Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes?

Genome Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 306-310

  Froenicke, Lutz ^a   Caldés, Montserrat Garcia ^b   Graphodatsky, Alexander ^c   Müller, Stefan ^d   Lyons, Leslie A ^a   Robinson, Terence J ^e   Volleth, Marianne ^f   Yang, Fengtang ^g   Wienberg, Johannes ^d,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^f OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^g WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^h INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AUTOSOME; BIOINFORMATICS; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE; MAMMALIAN GENETICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TAXON;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SYNTENY;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 33644655538     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.3955206     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Amrine-Madsen, H., Koepfli, K.P., Wayne, R.K., and Springer, M.S. 2003. A new phylogenetic marker, apolipoprotein B, provides compelling evidence for eutherian relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28: 225-240.
2. Bailey, J.A., Baertsch, R., Kent, W.J., Haussler, D., and Eichler, E.E. 2004. Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution. Genome Biol. 5: R23.
3. Birney, E., Andrews, T.D., Bevan, P., Caccamo, M., Chen, Y., Clarke, L., Coates, G., Cuff, J., Curwen, V., Cutts, T., et al. 2004. An overview of Ensembl. Genome Res. 14: 925-928.
4. Bourque, G. and Pevzner, P.A. 2002. Genome-scale evolution: Reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species. Genome Res. 12: 26-36.
5. Bourque, G., Pevzner, P.A., and Tesler, G. 2004. Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: Lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. Genome Res. 14: 507-516.
6. Bourque, G., Zdobnov, E.M., Bork, P., Pevzner, P.A., and Tesler, G. 2005. Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages. Genome Res. 15: 98-110.
7. Chowdhary, B.P., Raudsepp, T., Fronicke, L., and Scherthan, H. 1998. Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. Genome Res. 8: 577-589.
8. Dobigny, G., Ducroz, J.F, Robinson, T.J., and Volobouev, V. 2004. Cytogenetics and cladistics. Syst. Biol. 53: 470-484.
9. Froenicke, L. 2005. Origins of primate chromosomes - as delineated by Zoo-FISH and alignments of human and mouse draft genome sequences. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 108: 122-138.
10. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
11. Hillier, L.W., Miller, W., Birney, E., Warren, W., Hardison, R.C., Ponting, C.P., Bork, P., Burt, D.W., Groenen, M.A., Delany, M.E., et al. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432: 695-716.
12. Li, T., O'Brien, P.C., Biltueva, L., Fu, B., Wang, J., Nie, W., Ferguson-Smith, M.A., Graphodatsky, A.S., and Yang, F. 2004. Evolution of genome organizations of squirrels (Sciuridae) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting. Chromosome Res. 12: 317-335.
13. Lindblad-Toh, K., Wade, C.M., Mikkelsen, T.S., Karlsson, E.K., Jaffe, D.B., Kamal, M., Clamp, M., Chang, J.L., Kulbokas III, E.J., Zody, M.C., et al. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438: 803-819.
14. Margulies, E.H., Maduro, V.V., Thomas, P.J., Tomkins, J.P., Amemiya, C.T., Luo, M., and Green, E.D. 2005. Comparative sequencing provides insights about the structure and conservation of marsupial and monotreme genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 3354-3359.
15. Müller, S., Hollatz, M., and Wienberg, J. 2003. Chromosomal phylogeny and evolution of gibbons (Hylobatidae). Hum. Genet. 113: 493-501.
16. Murphy, W.J., Fronicke, L., O'Brien, S.J., and Stanyon, R. 2003. The origin of human chromosome 1 and its homologs in placental mammals. Genome Res. 13: 1880-1888.
17. Nilsson, S., Helou, K., Walentinsson, A., Szpirer, C., Nerman, O., and Stahl, F. 2001. Rat-mouse and rat-human comparative maps based on gene homology and high-resolution zoo-FISH. Genomics 74: 287-298.
18. O'Brien, S.J. and Graves, J.A. 1990. Report of the committee on comparative gene mapping. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 55: 406-433.
19. Pevzner, P. and Tesler, G. 2003. Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 7672-7677.
20. Richard, F., Lombard, M., and Dutrillaux, B. 2003. Reconstruction of the ancestral karyotype of eutherian mammals. Chromosome Res. 11: 605-618.
21. Robinson, T.J., Fu, B., Ferguson-Smith, M.A., and Yang, F. 2004. Cross-species chromosome painting in the golden mole and elephant-shrew: Support for the mammalian clades Afrotheria and Afroinsectiphillia but not Afroinsectivora. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 271: 1477-1484.
22. Ruiz-Herrera, A., Garcia, F., Mora, L., Egozcue, J., Ponsa, M., and Garcia, M. 2005. Evolutionarily conserved chromosomal segments in the human karyotype are bounded by unstable chromosome bands. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 108: 161-174.
23. Sargan, D.R., Yang, F., Squire, M., Milne, B.S., O'Brien, P.C., and Ferguson-Smith, M.A. 2000. Use of flow-sorted canine chromosomes in the assignment of canine linkage, radiation hybrid, and syntenic groups to chromosomes: Refinement and verification of the comparative chromosome map for dog and human. Genomics 69: 182-195.
24. Scherthan, H., Cremer, T., Arnason, U., Weier, H.U., Lima-de-Faria, A., and Frönicke, L. 1994. Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nat. Genet. 6: 342-347.
25. Stanyon, R., Yang, F., Cavagna, P., O'Brien, P.C., Bagga, M., Ferguson-Smith, M.A., and Wienberg, J. 1999. Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and cats. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 84: 150-155.
26. Svartman, M., Stone, G., Page, J.E., and Stanyon, R. 2004. A chromosome painting test of the basal eutherian karyotype. Chromosome Res. 12: 45-53.
27. Wienberg, J. 2004. The evolution of eutherian chromosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14: 657-666.
28. Wienberg, J., Jauch, A., Stanyon, R., and Cremer, T. 1990. Molecular cytotaxonomy of primates by chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization. Genomics 8: 347-350.
29. Yang, F., Alkalaeva, E.Z., Perelman, P.L., Pardini, A.T., Harrison, W.R., O'Brien, P.C., Fu, B., Graphodatsky, A.S., Ferguson-Smith, M.A., and Robinson, T.J. 2003. Reciprocal chromosome painting among human, aardvark, and elephant (superorder Afrotheria) reveals the likely eutherian ancestral karyotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 1062-1066.