Importin-β modulates the permeability of the nuclear pore complex in a Ran-dependent manner

eLife

Volumn 2015, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Lowe, Alan R ^a,c,d   Tang, Jeffrey H ^b,c,g   Yassif, Jaime ^c,d   Graf, Michael ^f   Huang, William Y C ^c   Groves, Jay T ^c,d,e   Weis, Karsten ^c,g   Liphardt, Jan T ^b,c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Bay Area Physical Sciences Oncology Center   (United States)

^e LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f EPFL   (Switzerland)

^g ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITONIN; KARYOPHERIN; KARYOPHERIN BETA; NUCLEOPORIN; NUCLEOPORIN 153; RAN PROTEIN; STREPTAVIDIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; NUP153 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TNPO1 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GEL PERMEATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENE; GENE SILENCING; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUP153 GENE; PHOTOCONVERSION ANALYSIS; PLASMID; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RNA INTERFERENCE; ACTIVE TRANSPORT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR PORE; PERMEABILITY;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; BETA KARYOPHERINS; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; PERMEABILITY; RAN GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; RNA INTERFERENCE;

EID: 84924310287     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04052     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Stewart, M., Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2007. 8(3): p. 195-208.
2. Peters, R., Translocation through the nuclear pore: Kaps pave the way. Bioessays, 2009. 31(4): p. 466-77.
3. Izaurralde, E., et al., The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J, 1997. 16(21): p. 6535-6547.
4. Kalab, P., K. Weis, and R. Heald, Visualization of a Ran-GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts. Science, 2002. 295(5564): p. 2452-6.
5. Frey, S., R.P. Richter, and D. Gorlich, FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a threedimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties. Science, 2006. 314(5800): p. 815-7.
6. Ribbeck, K. and D. Gorlich, Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J, 2001. 20(6): p. 1320-30.
7. Rout, M.P., et al., Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol, 2003. 13(12): p. 622-8.
8. Peters, R., Translocation through the nuclear pore complex: selectivity and speed by reduction- of-dimensionality. Traffic, 2005. 6(5): p. 421-7.
9. Lim, R.Y., et al., Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science, 2007. 318(5850): p. 640-3.
10. Gorlich, D., et al., Isolation of a Protein That Is Essential for the First Step of Nuclear-Protein Import. Cell, 1994. 79(5): p. 767-778.
11. Moore, M.S. and G. Blobel, The GTP-binding protein Ran/TC4 is required for protein import into the nucleus. Nature, 1993. 365(6447): p. 661-3.
12. Moore, M.S. and G. Blobel, Purification of a Ran-Interacting Protein That Is Required for Protein Import into the Nucleus. Proceedings ofthe National Academy ofSciences ofthe United States of America, 1994. 91(21): p. 10212-10216.
13. Gorlich, D., et al., Identification of different roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in nuclear protein import. EMBO J, 1996. 15(20): p. 5584-94.
14. Lowe, A.R., et al., Selectivity mechanism of the nuclear pore complex characterized by single cargo tracking. Nature, 2010. 467(7315): p. 600-3.
15. Snow, C.J., et al., Defective nuclear import of Tpr in Progeria reflects the Ran sensitivity of large cargo transport. J Cell Biol, 2013. 201(4): p. 541-57.
16. Lyman, S.K., et al., Influence of cargo size on Ran and energy requirements for nuclear protein import. J Cell Biol, 2002. 159(1): p. 55-67.
17. Adam, S.A., R.S. Marr, and L. Gerace, Nuclear protein import in permeabilized mammalian cells requires soluble cytoplasmic factors. J Cell Biol, 1990. 111(3): p. 807-16.
18. Tokunaga, M., N. Imamoto, and K. Sakata-Sogawa, Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells. Nat Methods, 2008. 5(2): p. 159-61.
19. Heilemann, M., et al., Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2008. 47(33): p. 6172-6.
20. van de Linde, S., et al., Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy with standard fluorescent probes. Nat Protoc, 2011. 6(7): p. 991-1009.
21. Ma, J., et al., Self-regulated viscous channel in the nuclear pore complex. PNAS, 2012. 109(19): p. 7326-7331.
22. Frenkiel-Krispin, D., et al., Structural analysis of a metazoan nuclear pore complex reveals a fused concentric ring architecture. J Mol Biol, 2010. 395(3): p. 578-86.
23. Loschberger, A., et al., Super-resolution imaging visualizes the eightfold symmetry of gp210 proteins around the nuclear pore complex and resolves the central channel with nanometer resolution. J Cell Sci, 2012. 125(Pt 3): p. 570-5.
24. Shah, S., S. Tugendreich, and D. Forbes, Major binding sites for the nuclear import receptor are the internal nucleoporin Nup153 and the adjacent nuclear filament protein Tpr. J Cell Biol, 1998. 141(1): p. 31-49.
25. Walther, T.C., et al., The nucleoporin Nup153 is required for nuclear pore basket formation, nuclear pore complex anchoring and import of a subset of nuclear proteins. EMBO J, 2001. 20(20): p. 5703-14.
26. Milles, S. and E.A. Lemke, Mapping Multivalency and Differential Affinities within Large Intrinsically Disordered Protein Complexes with Segmental Motion Analysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2014. 53(28): p. 7364-7.
27. Saitoh, H., et al., Direct and indirect association of the small GTPase ran with nuclear pore proteins and soluble transport factors: Studies in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Molecular Biology ofthe Cell, 1996. 7(9): p. 1319-1334.
28. Schrader, N., et al., The crystal structure of the Ran-Nup153ZnF2 complex: a general Ran docking site at the nuclear pore complex. Structure, 2008. 16(7): p. 1116-1125.
29. Ball, J.R. and K.S. Ullman, Versatility at the nuclear pore complex: lessons learned from the nucleoporin Nup153. Chromosoma, 2005. 114(5): p. 319-330.
30. Leake, M.C., et al., Stoichiometry and turnover in single, functioning membrane protein complexes. Nature, 2006. 443(7109): p. 355-8.
31. Pollard, V.W., et al., A novel receptor-mediated nuclear protein import pathway. Cell, 1996. 86(6): p. 985-94.
32. Lim, R.Y., et al., Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. PNAS, 2006. 103(25): p. 9512-7.
33. Tetin, S.Y., Methods in Enzymology. Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy (FFS), part B. Preface. Methods Enzymol, 2013. 519: p. xiii-xiv.
34. Chen, Y., et al., Probing ligand protein binding equilibria with fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy. Biophys J, 2000. 79(2): p. 1074-84.
35. Bischoff, F.R., et al., RanGAP1 induces GTPase activity of nuclear Ras-related Ran. PNAS, 1994. 91(7): p. 2587-91.
36. Chook, Y.M. and G. Blobel, Structure of the nuclear transport complex karyopherin-beta2-Ran x GppNHp. Nature, 1999. 399(6733): p. 230-7.
37. Ribbeck, K., et al., The translocation of transportin-cargo complexes through nuclear pores is independent of both Ran and energy. Current Biology, 1999. 9(1): p. 47-50.
38. Shah, S. and D.J. Forbes, Separate nuclear import pathways converge on the nucleoporin Nup153 and can be dissected with dominant-negative inhibitors. Current Biology, 1998. 8(25): p. 1376-1386.
39. Sun, C., et al., Single-molecule measurements of importin alpha/cargo complex dissociation at the nuclear pore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. 105(25): p. 8613-8618.
40. Schmidt, H.B. and D. Gorlich, Nup98 FG domains from diverse species spontaneously phase- separate into particles with nuclear pore-like permselectivity. Elife, 2015. 4.
41. Rabut, G., V. Doye, and J. Ellenberg, Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat Cell Biol, 2004. 6(11): p. 1114-21.
42. Zilman, A., et al., Efficiency, selectivity, and robustness of nucleocytoplasmic transport. PLoS Comput Biol, 2007. 3(7): p. e125.
43. Zilman, A. and G. Bel, Crowding effects in non-equilibrium transport through nano-channels. Journal ofPhysics-Condensed Matter, 2010. 22(45).
44. Jovanovic-Talisman, T., et al., Artificial nanopores that mimic the transport selectivity of the nuclear pore complex. Nature, 2009. 457(7232): p. 1023-1027.
45. Schleicher, K.D., et al., Selective transport control on molecular velcro made from intrinsically disordered proteins. Nature Nanotechnology, 2014. 9(7): p. 525-530.
46. Sampathkumar, P., et al., Structure, dynamics, evolution, and function of a major scaffold component in the nuclear pore complex. Structure, 2013. 21(4): p. 560-71.
47. Stuwe, T., et al., Evidence for an evolutionary relationship between the large adaptor nucleoporin Nup192 and karyopherins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 2014. 111(7): p. 2530-2535.
48. Andersen, K.R., et al., Scaffold nucleoporins Nup188 and Nup192 share structural and functional properties with nuclear transport receptors. Elife, 2013. 2: p. e00745.
49. Bischoff, F.R. and H. Ponstingl, Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the mitotic regulator RCC1. Nature, 1991. 354(6348): p. 80-2.
50. Hood, F.E. and P.R. Clarke, RCC1 isoforms differ in their affinity for chromatin, molecular interactions and regulation by phosphorylation. Journal of Cell Science, 2007. 120(19): p. 34363445.
51. Hitakomate, E., et al., The methylated N-terminal tail of RCC1 is required for stabilisation of its interaction with chromatin by Ran in live cells. Bmc Cell Biology, 2010. 11.
52. Li, H.Y. and Y.X. Zheng, Phosphorylation of RCC1 in mitosis is essential for producing a high RanGTP concentration on chromosomes and for spindle assembly in mammalian cells. Genes & Development, 2004. 18(5): p. 512-527.
53. Yoon, S.O., et al., Ran-binding protein 3 phosphorylation links the Ras and PI3-kinase pathways to nucleocytoplasmic transport. Mol Cell, 2008. 29(3): p. 362-75.
54. Li, M.Z. and S.J. Elledge, Harnessing homologous recombination in vitro to generate recombinant DNA via SLIC. Nat Methods, 2007. 4(3): p. 251-6.
55. Askjaer, P., et al., RanGTP-regulated interactions of CRM1 with nucleoporins and a shuttling DEAD-box helicase. Mol Cell Biol, 1999. 19(9): p. 6276-85.
56. Harborth, J., et al., Identification of essential genes in cultured mammalian cells using small interfering RNAs. J Cell Sci, 2001. 114(Pt 24): p. 4557-65.
57. Zhou, L. and N. Pante, The nucleoporin Nup153 maintains nuclear envelope architecture and is required for cell migration in tumor cells. FEBS Lett, 2010. 584(14): p. 3013-20.
58. Cheezum, M.K., W.F. Walker, and W.H. Guilford, Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys J, 2001. 81 (4): p. 2378-88.
59. Thompson, R.E., D.R. Larson, and W.W. Webb, Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys J, 2002. 82(5): p. 2775-83.
60. Newberry, M., Tech Note: Pixel response effects on CCD camera gain calibration. http://www.mirametrics.com/tech note ccdqain.htm, 1998.
61. Chung, S.H. and R.A. Kennedy, Forward-backward non-linear filtering technique for extracting small biological signals from noise. J Neurosci Methods, 1991. 40(1): p. 71-86.
62. Conover, W.J., Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. Wiley series in probability and statistics Applied probability and statistics section. 1999, New York: Wiley, viii, 584 p.
63. Forstner, M.B., et al., Lipid lateral mobility and membrane phase structure modulation by protein binding. J Am Chem Soc, 2006. 128(47): p. 15221-7.
64. Muller, J.D., Y. Chen, and E. Gratton, Resolving heterogeneity on the single molecular level with the photon-counting histogram. Biophys J, 2000. 78(1): p. 474-86.
65. Xu, Q., et al., EphA2 receptor activation by monomeric Ephrin-A1 on supported membranes. Biophys J, 2011. 101(11): p. 2731-9.
66. Nitsche, J.M., et al., A transient diffusion model yields unitary gap junctional permeabilities from images of cell-to-cell fluorescent dye transfer between Xenopus oocytes. Biophys J, 2004. 86(4): p. 2058-77.