Meaning and relevance

Meaning and Relevance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-382

  Wilson, Deirdre ^a,b   Sperber, Dan ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925623098     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139028370     Document Type: Book

References (560)

1. Ackerman, B. 1983. Form and function in children’s understanding of ironic utterances. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 35: 487-508.
2. Adachi, T., Koeda, T., Hirabayashi, S., Maeoka, Y., Shiota, M., Wright, E. and Wada, A. 2004. The metaphor and sarcasm scenario test: A new instrument to help differentiate high functioning pervasive developmental disorder from attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brain and Development 26: 301-6.
3. Anscombre, J. and Ducrot, O. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue.Brussels: Mardaga.
4. Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents.London: Routledge.
5. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 1995. Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context. Journal of Semantics 12: 69-108.
6. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition. Journal of Semantics 15: 239-99.
7. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 2003. Logics of Conversation.Cambridge University Press.
8. Asher, N. and Wada, H. 1988. A computational account of syntactic, semantic and pragmatic principles for anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 6: 309-44.
9. Astington, J., Harris, P. and Olson, D. (eds.) 1988. Developing Theories of Mind.Cambridge University Press.
10. Atlas, J. 2004. Presupposition. In Horn and Ward (eds.), 29-52.
11. Atlas, J.2005. Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, and their Interface. Oxford University Press.
12. Austen, J. [1990]. Persuasion.World’s Classics. Oxford University Press. (First published 1818.)
13. Bach, K. 1987. On communicative intentions: A reply to Recanati. Mind & Language 2: 141-54.
14. Bach, K. 1994a. Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language 9: 124-62.
15. Bach, K. 1994b. Semantic slack: What is said and more. In Tsohatzidis (ed.), 267-91.
16. Bach, K. 1997. The semantics-pragmatics distinction: What it is and why it matters. Linguistische Berichte 8: 33-50.
17. Bach, K. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327-66.
18. Bach, K. 2000. Quantification, qualification and context: A reply to Stanley and Szabo. Mind & Language 15: 262-83.
19. Bach, K. 2001. You don’t say? Synthese 127: 11-31.
20. Bach, K. 2004. Pragmatics and the philosophy of language. In Horn and Ward (eds.),461-87.
21. Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London: Routledge.
23. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. 1995. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.
24. Bar-Lev, S. and Palacas, A. 1980. Semantic command over pragmatic priority. Lingua 51: 137-46.
25. Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. and Frith, U. 1985. Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition 21: 37-46.
27. Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H. and Cohen, D. (eds.) 1993. Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism.Oxford University Press (2nd edition 2000).
28. Barsalou, L. 1987. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.) Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, 101-140. Cambridge University Press.
29. Bartsch, K. and Wellman, H. 1995. Children Talk about the Mind. Oxford University Press.
30. Becker, A. 1997. Emergent and common features influence metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol 12: 243-59.
31. Bell, M. 1975. Questioning. Philosophical Quarterly 25: 193-212.
32. Bender, J. and Wellbery, D. (eds.) 1990. The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Stanford University Press.
33. Benveniste, E. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale.Paris: Gallimard.
34. Bezuidenhout, A. 1997. Pragmatics, semantic underdetermination and the referential- attributive distinction. Mind 106: 375-409.
35. Bezuidenhout, A. and Cutting, J. 2002. Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 433-56.
36. Bezuidenhout, A. and Morris, R. 2004. Implicature, relevance and default inferences. In Noveck and Sperber (eds.), 257-82.
37. Bezuidenhout, A. and Sroda, M.-S. 1996. Disambiguation of reference by young children: An application of relevance theory. Paper presented at Relevance Theory Workshop, Tokyo, March 1996.
38. Bezuidenhout, A. and Sroda, M.-S. 1998. Children’s use of contextual cues to resolve referential ambiguity: An application of relevance theory. Pragmatics and Cognition 6: 265-99.
39. Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Blakemore, D. 1988. So as a constraint on relevance. In Kempson (ed.), 183-95.
41. Blakemore, D. 1991. Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 197-213.
42. Blakemore, D. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
43. Blakemore, D. 1994. Echo questions: A pragmatic account. Lingua 4: 197-211.
44. Blakemore, D. 1997. Restatement and exemplification: A relevance-theoretic reassessment of elaboration. Pragmatics and Cognition 5: 1-19.
45. Blakemore, D. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
46. Blakemore, D. 2009. Parentheticals and point of view in free indirect style. Language and Literature 18: 129-53.
47. Blass, R. 1989a. Pragmatic effects of co-ordination: the case of ‘and’ in Sissala. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 32-51.
48. Blass, R. 1989b. Grammaticalisation of interpretive use: The case of rein Sissala. Lingua 79: 299-326.
49. Blass, R.1990. Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala. Cambridge University Press.
50. Bloom, L. 1991. Language Development from Two to Three.Cambridge University Press.
51. Bloom, P. 1997. Intentionality and word learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1: 9-12.
52. Bloom, P. 2000. How Children Learn the Meanings of Words.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Bloom, P. 2002. Mindreading, communication, and the learning of names for things. Mind & Language 17: 37-54.
54. Blutner, R. and Zeevat, H. (eds.) 2003. Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
55. Bolinger, D. 1978. Yes-noquestions are not alternative questions. In Hiz (ed.), 87-105.
56. Booth, W. 1961. The Rhetoric of Fiction.Chicago University Press.
57. Booth, W. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony.University of Chicago Press.
58. Bott, L. and Noveck, I. 2004. Some utterances are under-informative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51: 437-57.
59. Braine, M. and O’Brien, D. 1998. Mental Logic.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60. Braine, M. and Rumain, B. 1981. Children’s comprehension of ‘or’: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31: 46-70.
61. Breheny, R. 2002. The current state of (radical) pragmatics in the cognitive sciences. Mind & Language 17: 169-87.
62. Breheny, R., Katsos, N. and Williams, J. 2006. Are generalized scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition 100: 434-63.
63. Bretherton, I. 1991. Intentional communication and the development of an understanding of mind. In Frye and Moore (eds.), 49-75.
64. Bretherton, I. and Beeghly, M. 1982. Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology 18: 906-21.
65. Brockway, D. 1981. Semantic constraints on relevance. In H. Parret, M. Sbisa and J. Verschueren (eds.) Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics,57-78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
66. Brüne, M. 2005. ‘Theory of mind’ in schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin31: 21-42.
67. Bruxelles, S., Ducrot, O. and Raccah, P.-Y. 1995. Argumentation and the lexical topical fields. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 99-114.
68. Bryant, G. and Fox Tree, J. 2005. Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech 48: 257-77.
69. Burton-Roberts, N. 1989. The Limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition.Cambridge University Press.
70. Burton-Roberts, N. (ed.) 2007. Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
71. Butler, K. 1995. Content, context and compositionality. Mind & Language 10: 3-24.
72. Byrne, R. and Johnson-Laird, P. 1989. Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 564-75.
73. Byrne, R. and Whiten, A. (eds.) 1988. Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans.Oxford University Press.
74. Capelli, C., Nakagawa, N. and Madden, C. 1990. How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development 61: 1824-41.
75. Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 1997a. Varieties of quotation. Mind 106: 429-50.
76. Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 1997b. On an alleged connection between indirect speech and theory of meaning. Mind & Language 12: 278-96.
77. Caramazza, A. and Grober, E. 1976. Polysemy and the structure of the subjective lexicon. In C. Rameh (ed.) Semantics: Theory and Application.Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, 181-206. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
78. Carruthers, P. and Boucher, J. (eds.) 1998. Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes.Cambridge University Press.
79. Carruthers, P. and Chamberlain, A. (eds.) 2000. Evolution and the Human Mind: Language, Modularity and Social Cognition.Cambridge University Press.
80. Carruthers, P. and Smith, P. (eds.) 1996. Theories of Theories of Mind.Cambridge University Press.
81. Carston, R. 1988. Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. In Kempson (ed.), 155-81. (Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, 33-51; Kasher (ed.) 1998, vol. IV, 464-79.)
82. Carston, R. 1993a. Conjunction, explanation and relevance. Lingua 90: 27-48.
83. Carston, R. 1993b. Conjunction and pragmatic effects. In R. Asher (ed.) The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 692-8. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
84. Carston, R. 1995. Quantity maxims and generalised implicature. Lingua 96: 213-44.
85. Carston, R. 1996. Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 309-30.
86. Carston, R. 1997. Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistische Berichte 8: 103-27.
87. Carston, R. 1998a. Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In Carston and Uchida (eds.), 179-236.
88. Carston, R. 1998b. Pragmatics and the Explicit-Implicit Distinction. PhD thesis, University of London. (Revised version published as Carston 2002a.)
89. Carston, R.2002a. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Carston, R. 2002b. Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind & Language 17: 127-48.
91. Carston, R. 2004. Explicature and semantics. In S. Davis and B. Gillon (eds.) Semantics: A Reader, 817-45. Oxford University Press.
92. Carston, R. 2009. The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication. International Review of Pragmatics 1: 35-62.
93. Carston, R. 2009. Explicit communication and ‘free’ pragmatic enrichment. In B. Soria and E. Romero (eds.) Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, 217-85. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
94. Carston, R. and Uchida, S. (eds.) 1998. Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
95. Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.) 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
96. Cheng, P. and Holyoak, K. 1985. Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology 17: 391-416.
97. Chevallier, C. 2009. Communication in Asperger’s Syndrome. PhD thesis, University of Lyon 2.
98. Chevallier, C., Noveck, I., Happé, F. and Wilson, D. 2011. What’s in a voice? Prosody as a test case for the Theory of Mind account of autism. Neuropsychologia 49: 507-17.
99. Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M., Gualmini, A. and Meroni, L. 2001. The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. BUCLD 25 Proceedings,157-68. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
100. Chierchia, G., Guasti, T., Gualmini, A., Meroni, L., Crain, S. and Foppolo, F. 2004. Adults’ and children’s semantic and pragmatic competence in interaction. In Noveck and Sperber (eds.), 283-300.
101. Clark, B. 1991. Relevance Theory and the Semantics of Non-declaratives. PhD thesis, University of London.
102. Clark, B. 1993. A relevance-theoretic analysis of pseudo-imperatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 79-121.
103. Clark, H. 1977. Bridging. In P. Johnson-Laird and P. Wason (eds.) Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science,411-20. Cambridge University Press.
104. Clark, H. 1993. Arenas of Language Use.Stanford, CA: CSLI.
105. Clark, H. 1996. Using Language.Cambridge University Press.
106. Clark, H. and Carlson, T. 1981. Context for comprehension. In J. Lang and A. Baddeley (eds.) Attention andperformancevol. IX, 313-30 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
107. Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 121-6.
108. Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764-805.
109. Clark, H. and Haviland, S. 1977. Comprehension and the Given-New Contract. In R. Freedle (ed.) Discourse Production and Comprehension,1-40. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
110. Clark, H. and Marshall, C. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber and I. Sag (eds.) Elements of Discourse Understanding, 10-63. Cambridge University Press.
111. Cohen, L. J. 1971. Some remarks on Grice’s views about the logical particles of natural language. In Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.) Pragmatics of Natural Languages,50-68. Dordrecht: Reidel.
112. Cohn, D. 1978. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction.Princeton University Press.
113. Cole, P. (ed.) 1981. Radical Pragmatics.New York: Academic Press.
114. Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) 1975. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts.New York: Academic Press.
115. Coleridge, S. T. 1907. Biographia Literaria, edited by J. Shawcross. London: Oxford University Press.
116. Coleridge, S. T.1987. The Collected Works, vol. V: Lectures 1808-1819, On Literature.Princeton University Press.
117. Colston, H. and Gibbs, R. 2007. A brief history of irony. In Gibbs and Colston (eds.), 3-21.
118. Comrie, B. 1985. Tense.Cambridge University Press.
119. Cosmides, L. 1989. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task. Cognition 31: 187-276.
120. Coulmas, F. (ed.) 1986. Direct and Indirect Speech.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
121. Creusere, M. 1999. Theories of adults’ understanding and use of irony and sarcasm: Applications to and evidence from research with children. Developmental Review 19: 213-62.
122. Creusere, M. 2000. A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children’s recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 29-45.
123. Culler, J. 1981. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
124. Curcó, C. 1998. Indirect echoes and verbal humour. In Rouchota and Jucker (eds.), 305-25.
125. Curcó, C. 2000. Irony: Negation, echo and metarepresentation. Lingua110: 257-80. (Reprinted in Gibbs and Colston (eds.) 2007, 269-93.)
126. Currie, G. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology.Oxford University Press.
127. Currie, G. 2006. Why irony is pretence. In S. Nichols (ed.) The Architecture of the Imagination, 111-33. Oxford University Press.
128. Currie, G. 2008. Echo et feintise: quelle est la difference et qui a raison? Philosophiques 35: 13-23.
129. Dancy, J., Moravcsik, J. and Taylor, C.C. W. (eds.) 1988. Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value.Stanford University Press.
130. Dascal, M. 1981. Contextualism. In H. Parret, M. Sbisà and J. Verschueren (eds.) Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics,153-77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
131. Davidson, D. 1968. On saying that. Synthese 19: 130-46. (Reprinted in Davidson 1984, pp. 93-108.)
132. Davidson, D. 1979a. Quotation. Theory and Decision11: 27-40. (Reprinted in Davidson 1984, pp. 79-92.)
133. Davidson, D. 1979b. Moods and performances. In A. Margalit (ed.) Meaning and Use,9-20. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Reprinted in Davidson 1984, pp. 109-21.)
134. Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation.Oxford University Press.
135. Davies, M. and Stone, T. (eds.) 1995a. Mental Simulation: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.
136. Davies, M. and Stone, T. (eds.) 1995b. Folk Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
137. Davis, S. (ed.). 1991. Pragmatics: A Reader.Oxford University Press.
138. Deane, P. 1988. Polysemy and cognition. Lingua 75: 325-61.
139. de Neys, W. and Schaeken, W. 2007. When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology 54: 128-33.
140. Dennis, M., Purvis, K., Barnes, M., Wilkinson, M. and Winner, E. 2001. Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury. Brain and Language 78: 1-16.
141. Dessalles, J.-L. 2000. Aux origines du langage. Une histoire naturelle de la parole.Paris: Hermès.
142. Dews, S. and Winner, E. 1999. Obligatory processing of literal and non-literal meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1579-99.
143. Dickens, C. [1996] Bleak House.Penguin Classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (First published 1852-3.)
144. Dowty, D. 1986. The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 37-61.
145. Ducrot, O. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire.Paris: Hermann.
146. Ducrot, O. 1973. Le preuve et le dire.Paris: Mame.
147. Ducrot, O. 1980. Analyses pragmatiques. Communications32: 11-60.
148. Ducrot, O. 1983. Puisque:Essai de description polyphonique. In M. Herslund, O. Mordrup and F. Sorensen (eds.) Analyse grammaticale du français.Special issue of Revue romane24: 166-85.
149. Ducrot, O. 1984. Le dire et le dit.Paris: Minuit.
150. Dunbar, R. 1996. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language.London: Faber and Faber.
151. Erku, F. and Gundel, J. 1987. The pragmatics of indirect anaphors. In Verschueren and Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), 533-45.
152. Escandell-Vidal, V. 1998. Metapropositions as metarepresentations. Paper delivered to the Relevance Theory Workshop, Luton, September 1998. (Revised version published as Escandell-Vidal 2002.)
153. Escandell-Vidal, V. 2002. Echo-syntax and metarepresentations. Lingua 112: 871-900.
154. Evans, J. St. B. T. 1989. Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
155. Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. and Byrne, R. 1993. Human Reasoning. The Psychology of Deduction.Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
156. Fauconnier, G. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353-75.
157. Fauconnier, G.1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
158. Fauconnier, G.1997. Mappings in Thought and Language.Cambridge University Press.
159. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way we Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind s Hidden Complexities.New York: Basic Books.
160. Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A. and Handley, S. 2004. The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58: 121-32.
161. Fiddick, L., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. 2000. No interpretation without representation: The role of domain-specific representations in the Wason Selection Task. Cognition 77: 1-79.
162. Fillmore, C. 1990. Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. Chicago Linguistic Society 26: 137-62.
163. Fludernik, M. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction.London: Routledge.
164. Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought.New York: Crowell.
165. Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
166. Fodor, J. 1992. A theory of the child’s theory of mind. Cognition 44: 283-96.
167. Fodor, J. and Lepore, E. 1998. The emptiness of the lexicon: Critical reflections on J. Pustejovsky’s. The Generative Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 269-88.
168. Franks, B. 1995. Sense generation: A ‘quasi-classical’ approach to concepts and concept combination. Cognitive Science 19: 441-505.
169. Franks, B. and Braisby, N. 1990. Sense generation or how to make a mental lexicon flexible. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
170. Fridlund, A. 1994. Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. New York: Academic Press.
171. Frith, U. and Happé, F. 1999. Theory of mind and self-consciousness: What is it like to be autistic? Mind & Language 14: 1-22.
172. Frye, D. and Moore, C. (eds.) 1991. Children’s Theories of Mind: Mental States and Social Understanding.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
173. Garnham, A. and Perner, J. 1990. Does manifestness solve problems of mutuality? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 178-9.
174. Garver, N. 1965. Varieties of use and mention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26: 230-8.
175. Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. London: Academic Press.
176. Gelman, S. and Markman, E. 1986. Categories and induction in young children. Cognition 23: 183-209.
177. Gernsbacher, M. (ed.) 1994. Handbook ofPsycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
178. Gibbs, R. 1986. On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115: 3-15. (Reprinted in Gibbs and Colston (eds.) 2007, 173-200.)
179. Gibbs, R. 1987. Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 561-88.
180. Gibbs, R. 1994a. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
181. Gibbs, R. 1994b. Figurative thought and figurative language. In Gernsbacher (ed.), 411-46.
182. Gibbs, R. 1996. Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition 61: 309-19.
183. Gibbs, R. 1998. The fight over metaphor in thought and language. In N. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs and M. Turner (eds.) Figurative Language and Thought,88-118. New York: Oxford University Press.
184. Gibbs, R. and Colston, H. (eds.) 2007. Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
185. Gibbs, R. and Moise, J. 1997. Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition 62: 51-74.
186. Gibbs, R. and Tendahl, M. 2006. Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language 21: 379-403.
187. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. and the ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart. Oxford University Press.
188. Gineste, M.-D., Indurkhya, B. and Scart, V. 2000. Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 117-35.
189. Giora, R. 1995. On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19: 239-64.
190. Giora, R. 1997. Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 17-34.
191. Giora, R. 2003. On our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language.New York: Oxford University Press.
192. Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G. and Kasher, A. 2000. Differential effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 63-83.
193. Girotto, V., Kemmelmeir, M., Sperber, D. and VanderHenst, J.-B. 2001. Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task. Cognition 81: 69-76.
194. Glucksberg, S. 2001. Understanding Figurative Language.Oxford University Press.
195. Glucksberg, S., ManfTedi, D. and McGlone, M. 1997. Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories. In T. Ward, S. Smith, and J. Vaid (eds.) Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes,327-50. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
196. Gombert, J. 1990. Metalinguistic Development.Sussex: Harvester Press.
197. Gopnik, A. and Wellman, H. 1992. Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind & Language7: 145-71.
198. Goschke, T. and Koppelberg, D. 1991. The concept of representation and the representation of concepts in connectionist models. In W. Ramsey, S. Stich and D. Rumelhart (eds.) Philosophy and Connectionist Theory,129-61. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
199. Green, D. and Larking, R. 1995. The locus of facilitation in the abstract selection task. Thinking and Reasoning 1: 183-99.
200. Green, G. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
201. Green, M. 1995. Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 83-112.
202. Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review66: 377-88. (Reprinted in Grice 1989, pp. 213-23.)
203. Grice, H. P. 1967. Logic and Conversation.William James Lectures, Harvard University. In Grice 1989, pp. 3-143.
204. Grice, H. P. 1969. Utterer’s meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review78: 147-77. (Reprinted in Grice 1989, pp. 86-116.)
205. Grice, H. P. 1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature. In Cole (ed.), 183-98. (Reprinted in Grice 1989, pp. 269-82.)
206. Grice, H. P. 1982. Meaning revisited. In N. Smith (ed.) Mutual Knowledge,223-43. London: Academic Press. (Reprinted in Grice 1989, pp. 283-303.)
207. Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
208. Griggs, R. and Cox, J. 1982. The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s Selection Task. British Journal of Psychology 73: 407-20.
209. Groefsema, M. 1995a. ‘Can’, ‘may’, ‘must’ and ‘should’: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Linguistics 31: 53-79.
210. Groefsema, M. 1995b. Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach. Lingua 96: 139-61.
211. Gross, S. 1998. Essays on Linguistic Context-Sensitivity and its Philosophical Significance. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
212. Gross, S. 2001. Essays on Linguistic Context-Sensitivity and its Philosophical Significance. London: Routledge.
213. Grosz, B. 1981. Focusing and description in natural language dialogues. In A. Joshi, B.Webber and I. Sag (eds.) Elements of Discourse Understanding,85-105. Cambridge University Press.
214. Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. 1986. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12: 175-204.
215. Guasti, M.T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A. and Meroni, L. 2005. Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 667-96.
216. Gunderson, K. (ed.) 1975. Language, Mind and Knowledge.Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VII. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
217. Gutt, E.-A. 1991. Translation and Relevance.Oxford: Blackwell.
218. Hall, A. 2004. The meaning of ‘but’: A procedural reanalysis. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 199-236.
219. Hall, A. 2007. Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures? Lingua 117: 149-74.
220. Hamamoto, H. 1998. Irony from a cognitive perspective. In Carston and Uchida (eds.), 257-70.
221. Hamblin, C. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41-53.
222. Happé, F. 1993. Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition 48: 101-19.
223. Happé, F. 1994. Autism: An Introduction to Psychological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
224. Happé, F. and Loth, E. 2002. ‘Theory of mind’ and tracking speakers’ intentions. Mind & Language 17: 24-36.
225. Hardin, C. 1988. Color for Philosophers. New York: Hackett.
226. Hardman, D. 1998. Does reasoning occur in the selection task? A comparison of relevance-based theories. Thinking and Reasoning 4: 353-76.
227. Hare, R. M. 1970. Meaning and speech acts. Philosophical Review79: 3-24. (Reprinted in Hare 1971, pp. 74-93.)
228. Hare, R. M. 1971. Practical Inferences.London: Macmillan.
229. Harman, G. 1995. Rationality. In E. Smith and D. Osherson (eds.) Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol. III, 175-211. (2nd edition) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
230. Harnish, R. M. 1976. Logical form and implicature. In T. Bever, J. Katz, and D. T. Langendoen (eds.) An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability,313-91. New York: Crowell. (Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 316-64.)
231. Harnish, R. M. 1994. Mood, meaning and speech acts. In Tsohatzidis (ed.), 407-59.
232. Hauser, M. 1996. The Evolution of Communication.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
233. Hawkins, J. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.
234. Hirschberg, J. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature.New York: Garland.
235. Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. 1994. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge University Press.
236. Hiz, H. (ed.) 1978. Questions.Dordrecht: Reidel.
237. Hobbs, J. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3: 67-90.
238. Hobbs, J. 1985. On the coherence and structure of discourse. Report CSLI85-37. Menlo Park, CA: CSLI.
239. Hobbs, J. 2004. Abduction in natural language understanding. In Horn and Ward (eds.), 724-41.
240. Hobbs, J., Stickel, M., Appelt, D. and Martin, P. 1993. Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63: 69-142.
241. Horn, L. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. PhD Dissertation, UCLA.
242. Horn, L. 1984. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context,11-42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
243. Horn, L. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121-74.
244. Horn, L. 1989. A Natural History of Negation.University of Chicago Press.
245. Horn, L. 1992. The said and the unsaid. SALT II: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 163-202. Ohio State University Linguistics Department.
246. Horn, L. 1996. Presupposition and implicature. In S. Lappin (ed.) The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory,299-320. Oxford: Blackwell.
247. Horn, L. 2000. From IF to IFF: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289-326.
248. Horn, L. 2004. Implicature. In Horn and Ward (eds.), 3-28.
249. Horn, L. 2006. The Border wars: A neo-Gricean perspective. In K. Turner and K. von Heusinger (eds.) Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics,21-48. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
250. Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) 2004. The Handbook of Pragmatics.Oxford: Blackwell.
251. Hornsby, J. 1988. Things done with words. In Dancy, Moravcsik and Taylor (eds.), 27-46.
252. Hovy, E. 1990. Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of discourse structure relations. In K. McKeown, J. Moore and S. Nirenburg (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Pittsburgh 1990:128-36.
253. Hugo, V. [1985] Oeuvres complètes: Poésie II.Paris: Robert Laffont. (First published 1880-92.)
254. Huntley, M. 1984. The semantics of English imperatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 103-33.
255. Ifantidou, E. 1993. Parentheticals and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 193-210.
256. Ifantidou, E. 1994. Evidentials and Relevance. PhD thesis, University of London. (Revised version published as Ifantidou 2001.)
257. Ifantidou, E. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
258. Ifantidou-Trouki, E. 1993. Sentence adverbials and relevance. Lingua 90: 69-90.
259. Itani, R. 1990. Explicature and explicit attitude. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 52-64.
260. Itani, R.1996. Semantics and Pragmatics of Hedges in English and Japanese.Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
261. Iten, C. 2005. Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
262. Iwata, S. 1998. Some extensions of the echoic analysis of metalinguistic negation. Lingua 105: 49-65.
263. Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press.
264. Jackson, F. (ed.) 1991. Conditionals.Oxford University Press.
265. Johnson-Laird, P. and Byrne, R. 1991. Deduction.Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
266. Johnson-Laird, P. and Byrne, R. 1995. A model point of view. Thinking and Reasoning 1: 339-50.
267. Jorgensen, J., Miller, G. and Sperber, D. 1984. Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 112-20.
268. Joyce, J. [1960] Ulysses.London: The Bodley Head. (First published 1922.)
269. Kadmon, N. 2001. Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition and Focus.Oxford: Blackwell.
270. Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan,481-563. Oxford University Press.
271. Karttunen, L. 1977. The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3-44. (Reprinted in Hiz 1978: 165-210.)
272. Karttunen, L. and Peters, S. 1976. What indirect questions conventionally implicate. In S. Mufwene, C. Walker and S. Steever (eds.) Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting, 351-68. Chicago Linguistic Society.
273. Karttunen, L. and Peters, S. 1979. Conventional implicature. In C.-Y. Oh, and D. Dineen (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, 1 -56. New York: Academic Press.
274. Kasher, A. 1976. Conversational maxims and rationality. In A. Kasher (ed.) Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems, 197-211. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Reprinted in Kasher (ed.) 1998, vol. IV, pp. 181-214.)
275. Kasher, A. 1982. Gricean inference revisited. Philosophica 29: 25-44.
276. Kasher, A. 1984. Pragmatics and the modularity of mind. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 539-57. (Revised version published in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 567-82.)
277. Kasher, A. (ed.) 1998. Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, vols. I-VI. London: Routledge.
278. Katz, J. 1977. Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force.New York: Crowell.
279. Katz, J.1990. The Metaphysics of Meaning.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
280. Keefe, R. and Smith, P. (eds.) 1997. Vagueness: A Reader.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
281. Keenan, T. and Quigley, K. 1999. Do young children use echoic information in their comprehension of sarcastic speech? A test of echoic mention theory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 17: 83-96.
282. Kempson, R. (ed.) 1988a. Mental Representation: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press.
283. Kempson, R. (ed.)1988b. On the grammar-cognition interface: The principle of full interpretation. In Kempson (ed.), 199-224.
284. Khalfa, Jean. (ed.) 1994. What is Intelligence?Cambridge University Press.
285. Kintsch, W. 2000. Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7: 257-66.
286. Kiparsky, C. and Kiparsky, P. 1971. Fact. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.) Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader, 345-69. Cambridge University Press.
287. Kirby, S. 2002. Natural language from artificial life. Artificial Life 8: 185-215.
288. Kleiber, G. 1990. Marqueurs référentiels et processus interprétatifs: pour une approche ‘plus sémantique’. Cahiers de linguistique française11: 241-58.
289. Kreuz, R. and Glucksberg, S. 1989. How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118: 374-86.
290. Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. and Brown, M. 1995. How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General124: 3-21. (Reprinted in Gibbs and Colston (eds.) 2007, pp. 57-95.)
291. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
292. Lakoff, G.1994. Conceptual metaphor home page. Available at: http://cogsci.berkeley.edu/lakoff/MetaphorHome.html.
293. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by.Chicago University Press. (New edition with Afterword, 2003.)
294. Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphors.University of Chicago Press.
295. Langdon, R., Davies, M. and Coltheart, M. 2002. Understanding minds and understanding communicated meanings in schizophrenia. Mind & Language 17: 68-104.
296. Lascarides, A. 1992. Knowledge, causality and temporal representation. Linguistics 30: 941-73.
297. Lascarides, A. and Asher, N. 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and common-sense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 437-93.
298. Lascarides, A., Asher, N. and Oberlander, J. 1992. Inferring discourse relations in context. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Delaware, June 1992,1-8. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
299. Lascarides, A. and Oberlander, J. 1993. Temporal coherence and defeasible knowledge. Theoretical Linguistics 19: 1-37.
300. Lascelles, M. 1939. Jane Austen and her Art.Oxford University Press. (2nd edition 1965.)
301. Lasersohn, P. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75: 522-51.
302. Leech, G. and Short, M. 1981. Style in Fiction: An Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman.
303. Lehrer, A. 1990. Polysemy, conventionality and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics 1-2: 207-46.
304. Leslie, A. 1987. Pretense and representation: The origins of ‘theory of mind’. Psychological Review 94: 412-26.
305. Leslie, A. 1991. The theory of mind impairment in autism: Evidence for a modular mechanism of development? In Whiten (ed.), 63-78.
306. Leslie, A., Friedman, O. and German, T. 2004. Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 528-33.
307. Leslie, A. and Happé, F. 1989. Autism and ostensive communication: The relevance of metarepresentation. Development and Psychopathology 1: 205-12.
308. Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
309. Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics.Cambridge University Press.
310. Levinson, S. 1987. Minimization and conversational inference. In Verschueren and Bertuccelli- Papi (eds.), 61-129.
311. Levinson, S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory ofGeneralized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
312. Lewis, C. and Mitchell, P. (eds.) 1994. Children’s Early Understanding of Mind: Origins and Development.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
313. Lewis, D. 1970. General semantics. Synthese22: 18-67. (Reprinted in Lewis 1983, pp. 189-232.)
314. Lewis, D. 1975. Languages and language. In Gunderson (ed.), 3-35. (Reprinted in Lewis 1983, pp. 163-88.)
315. Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339-59. (Reprinted in Lewis 1983, pp. 233-49.)
316. Lewis, D. 1983. Philosophical Papers, vol. I. Oxford University Press.
317. Liberman, N. and Klar, Y. 1996. Hypothesis testing in Wason’s Selection Task: Social exchange, cheating detection or task understanding. Cognition 58: 127-56.
318. Lock, A. 1980. The Guided Reinvention of Language.New York: Academic Press.
319. Love, R. and Kessler, C. 1995. Focussing in Wason’s Selection Task: Content and instruction effects. Thinking and Reasoning 1: 153-82.
320. Luscher, J.-M. 1989. Connecteurs et marques de pertinence: l’exemple de d’ailleurs. Cahiers de linguistique française10: 101-45.
321. Luscher, J.-M. 1994 Les marques de connexion: Des guides pour l’interprétation. In Moeschler et al. (eds.), 17-227.
322. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
323. MacKay, G. and Shaw, A. 2004. A comparative study of figurative language in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Language, Teaching and Therapy 20: 13-32.
324. Manktelow, K. 1999. Reasoning and Thinking.Hove: Psychology Press.
325. Mann, W. and Thompson, S. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory. Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text 8: 243-48.
326. Martin, I. and McDonald, S. 2004. An exploration of causes of non-literal language problems in individuals with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34: 311-28.
327. Martin, R. 1992. Irony and universe of belief. Lingua 87: 77-90.
328. Martinich, A. P. 1984. A theory for metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics13: 35-56. (Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 507-18.)
329. Matsui, T. 1995. Bridging and Relevance. PhD thesis, University of London. (Revised version published as Matsui 2000.)
330. Matsui, T. 1998. Pragmatic criteria for reference assignment: A relevance-theoretic account of the acceptability of bridging. Pragmatics and Cognition 6: 47-97.
331. Matsui, T. 2000. Bridging and Relevance.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
332. Matsui, T. 2001. Experimental pragmatics: Towards testing relevance-based predictions about anaphoric bridging inferences. In V. Akman, P. Bouquet, R. Thomason and R. Young (eds.) Modeling and Using Context, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,48-60. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
333. Matsumoto, Y. 1995. The conversational condition on Horn scales. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 21-60.
334. McCawley, J. 1991. Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. In L. Dobrin, L. Nichols and R. Rodriguez (eds.) Chicago Linguistic Society27, Parasession on Negation,189-206. Chicago Linguistic Society.
335. McDonald, S. 1999. Exploring the process of inference generation in sarcasm: A review of normal and clinical studies. Brain and Language 69: 486-506.
336. McDonald, S. 2000. Neuropsychological studies of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol15: 85-98. (Reprinted in Gibbs and Colston (eds.) 2007, pp. 217-30.)
337. McGinn, Colin. 1977. Semantics for non-indicative sentences. Philosophical Studies 32: 301-11.
338. McHale, B. 1978. Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature 3: 249-87. (Reprinted in M. Bal (ed.) 2004 Narrative Theory: Critical Concepts and Cultural Studies, vol. I, 187-222. London: Routledge.)
339. Medin, D., Coley, J., Storms, G. and Hayes, B. 2003. A relevance theory of induction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10: 517-32.
340. Mey, J. 1999. When Voices Clash: A Study in Literary Pragmatics.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
341. Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
342. Millikan, R. 1998. Language conventions made simple. Journal of Philosophy 95: 161-80.
343. Mitchell, P., Robinson, E. and Thompson, D. 1999. Children’s understanding that utterances emanate from minds: Using speaker belief to aid interpretation. Cognition 72: 45-66.
344. Mo, S., Su, Y., Chan, R. and Liu, J. 2008. Comprehension of metaphor and irony in schizophrenia during remission: The role of theory of mind and IQ. Psychiatry Research 157: 21-9.
345. Moeschler, J. 1989a. Modélisation du dialogue: Représentation de l'inférence argumentative.Paris: Hermès.
346. Moeschler, J.1989b. Pragmatic connectives, argumentative coherence and relevance. Argumentation 3: 321-39.
347. Moeschler, J.1998. Les relations entre événements et l’interprétation des énoncés. In J. Moeschler, J. Jayez, M. Kozlowska, J.-M Luscher, L. de Saussure and B. Sthioul (eds.) Le Temps des événements: Pragmatique de la référence temporelle,293-321. Paris: Kimé.
348. Moeschler, J. and Reboul, A. 1994. Dictionnaire encyclopédique de pragmatique. Paris: Seuil.
349. Moeschler, J., Reboul, A., Luscher, J. and Jayez, J. (eds.) 1994. Langage et pertinence: Référence temporelle, anaphore, connecteurs et métaphore. Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
350. Morris, A. and Sloutsky, V. 1998. Understanding of logical necessity: Developmental antecedents and cognitive consequences. Child Development69: 721-41.
351. Morris, C. 1938. Foundations of the Theory of Signs.University of Chicago Press.
352. Muecke, D. 1970. Irony.London: Methuen.
353. Murphy, G. 1996. On metaphoric representation. Cognition 60: 173-204.
354. Murphy, G. 1997. Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation. Cognition 62: 99-108.
355. Nakassis, C. and Snedeker, J. 2002. Beyond sarcasm: Intonation and context as relational cues in children’s recognition of irony. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughs, H. Littlefield and H. Walsh (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Boston University Conference on Language Development, 429-40. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
356. Neale, S. 1990. Descriptions.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
357. Neale, S. 1992. Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 509-59.
358. Neale, S. 2000. On being explicit: Comments on Stanley and Szabo, and on Bach. Mind & Language 15: 284-94.
359. Neale, S. 2004. This, that and the other. In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond,68-182. Oxford University Press.
360. Neale, S. in press. Linguistic Pragmatism. Oxford University Press.
361. Nicolle, S. and Clark, B. 1999. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 66: 337-54.
362. Noh, E.-J. 1998a. Echo questions: Metarepresentation and pragmatic enrichment. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 603-28.
363. Noh, E.-J. 1998b. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Metarepresentations in English: A Relevance-theoretic Approach. PhD thesis, University of London. (Revised version published as Noh 2000.)
364. Noh, E.-J. 1998c. A relevance-theoretic account of metarepresentative uses in conditionals. In Rouchota and Jucker (eds.), 271-304.
365. Noh, E.-J.2000. Metarepresentation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
366. Nølke, H. 1990. Pertinence et modalisateurs d’énonciation. Cahiers de linguistique française11: 105-26.
367. Norbury, C. 2005. The relationship between Theory of Mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23: 383-99.
368. Noveck, I. 2001. When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78: 165-88.
369. Noveck, I., Bianco, M. and Castry, A. 2001. The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 16: 109-21.
370. Noveck, I., Ho, S. and Sera, M. 1996. Children’s understanding of epistemic modals. Journal of Child Language 23: 621-43.
371. Noveck, I. and Posada, A. 2003. Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85: 203-10.
372. Noveck, I. and Sperber, D. (eds.) 2004. Experimental Pragmatics.Basingstoke: Palgrave.
373. Noveck, I. and Sperber, D. (eds.) 2007. The why and how of experimental pragmatics. In Burton-Roberts (ed.), 184-212. (Chapter 14, this volume.)
374. Nunberg, G. 1996. Transfers of meaning. In Pustejovsky and Boguraev (eds.), 109-32.
375. Nuti, M. 2003. Ethnoscience: Examining Common Sense. PhD thesis, University of London.
376. Onishi, K. and Baillargeon, R. 2005. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308: 255-8.
377. Origgi, G. 2001. Interpretare il linguaggio e interpretare gli altri: una o due teorie? Sistemi Intelligenti8: 171 -88.
378. Origgi G. and Sperber, D. 2000. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In Carruthers and Chamberlain (eds.), 140-69.
379. Overton, W. (ed.) 1990. Reasoning, Necessity and Logic: Developmental Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
380. Palmer, F. 1986. Mood and Modality.Cambridge University Press.
381. Papafragou, A. 1998a. Modality and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. PhD thesis, University of London. (Revised version published as Papafragou 2000.)
382. Papafragou, A. 1998b. Inference and word meaning: The case of modal auxiliaries. Lingua 105: 1-47.
383. Papafragou, A. 1998c. The acquisition of modality: Implications for theories of semantic representation. Mind & Language 13: 370-99.
384. Papafragou, A.2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
385. Papafragou, A. 2002. Mindreading and verbal communication. Mind & Language 17: 55-67.
386. Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J. 2003. Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the seman- tics-pragmatics interface. Cognition 86: 253-82.
387. Papafragou, A. and Tantalou, N. 2004. Children’s computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition 12: 71-82.
388. Paris, S. 1973. Comprehension of language connectives and propositional logical relationships. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16: 278-91.
389. Partee, B. 1973. The syntax and semantics of quotations. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle,410-18. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
390. Pendlebury, M. 1986. Against the power of force: Reflections on the meaning of mood. Mind 95: 361-72.
391. Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. and Leekam, S. 1989. Explorations of the autistic child’s theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development 60: 689-700.
392. Pexman, P. and Glenwright, M. 2007. How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony? Journal of Neurolinguistics 20: 178-96.
393. Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
394. Pinkal, M. 1995. Logic and Lexicon.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
395. Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct.New York: Penguin.
396. Politzer, G. 1996. A pragmatic account of a presuppositional effect. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25: 543-51.
397. Posner, R. 1980. Semantics and pragmatics of sentence connectives in natural language. In J. Searle, F. Kiefer and M. Bierwisch (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, 68-203. Dordrecht: Reidel.
398. Predelli, S. 1998. Utterance, interpretation and the logic of indexicals. Mind & Language 13: 400-14.
399. Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
400. Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B. (eds.) 1996. Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
401. Reboul, A. 1990. Rhétorique de l’anaphore. In G. Kleiber and J. Tyvaert (eds.) L’anaphore et ses domaines,279-300. Paris: Klincksieck.
402. Reboul, A. 1994. L’anaphore pronominale: le problème de l’attribution des référents. In Moeschler, Reboul, Luscher and Jayez (eds.), 105-73.
403. Reboul, A. and the CERVICAL group. 1997. Le projet CERVICAL: Représentations mentales, référence aux objets et aux événements. Ms., CRIN-CNRS and INRIA- Lorraine.
404. Recanati, F. 1986. On defining communicative intentions. Mind & Language1: 213-42.
405. Recanati, F. 1987. Meaning and Force.Cambridge University Press.
406. Recanati, F. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language 4: 295-329. (Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 97-120.)
407. Recanati, F. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought.Oxford: Blackwell.
408. Recanati, F.1994. Contextualism and anti-contextualism in the study of language. In Tsohatzidis (ed.), 156-65.
409. Recanati, F.1995. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207-32.
410. Recanati, F. 1998. Pragmatics. In E. Craig (ed.) Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 7, 620-33. London: Routledge.
411. Recanati, F. 2000. Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: The Semantics of Metarepresentations.Cambridge University Press.
412. Recanati, F.2002a. Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299-345.
413. Recanati, F.2002b. Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind & Language 17: 105-26.
414. Recanati, F.2004a. Literal Meaning.Cambridge University Press.
415. Recanati, F.2004b. Semantics and pragmatics. In Horn and Ward (eds.), 442-62.
416. Recanati, F.2007. Indexicality, context and pretence. In Burton-Roberts (ed.), 213-29.
417. Reinhart, T. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53-94.
418. Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
419. Rips, L. 1975. Quantification and semantic memory. Cognitive Psychology 7: 307-40.
420. Rips, L. 1994. The Psychology of Proof. London: MIT Press.
421. Rockwell, P. 2000. Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research 29: 483-95.
422. Rouchota, V. and Jucker, A. (eds.) 1998. Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
423. Ryder, N and Leinonen, E. 2003. Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5- year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32: 397-415.
424. Sadock, J. 2004. Speech acts. In Horn and Ward (eds.), 53-73.
425. Saka, P. 1998. Quotation and the use-mention distinction. Mind 107: 113-35.
426. Salmon, N. 1986. Frege's Puzzle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
427. Samet, J. and Schank, R. 1984. Coherence and connectivity. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 57-82.
428. Sanders, T., Spooren, W. and Noordman, L. 1992. Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15: 1-35.
429. Sanders, T., Spooren, W. and Noordman, L. 1993. Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 93-133.
430. Sanford, A. 2002. Context, attention, and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language 17: 186-206.
431. Sanford, A. and Garrod, S. 1981. Understanding Written Language.Chichester: John Wiley.
432. Sanford, A., Moar, K. and Garrod, S. 1988. Proper names as controllers of discourse focus. Language and Speech 31: 43-56.
433. Schiffer, S. 1972. Meaning.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
434. Schmerling, S. 1975. Some remarks on symmetric and asymmetric conjunctions. In Cole and Morgan (eds.), 211-32.
435. Schmerling, S. 1982. How imperatives are special, and how they aren’t. In R. Schneider, K. Tuite and R. Chameltzy (eds.) Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Nondeclaratives, 202-218. Chicago Linguistic Society.
436. Scholl, B. and Leslie, A. 1999. Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind’. Mind & Language 14: 131-53.
437. Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E. and Srinivas, K. 2000. Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: Further evidence. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 47-61. (Reprinted in Gibbs and Colston (eds.) 2007, pp. 253-67.)
438. Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts.Cambridge University Press.
439. Searle, J. (ed.) 1971. The Philosophy of Language.Oxford University Press.
440. Searle, J. 1975a. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson (ed.), 334-69. (Reprinted in Searle 1979, pp. 1-29.)
441. Searle, J. 1975b. Indirect speech acts. In Cole and Morgan (eds.), 59-82.
442. Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
443. Searle, J. 1980. The background of meaning. In J. Searle, andF. Kiefer (eds.) Speech-Act Theory and Pragmatics, 221 -32. Dordrecht: Reidel.
444. Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality.Cambridge University Press.
445. Seto, K. 1998. On non-echoic irony. In Carston and Uchida (eds.), 239-55.
446. Shamay-Tsoory, S., Tomer, R. and Aharon-Peretz, J. 2005. The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relation to social cognition. Neuropsychology 19: 288-300.
447. Sidner, C. 1983. Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. In M. Brady and R. Berwick (eds.) Computational Models of Discourse,267-330. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
448. Sigman, M. and Kasari, C. 1995. Joint attention across contexts in normal and autistic children. In C. Moore, and P. Dunham (eds.) Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development,189-203. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
449. Smith, C. L. 1980. Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 30: 191-205.
450. Smith, N. V. (ed.) 1982. Mutual Knowledge.London: Academic Press.
451. Smith, N. V. and Tsimpli, I.-M. 1995. The Mind of a Savant: Language Learning and Modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.
452. Southgate, V., Chevallier, C. and Csibra, G. 2010. Seventeen-month-olds appeal to false beliefs to interpret others’ referential communication. Developmental Science 16: 907-12.
453. Sperber, D. 1984. Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 130-6.
454. Sperber, D. 1985. On Anthropological Knowledge.Cambridge University Press.
455. Sperber, D. 1994a. Understanding verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa (ed.) What is Intelligence?, 179-98. Cambridge University Press.
456. Sperber, D. 1994b. The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In Hirschfeld and Gelman (eds.), 39-67.
457. Sperber, D.1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach.Oxford: Blackwell.
458. Sperber, D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language 12: 67-83.
459. Sperber, D. 2000a. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In Sperber (ed.), 117-37.
460. Sperber, D.(ed.) 2000b. Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.Oxford University Press.
461. Sperber, D. 2001. In defense of massive modularity. In E. Dupoux (ed.) Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler,45-57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
462. Sperber, D., Cara, F. and Girotto, V. 1995. Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57: 31-95.
463. Sperber, D. and Girotto, V. 2002. Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby. Cognition 85: 277-90.
464. Sperber, D. and Girotto, V. 2003. Does the selection task detect cheater-detection? In K. Sterelny and J. Fitness (eds.) From Mate to Mentality. Evaluating Evolutionary Psychology,197-225. New York: Psychology Press.
465. Sperber, D., Premack, D. and Premack, A. (eds.) 1995. Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
466. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1978. Les ironies comme mentions. Poétique: Revue de Théorie et d’Analyse Littéraire 36: 395-412.
467. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole (ed.), 295-318. (Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 550-63.)
468. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1982. Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension. In Smith (ed.), 61-87. (Reprinted in Kasher (ed.) 1998, vol. IV, pp. 369-82.)
469. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986a. Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Oxford: Blackwell and Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. (1st edition; 2nd edition published as Sperber and Wilson 1995.)
470. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986b Loose talk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society86: 153-71. (Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 540-9.)
471. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1987a. Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 697-710. (Reprinted in Kasher (ed.) 1998, vol. V, pp. 82-115.)
472. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1987b. Presumptions of relevance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 736-53.
473. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1990a. Rhetoric and relevance. In Bender and Wellbery (eds.), 140-56. (Chapter 4, this volume.)
474. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1990b. Spontaneous deduction and mutual knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 179-84.
475. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition.(2nd edition, with a new Postface) Oxford: Blackwell.
476. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998a. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In Carruthers and Boucher (eds.), 184-200. (Chapter 2, this volume.)
477. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998b. Irony and relevance: A reply to Drs Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In Carston and Uchida (eds.), 283-93.
478. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind & Language17: 3-23. (Chapter 12, this volume.)
479. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2004. Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy,468-501. Oxford University Press. (Chapter 1, this volume.)
480. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2008. A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. Gibbs (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 84-105. Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 5, this volume.)
481. Stainton, R. 1997. Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis. Pragmatics and Cognition 5: 51-78.
482. Stainton, R. 1998. Quantifier phrases, ‘Meaningfulness in Isolation’, and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 311-40.
483. Stalnaker, R. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.) Semantics and Philosophy. New York University Press. (Reprinted in Stalnaker 1999, 47-62.)
484. Stalnaker, R. 1999. Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford University Press.
485. Stanley, J. 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391-434.
486. Stanley, J. 2002. Making it articulated. Mind & Language 17: 49-68.
487. Stanley, J. and Szabo, Z. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language 15: 219-61.
488. Sternberg, M. 1982a. Proteus in quotation-land: Mimesis and the forms of reported discourse. Poetics Today 3: 107-56.
489. Sternberg, M. 1982b. Point of view and the indirections of direct speech. Language and Style 15: 67-117.
490. Sternberg, R. 1979. Developmental patterns in the encoding and combination of logical connectives. Journal ofExperimental Child Psychology 28: 469-98.
491. Stich, S. 1990. The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
492. Strawson, P. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory.London: Methuen.
493. Strawson, P. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review 73: 439-60. (Reprinted in Searle (ed.) 1971, 170-89.)
494. Sullivan, K., Winner, E. and Hopfield, N. 1995. How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 13: 191-204.
495. Surian, L., Caldi, S. and Sperber, D. 2007. Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science 18: 580-6.
496. Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure.Cambridge University Press.
497. Szabo, Z. (ed.) 2005. Semantics versus Pragmatics.Oxford University Press.
498. Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics(2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
499. Taylor, K. 2001. Sex, breakfast and descriptus interruptus. Synthese 128: 45-61.
500. Tomasello, M. and Kruger, A. 1992. Joint attention in action: Acquiring verbs in ostensive and non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language 19: 311-33.
501. Tourangeau, R. and Rips, L. 1991. Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 452-72.
502. Travis, C. 1975. Saying and Understanding.Oxford: Blackwell.
503. Travis, C. 1985. On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15: 187-229.
504. Travis, C. 2001. Unshadowed Thought: Representation in Thought and Language.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
505. Tsohatzidis, S. (ed.) 1994. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge.
506. Turner, K. (ed). 1999. The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
507. Unger, P. 1975. Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
508. Urmson, J. 1963. Parenthetical verbs. In C. Caton (ed.) Philosophy and Ordinary Language, 220-40. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
509. van der Auwera, J. 1981. What do we Talk about When we Talk? Speculative Grammar and the Semantics and Pragmatics of Focus.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
510. van der Auwera, J. 1985. Language and Logic. A Speculative and Condition-Theoretic Study.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
511. van der Auwera, J.1986. Conditionals and speech acts. In E. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. Reilly and C.Ferguson (eds.) On Conditionals,197-214. Cambridge University Press.
512. van der Auwera, J.1997. Conditional perfection. In A. Athanasiadou, and R. Dirven (eds.) On Conditionals Again,169-90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
513. Van der Henst, J.-B. 1999. The mental model theory and spatial reasoning reexamined: The role of relevance in premise order. British Journal of Psychology 90: 73-84.
514. Van der Henst, J.-B., Carles, L. and Sperber, D. 2002. Truthfulness and relevance in telling the time. Mind & Language 17: 457-66.
515. Van der Henst, J.-B. and Sperber, D. 2004. Testing the cognitive and communicative principles of relevance. In Noveckand Sperber (eds.), 141-71. (Chapter 13, this volume.)
516. Van der Henst, J.-B., Sperber, D. and Politzer, G. 2002. When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems. Thinking and Reasoning 8: 1-20.
517. van der Sandt, R. 1991. Denial. In L. Dobrin, L. Nichols and R. Rodriguez (eds.) Chicago Linguistic Society27, Parasession on Negation,331-44. Chicago Linguistic Society.
518. Vanderveken, D. 1990-91. Meaning and Speech Acts(2 vols.). Cambridge University Press.
519. van Rooy, R. 2003. Questioning to resolve decision problems. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 727-63.
520. Vega Moreno, R. 2004. Metaphor interpretation and emergence. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 197-222.
521. Vega Moreno, R.2007. Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
522. Verschueren, J. and Bertuccelli-Papi, M. (eds.) 1987. The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
523. von Frisch, K. 1967. The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
524. Wade, E. and Clark, H. 1993. Reproduction and demonstration in quotations. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 805-19.
525. Walton, K. 1976. Points of view in narrative and depictive representation. Nous 10: 49-61.
526. Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
527. Wang, A., Lee, S., Sigman, M. and Dapretto, M. 2006. Neural basis of irony comprehension in children with autism: The role of prosody and context. Brain 129: 932-43.
528. Wason, P. 1966. Reasoning. In B. Foss (ed.) New Horizons in Psychology,135-51. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
529. Wellman, H. 1990. The Child’s Theory of Mind.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
530. Werth, P. (ed.) 1981. Conversation and Discourse.London: Croom Helm.
531. Wharton, T. 2003a. Interjections, language and the ‘showing/saying’ continuum. Pragmatics and Cognition 11: 39-91.
532. Wharton, T. 2003b. Natural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind & Language 18: 447-77.
533. Wharton, T.2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge University Press.
534. Whiten, A. (ed.) 1991. Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading.Oxford: Blackwell.
535. Whiten, A. and Byrne, R. (eds.) 1997. Machiavellian Intelligence II: Evaluations and Extensions. Cambridge University Press.
536. Willey, L. H. 1999. Pretending to be Normal: Living with Asperger’s Syndrome.London: Jessica Kingsley.
537. Williams, D. 1992. Nobody Nowhere.New York: Avon Books.
538. Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness.London: Routledge.
539. Wilson, D. 1975. Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics.London: Academic Press. (Reprinted by Gregg Revivals, Aldershot, 1991.)
540. Wilson, D. 1998a. Linguistic structure and inferential communication. In B. Caron (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, Paris, 20-25 July 1997 Oxford: Elsevier Sciences.
541. Wilson, D. 1998b. Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 57-74.
542. Wilson, D. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In Sperber (ed.), 411-48. (Chapter 11, this volume.)
543. Wilson, D.2003. Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 15: 273-91.
544. Wilson, D. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 116: 1722-43.
545. Wilson, D. and Carston, R. 2006. Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language 21: 404-33.
546. Wilson, D. and Carston, R. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Burton-Roberts (ed.), 230-59.
547. Wilson, D. and Matsui, T. 2000. Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence, relevance. In J. de Bustos Tovar, P. Charaudeau, J. Alconchel, S. Iglesias Recuero and C. Lopez Alonso (eds.) Lengua, Discurso, Texto, vol. 1, 103-132. Madrid: Visor Libros. (Chapter 9, this volume.)
548. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1981. On Grice’s theory of conversation. In Werth (ed.), 155-78. London: Croom Helm. (Reprinted in Kasher (ed.) 1998, vol. IV, pp. 347-68.)
549. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1986. Pragmatics and modularity. In A. Farley, P. Farley and K.-E. McCullough (eds.) Chicago Linguistic Society 22, Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory,67-84. Chicago Linguistic Society. (Reprinted in Davis (ed.) 1991, pp. 583-95.)
550. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1988a. Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In Dancy, Moravcsik and Taylor (eds.), 77-101. (Reprinted in Kasher (ed.) 1998, vol. II, pp. 262-89.) (Chapter 10, this volume.)
551. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1988b. Representation and relevance. In Kempson (ed.), 133-53.
552. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 87: 53-76. (Reprinted in Gibbs and Colston (eds.) 2007, pp. 35-55.)
553. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1-25. (Chapter 7, this volume.)
554. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998a. Pragmatics and time. In Carston and Uchida (eds.), 1-22. (Chapter 8, this volume.)
555. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1998b. Truthfulness and relevance. Paper delivered to the San Marino conference on Grice’s Heritage, May 1998. (Revised version published as Wilson and Sperber 2002.)
556. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. Truthfulness and relevance. Mind111: 583-632. (Chapter 3, this volume.)
557. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. Relevance theory. In Horn and Ward (eds.), 607-32.
558. Winner, E. 1988. The Point of Words: Children’s Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
559. Winner, E., Brownell, H., Happé, F., Blum, A. and Pincus, D. 1998. Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of Mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right- hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 62: 89-106.
560. Yamanashi, M. 1998. Some issues in the treatment of irony and related tropes. In Carston and Uchida (eds.), 271-82.