Erratum: Kinetochore-microtubule error correction is driven by differentially regulated interaction modes (Nature Cell Biology (2015) 16 DOI: 10.1038/ncb3128);Kinetochore-microtubule error correction is driven by differentially regulated interaction modes

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 421-433

  Kalantzaki, Maria ^a,c   Kitamura, Etsushi ^a   Zhang, Tongli ^b   Mino, Akihisa ^a,d   Novák, Béla ^b   Tanaka, Tomoyuki U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; CHROMOSOME PROTEIN; DAM1 PROTEIN; NDC80 COMPLEX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; AURORA KINASE; CDC6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DAM1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; IPL1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; NDC80 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME REGULATION; KINETOCHORE MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SISTER CHROMATID; STEADY STATE; BINDING SITE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; GENETICS; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

AURORA KINASES; BINDING SITES; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84925946869     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3153     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Tanaka, T. U. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: steps towards bi-orientation. EMBO J. 29, 4070-4082 (2010).
2. Rieder, C. L. & Alexander, S. P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 110, 81-95 (1990).
3. Tanaka, K. et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434, 987-994 (2005).
4. Tanaka, K., Kitamura, E., Kitamura, Y. & Tanaka, T. U. Molecular mechanisms of microtubule-dependent kinetochore transport toward spindle poles. J. Cell Biol. 178, 269-281 (2007).
5. Tanaka, T. U. et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317-329 (2002).
6. Hauf, S. et al. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 161, 281-294 (2003).
7. Lampson, M. A., Renduchitala, K., Khodjakov, A. & Kapoor, T. M. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 232-237 (2004).
8. Westermann, S., Drubin, D. G. & Barnes, G. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 563-591 (2007).
9. Tanaka, T. U. & Desai, A. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 53-63 (2008).
10. Nogales, E. & Ramey, V. H. Structure-function insights into the yeast Dam1 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3831-3836 (2009).
11. Biggins, S. The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore. Genetics 194, 817-846 (2013).
12. Lampert, F., Hornung, P. & Westermann, S. The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-Tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Biol. 189, 641-649 (2010).
13. Tien, J. F. et al. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 189, 713-723 (2010).
14. Maure, J. F. et al. The Ndc80 loop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end. Curr. Biol. 21, 207-213 (2011).
15. Lampert, F., Mieck, C., Alushin, G. M., Nogales, E. & Westermann, S. Molecular requirements for the formation of a kinetochore-microtubule interface by Dam1 and Ndc80 complexes. J. Cell Biol. 200, 21-30 (2013).
16. Miranda, J. J., De Wulf, P., Sorger, P. K. & Harrison, S. C. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 138-143 (2005).
17. Westermann, S. et al. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell 17, 277-290 (2005).
18. Cheeseman, I. M. et al. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111, 163-172 (2002).
19. Akiyoshi, B., Nelson, C. R., Ranish, J. A. & Biggins, S. Analysis of Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation of the Ndc80 kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 183, 1591-1595 (2009).
20. Lampson, M. A. & Cheeseman, I. M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 133-140 (2011).
21. Ramey, V. H. et al. Subunit organization in the Dam1 kinetochore complex and its ring around microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4335-4342 (2011).
22. Wei, R. R., Al-Bassam, J. & Harrison, S. C. The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 54-59 (2007).
23. Ciferri, C. et al. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133, 427-439 (2008).
24. DeLuca, J. G. et al. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127, 969-982 (2006).
25. Demirel, P. B., Keyes, B. E., Chaterjee, M., Remington, C. E. & Burke, D. J. A redundant function for the N-Terminal tail of Ndc80 in kinetochore-microtubule interaction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 192, 753-756 (2012).
26. Cheeseman, I. M., Chappie, J. S., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M. & Desai, A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127, 983-997 (2006).
27. Miller, S. A., Johnson, M. L. & Stukenberg, P. T. Kinetochore attachments require an interaction between unstructured tails on microtubules and Ndc80(Hec1). Curr. Biol. 18, 1785-1791 (2008).
28. Sarangapani, K. K., Akiyoshi, B., Duggan, N. M., Biggins, S. & Asbury, C. L. Phosphoregulation promotes release of kinetochores from dynamic microtubules via multiple mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7282-7287 (2013).
29. Hill, A. & Bloom, K. Genetic manipulation of centromere function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2397-2405 (1987).
30. Gandhi, S. R. et al. Kinetochore-dependent microtubule rescue ensures their efficient and sustained interaction in early mitosis. Dev. Cell 21, 920-933 (2011).
31. Howard, J. & Hyman, A. A. Growth, fluctuation and switching at microtubule plus ends. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 569-574 (2009).
32. Keating, P., Rachidi, N., Tanaka, T. U. & Stark, M. J. Ipl1-dependent phosphorylation of Dam1 is reduced by tension applied on kinetochores. J. Cell Sci. 122, 4375-4382 (2009).
33. Maure, J. F., Kitamura, E. & Tanaka, T. U. Mps1 kinase promotes sisterkinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr. Biol. 17, 2175-2182 (2007).
34. Jelluma, N. et al. Mps1 phophorylates Borealin to control Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment. Cell 132, 233-246 (2008).
35. Shimogawa, M. M. et al. Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase. Curr. Biol. 16, 1489-1501 (2006).
36. Westermann, S. et al. The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature 440, 565-569 (2006).
37. Zhang, T., Oliveira, R. A., Schmierer, B. & Novak, B. Dynamical scenarios for chromosome bi-orientation. Biophys. J. 104, 2595-2606 (2013).
38. Guimaraes, G. J., Dong, Y., McEwen, B. F. & Deluca, J. G. Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-Terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr. Biol. 18, 1778-1784 (2008).
39. Welburn, J. P. et al. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 38, 383-392 (2010).
40. Kemmler, S. et al. Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. EMBO J. 28, 1099-1110 (2009).
41. Welburn, J. P. et al. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell 16, 374-385 (2009).
42. Gaitanos, T. N. et al. Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J. 28, 1442-1452 (2009).
43. Chan, Y. W., Jeyaprakash, A. A., Nigg, E. A. & Santamaria, A. Aurora B controls kinetochore-microtubule attachments by inhibiting Ska complex-KMN network interaction. J. Cell Biol. 196, 563-571 (2012).
44. Hanisch, A., Sillje, H. H. & Nigg, E. A. Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2. EMBO J. 25, 5504-5515 (2006).
45. Cheerambathur, D. K., Gassmann, R., Cook, B., Oegema, K. & Desai, A. Crosstalk between microtubule attachment complexes ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Science 342, 1239-1242 (2013).
46. Amberg, D C., Burke, D. J. & Strathern, J. N. Methods in Yeast Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2005).
47. Tanaka, T., Fuchs, J., Loidl, J. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 492-499 (2000).
48. Michaelis, C., Ciosk, R. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91, 35-45 (1997).
49. Bressan, D. A., Vazquez, J. & Haber, J. E. Mating type-dependent constraints on the mobility of the left arm of yeast chromosome III. J. Cell Biol. 164, 361-371 (2004).
50. Uhlmann, F., Wernic, D., Poupart, M. A., Koonin, E. V. & Nasmyth, K. Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast. Cell 103, 375-386 (2000).
51. Straight, A. F., Marshall, W. F., Sedat, J. W. & Murray, A. W. Mitosis in living budding yeast: anaphase A but no metaphase plate. Science 277, 574-578 (1997).
52. Dohmen, R. J., Wu, P. & Varshavsky, A. Heat-inducible degron: a method for constructing temperature-sensitive mutants. Science 263, 1273-1276 (1994).
53. Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T. & Kanemaki, M. An auxinbased degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6, 917-922 (2009).
54. Haruki, H., Nishikawa, J. & Laemmli, U. K. The anchor-Away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol. Cell 31, 925-932 (2008).
55. Biggins, S. et al. The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13, 532-544 (1999).
56. Tanaka, K., Kitamura, E. & Tanaka, T. U. Live-cell analysis of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in budding yeast. Methods 51, 206-213 (2010).
57. Kitamura, E. et al. Kinetochores generate microtubules with distal plus ends: their roles and limited lifetime in mitosis. Dev. Cell 18, 248-259 (2010).