Restatement and exemplification: A relevance theoretic reassessment of elaboration

Pragmatics and Cognition

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-19

  Blakemore, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989403379     PISSN: 09290907     EISSN: 15699943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/pc.5.1.04bla     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blakemore, D. L. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Blakemore, D.L. 1988. "The organization of discourse". In F.J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Volume 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229-250.
3. Blakemore, D.L. 1993. "The relevance of reformulations". Language and Literature 2(2): 101-120.
4. Blakemore, D. L. 1994. "Relevance, poetic effects and social goals: a reply to Culpeper". Language and Literature 3(1): 49-59.
5. Blakemore, D.L. 1996. "Are reformulation markers discourse markers?". Journal of Linguistics 32: 325-347.
6. Blakemore, D.L. forthcoming. "On the context for so-called discourse connectives". In K. Malmkjaer and J. Williams (eds), The Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Blass, R. 1990. Relevance Relations in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Carston, R. 1992. "Conjunction, explanation and relevance". Unpublished ms. Revised (1993) version in Lingua 90(2): 27-48.
9. Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
10. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
11. Hobbs, J. 1979. "Coherence and coreference". Cognitive Science 3: 67-90.
12. Hobbs, J. 1983. "Why is discourse coherent?". In F. Neubauer (ed.), Coherence in Natural Language Texts. Hamburg: Buske, 29-70.
13. Hovy, E. and Maier, E. forthcoming. "Parsimonious or profligate: how many and which discourse structure relations?". Discourse Processes.
14. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. 1987. "Relational propositions in discourse". Discourse Processes 9: 57-90.
15. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. 1988. "Rhetorical structure theory: towards a functional theory of text organisation". Text 8(3): 243-281.
16. Sanders, T., Spooren, W, and Noordman, L. 1993. "Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations". Discourse Processes 15(1): 1-36.
17. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1987. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Tanaka, K. 1992. "The pun in advertising: a pragmatic approach". Lingua 87(1/2): 91-102.
19. Tanaka, K. 1994. The Pun in Advertising: A Pragmatic Approach to Advertisements in Japan and Britain. London: Routledge.
20. Wilson, D. 1994. "Discourse markers: social and cognitive approaches". Paper delivered at the conference on Linguistic Processes in Communication, University of Wales, Bangor.