The fragile breakage versus random breakage models of chromosome evolution

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 100-111

  Peng, Qian ^a   Pevzner, Pavel A ^a   Tesler, Glenn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS; TOYS;

BLOCK IDENTIFICATION; BREAKAGE MODELS; CHROMOSOME EVOLUTION; COMPARATIVE GENOMICS; GENOMIC ARCHITECTURE; HOTSPOTS; HUMAN GENOMES; IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHMS; REGULATORY REGIONS; SYNTENY BLOCKS;

GENES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME FRAGILITY; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOARCHITECTURE; ERROR; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; REGULATOR GENE; SYNTENY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHROMOSOME; DNA DAMAGE; HUMAN; HUMAN CHROMOSOME; MOUSE; STATISTICAL MODEL; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X CHROMOSOME;

MAMMALIA;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOMES; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA DAMAGE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; X CHROMOSOME;

EID: 33645766047     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Nadeau J, Taylor B (1984) Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81: 814-818.
2. Ohno S (1973) Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature 244: 259-262.
3. Copeland N, Jenkins NA, Gilber DJ, Eppig JT, Maltasi LJ, et al. (1993) A genetic linkage map of the mouse: Current applications and future prospects. Science 262: 57-66.
4. DeBry R, Seldin M (1996) Human/mouse homology relationships. Genomics 33: 337-351.
5. Burt D, Bruley C, Dunn I, Jones C, Ramage A, et al. (1999) The dynamics of chromosome evolution in birds and mammals. Nature 402: 411-413.
6. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409: 860-921.
7. Mural RJ, Adams MD, Myers EW, Smith HO, Mikos GL, et al. (2002) A comparison of whole-genome shotgun-derived mouse chromosome 16 and the human genome. Science 296: 1661-1671.
8. Pennisi E (2000) A mouse chronology. Science 288: 248-257.
9. Pevzner P, Tesler G (2003) Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 7672-7677.
10. Sankoff D, Trinh P (2004) Chromosomal breakpoint re-use in the inference of genome sequence rearrangement. In: Gusfield D, Bourne P, Istrail S, Pevzner P, Waterman M, editors. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology, March 27-31, 2004, San Diego, California. New York: ACM Press. pp 30-35.
11. Sankoff D, Trinh P (2005) Chromosomal breakpoint re-use in genome sequence rearrangement. J Comput Biol 12: 812-821.
12. Bailey JA, Baertsch R, Kent WJ, Haussler D, Eichler EE (2004) Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution. Genome Biol 5: R23.
13. Zhao S, Shetty J, Hou L, Delcher A, Zhu B, et al. (2004) Human, mouse, and rat genome large-scale rearrangements: Stability versus speciation. Genome Res 14: 1851-1860.
14. Trinh P, McLysaght A, Sankoff D (2004) Genomic features in the breakpoint regions between syntenic blocks. Bioinformatics 20: i318-i325.
15. Pevzner P, Tesler G (2003) Transforming men into mice: The Nadeau-Taylor chromosomal breakage model revisited. In: Miller W, Vingron M, Istrail S, Pevzner P, Waterman M, editors. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology, April 10-14, 2003, Berlin, Germany. New York: ACM Press. pp. 247-256.
16. Bourque G, Pevzner PA, Tesler G (2004) Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: Lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. Genome Res 14: 507-516.
17. Pevzner P, Tesler G (2003) Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: Lessons from human and mouse genomes. Genome Res 13: 37-45.
18. Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Metzker ML, Muzny DM, Sodergren EJ, et al. (2004) Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 428: 493-521.
19. Hillier LW, Miller W, Birney E, Warren W, Hardison RC, et al. (2004) Sequencing and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432: 695-716.
20. Bourque G, Zdobnov E, Bork P, Pevzner P, Tesler G (2005) Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages. Genome Res 15: 98-110.
21. Tesler G (2002) GRIMM: Genome rearrangements web server. Bioinformatics 18: 492-493.
22. Tesler G (2002) Efficient algorithms for multichromosomal genome rearrangements. J Comp Sys Sci 65: 587-609.
23. Schwartz S, Kent WJ, Smit A, Zheng Zhang RB, Hardison RC, et al. (2003) Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ. Genome Res 13: 103-107.
24. Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, van der Wind AE, Bourque G, Tesler G, et al. (2005) Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309: 613-617.