Phosphoregulation promotes release of kinetochores from dynamic microtubules via multiple mechanisms

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 18, 2013, Pages 7282-7287

  Sarangapani, Krishna K ^a   Akiyoshi, Bungo ^a,b,c   Duggan, Nicole M ^b   Biggins, Sue ^b   Asbury, Charles L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; DAM1 PROTEIN; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; NDC80 COMPLEX; SERINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROTUBULE; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY;

BIOMECHANICS; KINETICS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHOSPHOSERINE; PROTEIN KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84876947414     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220700110     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Cheeseman IM, Desai A (2008) Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(1):33-46.
2. DeLuca JG, Musacchio A (2012) Structural organization of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24(1):48-56.
3. McAinsh AD, Tytell JD, Sorger PK (2003) Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:519-539. (Pubitemid 37487359)
4. Biggins S, et al. (1999) The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev 13(5):532-544. (Pubitemid 29131878)
5. Hauf S, et al. (2003) The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 161(2):281-294. (Pubitemid 36529847)
6. Liu D, Lampson MA (2009) Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Aurora B kinase. Biochem Soc Trans 37(Pt 5):976-980.
7. Tanaka TU, et al. (2002) Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108(3):317-329. (Pubitemid 34178397)
8. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A (2006) The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127(5):983-997. (Pubitemid 44792248)
9. Hanisch A, Silljé HH, Nigg EA (2006) Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2. EMBO J 25(23):5504-5515. (Pubitemid 44847191)
10. Janke C, Ortíz J, Tanaka TU, Lechner J, Schiebel E (2002) Four new subunits of the Dam1-Duo1 complex reveal novel functions in sister kinetochore biorientation. EMBO J 21(1-2):181-193. (Pubitemid 34087087)
11. Asbury CL, Gestaut DR, Powers AF, Franck AD, Davis TN (2006) The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(26):9873-9878. (Pubitemid 43993590)
12. Grishchuk EL, et al. (2008) Different assemblies of the DAM1 complex follow shortening microtubules by distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(19):6918-6923. (Pubitemid 351754505)
13. McIntosh JR, et al. (2008) Fibrils connect microtubule tips with kinetochores: A mechanism to couple tubulin dynamics to chromosome motion. Cell 135(2):322-333.
14. Powers AF, et al. (2009) The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell 136(5):865-875.
15. Westermann S, et al. (2006) The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature 440(7083):565-569.
16. Lampert F, Hornung P, Westermann S (2010) The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J Cell Biol 189(4):641-649.
17. Tien JF, et al. (2010) Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J Cell Biol 189(4):713-723.
18. Ciferri C, et al. (2008) Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133(3):427-439. (Pubitemid 351622013)
19. Gestaut DR, et al. (2008) Phosphoregulation and depolymerization-driven movement of the Dam1 complex do not require ring formation. Nat Cell Biol 10(4):407-414.
20. Alushin GM, et al. (2012) Multimodal microtubule binding by the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19(11):1161-1167.
21. Umbreit NT, et al. (2012) The Ndc80 kinetochore complex directly modulates microtubule dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(40):16113-16118.
22. Welburn JP, et al. (2010) Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol Cell 38(3):383-392.
23. Wang HW, et al. (2007) Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14(8):721- 726.
24. Lampson MA, Renduchitala K, Khodjakov A, Kapoor TM (2004) Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat Cell Biol 6(3):232-237. (Pubitemid 38344361)
25. Akiyoshi B, et al. (2010) Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 468(7323):576-579.
26. Franck AD, et al. (2007) Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 9(7):832-837. (Pubitemid 47019470)
27. Akiyoshi B, Nelson CR, Ranish JA, Biggins S (2009) Analysis of Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation of the Ndc80 kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 183(4):1591- 1595.
28. Cheeseman IM, et al. (2002) Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111(2):163-172. (Pubitemid 35292437)
29. Guimaraes GJ, Dong Y, McEwen BF, Deluca JG (2008) Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr Biol 18(22): 1778-1784.
30. Miller SA, Johnson ML, Stukenberg PT (2008) Kinetochore attachments require an interaction between unstructured tails on microtubules and Ndc80(Hec1). Curr Biol 18(22):1785-1791.
31. Miranda JJ, King DS, Harrison SC (2007) Protein arms in the kinetochore-microtubule interface of the yeast DASH complex. Mol Biol Cell 18(7):2503-2510. (Pubitemid 47025716)
32. Ramey VH, et al. (2011) Subunit organization in the Dam1 kinetochore complex and its ring around microtubules. Mol Biol Cell 22(22):4335-4342.
33. Wei RR, Al-Bassam J, Harrison SC (2007) The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14(1):54-59. (Pubitemid 46067423)
34. DeLuca JG, et al. (2006) Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127(5):969-982. (Pubitemid 44792254)
35. Keating P, Rachidi N, Tanaka TU, Stark MJ (2009) Ipl1-dependent phosphorylation of Dam1 is reduced by tension applied on kinetochores. J Cell Sci 122(Pt 23):4375-4382.
36. Tooley JG, Miller SA, Stukenberg PT (2011) The Ndc80 complex uses a tripartite attachment point to couple microtubule depolymerization to chromosome movement. Mol Biol Cell 22(8):1217-1226.
37. Enquist-Newman M, et al. (2001) Dad1p, third component of the Duo1p/Dam1p complex involved in kinetochore function and mitotic spindle integrity. Mol Biol Cell 12(9):2601-2613. (Pubitemid 33051928)
38. Franck AD, Powers AF, Gestaut DR, Davis TN, Asbury CL (2010) Direct physical study of kinetochore-microtubule interactions by reconstitution and interrogation with an optical force clamp. Methods 51(2):242-250.
39. Tanaka K, et al. (2005) Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434(7036):987-994. (Pubitemid 40586041)
40. Westermann S, et al. (2005) Formation of a dynamic kinetochore- microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol Cell 17(2):277-290. (Pubitemid 40138621)
41. Dewar H, Tanaka K, Nasmyth K, Tanaka TU (2004) Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 428(6978):93-97. (Pubitemid 38332364)
42. Magidson V, et al. (2011) The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell 146(4):555-567.
43. Rieder CL, Salmon ED (1994) Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 124(3):223-233. (Pubitemid 24050342)
44. DeLuca KF, Lens SM, DeLuca JG (2011) Temporal changes in Hec1 phosphorylation control kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability during mitosis. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 4):622-634.
45. Maskell DP, Hu XW, Singleton MR (2010) Molecular architecture and assembly of the yeast kinetochore MIND complex. J Cell Biol 190(5):823-834.
46. Westermann S, et al. (2003) Architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore reveals a conserved molecular core. J Cell Biol 163(2):215-222. (Pubitemid 37363122)