Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures?

Lingua

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 149-174

  Hall, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conventional implicature; Discourse connectives; Procedural meaning; Relevance theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750619618     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anscombre J.C., and Ducrot O. Deux 'mais' en français?. Lingua 43 (1977) 23-40
2. Bach K. Thought and Reference (1987), Clarendon Press, Oxford
3. Bach K. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9 (1994) 124-162
4. Bach K. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (1999) 327-366
5. Bach K. You don't say?. Synthese 128 (2001) 15-44
6. Bach K., and Harnish R. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts (1979), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Blakemore D. Semantic Constraints on Relevance (1987), Blackwell, Oxford
8. Blakemore D. Denial and contrast: a relevance theoretic account of but. Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1989) 15-37
9. Blakemore D. Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics (1992), Blackwell, Oxford
10. Blakemore D. Indicators and procedures: nevertheless and but. Journal of Linguistics 36 (2000) 463-486
11. Blakemore D. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Blakemore D., and Carston R. The pragmatics of sentential coordination with 'and'. Lingua 115 4 (2005) 569-589
13. Cappelen H., and Lepore E. On an alleged connection between indirect speech and the theory of meaning. Mind and Language 12 (1997) 278-296
14. Carston R. Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. In: Kempson R. (Ed). Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 155-181
15. Carston R. Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed?. Linguistische Berichte 8 (1997) 103-127 Special Issue on Pragmatics
16. Carston R. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication (2002), Blackwell, Oxford
17. Dascal M., and Katriel T. Between semantics and pragmatics: the two types of 'but'-Hebrew 'aval' and 'ela'. Theoretical Linguistics 4 (1977) 143-172
18. Fodor J. Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980) 63-109
19. Fodor J. The present status of the innateness controversy. In: Fodor J. (Ed). Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science (1981), Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex 257-316
20. Fodor J. The Modularity of Mind (1983), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Fodor J. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong (1998), Clarendon Press, Oxford
22. Fodor J., Garrett M., Walker E., and Parkes C. Against definitions. Cognition 8 (1980) 263-367
23. Grice H.P. Studies in the Way of Words (1989), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
24. Heim I., and Kratzer A. Semantics in Generative Grammar (1998), Blackwell, Oxford
25. Iten, C., 2000. 'Non-Truth-Conditional' Meaning, Relevance and Concessives. University of London Ph.D. thesis.
26. Kaplan D. Demonstratives. In: Almog J., Perry J., and Wettstein H. (Eds). Themes from Kaplan (1989), Oxford University Press, Oxford 481-563
27. Lakoff, G., 1971. The role of deduction in grammar. In: Fillmore, C., Langendoen, D.T. (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 62-70.
28. Lakoff, R., 1971. If's, and's, and but's about conjunction. In: Fillmore, C., Langendoen, D.T. (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 114-149.
29. Larson R., and Segal G. Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
30. Levinson S. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
31. Neale S. Coloring and composition. In: Murusagi K., and Stainton R. (Eds). Philosophy and Linguistics (1999), Westville, Boulder, CO 35-82
32. Neale, S., forthcoming. Linguistic Pragmatism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. Potts C. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
34. Recanati F. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought (1993), Blackwell, Oxford
35. Recanati F. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science 19 (1995) 207-232
36. Recanati F. Literal Meaning (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
37. Rieber S. Conventional implicatures as tacit performatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (1997) 51-72
38. Sperber D., and Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (1986/1995), Blackwell, Oxford
39. Sperber D., and Wilson D. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In: Carruthers P., and Boucher J. (Eds). Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 184-200
40. Stainton R. Using non-sentences: an application of relevance theory. Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1994) 269-284
41. Tsohatzidis, S., 1997. Sense and Tone. Paper presented at University College London Pragmatics Reading Group, January.
42. Wharton, T., 2003. Pragmatics and the 'Showing-Saying' Distinction. University of London PhD thesis.
43. Wilson D., and Sperber D. On Grice's theory of conversation. In: Werth P. (Ed). Conversation and Discourse (1981), Croom Helm, London 155-178
44. Wilson D., and Sperber D. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90 (1993) 1-25
45. Wilson D., and Sperber D. Truthfulness and relevance. Mind 111 (2002) 583-632