48.
108. Yunis JJ, Prakash O. 1982. The origin of man: a chromosomal pictorial legacy. Science 215: 1525-30.
109. Prado-Martinez J, Sudmant PH, Kidd JM, Li H, et al. 2013. Great ape genetic diversity and population history. Nature 499: 471-5.
110. Shen MR, Batzer MA, Deininger PL. 1991. Evolution of the master Alu gene(s). J Mol Evol 33: 311-20.
111. Jurka J. 1997. Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 1872-7.
112. Levy A, Schwartz S, Ast G. 2010. Large-scale discovery of insertion hotspots and preferential integration sites of human transposed elements. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 1515-30.
113. Kvikstad EM, Makova KD. 2010. The (r) evolution of SINE versus LINE distributions in primate genomes: sex chromosomes are important. Genome Res 20: 600-13.
114. Jeffreys AJ, Kauppi L, Neumann R. 2001. Intensely punctate meiotic recombination in the class II region of the major histocompatibility complex. Nat Genet 29: 217-22.
115. Myers S, Bottolo L, Freeman C, McVean G, et al. 2005. A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science 310: 321-4.
116. Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, et al. 2012. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485: 642-5.
117. Wu H, Mathioudakis N, Diagouraga B, Dong A, et al. 2013. Molecular basis for the regulation of the H3K4 methyltransferase activity of PRDM9. Cell Rep 5: 13-20.
118. Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, et al. 2009. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373-5.
119. Capilla L, Medarde N, Alemany-Schmidt A, Oliver-Bonet M, et al. 2014. Genetic recombination variation in wild Robertsonian mice: on the role of chromosomal fusions and Prdm9 allelic background. Proc Biol Sci 281: pii: 20140297.