Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise

Cognition

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 337-354

  Nicolle, Steve ^a   Clark, Billy ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Experimental pragmatics; Relevance Theory; What is said

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; SPEECH;

COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; SPEECH;

EID: 0032618020     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bach, K., 1994. Semantic slack: what is said and more. In: Tsohatzidis, S. (Ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory. Routledge, New York, pp. 267-291.
2. Carston, R., 1988. Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In: Kempson, R.M. (Ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 155-181.
3. Cohen, L.J., 1971. Some remarks on Grice's views about the logical particles of natural language. In: Bar-Hillel, Y. (Ed.), Pragmatics of Natural Language. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 50-68.
4. Gibbs, R., Moise, J., 1997. Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition 62, 51-74.
5. Grice, H.P., 1967. Logic and conversation. William James lectures, reprinted in Grice (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-143.
6. Recanati, F., 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4, 295-329.
7. Sperber, D., Wilson, D., 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.