Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 195-208

  Stewart, Murray ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR PROTEIN;

ALLOSTERISM; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL NUCLEUS MATRIX; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN INDUCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RAN GTP-BINDING PROTEIN;

EID: 33847176295     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm2114     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Görlich, D. & Kutay, U. Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 607-660 (1999).
2. Macara, I. G. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 570-594 (2001).
3. Chook, Y. M. & Blobel, G. Karyopherins and nuclear import. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 703-715 (2001).
4. Conti, E. & Izaurralde, E. Nuclear transport enters the atomic age. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 310-319 (2001).
5. Fahrenkrog, B. & Aebi, U. The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 757-766 (2003).
6. Mosammaparast, N. & Pemberton, L. F. Karyopherins: from nuclear-transport mediators to nuclear-function regulators. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 547-556 (2004).
7. Pemberton, L. F. & Paschal, B. M. Mechanisms of receptor-mediated nuclear import and nuclear export. Traffic 6, 187-198 (2005).
8. Madrid, A. S. & Weis, K. Nuclear transport is becoming crystal clear. Chromosoma 115, 98-109 (2006).
9. Conti, E., Müller, C. W. & Stewart, M. Karyopherin flexibility in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 237-244 (2006).
10. Stewart, M. et al. Molecular mechanism of translocation through nuclear pore complexes during nuclear protein import. FEBS Lett. 498, 145-149 (2001).
11. Weis, K. Regulating access to the genome. Nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle. Cell 112, 441-451 (2003).
12. Feldherr, C. M., Akin, D. & Cohen, R. J. Regulation of functional nuclear pores size in fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4621-4627 (2001).
13. Rout, M. P. & Wente, S. R. Pores for thought: nuclear pore complex proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 4, 357-365 (1994).
14. Rout, M. P. et al. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148, 635-651 (2000). A landmark paper that established the complete protein composition of yeast NPCs together with the location of each nucleoporin as determined by electron microscopy. The authors also proposed an entropic gating mechanism to prevent entry of inappropriate material into the NPC transport channel.
15. Cronshaw, J. M., Krutchinsky, A. N., Zhang, W., Chait, B. T. & Matunis, M. J. Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 158, 915-927 (2002).
16. Timney, B. L. et al. Simple kinetic relationships and nonspecific competition govern nuclear import rates in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 175, 579-593 (2006).
17. Mosammaparast, N. et al. Nuclear import of histone H2A and H2B is mediated by a network of karyopherins. J. Cell Biol. 153, 251-262 (2001).
18. Lee, B. J. et al. Rules for nuclear localization sequence recognition by karyopherinβ2. Cell 126, 543-558 (2006).
19. Ribbeck, K. & Görlich, D. Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J. 20, 1320-1330 (2001). Presents a careful analysis of nuclear protein import kinetics and proposes a selective phase model based on the formation of a hydrogel formed by interactions between the hydrophobic cores of FG repeats.
20. Ribbeck, K., Lipowsky, G., Kent, H. M., Stewart, M. & Görlich, D. NTF2 mediates nuclear import of Ran. EMBO J. 17, 6587-6598 (1998).
21. Smith, A. E., Brownawell, A. & Macara, I. G. Nuclear import of Ran is mediated by the transport factor NTF2. Curr. Biol. 8, 1403-1406 (1998).
22. Conti, E., Uy, M., Leighton, L., Blobel, G. & Kuriyan, J. Crystallographic analysis of the recognition of a nuclear localization signal by the nuclear import factor karyopherin-α. Cell 94, 193-204 (1998). Pioneering determination of the structure of yeast importin-α and the way in which it binds NLSs.
23. Conti, E. & Kuriyan, J. Crystallographic analysis of the specific yet versatile recognition of distinct nuclear localization signals by karyopherin-α. Structure Fold. Des. 8, 329-338 (2000).
24. Fontes, M. R., The, T. & Kobe, B. Structural basis of recognition of monopartite and bipartite nuclear localization sequences by mammalian importin-α. J. Mol. Biol. 297, 1183-1194 (2000).
25. Hodel, M. R., Corbett, A. H. & Hodel, A. E. Dissection of a nuclear localization signal. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1317-1325 (2001).
26. Catimel, B. et al. Biophysical characterization of interactions involving importin-α during nuclear import. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34189-34198 (2001).
27. Rodriguez, M. et al. A cytotoxic ribonuclease variant with a discontinuous nuclear localization signal constituted by basic residues scattered over three areas of the molecule. J. Mol. Biol. 360, 548-557 (2006).
28. Lee, S. J. et al. The structure of importin-β bound to SREBP-2: nuclear import of a transcription factor. Science 302, 1571-1575 (2003).
29. Cingolani, G., Bednenko, J., Gillespie, M. T. & Gerace, L. Molecular basis for the recognition of a nonclassical nuclear localization signal by importin β. Mol. Cell 10, 1345-1353 (2002).
30. Görlich, D., Henklein, P., Laskey, R. A. & Hartmann, E. A 41 amino acid motif in importin-α confers binding to importin-β and hence transit into the nucleus. EMBO J. 15, 1810-1817 (1996).
31. Weis, K., Ryder, U. & Lamond, A. I. The conserved amino-terminal domain of hSRP1 α is essential for nuclear protein import. EMBO J. 15, 1818-1825 (1996).
32. Kobe, B. Autoinhibition by an internal nuclear localization signal revealed by the crystal structure of mammalian importin α. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 388-397 (1999). Pioneering structural paper that proposed how the importin-α IBB domain could have an autoinhibitory function that facilitates cargo release in the nucleus.
33. Matsuura, Y. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for the assembly of a nuclear export complex. Nature 432, 872-877 (2004). Describes the structure of the yeast CAS:RanGTP: importin-α complex, showing the central role of the IBB domain in preventing futile cycles in which cargo is returned to the cytoplasm. Also proposes a spring-loaded model to account for how karyopherin flexibility can mediate the release of importin-α following GTP hydrolysis on Ran.
34. Matsuura, Y., Lange, A., Harreman, M. T., Corbett, A. H. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for Nup2p function in cargo release and karyopherin recycling in nuclear import. EMBO J. 22, 5358-5369 (2003).
35. Matsuura, Y. & Stewart, M. Nup50/Npap60 function in nuclear protein import complex disassembly and importin recycling. EMBO J. 24, 3681-3689 (2005). Demonstration of active displacement of cargo from importin-α by NUP50 and how this can generate a molecular ratchet to prevent futile cycles.
36. Goldfarb, D. S., Corbett, A. H., Mason, D. A., Harreman, M. T. & Adam, S. A. Importin α: a multi-purpose nuclear receptor. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 505-514 (2004).
37. Hodel, H. E. et al. Nuclear localization signal-receptor affinity correlates with in vivo localization in S. cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 23545-23556 (2006).
38. Yang, W., Gelles, J. & Musser, S. M. Imaging of single-molecule translocation through nuclear pore complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12887-12892 (2004). Direct demonstration of the random-walk diffusion of import complexes in the central transport channel of NPCs.
39. Kubitscheck, U. et al. Nuclear transport of single molecules: dwell times at the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 168, 233-243 (2005).
40. Wang, W. & Musser, S. M. Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin β concentration. J. Cell Biol. 174, 951-961 (2006).
41. Bayliss, R. et al. Interaction between NTF2 and xFxFG nucleoporins is required for the nuclear import of RanGDP. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 579-593 (1999).
42. Bayliss, R., Littlewood, T. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-β in nuclear trafficking. Cell 102, 99-108 (2000). Describes the structural basis for the interaction between importin-β and FG-nucleoporin cores.
43. Bayliss, R., Littlewood, T., Strawn, L. A., Wente, S. R. & Stewart, M. GLFG and FxFG nucleoporins bind to overlapping sites on importin-β. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 50597-50606 (2002).
44. Bayliss, R. et al. Structural basis for the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats. EMBO J. 21, 2843-2853 (2002).
45. Fribourg, S. Braun, I. C., Izaurralde, E. & Conti, E. Structural basis for the recognition of a nucleoporin FG repeat by the NTF2-like domain of the TAP/p15 mRNA nuclear export factor. Mol. Cell 8, 645-656 (2001).
46. Grant, R. P., Neuhaus, D. N. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for the interaction between the Tap/NXF1 UBA domain and FG nucleoporins at 1Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 849-858 (2003).
47. Rexach, M. & Blobel, G. Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins. Cell 83, 683-692 (1995).
48. Ribbeck, K. & Görlich, D. The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion. EMBO J. 21, 2664-2671 (2002).
49. Strawn, L. A., Shen, T. & Wente, S. R. The GLFG regions of Nup116p and Nup100p serve as binding sites for both Kap95p and Mex67p at the nuclear pore complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6445-6452 (2001).
50. Strawn, L. A., Shen, T., Shulga, N., Goldfarb, D. S. & Wente, S. R. Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 197-206 (2004). Exploration of the importance of the FG-repeat regions of nucleoporins using an innovative method for deleting these regions in S. cerevisiae. Whereas up to half the mass of FG repeats can be deleted using particular groups of nucleoporins, deletion from several selected nucleoporins has a marked effect.
51. Tran, E. J. & Wente, S. R. Dynamic nuclear pore complexes: life on the edge. Cell 125, 1041-1053 (2006).
52. Grote, M., Kubitscheck, U., Reichelt, R. & Peters, R. Mapping of nucleoporins to the centre of the nuclear pore complex by post-embedding immunogold electron microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 108, 2963-2972 (1995).
53. Denning, D. P., Uversky, V., Patel, S. S., Fink, A. L. & Rexach, M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleoporin Nup2p is a natively unfolded protein. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33447-33455 (2002).
54. Denning, D. P., Patel, S. S., Uversky, V., Fink, A. L. & Rexach, M. Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: the FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2450-2455 (2003).
55. Paulillo, S. M. et al. Nucleoporin domain topology is linked to transport status of the nuclear pore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 351, 784-798 (2005).
56. Liu, S. M. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for the high-affinity binding of nucleoporin Nup1p to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae importin-β homologue, Kap95p. J. Mol. Biol. 349, 515-525 (2005).
57. Bednenko, J., Cingolani, G. & Gerace, L. Importin β contains a COOH-terminal nucleoporin binding region important for nuclear transport. J. Cell Biol. 162, 391-401 (2003).
58. Ben-Efraim, I. & Gerace, L. Gradient of increasing affinity of importin-β for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import. J. Cell Biol. 152, 411-418 (2001).
59. Pyhtila, B. & Rexach, M. A gradient of affinity for the karyopherin Kap95p along the yeast nuclear pore complex. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 42699-42709 (2003).
60. Zeitler, B. & Weis, K. The FG-repeat asymmetry of the nuclear pore complex is dispensable for bulk nucleocytoplasmic transport in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 167, 583-590 (2004).
61. Nachury, M. V. & Weis, K. The direction of transport through the nuclear pore can be inverted. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9622-9627 (1999). Direct demonstration that the directionality of nuclear transport can be reversed by reversing the RanGTP gradient. This work shows conclusively that directionality of transport is driven by the Ran nucleotide state and not by a nucleoporin-affinity gradient for importin-β.
62. Lim, R. Y. et al. Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9512-9517 (2006). This paper uses atomic force microscopy to show that FG-repeats can form molecular brushes when bound to gold particles in vitro.
63. Rout, M. P., Aitchison, J. D., Magnasco, M. O. & Chait, B. T. Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 622-628 (2003).
64. Tanford, C. The Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules. (Wiley, New York, 1961).
65. de Gennes, P. G. Conformations of polymers attached to an interface. Macromolecules 13, 1069-1075 (1980).
66. Frey, S., Richter, R. P. & Görlich, D. FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties. Science 314, 815-817 (2006).
67. Doi, M. & Edwards, S. F. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986).
68. Gilchrist, D., Mykytka, B. & Rexach, M. Accelerating the rate of disassembly of karyopherin-cargo complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18161-18172 (2002).
69. Franke, W. W. Structure, biochemistry and functions of the nuclear envelope. Internat. Rev. Cytol. (Suppl. 4), 71-236 (1974).
70. Richardson, W. D., Mills, A. D., Dilworth, S. M., Laskey, R. A. & Dingwall, C. Nuclear protein migration involves two steps: rapid binding at the nuclear envelope followed by slower translocation through nuclear pores. Cell 52, 655-664 (1988).
71. Walther, T. C. et al. The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. J. Cell Biol. 158, 63-77 (2002).
72. Rexach, M. & Blobel, G. Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors and nucleoporins. Cell 83, 683-692 (1995).
73. Vetter, I. R., Arndt, A., Kutay, U., Görlich, D. & Wittinghofer, A. Structural view of the Ran-importin β interaction at 2. 3 Å resolution. Cell 97, 635-646 (1999).
74. Lee, S. J., Matsuura, Y., Liu, S. M. & Stewart, M. Structural basis for nuclear import complex dissociation by RanGTP. Nature 435, 693-696 (2005). The structure of full-length yeast importin-β bound to RanGTP shows how Ran binding alters the pitch of the importin-β helicoid and facilitates release of the importin-α IBB domain.
75. Cingolani, G., Petosa, C., Weis, K. & Müller C. W. Structure of importin-β bound to the IBB domain of importin-α. Nature 399, 221-229 (1999). Structure of the IBB:importin-β complex showing how the 19 HEAT repeats of importin-β are arranged to form a helicoidal molecule that coils around the α-helical IBB domain. Comparison between different crystal forms indicated that importin-β might be flexible.
76. Görlich, D. et al. A novel class of RanGTP binding proteins. J. Cell Biol. 138, 65-80 (1997).
77. Chook, Y. M. & Blobel, G. Structure of the nuclear transport complex karyopherin-β2-Ran x GppNHp. Nature 399, 230-237 (1999).
78. Bischoff, F. R. & Görlich, D. RanBP1 is crucial for the release of RanGTP from importin-β-related nuclear transport factors. FEBS Lett. 419, 249-254 (1997).
79. Cook, A. et al. The structure of the nuclear export receptor Cse1 in its cytosolic state reveals a closed conformation incompatible with cargo binding. Mol. Cell 18, 355-367 (2005). Direct demonstration of the dramatic conform ational change in the yeast homologue of CAS, Cse1. In the absence of RanGTP and importin-α, the Cse1 helicoid adopts a closed conformation in which the N terminus becomes bound to a region near the centre of the molecule.
80. Fukuhara, N., Fernandez, E., Ebert, J., Conti, E. & Svergun, D. Conformational variability of nucleocytoplasmic transport factors. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2176-2181 (2004). Low-angle X-ray scattering is used to show that several β-karyopherins can adopt different structures in solution, leading to the concept of these molecules having flexible structures.
81. Stewart, M. Molecular recognition in nuclear trafficking. Science 302, 1513-1514 (2003).
82. Görlich, D., Seewald, M. J. & Ribbeck, K. Characterization of Ran-driven cargo transport and the RanGTPase system by kinetic measurements and computer simulation. EMBO J. 22, 1088-1100 (2003).
83. Riddick, G. & Macara, I. G. A systems analysis of importin-α:β mediated nuclear protein import. J. Cell Biol. 168, 1027-1038 (2005). A comprehensive simulation of the classic nuclear protein import cycle that gives several novel and unanticipated functional insights.
84. Smith, A., Slepchenko, B. M., Schaff, J. C. Loew, L. M. & Macara, I. G. Systems analysis of Ran transport. Science 295, 488-491 (2002).
85. Becskei, A. & Mattaj, I. W. Quantitative models of nuclear transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 27-34 (2005).
86. Akey, C. W. Structural plasticity of the nuclear pore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 248, 273-293 (1995).
87. Akey, C. W. & Radermacher, M. Architecture of the Xenopus nuclear pore complex revealed by three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1-19 (1993).
88. Stoffler, D. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. J. Mol. Biol. 328, 119-130 (2003). Comprehensive analysis of NPC morphology using cryo-EM and tomography.
89. Lim, R. Y. H. & Fahrenkrog, B. The nuclear pore complex up close. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 342-347 (2006).
90. Lim, R. Y., Aebi U. & Stoffler D. From the trap to the basket: getting to the bottom of the nuclear pore complex. Chromosoma 115, 15-26 (2006).
91. Beck, M. et al. Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 306, 1387-1390 (2004).
92. Fahrenkrog, B. et al. Domain-specific antibodies reveal multiple-site topology of Nup153 within the nuclear pore complex. J. Struct. Biol. 140, 254-267 (2002).
93. Devos, D. et al. Components of coated vesicles and nuclear pore complexes share a common molecular architecture. PloS Biol. 2, e380 (2004).
94. Vetter, I. R., Nowak, C., Nishimoto, T., Kuhlmann, J. & Wittinghofer, A. Structure of a Ran-binding domain complexed with Ran bound to a GTP analogue: implications for nuclear transport. Nature 398, 39-46 (1999).
95. Stewart, M., Kent, H. M. & McCoy, A. J. Structural basis for molecular recognition between nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) and the GDP-bound form of the Ras-family GTPase, Ran. J. Mol. Biol. 277, 635-646 (1998).
96. Bullock, T. L., Clarkson, W. D., Kent, H. M. & Stewart, M. The 1.6 Å resolution crystal structure of nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2). J. Mol. Biol. 260, 422-431 (1996).
97. Renault, L., Kuhlmann, J., Henkel, A. & Wittinghofer, A. Structural basis for guanine nucleotide exchange on ran by the regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1). Cell 105, 245-255 (2001).
98. Hillig, R. C. et al. The crystal structure of rna1p: a new fold for a GTPase activating protein. Mol. Cell 3, 781-791 (1999).
99. Seewald, M. J., Korner, C., Wittinghofer, A. & Vetter, I. R. RanGAP mediates GTP hydrolysis without an arginine finger. Nature 415, 662-666 (2002).