Molecular requirements for the formation of a kinetochore-microtubule interface by Dam1 and Ndc80 complexes

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 21-30

  Lampert, Fabienne ^a   Mieck, Christine ^a   Alushin, Gregory M ^b,d   Nogales, Eva ^b,c   Westermann, Stefan ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALPONIN; DAM1 PROTEIN; NDC80 COMPLEX; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; GENE MUTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; LETHALITY; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; YEAST;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE DELETION;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84872060314     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201210091     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alushin, G.M., V.H. Ramey, S. Pasqualato, D.A. Ball, N. Grigorieff, A. Musacchio, and E. Nogales. 2010. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature. 467:805-810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09423
2. Asbury, C.L., D.R. Gestaut, A.F. Powers, A.D. Franck, and T.N. Davis. 2006. The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:9873-9878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602249103
3. Bloom, K., and A. Joglekar. 2010. Towards building a chromosome segregation machine. Nature. 463:446-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08912
4. Camahort, R., M. Shivaraju, M. Mattingly, B. Li, S. Nakanishi, D. Zhu, A. Shilatifard, J.L. Workman, and J.L. Gerton. 2009. Cse4 is part of an octameric nucleosome in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. 35:794-805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.022
5. Cheeseman, I.M., S. Anderson, M. Jwa, E.M. Green, Js. Kang, J.R. Yates III, C.S. Chan, D.G. Drubin, and G. Barnes. 2002. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell. 111:163-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00973-X
6. Cheeseman, I.M., J.S. Chappie, E.M. Wilson-Kubalek, and A. Desai. 2006. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell. 127:983-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.039
7. Ciferri, C., S. Pasqualato, E. Screpanti, G. Varetti, S. Santaguida, G. Dos Reis, A. Maiolica, J. Polka, J.G. De Luca, P. De Wulf, et al. 2008. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell. 133:427-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.020
8. De Wulf, P., A.D. McAinsh, and P.K. Sorger. 2003. Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Genes Dev. 17:2902-2921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1144403
9. DeLuca, J.G., Y. Dong, P. Hergert, J. Strauss, J.M. Hickey, E.D. Salmon, and B.F. McEwen. 2005. Hec1 and nuf2 are core components of the kinetochore outer plate essential for organizing microtubule attachment sites. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:519-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0852
10. DeLuca, K.F., S.M. Lens, and J.G. DeLuca. 2011. Temporal changes in Hec1 phosphorylation control kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability during mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 124:622-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.072629
11. Demirel, P.B., B.E. Keyes, M. Chaterjee, C.E. Remington, and D.J. Burke. 2012. A redundant function for the N-terminal tail of Ndc80 in kinetochoremicrotubule interaction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 192:753-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.143818
12. Desai, A., S. Rybina, T. Müller-Reichert, A. Shevchenko, A. Shevchenko, A. Hyman, and K. Oegema. 2003. KNL-1 directs assembly of the microtubule-binding interface of the kinetochore in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 17:2421-2435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1126303
13. Gestaut, D.R., B. Graczyk, J. Cooper, P.O. Widlund, A. Zelter, L. Wordeman, C.L. Asbury, and T.N. Davis. 2008. Phosphoregulation and depolymerization-driven movement of the Dam1 complex do not require ring formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:407-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1702
14. Gonen, S., B. Akiyoshi, M.G. Iadanza, D. Shi, N. Duggan, S. Biggins, and T. Gonen. 2012. The structure of purified kinetochores reveals multiple microtubule-attachment sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:925-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2358
15. Grishchuk, E.L., A.K. Efremov, V.A. Volkov, I.S. Spiridonov, N. Gudimchuk, S. Westermann, D. Drubin, G. Barnes, J.R. McIntosh, and F.I. Ataullakhanov. 2008. The Dam1 ring binds microtubules strongly enough to be a processive as well as energy-efficient coupler for chromosome motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:15423-15428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807859105
16. Haruki, H., J. Nishikawa, and U.K. Laemmli. 2008. The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol. Cell. 31:925-932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020
17. Hsu, K.S., and T. Toda. 2011. Ndc80 internal loop interacts with Dis1/TOG to ensure proper kinetochore-spindle attachment in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 21:214-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.048
18. Janke, C., J. Ortíz, T.U. Tanaka, J. Lechner, and E. Schiebel. 2002. Four new subunits of the Dam1-Duo1 complex reveal novel functions in sister kinetochore biorientation. EMBO J. 21:181-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.1.181
19. Joglekar, A.P., K. Bloom, and E.D. Salmon. 2009. In vivo protein architecture of the eukaryotic kinetochore with nanometer scale accuracy. Curr. Biol. 19:694-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.056
20. Kemmler, S., M. Stach, M. Knapp, J. Ortiz, J. Pfannstiel, T. Ruppert, and J. Lechner. 2009. Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. EMBO J. 28:1099-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.62
21. Lampert, F., and S. Westermann. 2011. A blueprint for kinetochore-new insights into the molecular mechanics of cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:407-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3133
22. Lampert, F., P. Hornung, and S. Westermann. 2010. The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Biol. 189:641-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200912021
23. Maiolica, A., D. Cittaro, D. Borsotti, L. Sennels, C. Ciferri, C. Tarricone, A. Musacchio, and J. Rappsilber. 2007. Structural analysis of multiprotein complexes by cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and database searching. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 6:2200-2211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M700274-MCP200
24. Maure, J.F., S. Komoto, Y. Oku, A. Mino, S. Pasqualato, K. Natsume, L. Clayton, A. Musacchio, and T.U. Tanaka. 2011. The Ndc80 loop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end. Curr. Biol. 21:207-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.050
25. Mendoza, M.A., S. Panizza, and F. Klein. 2009. Analysis of protein-DNA interactions during meiosis by quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (qChIP). Methods Mol. Biol. 557:267-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-527-5_17
26. Miranda, J.J., P. De Wulf, P.K. Sorger, and S.C. Harrison. 2005. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:138-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb896
27. Powers, A.F., A.D. Franck, D.R. Gestaut, J. Cooper, B. Gracyzk, R.R. Wei, L. Wordeman, T.N. Davis, and C.L. Asbury. 2009. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell. 136:865-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.045
28. Ramey, V.H., A. Wong, J. Fang, S. Howes, G. Barnes, and E. Nogales. 2011. Subunit organization in the Dam1 kinetochore complex and its ring around microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:4335-4342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-07-0659
29. Santaguida, S., and A. Musacchio. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28:2511-2531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.173
30. Schmidt, J.C., and I.M. Cheeseman. 2011. Chromosome segregation: keeping kinetochores in the loop. Curr. Biol. 21:R110-R112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.030
31. Sundin, L.J., G.J. Guimaraes, and J.G. Deluca. 2011. The NDC80 complex proteins Nuf2 and Hec1 make distinct contributions to kinetochore-microtubule attachment in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:759-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0671
32. Tanaka, K., E. Kitamura, Y. Kitamura, and T.U. Tanaka. 2007. Molecular mechanisms of microtubule-dependent kinetochore transport toward spindle poles. J. Cell Biol. 178:269-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb200702141
33. Tien, J.F., N.T. Umbreit, D.R. Gestaut, A.D. Franck, J. Cooper, L. Wordeman, T. Gonen, C.L. Asbury, and T.N. Davis. 2010. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 189:713-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200910142
34. Tooley, J.G., S.A. Miller, and P.T. Stukenberg. 2011. The Ndc80 complex uses a tripartite attachment point to couple microtubule depolymerization to chromosome movement. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:1217-1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0626
35. Wang, H.W., S. Long, C. Ciferri, S. Westermann, D. Drubin, G. Barnes, and E. Nogales. 2008. Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 383:894-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.077
36. Wei, R.R., P.K. Sorger, and S.C. Harrison. 2005. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:5363-5367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501168102
37. Westermann, S., A. Avila-Sakar, H.W. Wang, H. Niederstrasser, J. Wong, D.G. Drubin, E. Nogales, and G. Barnes. 2005. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell. 17:277-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.019
38. Westermann, S., H.W. Wang, A. Avila-Sakar, D.G. Drubin, E. Nogales, and G. Barnes. 2006. The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature. 440:565-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04409
39. Wigge, P.A., and J.V. Kilmartin. 2001. The Ndc80p complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains conserved centromere components and has a function in chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 152:349-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.152.2.349
40. Wilson-Kubalek, E.M., I.M. Cheeseman, C. Yoshioka, A. Desai, and R.A. Milligan. 2008. Orientation and structure of the Ndc80 complex on the microtubule lattice. J. Cell Biol. 182:1055-1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200804170
41. Zimniak, T., K. Stengl, K. Mechtler, and S. Westermann. 2009. Phosphoregulation of the budding yeast EB1 homologue Bim1p by Aurora/Ipl1p. J. Cell Biol. 186:379-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200901036