Political competition, partisanship, and policy making in Latin American public utilities

Political Competition, Partisanship, and Policy Making in Latin American Public Utilities

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-296

  Murillo, Maria Victoria ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924190342     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813092     Document Type: Book

References (446)

1. Abdala, Manuel, and Alice Hill. 1996. “Argentina: The Sequencing of Privatization and Regulation.” In Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Study of Telecommunications, ed. Brian Levy and Pablo Spiller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Abdala, Manuel, and Pablo Spiller. 1999. Instituciones, contratos y regulación en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Temas.
3. Abeles, Martín, Karina Forcinito, and Martín Shorr. 2001. El oligopolio telefónico argentino frente a la liberalización del mercado. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Universidad de Quilmes.
4. Acuña, Carlos. 1994. “Politics and Economics in the Argentina of the Nineties (Or, Why the Future No Longer Is What It Used to Be).” In Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America, ed. William C. Smith, Carlos H. Acuña, and Eduardo Gamarra. New Brunswick, NJ: North-South Center, Transaction Publishers.
5. Alesina, Alberto. 1987. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651-78.
6. Alesina, Alberto, James Mirrlees, and Manfred J. M. Neumann. 1989. “Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies,” Economic Policy 4, no. 8: 57-98.
7. Alianzapor Mexico. 2000. Plataforma Electoral 2000, PRD, Convergencia, PAS, PT, PSN.
8. Altamirano, Carlos. 2002. “Ideologías, políticas y debate cívico.” In Los años peronistas (1943-55), ed. Juan Carlos Torre. Series Nueva Historia Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 207-55.
9. Altomonte, Hugo. 1996. “Energía y desarrollo en América Latina y el Caribe: Síntesis del estudio de caso sobre Chile.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, May.
10. Altomonte, Hugo, and Graciela Moguillansky. 1999. “La crisis eléctrica en Chile: Del modelo a imitar al principios de los noventa al modelo a evitar en el 2000?” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, June.
11. Aninat, Cristóbal, John Landregan, Patricio Navia, and Joaquín Vial. 2004. Political Institutions, Policy Making Process and Policy Outcomes in Chile. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
12. Arias, Asunción, and Mario Carlos Damonte. 1998. “La visión de los grandes usuarios.” In Argentina. El Sector Eléctrico. Buenos Aires: Manrique Zago Ediciones S. R. L.
13. Arriagada, Genaro. 1988. Pinochet: The Politics of Power. Boston: Unwin.
14. Arza, Camila. 2002. “La privatización de los servicios públicos y sus impactos distributivos.” In Privatizaciones y Poder Económico, ed. Daniel Azpiazu. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 91-129.
15. Aspe, Pedro. 1993. El camino mexicano de la transformación económica. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
16. AVANTEL. 2000. “Comparative Revenue of Local Communication Companies.” Internal Document. Mimeo. Mexico City.
17. Avelino, George, David Brown, and Wendy Hunter. 2005. “The Effects of Capital Mobility, Trade Openness, and Democracy on Social Spending in Latin America, 1980-1999,” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 3: 625-41.
18. Azpiazu, Daniel, ed. 2002. Privatizaciones y poder económico. Buenos Aires: FLACSOUniversidad de Quilmes.
19. Azpiazu, Daniel, ed. 1999. “Privatizaciones en la Argentina. Regulación tarifaria, mutaciones en los precios relativos, rentas extraordinarias y concentración económica.” Working Paper 7 (April). Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Universidad de Quilmes.
20. Azpiazu, Daniel, ed. 1997. “Elite empresaria en la Argentina.” Working Paper no. 7. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Universidad de Quilmes.
21. Babb, Sarah. 2001. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Bachelet, Michelle. 2005. “Programa de Gobierno de Michelle Bachelet, 2006-2010.” Michelle Bachelet’s Electoral Plataform. Centro de Estudios Miguel Enriquez, Archivo Chile. Santiago de Chile, Chile (October 18).
23. Badaraco, Ernesto. 1998. “La transformación del sector eléctrico argentino. La visión de los generadores.” In Argentina. El Sector Eléctrico. Buenos Aires: Manrique Zago Ediciones S. R. L.
24. Baena Paz, Guillermina. 2003. “La participación de las bases en el PRI (un estudio del estado de México y un estudio nacional).” In Partido Revolucionario Institucional. Crisis y refundación, ed. Francisco Reveles Vázquez. Mexico City: Ediciones Gernika, 221-88.
25. Baker, Andy. 2007. Consuming the Washington Consensus: Mass Responses to the Market in Latin America. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Baker, Andy. 2003. “Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-based Theory of Trade Preferences,” World Politics 55, no. 3 (April): 423-55.
27. Barros, Robert. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Bartle, Ian. 2002. “When Institutions No Longer Matter: Reform of Telecommunications and Electricity in Germany, France, and Britain,” Journal of Public Policy 22, no. 1: 1-27.
29. Basañes, C. Federico, Eduardo Saavedra, and Raimundo Soto. 2002. “Postprivatization Renegotiation and Disputes in Chile.” In Second-Generation Reforms in Infrastructure Services, ed. F. Basañes and R. Willig. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 51-88.
30. Bastos, Carlos M., and Manuel A. Abdala. 1995. Transformacion del Sector Electrico Argentino. Córdoba, Argentina: Editorial Pugliese Sena S. R. L.
31. Basualdo, Eduardo, Daniel Azpiazu, Martin Abeles, Camila Arza, Karina Porcinito, and Martin Schorr. 2002. “El proceso de privatización en la Argentina: La renegociación con las empresas privatizadas; Revisión contractual y supresión de privilegios y de rentas extraordinarias.” Working Paper. Buenos Aires: Economy and Technology Area, FLACSO-Argentina, April.
32. Basualdo, Eduardo, Daniel Azpiazu, Martin Abeles, Camila Arza, Karina Porcinito, and Martin Schorr. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. BCN. 2004a. Informe de comisión de Minería y Energía. Cámara Boletín No. 2, 922-08. http: //sil. senado. cl/pags/index. html (accessed September 8, 2005).
34. BCN. 2004b. Primer informe de comisión de Minería y Energía del Senado. Boletín No. 2, 922-08. http: //sil. senado. cl/pags/index. html (accessed September 8, 2005).
35. BCN. 2004c. Segundo informe de comisión de Minería y Energía del Senado. Boletín No. 2, 922-08. http: //sil. senado. cl/pags/index. html (accessed September 8, 2005).
36. BCN. 1999. Historia de la Ley. Compilación de Textos Oficiales del Debate Parlamentario. Ley No. 19, 613. Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.
37. BCN. 1994. Historia de la Ley 19, 302. Compilación de Textos Oficiales del Debate Parlamentario. Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.
38. BCN. 1993. Historia de la Ley 19, 496, Vols. 1-4, Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.
39. BCN. n. d. Historia de la ley referencial. Santiago de Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional. http: //websinileg. bcn. cl/websinileg/hley/index. asp (accessed September 10, 2005).
40. Becker Gary. 1985. “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (1985): 371-400.
41. Benton, Allyson. 2007. “Political Institutions, Hydrocarbons Resources, and Economic Policy Divergence in Latin America.” Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30-September 2.
42. Bernstein, Juan Sebastián. 1999. “Racionamiento Eléctrico: Causas y Posibles Soluciones.” Puntos de Referencia 209 (May): 1-11.
43. Bernstein, Juan Sebastián. 1995. “Establecimiento de una política energética basada en el funcionamiento de los mercados competitivos y en la participación privada.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
44. Bicameral Commission for the Reform of the State and the Following of Privatization. Proceedings of Special Meeting in July 25, 2000, Congress of the Nation of Argentina, Buenos Aires.
45. Biglaiser, Glen, and David Brown. 2003. “The Determinants of Privatization in Latin America,” Political Research Quarterly 56, no. 1 (March): 77-89.
46. Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47. Birdsall, Nancy, and John Nellis. 2002. “Winners and Losers: Assessing the Distributional Impact of Privatization.” Working Paper no. 6. Center for Global Development, May.
48. Bitran, Eduardo. 1998. “Regulación, privatización y competencia: Lecciones de la experiencia chilena.” In Quéhay de nuevo en las regulaciones? Telecomunicaciones, electricidad y agua en América Latina, ed. Arthur Barrionuevo and Eugenio Lahera. Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 31-60.
49. Bitran, Eduardo, and Raúl Saéz. 1994. “Privatization and Regulation in Chile.” In The Chilean Economy: Policy Lessons and Challenges, ed. Barry Bosworth, Rudiger Dornbusch, and Raul Labán. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 329-78.
50. Bitran, Eduardo, and Pablo Serra. 1998. “Regulation of Privatized Utilities: The Chilean Experience,” World Development 26, no. 6: 945-62.
51. Bitran, Eduardo, and Pablo Serra. 1994. “Regulatory Issues in the Privatization of Public Utilities: The Chilean Experience,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34: 179-97.
52. Bitran, Eduardo, Antonio Estache, José Luis Guash, and Pablo Serra. 1999. “Privatizing and Regulating Chile’s Utilities, 1974-2000: Successes, Failures, and Outstanding Challenges.” In Chile: Recent Policy Lessons and Emerging Challenges, ed. Guillermo Perry and Danny M. Leipziger. Washington, DC: World Bank, 327-92.
53. Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Boix, Carles. 2000. “Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in OECD Countries, 1964-1993,” World Politics 53: 38-73.
55. Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Bonnet, Céline, Pierre Dubois, David Martimort, and Stéphane Straub. 2006. Empirical evidence on satisfaction with privatization in Latin America: Welfare Effects and Beliefs. Mimeo. Toulouse: IDEI.
57. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Christopher J. W. Zorn. 2001. “Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science,” American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 4 (October): 972-88.
58. Boylan, Delia M. 2001. Defusing Democracy: Central Bank Autonomy and the Transition from Authoritarian Rule. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
59. Briceño, Arturo. n. d. Case Study: Fixed-mobile Interconnection in Mexico. http: //www. itu. int/osg/sec/spu/ni/fmi/case_studies/(accessed March 30, 2009).
60. Brooks, Sarah. 2008. Social Protection and the Market: The Transformation of Social Security Institutions in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Brune, Nancy, and Geoffrey Garrett. 2000. “The Diffusion of Privatization in the Developing World.” Paper presented at the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 31-September 3.
62. Buira, Ariel. 2003. “An Analysis of IMF Conditionality.” G-24 Discussion Paper Series 22.
63. Bull, Benedicte. 2005. Aid, Power, and Privatization: The Politics of Telecommunications Reform in Central America. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
64. Burgess, Katrina. 2004. Parties and Unions in the New Global Economy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
65. CAF. 2006. “Argentina. Análisis del Sector Eléctrico,” Corporación Andina de Fomento. Informes Sectoriales de Infraestructura 4, no. 1 (February).
66. Callaghy, Thomas. 1997. “Globalization and Marginalization: Debt and the International Underclass,” special issue, The Global Economy, Current History 96, no. 613: 392-6.
67. Calvo, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo. 2005. “A New Law of Argentine Politics.” In Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, ed. Steven Levitsky and Maria Victoria Murillo. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 207-26
68. Calvo, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market,” American Journal of Political Science 48, no. 4 (October): 742-57.
69. Cámara de Diputados. 1999. Informe de la Comisión de Minería y Energía sobre la investigación de los hechos que han motivado el racionamiento de energía eléctrica en el país. Valparaíso, Chile: Cámara de Diputados.
70. Camp, Roderic Ai. 2003. Politics in Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. CANIETI. 2000. “Propuesta del sector de telecomunicaciones para la nueva administracion del gobierno federal.” Mexico City, January 18. Paper presented to the Joint Congressional Commission on Telecommunications Reform.
72. Canitrot, Adolfo. 1981. “Teoría y práctica del liberalismo. Política antiinflacionaria y apertura económica en la Argentina, 1976-1981,” Desarrollo Económico 21, no. 82 (July-September): 131-89.
73. Canton, Darío, and Jorge R. Jorrat. 2001. “Economic Evaluations, Partisanship, and Social Bases of Presidential Voting in Argentina, 1995 and 1999,” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14, no. 4 (August): 413-27.
74. Carey, John. 2002. “Parties, Coalitions, and the Chilean Congress.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 222-53
75. Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76. Carreón Rodríguez, David G. Víctor, Armando Jiménez and Juan Rosellón. 2007. “The Mexican Electricity Sector: Economic, Legal, and Political Issues.” In The Political Economy of Power Sector Reform, ed. David G. Victor and Thomas C. Heller. New York: Cambridge University Press: 175-214.
77. Carrera, Jorge, Daniele Checchi, and Massimo Florio. 2005. “Privatization Discontent and Its Determinants: Evidence from Latin America.” Mimeo. University of Milan (March).
78. Casar, Maria Amparo. 1998. “Oscillating Relations: President and Congress in Argentina.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 114-44.
79. Castelar Pinheiro, Armando, and Ben Ross Schneider. 1994. “The Fiscal Impact of Privatization in Latin America,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34 (Summer): 9-42.
80. Catterberg, Edgardo. 1989. Los argentinos frente a la política: Cultura política y opinión pública en la transición argentina a la democracia. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta.
81. Celani, Marcelo. 2000. “Determinantes de la inversión en telecomunicaciones en Argentina.” In La Argentina de los noventa, ed. Daniel Heymann and Bernardo Kosacoff. Buenos Aires: CEPAL-Eudeba, 9-56
82. Centeno, Miguel A. 1994. Democracy within Reason. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
83. Centeno, Miguel A., and Patricio Silva. 1998. The Politics of Expertise in Latin America. Amsterdam: Macmillan Press.
84. Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). Studies in Public Opinion: Surveys from 1993 to 1999. http: //www. cepchile. cl/enc_main. html (accessed October 1, 2005).
85. Centeno, Miguel A., and Patricio Silva. 1992. El ladrillo: Bases de la política económica del gobierno militar chileno. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.
86. CEPAL. 2007. Anuario estadistico de America Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: CEPAL.
87. Chong, Alberto. 2005. “Privatization in Latin America.” Mimeo. Inter-American Development Bank.
88. Chong, Alberto, and Florencio López-de-Silanes. 2005. Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality. Washington, DC: Stanford University Press and the World Bank.
89. CIDE. 2000a. Encuesta de Privatización del Sector Eléctrico. Presidencia de la Nación. National Survey. February 1 (PRV10200).
90. CIDE. 2000b. Encuesta de la Declaracion de Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Privatización del Sector Eléctrico. Presidencia de la Nación. National Survey. August 15 (PRV10899).
91. CIDE. 2008. National Home Surveys of the Office of the President of Mexico (1989-2000) and BGC Ulises Beltrán y Asociados (2001-2). National Sample. CIDE/Presidencia de la Republica, 1989-2000, public opinión survey database.
92. CIDE. 1995. Encuesta de Privatizacion Roll Económico. Presidencia de la Nacional. National Survey. August 29 (code REC30895. PRG).
93. Clark, William. 2003. Capitalism, Not Globalism. Capital Mobility, Central Bank Independence and the Political Control of the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
94. Cleary, Matthew. 2006. “Explaining the Left’s Resurgence,” Journal of Democracy 17, no. 4: 35-49.
95. Clifton, Judith. 2000. The Politics of Telecommunications in Mexico. London: Macmillan.
96. CMIC. 2002. “Comision de Infraestructura: Sector Electrico.” Mexico City. Paper presented to the Congressional Commission on Electricity Reform.
97. Collier, David, and Ruth Berins Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
98. Comisión Nacional de Energía (CNE). 1999. Crisis eléctrica. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Nacional de Energía.
99. Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. 1993. “Un gobierno para los nuevos tiempos: Bases programáticas del segundo gobierno de la Concertacion.” Santiago de Chile.
100. Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. 1989. “Programa de Gobierno.” Santiago de Chile: Documentos La Época.
101. Conniff, Michael L. 1999. Introduction to Populism in Latin America, ed. Michael L. Conniff. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
102. Cook, Maria Lorena. 2007. The Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
103. Coppedge, Michael. 1997. “A Classification of Latin American Political Parties.” Working Paper no. 244. Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, November.
104. Corrales, Javier. 2002. Presidents without Parties: The Politics of Economic Reform in Argentina and Venezuela in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
105. Cox, D. R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life-Tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 34, no. 2: 187-220.
106. Cox, Gary, and Matthew D. McCubbins. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Stephen Haggard and Matthew D. McCubbins. New York: Cambridge University Press, 21-63.
107. CPT. 2002. “Ley Federal de Telecomunicaciones: Propuesta de reforma.” Conferencia Parlamentaria de Telecomunicaciones, August 22.
108. Crisp, Brian, and Gregg Johnson. 2003. “Mandates, Power, and Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 1 (January): 128-42.
109. Cukierman, Alex, and Mariano Tommasi. 1998. “When Does It Take a Nixon to Go to China?” American Economic Review 88, no. 1 (March): 180-97.
110. Curzio, Leonardo. 1994. La of erta electoral de los partidos politicos. Mexico City: Triana Editores.
111. De la Garza Talavera, Rafael. 2003. “Del nacionalismo al liberalismo: la transformación ideológica del Partido de la Revolución.” In Partido de la Revolución Institucional: crisis y refundación, ed. Francisco Reveles Vázquez. Mexico City: Editorial Gernika, 315-45.
112. Devlin, Robert, and Rosella Cominetti. 1994. “La crisis de la empresa pública, las privatizaciones y la equidad social.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
113. Díaz, Carlos, Alexander Galetovic, and Raimundo Soto. 2000. “La crisis eléctrica 1998-1999: Causas, consecuencias, y lecciones,” Estudios Públicos 80 (Spring): 149-92.
114. Di Maggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (April): 147-60.
115. Domínguez, Jorge I. 1996. “Ideas and Leaders in Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s.” In Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s, ed. Jorge I. Domínguez. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
116. Domínguez, Jorge, and James McCann. 1996. Democratizing Mexico. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
117. Dornbush, Rudiger, and Sebastian Edwards. 1991. “The Macroeconomics of Populism.” In The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, ed. R. Dornbush and S. Edwards. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 7-13.
118. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
119. Edwards, Sebastian. 1995. Crisis and Reform in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
120. Eicheengreen, Barry, and Albert Fishlow. 1998. “Contending with Capital Flows: What Is Different about the 1990s.” In Capital Flows and Financial Crises, ed. Miles Kahler. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1-22.
121. Eising, Rainer. 2002. “Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization,” International Organization 56, no. 1: 85-120.
122. Elster, Jon. 1998. “A Plea for Mechanisms.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, ed. Peter Hedstrom and Richard Swedberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45-73
123. Escolar, Marcelo, and Ernesto Calvo. 2002. Transferencia electoral y reestructuración partidaria en la elección federal Argentina 2001: Categoría diputados nacionales. Buenos Aires: UNDP Political Reform Program report.
124. Esping-Anderson, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
125. Etchemendy, Sebastián. 2009. “Models of Economic Liberalization: Regime, Power and Compensation in Spain, Argentina, Chile, and the Iberian-American Region,” Manuscript. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
126. Fazio, Hugo. 1997. Mapa actual de la extrema riqueza en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Lom.
127. Fernández-Arias, Eduardo, and Ricardo Hausmann. 2000. “Is FDI a Safer Form of Financing?” RES Working Papers 4201, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
128. FIEL. 1999. La regulación de la competencia y de los servicios públicos. Buenos Aires: Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas.
129. Fisher, Ronald, and Alexander Galetovic. 2003. “Regulatory Governance and Chile’s 1998-1999 Electricity Shortage,” Policy Reform 6, no. 2 (June): 105-25.
130. Fischer, Ronald, and Pablo Serra. 2003. “Efecto de la privatización de servicios públicos en Chile: Casos sanitario, electricidad y telecomunicaciones.” Mimeo. Universidad de Chile (June).
131. Fishlow, Albert. 1994. “Latin America and the United States in a Changing World Economy.” In Latin America in a New World, ed. Abraham Lowenthal and Gregory Treverton. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 65-78.
132. Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
133. Fontaine Aldunate, Arturo. 1988. Los Economistas y el Presidente Pinochet. Santiago de Chile: Zig-Zag.
134. Foster, Vivien. 2004. “Toward a Social Policy for Argentina’s Infrastructure Sectors: Evaluating the Past and Exploring the Future,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3422 (October).
135. Foweraker, Joe, Todd Landman, and Neil Harvey. 2003. Governing Latin America. Cambridge: Polity.
136. Fox, Vicente. 2005. Quinto informe de gobierno. Mexico City: Presidencia de la República.
137. Franzese, Robert. 2002a. “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes,” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 369-421.
138. Franzese, Robert. 2002b. Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
139. Frei, Eduardo. 1999a. Discurso sobre la crisis eléctrica, 26 Abril de 1999. http: //www. fundacionfrei. cl/nuevo/efr/discursos. html (accessed September 20, 2005).
140. Frei, Eduardo. 1999b. Mensaje presidencial 21 de Mayo 1999. http: //www. camara. cl/hist/archivo/discurs/presi99. pdf (accessed September 21, 2005).
141. Frente para la Victoria. 2003. “Declaracion de Principios.” Nestor Kirchner’s Electoral Plataform. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
142. Frente para la Lealtad. 2003. “10 Propuestas para salir de la crisis.” Carlos Menem’s Electoral Plataform. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
143. Frieden, Jeffrey. 1992. Debt, Development, and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
144. Frye, Timothy. 2006. “Partisan Politics in Transition Economies.” Mimeo. Columbus: Ohio State University.
145. Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World,” World Politics 54: 308-36.
146. Galetovic, Alexander. 2003. “Integración vertical en el sector eléctrico: Una guía para el usuario,” Estudios Públicos 91 (Winter): 199-232.
147. Galetovic, Alexander. 2002. “Transmisión y la ‘ley corta.’” Puntos de Referencia, 265. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos, December.
148. Gargarella, Roberto. 2008. “The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies: The Cases of Argentina, Chile and Colombia.” In The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, ed. Roberto Gargarella, Siri Gloppen, Morten Kinander, and Bruce Wilson. Manuscript.
149. Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1991. “The Political Opposition and the Party System under the Military Regime.” In The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, ed. Paul Drake and Ivan Jaksic. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 211-50.
150. Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
151. Gerchunoff, Pablo, Esteban Greco, and Diego Bondorevsky. 2003. “Comienzos diversos, distintas trayectorias y final abierto: Más de una década de privatizaciones en Argentina, 1990-2002.” Working Paper 34, Public Management Series. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL (April).
152. Gereffi, Gary, and Peter Evans. 1981. “Transnational Corporations, Dependent Development and State Policies in the Semiperiphery: A Comparison of Brazil and Mexico,” Latin American Research Review 16, no. 3: 31-64.
153. Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
154. Gervasoni, Carlos. 1998. “Del Distribucionismo al neoliberalismo: Los cambios en la Coalición Electoral Peronista durante el gobierno de Menem.” Paper presented at the 1998 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, September 24-6.
155. Gibson, Edward. 1997. “The Populist Road to Market Reforms: Policy and Electoral Coalitions in Argentina and Mexico,” World Politics 49 (April): 339-70.
156. Gibson, Edward, and Ernesto Calvo. 2000. “Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina,” Studies in Comparative International Development 35, no. 3 (Fall): 32-55.
157. Gil Hubert, Johanna. 2000. “La Interconexión en el sector de las telecomunicaciones en México a partir de la privatización de Telmex: Un análisis teórico y empírico.” BA thesis, Economics Department, ITAM, Mexico City.
158. Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2004. “Institutional Change in Regulatory Policies: Regulation through Independent Agencies and the Three New Institutionalisms.” In The Politics of Regulation: Examining Regulatory Institutions and Instruments in the Age of Governance, ed. Jacint Jordana and David Levi-Faur. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 67-89.
159. Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2002. “Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis,” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 6: 873-93.
160. Gomez-Ibanez, Jose. 2003. Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly, Contracts and Distribution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
161. Greif, Avner, and David D. Laitin. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98, no. 4 (November): 633-52
162. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
163. Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe,” Comparative Political Studies 36: 1123-46.
164. Guerrero, Isabel, Luis Felipe Lopez-Calva, and Michael Walton. 2006. “The Inequality Trap and Its Links to Low Growth in Mexico.” Mimeo.
165. Haas, Peter. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization 46, no. 1: 1-35.
166. Hachette, Dominique, and Rulf Luders. 1993. Privatization in Chile. San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth.
167. Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
168. Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1992. “Economic Adjustment and the Prospects for Democracy.” In The Politics of Economic Adjustment, ed. Stephen Haggard and Robert Kaufman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 319-50.
169. Haggard, Stephen, and Sylvia Maxfield. 1996. “The Political Economy of Financial Internationalization in the Developing World.” In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, ed. Robert Keohane and Helen Milner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 209-39.
170. Haggard, Stephen, and Matthew D. McCubbins, 2001. “Introduction: Political Institutions and the Determinants of Public Policy.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Stephen Haggard and Matthew D. McCubbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-17.
171. Haggard, Stephen, and Gregory Noble. 2001. “Power Politics: Elections and Electricity Regulation in Taiwan.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Stephen Haggard and Matthew D. McCubbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 256-90.
172. Hagopian, Frances. 2005. “Conclusions: Government Performance, Political Representation, and Public Perceptions of Contemporary Democracy in Latin America.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Frances Hagopian and Scott Mainwaring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319-62
173. Hall, Peter A. 1989. “Conclusion: The Politics of Keynesian Ideas.” In The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, ed. Peter A. Hall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 361-91
174. Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
175. Heckman, John, and Carmen Pages. 2000. “The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets,” Economia, the Journal of the Latin American Economic Association 1 (Fall): 109-54.
176. Heller, William B., and Matthew D. McCubbins. 2001. “Political Institutions and Economic Development: The Case of Electric Utility Regulation in Argentina and Chile.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Stephen Haggard and Matthew D. McCubbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229-55
177. Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions,” World Politics 50 (January): 203-34.
178. Helmke, Gretchen. 2004. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.
179. Helmke, Gretchen, and Steven Levitsky. 2006. Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
180. Henisz, Witold J. 2002. “The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment,” Industrial and Corporate Change 11, no. 2: 355-89.
181. Henisz, Witold J., and Bennet A. Zelner. 2005. “Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures and Change in Emerging Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments,” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 3: 361-82.
182. Henisz, Witold J., and Bennet A. Zelner. 2003. “Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures and Change in Emergent Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments,” William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2003-589, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School.
183. Henisz, Witold J., Bennet A. Zelner, and Mauro F. Guillen. 2005. “The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977-1999,” American Sociological Review 70: 871-97.
184. Hernández, Cesar. 2007. La reforma cautiva. Inversión, trabajo y empresa en el sector eléctrico mexicano. Mexico City: CIDAC.
185. Hibbs, Douglas. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review 71, no. 4: 1467-87.
186. Hillman, Amy J., Gerald D. Keim, and Douglas Schuler. 2004. “Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management 30, no. 6: 837-57.
187. Hinich, Melvin, and Michael Munger. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
188. Hirshman, Albert. 1968. “The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrialization in Latin America,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (February): 2-32.
189. Hirshman, Albert. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
190. Hite, Katherine. 2000. When the Romance Ended: Leaders of the Chilean Left, 1968-1998. New York: Columbia University Press.
191. Holburn, Guy, and Pablo Spiller. 2002. “Interest Group Representation in Administrative Institutions: The Impact of Consumer Advocate and Elected Commissioners on Regulatory Policy in the United States.” Unpublished manuscript.
192. Huber, Evelyne, Thomas Mustillo, and John D. Stephens. 2008. “Politics and Social Spending in Latin America,” The Journal of Politics 70, no. 2 (April): 420-36.
193. Huber, Evelyne, and John Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
194. Huber, John, and Charles Shipan. 2006. “Politics, Delegation and Bureaucracy.” In The Oxford Handbook for Political Economy, ed. Barry Weingast and Donald Wittman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 256-73.
195. Huber, John, and Charles Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
196. Hulsink, Willem. 1999. Privatization and Liberalization in European Telecommunications: Comparing Britain, the Netherlands, and France. London: Routledge.
197. Huneeus, Carlos. 2000a. El régimen de Pinochet. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Sudamericana.
198. Huneeus, Carlos. 2000b. “Technocrats and Politicians in an Authoritarian Regime: The ‘Odeplan Boys’ and the ‘Gremialists’ in Pinochet’s Chile,” Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (May): 461-501.
199. IADB. 2005. The Politics of Policies. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America 2006 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
200. IADB. 2001. Competitiveness: The Business of Growth. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America 2001 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
201. IERAL. 1999. “Las regulaciones en la Argentina.” Working Paper 22, IERAL.
202. Inostroza, Gabriel. 1995. “Control del estado y gestión empresarial en el sector eléctrico de Chile.” Working Paper. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, February.
203. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Población de 15 años y más por situación en la fuerza de trabajo y tasa de desocupación. Total país, ambos sexos. Series 1986-2004. http: //www. ine. cl/03-empleo/9999. htm (accessed October 1, 2005).
204. Inter-American Development Bank. 2001. Competitiveness: The Business of Growth. Washington, DC: IPES, Research Department, Inter-American Development Bank.
205. Iversen, Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
206. Iversen, Torben, and Anne Wren. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy,” World Politics 50 (July): 507-46.
207. James, Scott. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
208. Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
209. Johnson, Gregg, and Brian Crisp. 2003. “Mandates, Power, and Politics,” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 1 (January): 128-42.
210. Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgarner. 2005. The Politics of Attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
211. Jones, Mark. 1997. “Evaluating Argentina’s Presidential Democracy.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Shuggart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 259-99.
212. Jones-Luong, Pauline, and Erika Weinthal. 2004. “Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review 98, no. 1 (February): 139-52.
213. Jones-Luong, Pauline, and Erika Weinthal. 2001. “Prelude to the Resource Curse: Explaining Oil and Gas Development Strategies in the Soviet Successor States and Beyond,” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 4 (May): 367-99.
214. Jordana, Jacint, and David Levi-Faur. 2005. “The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (March): 102-24.
215. Kaufman, Robert. 2008. “The Political Left, the Export Boom, and the Populist Temptation.” Mimeo. New York.
216. Kaufman, Robert R., and Joan M. Nelson. 2004. Crucial Needs, Weak Incentives: Social Sector Reform, Democratization, and Globalization in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
217. Kaufman, Robert R., and Alex Segura-Ubiergo. 2001. “Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973-97,” World Politics 53 (July): 553-87.
218. King, Gary, Robert Keohena, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princenton University Press.
219. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.
220. Kingstone, Peter. 2003. “Privatizing Telebrás: Brazilian Political Institutions and Policy Performance,” Comparative Politics 36, no. 1 (October): 21-40.
221. Kitschelt, Hebert. 2001. “Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment: When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies?” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Paul Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 265-302.
222. Klesner, Joseph. 2004. “The Structure of the Mexican Electorate: Social Attitudinal and Partisan Bases of Vicente Fox’s Victory.” In Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Jorge I. Domínguez and Chappell Lawson. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 91-122
223. Kogut, Bruce, and J. Muir Macpherson. 2004. “The Decision to Privatize as an Economic Policy Idea: Epistemic Communities, Palace Wars, and Diffusion.” Mimeo.
224. Kuhlmann, Federico, Marcio Wohlers de Almeida, Martin Abeles, Karina Forcinito, and Martín Schorr. 2000. “Privatization and Deregulation: Latin American Style.” Paper presented at the 11th ITS European Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, September 9-11.
225. Kurtz, Marcus. 2004. “The Dilemmas of Democracy in the Open Economy Lessons from Latin America,” World Politics 56 (January): 261-302.
226. Kurtz, Marcus. 1999. “Chile’s Neo-Liberal Revolution: Incremental Decisions and Structural Transformation, 1973-89,” Journal of Latin American Studies 31, pt. 2 (May): 399-427.
227. Lagos, Ricardo. 1999. “Iniciar el siglo XXI con mas democracia y mas derechos,” Ricardo Lagos’s Electoral Plataform Bases Programáticas. Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. Santiago de Chile. Chile (June 23).
228. La Época. Programa de Gobierno. 1989. Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. Santiago de Chile.
229. Latintrack 2000. Public Opinion Tracking. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
230. Latinobarómetro. 2005. Informe Latinobarómetro, 1995-2005: Diez años de opinión pública. http: //www. latinobarometro. org (accessed July 15, 2008).
231. Latinobarómetro. 2003. Informe de prensa: resumen. http: //www. latinobarometro. org/Upload/Informe-Resumen%20Latinobarómetro%202003. zip (accessed July 15, 2008).
232. Latinobarómetro. 1998. 1998 Latinobarometer survey of Latin America data purchased at http: //www. latinobarometro. org/(accessed July 20, 2008).
233. Latinobarómetro. 1995. 1995 Latinobarometer survey of Latin America data purchased at http: //www. latinobarometro. org/(accessed July 20, 2008).
234. Lawson, Chappell. 2004. Introduction to Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Jorge I. Domínguez and Chappell Lawson. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
235. Lawson, Chappell. 2002. Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
236. Legisa, Juan. 2002. “Settlement of Disputes in the Power Sector in Argentina.” In Second-Generation Reforms in Infrastructure Services, ed. F. Basañes and R. Willig. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 133-45.
237. Legisa, Juan. 1999. “Second Generation Issues in the Reform of Public Services,” Mimeo, Interamerican Development Bank (October).
238. León, Samuel. 1990. “Del partido de partidos al partido de sectores.” In El Partido en el poder. IEPES: Mexico City.
239. Levi-Faur, David. 2004. “On the ‘Net Impact’ of Europeanization: The EU’s Telecoms and Electricity Regimes between the Global and the National,” Comparative Political Studies 37, no. 1 (February): 3-39.
240. Levi-Faur, David. 2003. “The Politics of Liberalization: Privatization and Regulation-for-Competition in Europe’s and Latin America’s Telecoms and Electricity Industries,” European Journal of Political Research 42: 705-40.
241. Levi-Faur, David. 1999. “The Governance of Competition: The Interplay of Technology, Economics, and Politics in European Union Electricity and Telecom Regimes,” Journal of Public Policy 19, no. 2: 175-207.
242. Levi-Faur, David, and Jacint Jordana. 2005. “The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (March): 102-24.
243. Levine, Michael, and Jennifer Forrence. 1990. “Regulatory Capture, Public Interest, and the Public Agenda: Toward a Synthesis,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 167-98.
244. Levitsky, Steve. 2003. Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
245. Levitsky, Steven, and María Victoria Murillo. 2009. “The Causes and Implications of Variation in Institutional Strength,” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 115-33.
246. Levitsky, Steven, and María Victoria Murillo. 2003. “Argentina Weathers the Storm,” Journal of Democracy 14, no. 4 (October): 152-66.
247. Levy, Brian, and Pablo Spiller. 1996. Introduction to Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Study of Telecommunications, ed. Brian Levy and Pablo Spiller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
248. Littlechild, Stephen C., and Carlos J. Skerk. 2004. “Regulation of Transmission Expansion in Argentina.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 464. November.
249. Libertad y Desarrollo. 1993a. “Comentarios al Proyecto de Ley sobre los Derechos del Consumidor.” Reseña Legislativa 155 (August). Santiago de Chile.
250. Libertad y Desarrollo. 1993b. “Telecomunicaciones: Hacia una Mayor Competencia,” Temas Públicos 147 (June). Santiago de Chile.
251. Llanos, Mariana. 2002. Privatization and Democracy in Argentina: An Analysis of President-Congress Relations. New York: Palgrave.
252. Lodge, Milton, and Ruth Hammill. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing,” American Political Science Review 80, no. 2 (June): 505-20.
253. Lopreite, Débora Cecilia. 2001. “Ciudadanos o consumidores: Los dilemas institucionales del Defensor del Pueblo de la Nación Argentina.” MA thesis, Public Administration, School of Economics, University of Buenos Aires, May.
254. Lora, Eduardo. 2001. “Structural Reforms in Latin America: What Has Been Reformed and How to Measure It.” Working Paper 446. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, December.
255. Lora, Eduardo, and Mauricio Olivera. 2005. “The Electoral Consequences of the Washington Consensus,” Economia (Spring): 1-45.
256. Lustig, Nora. 1992. “Equity and Growth in Mexico.” In Towards a New Development Strategy for Latin America, ed. Simon Teitel. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 219-58.
257. Madrid, Raul. 2003. Retiring the State: The Politics of Pension Privatization in Latin America and Beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
258. Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
259. Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Poire. 2004. “The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change.” In Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election, ed. Jorge I. Domínguez and Chapel Lawson. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 293-319.
260. Magaloni, Beatriz, Alberto Diaz Cayeros, and Federico Estevez. 2007. “Clientelism and portfolio diversification: a model of electoral investment with applications to Mexico.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Electoral Competition, ed. Herbert Kitschelt and Steven Wilkinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
261. Mahoney, James. 2003. “Long-Run Development and the Legacy of Colonialism in Spanish America,” American Journal of Sociology 109, no. 1 (July): 50-106.
262. Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully. 1995. “Introduction: Party Sytems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1-34.
263. Manza, Jeff, and Fay Lomax Cook. 2002. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: The State of the Debate.” In Navigating Public Opinion, ed. Jeff Manza, Fay Lomax Cook, and Benjamin I. Page. New York: Oxford University Press, 17-32.
264. Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk. New York: Cambridge University Press.
265. Margheritis, Ana. 2002. “Policy Innovation and Leaders’ Perceptions: Building a Reformist Consensus in Argentina,” Journal of Latin American Studies 34: 881-914.
266. Margheritis, Ana. 1999. Ajuste y reforma en Argentina, 1989-1995. Buenos Aires: Nuevohacer.
267. Mariscal, Judith. 2002. Unfinished Business: Telecommunications Reform in Mexico. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
268. Mariscal, Judith, and Eugenio Rivera. 2005. “New Trends in the Latin American Telecommunications Market: Telefonica and Telmex,” Telecommunications Policy 29: 757-77.
269. Martinez Gallardo, Cecilia. Forthcoming. “Cabinets and the Policy-Making Process.” In Political Institutions, Actors and Arenas in Latin American, ed. Carlos Scartascini, Ernesto Stein, and Mariano Tommasi.
270. McAdam, Adam, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
271. McCubbins, Matthew, and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked,” American Journal of Political Science 28 (February): 165-79.
272. McCubbins, Mathew, Roger Noll, and Barry Weingast. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3, no. 2 (Fall): 243-77.
273. McGillivray, Fiona. 2003. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
274. McGuire, James. 1997. Peronism without Perón. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
275. Megginson, William L., and Jeffrey M. Netter. 2001. “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies in Privatization,” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (June): 321-89.
276. Meller, Patricio. 1996. Un siglo de economía política chilena (1890-1990). Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andrés Bello.
277. Melo, José Ricardo. 1993. “La liberalización y la privatización de las telecomunicaciones.” Manuscript, University of Chile.
278. Melo, José Ricardo and Pablo Serra. 1998. “Competencia y regulación en telecomunicaciones: la experiencia chilena,” Perspectivas 2, no. 1: 215-47. Santiago de Chile.
279. Menem, Carlos, and Roberto Dromi. 1997. Reforma del estado. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ciudad Argentina.
280. Meseguer Yebra, Covadonga, and Fabrizio Gilardi. 2005. “What Is New in the Study of Policy Diffusion? A Critical Review.” Mimeo. Mexico City.
281. Meseguer Yebra, Covadonga. 2002. Bayesian Learning about Policies. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales, Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones.
282. MIDEPLAN (Ministry of Planning and Cooperation). 1998. Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional 1998 (CASEN), Cuadros Vivienda. http: //www. mideplan. cl/casen3/vivienda/cuadros1998. html (accessed September 18, 2005).
283. Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
284. Ministerio Secretaria General de Gobierno (MSGG). 1999. Informe encuestas flash crisis eléctrica. Santiago de Chile: Secretaria de Comunicación y Cultura, MSGG, May.
285. Moe, Terry. 1990. “The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy.” In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, ed. Oliver E. Williamson. New York: Oxford University Press, 116-53.
286. Moguillansky, Graciela. 1999. La inversión en Chile: El fin de un ciclo en expansión? Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
287. Molano, Walter. 1997. The Logic of Privatization: The Case of Telecommunications in the Southern Cone of Latin America. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
288. Mora y Araujo, Manuel. 1980a. “Las bases estructurales del peronismo.” In El voto Peronista: Ensayos de sociología electoral Argentina, ed. Manuel Mora y Araujo and Ignacio Llorente. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 397-440.
289. Mora y Araujo, Manuel. 1980b. “Introducción: La sociología electoral y la comprensión del peronismo.” In El voto Peronista: Ensayos de sociología electoral Argentina, ed. Manuel Mora y Araujo and Ignacio Llorente. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 11-54.
290. Moreira, Carlos, and Pedro Narbondo. 1998. “La reforma de las empresas públicas (1992-1994): Actores, diagnósticos y objetivos.” Working Paper no. 11. Department of Political Science, Universidad de la República, Montevideo.
291. Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
292. Munck, Gerardo. 2004. “Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers,” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (May 2004): 437-62
293. Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2005. “Partisanship Amidst Convergence: Labor Market Reforms in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 37, no. 4 (July 2005): 441-58.
294. Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2002. “Political Bias in Policy Convergence. Privatization Choices in Latin America,” World Politics 54, no. 4 (July): 462-93.
295. Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
296. Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Andrew Schrank. 2005. “With a Little Help from My Friends: External and Domestic Allies and Labor Rights in Latin America,” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 8 (October): 971-99.
297. Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Andrew Schrank. Forthcoming. “Labor Unions in the Policy making Process in Latin America.” In Actors in Latin American Policy making, ed. Ernesto Stein and Mariano Tommasi. Washington, DC: Interamerican Development Bank.
298. Murillo, María Victoria, and Cecilia Martínez Gallardo. 2007. “Political Competition and Policy Adoption: Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities,” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1 (January): 120-39.
299. Murillo, María Victoria, and Carmen Le Foulon. 2006. “Crisis and Policymaking in Latin America: The Case of Chile’s 1998-99 Electricity Crisis,” World Development 34, no. 9 (September): 1580-96.
300. Murillo, María Victoria, and Diego Finchelstein. 2004. “Privatización y Poder de Mercado: el caso de la generación de energía eléctrica en Argentina. Nota de investigación,” Desarrollo Económico 44, no. 173 (April-June): 131-44.
301. Murillo, Maria Victoria, Virginia Oliveros, and Milan Vaishnav. Forthcoming. “Voting for the Left or Governing on the Left?” In Latin American Left Turn, ed. Steven Levitsky and Kenneth Roberts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
302. Mustapic, Ana María. 2002. “Oscillating Relations: President and Congress in Argentina.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23-47.
303. Navia, Patricio. 2004. Las grandes alamedas: El Chile post Pinochet. Santiago de Chile: Tercera-Mondadori.
304. NERA (National Economic Research Associates). 1998. “Analysis of the Reform of the Argentine Power Sector: Final Report.” New York, January.
305. Noll, Roger. 1999. “Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries.” Working Paper 99-10, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, November.
306. Noll, Roger. 1989. “Economic Perspective on the Politics of Regulation.” In Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2, ed. Richard Schmalensee and Robert D. Willig. London: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1253-87.
307. Noll, Roger, and Bruce Owen. 1983. The Political Economy of Deregulation: Interest Groups in the Regulatory Process. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
308. Obinger, Herbert, and John Zohnhofer. 2005. “Selling Off the ‘Family Silver’: The Politics of Privatization in the OECD, 1990-2000.” Center for European Studies Working Paper no. 121. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
309. Observatorio de Servicios Públicos (OPSM-Enrique Zuleta Puceiro). 2002. Monitor de Tendencias Económicas y Sociales. Opinión Pública, Servicios y Mercados (July).
310. Observatorio de Servicios Públicos (OPSM-Enrique Zuleta Puceiro). 2003. Monitor de Tendencias Económicas y Sociales. Opinión Pública, Servicios y Mercados (September).
311. Ochoa Camposeco, Victor, and Jesus Orozco. 2002. “Iniciativa de Ley Federal para el Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones,” April. Congreso de la Union. Mexico City.
312. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy?” Journal of Democracy 5 (January): 55-69.
313. OECD. 2000. Reforma regulatory en México. Vol. 1. Paris: OECD.
314. Olson Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
315. O’Neil, Shannon. 2007. “The Rise of the Regulatory State: Post-Privatization Politics in Latin America.” Paper presented at Latin American Studies Association International Congress XXVII, Montréal, Canada.
316. Orenstein, Michael. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Post Communist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
317. Orozco, Jesús and Víctor Manuel Ochoa Camposeco. 2002. “Propuesta de Reforma a la ley Federal de Telecomunicaciones.” Comisión de Telecomunicaciones. Cámara de Diputados. Mexico City, Mexico.
318. Ostiguy, Pierre. 1998. Peronism and Anti-Peronism: Class-Cultural Cleavages and Political Identity in Argentina. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
319. Oxhorn, Philip, and Graciela Ducatenzeiler. 1998. What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
320. Palermo, Vicente and Marcos Novaro. 1996. Política y poder en el gobierno de Menem. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma Ensayo.
321. Palermo, Vicente, and Juan Carlos Torre. 1992. “A la sombra de la hiperinflación. La política de reformas estructurales en Argentina.” CEPAL, Buenos Aires, unpublished manuscript.
322. PAN. 2003. “Legislative Program 2003.” Mexico City, IFE.
323. PAN. 1997. Plataforma Legislativa 1997-2000, January 13.
324. Parametría. 2002. National Home Surveys. Electricity Reform. Parametria SA de CV, Mexico City, Mexico (June 15-13).
325. Pastor, Manuel, and Carol Wise. 1997. “State Policy, Distribution, and Neoliberal Reform in Mexico,” Journal of Latin American Studies 29, no. 2 (May): 419-56.
326. Pelzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211-40.
327. Peruzzotti, Enrique, and Catalina Smulovitz, eds. 2006. Enforcing the Rule of the Law: Social Accountabity in the New Latin American Democracies. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
328. Petracci, Mónica. 1998. “La calidad de los servicios públicos privatizados-luz, agua, gas y teléfono: Evaluada por el ciudadano-usuario.” Dirección Nacional de Estudios y Documentación, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública (INAP). Buenos Aires.
329. Petrazzini, Ben Alfa. 1995. The Political Economy of Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries: Privatization and Liberalization in Comparative Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.
330. Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
331. Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
332. Piñera, José. 1990. La revolución laboral en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Zig-Zag.
333. Piñeira, Sebastián. 2005. “Compromiso de Gobierno de Sebastián Piñeira. Primeros 120 días.” Sebastián Piñeira’s Electoral Plataform. Santiago de Chile, Chile.
334. Pop-Eleches, Grigore. 2008. “Crisis in the Eye of the Beholder: Economic Crisis and Partisan Politics in Latin American and East European International Monetary Fund Programs,” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 9 (September): 1179-1211.
335. Post, Alison. 2007. “Bargaining for the Long-Term in Volatile Economies: The Regulation of Water and Sanitation Concessions in Latin America.” Paper presented for the Latin American Studies Association Meeting, Montreal, September 5-8.
336. PRD. 2003. “Party for a Democratic Revolution: Legislative Program, 2003-2006.” Mexico City, IFE.
337. PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). 2003. “Unidad y Congruencia: Plataforma Electoral 2003.” PRI National Political Committee, Mexico City. January 13, IFE.
338. PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). 2002. “Analisis y presentación de criterios para la discusión de reformas del sector eléctrico nacional.” Aprobado por unanimidad en la comisión permanente del consejo político nacional del PRI.
339. PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). 2000. Federal Electoral Program, 2000-2006. Mexico City.
340. Proyecto de Elites Latinoamericanas (PELA). 1994-2005. Manuel Alcántara, Director. Salamanca, Spain: Universidad de Salamanca.
341. Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
342. Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
343. Rehren, Alfredo. 2000. “Clientelismo político, corrupción y reforma del estado en Chile.” Working Paper no. 305. Centro de Estudios Publicos, Santiago de Chile.
344. Remmer, Karen. 2003. “Elections and Economics in Contemporary Latin America.” In Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America, ed. Carol Wise and Riordan Roett. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 31-55.
345. Remmer, Karen. 2002. “The Politics of Economic Policy and Performance in Latin America,” Journal of Public Policy 22, no. 1: 29-59.
346. Remmer, Karen. 1998. “The Politics of Neoliberal Economic Reform in South America, 1980-94,” Studies in Comparative International Development 33 (Summer): 3-29.
347. Reveles Vázquez, Francisco. 2003. “La lucha entre fracciones priistas en la selección de candidatos presidenciales.” In Partido Revolucionario Institucional: Crisis y refundación, ed. Francisco Reveles Vázquez. Mexico City: Ediciones Gernika, 79-152.
348. Reyes Heroles, Federico. 2000. Hacia la Presidencia en el 2000. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
349. Rhodes, Sybil. 2006. Social Movements and Free-Market Capitalism in Latin America. Albany: State University of New York Press.
350. Rios Figueroa, Julio. 2007. “Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994-2002,” Latin American Politics and Society 49, no. 1 (Spring): 31-57.
351. Rivera, Eugenio. 2000. “Competencia y regulación de los servicios de utilidad pública en Chile: una perspectiva institucional.” In El estado y el sector privado: Construyendo una nueva economía en los años 90, ed. Oscar Muñoz Gomá. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen-FLACSO, 155-98.
352. Roberts, Kenneth. 2008. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility during Latin America’s Transition to Economic Liberalism.” Mimeo. Ithaca, NY.
353. Roberts, Kenneth. 2002. “Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era,” Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 3-33.
354. Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” Journal of Political Economy 106, no. 5 (October): 997-1032.
355. Rodrik, Dani. 1996. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform,” Journal of Economic Literature 34, no. 1 (March): 9-41.
356. Rogozinski, Jacques. 1997. La privatización en México: Razones e impactos. Mexico City: Trillas.
357. Rojas Bolaños, Manuel, and Carlos Sojo. 1995. El malestar con la política: Partidos y elites en Costa Rica. San José: FLACSO.
358. Romero, Carlos. 1999. “Regulaciones e inversiones en el sector electric.” Texto de Discusión 5, Centro de Estudios Económicos de la Regulación. UADE, Buenos Aires, Argentina (June).
359. Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences,” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 7 (September): 824-49.
360. Rossi de Oliveira, Andre. 2003. “The Future of Privatization and Regulation in Brazil.” Paper presented at the conference Progress and Challenges of Rendering Infrastructure in Latin America, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Peru, October 2.
361. Rozas, Patricio. 1999. “La crisis eléctrica en Chile: Antecedentes para una evaluación de la institucionalidad reguladora.” Serie Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura No. 5. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
362. Rufin, Carlos. 2003. The Political Economy of Institutional Change in the Electricity Supply Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
363. Rufin, Carlos. 2002. “Political Economy of the Brazilian Electricity Sector.” Report presented to the Inter-American Development Bank. http: //faculty. babson. edu/crufin/(accessed June 8, 2005).
364. Rufin, Carlos, and U. Srinivasa Rangan. 2004. Institutional Change in the Electricity Industry: Initial Evidence. Unpublished manuscript. Babson College, January.
365. Rufin, Carlos, and Evanán Romero. 2005. “Evaluating the Sustainability of Privatization and Regulatory Reform: Brazil in Comparative Perspective.” Paper presented at the Brazil in Interdisciplinary Perspective conference, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, April 29-30.
366. Saavedra, Eduardo. 2005. Marco Regulatorio de los Servicios Basicos en Chile. IDEAS. http: //ideas. repec. org/p/ila/ilades/inv167. html (accessed September 28, 2006).
367. Sábato, Jorge. 1971. Segba, cogestión y Banco Mundial. Buenos Aires: Juárez.
368. Saiegh, Sebastian. 2006. “Patterns of Successful Statutory Policy Making around the World.” Mimeo. San Diego: University of California, San Diego.
369. Salinas, Carlos. 1994. Sexto informe de gobierno. Mexico City: Presidencia de la República.
370. Schamis, Hector. 2002. Re-Forming the State: The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
371. Schamis, Hector. 1999. “Distributional Coalitions and the Politics of Economic Reform in Latin America,” World Politics 51: 236-68.
372. Schamis, Hector. 1991. “Reconceptualizing Latin American Authoritarianism in the 1970s: From Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism to Neoconservatism,” Comparative Politics 23, no. 2 (January): 201-20.
373. Schenone, Osvaldo. 1991. “Public Sector Behavior in Argentina.” In The Public Sector and the Latin American Crisis, ed. Felipe Larraín and Marcelo Selowsky. San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth, 20-56.
374. Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
375. Schneider, Ben Ross. 1998. “The Material Bases of Technocracy: Investor Confidence and Neoliberalism in Latin America.” In The Politics of Expertise in Latin America, ed. Miguel Centeno and Patricio Silva. London: St. Martin, 77-95.
376. Schneider, Volker, Simon Fink, and Marc Tenbücken. 2005. “Buying Out the State: A Comparative Perspective on the Privatization of Infrastructures,” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 6: 704-27.
377. Secretary of Communications and Transportation (SCT). 2000. El sector comunicaciones y transporte, 1994-2000. Mexico City: SCT.
378. Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2007. The Political Economy of the Welfare State in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
379. Serra, Pablo. 2002. “Regulacion del sector electrico chileno,” Perspectivas 6, no. 1: 11-44.
380. Shoetters, Marcelo Alberto. 1999. “Preocupa la posible cartelización de la generación en el MEM?” Mimeo. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
381. Shugart, Matthew S., and John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
382. Shugart, Matthew S. and Stephen Haggard. 2001. “Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Stephen Haggard and Matthew D. McCubbins. New York: Cambridge University Press, 21-63.
383. Siavelis, Peter. 2002. “Executive-Legislative Relations in Chile.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79-113.
384. Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
385. Sigmund, Paul. 1990. “Chile: Privatization, Reprivatization, Hyperprivatization.” In The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization, ed. Ezra N. Suleiman and John Waterbury. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 87-113.
386. Silva, Eduardo. 1996. The State and Capital in Chile. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
387. Silva, Patricio. 1991. “Technocrats and Politics in Chile: From the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks,” Journal of Latin American Studies 23 (May): 385-410.
388. Simmons, Beth. 1999. “The Internationalization of Capital.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John Stephens. New York: Cambridge University Press, 36-69.
389. Simmons, Beth, and Zachary Elkins. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy,” American Political Science Review 98, no. 1 (February): 171-89.
390. Smith, Peter. 1980. “Las elecciones de 1946 y las inferencias ecológicas.” In El voto Peronista: Ensayos de sociología electoral Argentina, ed. Manuel Mora y Araujo and Ignacio Llorente. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana, 165-89.
391. Spiller, Pablo, and Luis Viana Martorell. 1996. “How Should It Be Done? Electricity Regulation in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Chile.” In International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation, ed. Richard J. Gilbert and Edward P. Kahn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 82-125.
392. Stallings, Barbara. 1992. “International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization, and Structural Reform.” In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State, ed. Stephen Haggard and Robert Kaufman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 41-88.
393. Stallings, Barbara. 1990. “The Role of Foreign Capital in Economic Development.” In Manufacturing Miracles: The Path of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia, ed. Gary Gereffi and Donald L. Wyman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 54-87.
394. Stallings, Barbara and Wilson Perez. 2000. Crecimiento, Empleo y Equidad: el impacto de las reformas económicas en América Latina. Mexico City: CEPAL/Fondo de Cultura Económica.
395. Stigler, George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” Bell Journal on Economic and Management Science 2: 3-21.
396. Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina,” American Political Science Review 99, no. 3 (August): 315-26.
397. Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
398. Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
399. Sturzenegger, Federico. 1990. “Description of a Populist Experience: Argentina, 1973-1976.” In The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America, ed. Rudisher Dornbush and Sebastian Edwards. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 77-120.
400. Subsecretaria de Economia. 2004. “Indicadores de regulacion: Servicios de utilidad publica.” Ministerio de Economia, Santiago de Chile. http: //www. economia. cl/aws00/Estatico/repositorio/Y/j/R/YjRiNWM0ZTZmNTMwZDQ1MjRiNj Y0NWM0MWZhNTFmMjg4YWRlN2ZmOA==. pdf (accessed October 1, 2005).
401. Székely, Gabriel, and Jaime Del Palacio. 1995. Teléfonos de México: una empresa privada. Mexico City: Grupo Editorial Planeta.
402. Tabja, Rodrigo. 1996. “Organización industrial, legislación y tarificación en las telecomunicaciones de Chile. Un intento de Síntesis.” Mimeo. Santiago de Chile.
403. Taylor, Shelley. 1982. “The Availability Bias in Social Perception and Interaction.” In Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 190-200.
404. Telecomunicaciones y Negocios. 1999. no. 42, year 9.
405. Telecomunicaciones y Negocios. 1997. “Las Pymes hacen numerous,” no. 32, year 7.
406. Teichman, Judith. 2001. The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
407. Telmex. 2002. “Propuesta de Telmex a la CPT.” Mexico City. Mimeo.
408. Thatcher, Mark. 2002a. “Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation,” West European Politics 25, no. 1 (January): 125-47.
409. Thatcher, Mark. 2002b. “Regulation after Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe,” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 6: 954-72.
410. Thatcher, Mark. 1999. The Politics of Telecommunications. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Thelen, Kathleen. 2004 How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
411. Thatcher, Mark. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (June): 369-404.
412. Torre, Juan Carlos. 1998. El proceso político de las reformas económicas en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
413. Torre, Leonardo. 2000. “Tarifas y penetración telefónica en México: Demanda insuficiente o poder de monopolio?” Working Paper 18. Centro de Análisis y Difusión Económica (CADE), Monterrey (November).
414. Trends in Telecommunications Reforms. 1998. Geneva: International Telecommunications Union.
415. Tsebelis, George. 2003. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
416. Tufte, Edward. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
417. Ugalde, Luis Carlos. 2000. The Mexican Congress: Old Player, New Power. Washington, DC: CSIS.
418. UNDP. 2004. Democracy in Latin America: Towards a Citizens’ Democracy. New York: United Nations Development Program.
419. Urbiztondo, Santiago. 2000. “El problema de los cortes de electricidad y posibles soluciones regulatorias.” Mimeo. FIEL, March.
420. Urbiztondo, Santiago, Daniel Artana, and Fernando Navajas. 1998. “La autonomía de los nuevos entes reguladores argentinos,” Desarrollo Económico 38 (Autumn): 7-40.
421. Valenzuela, Arturo. 1991. “The Military in Power: The Consolidation of One-Man Rule.” In The Struggle for Democracy in Chile, ed. Paul Drake and Ivan Jaksic. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press: 97-132.
422. Vergara, Pilar. 1981. “Las Transformaciones de las Funciones Económicas del Estado en Chile Bajo el Gobierno Militar,” Colección Estudios CIEPLAN 5: 117-54.
423. Vernon, Raymond. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises. New York: Basic Books.
424. Victor, David, and Thomas Heller. 2007. Introduction to the Political Economy of Power Sector Reform, ed. D. Victori and T. Heller. New York: Cambridge University Press.
425. Vispo, Adolfo. 1999. Los entes de regulación. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-Norma.
426. Vogel, Steven K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reforms in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
427. Vreeland, James. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
428. Weingast, Barry. 1981. “Regulation, Reregulation, and Deregulation: The Political Foundations of Agency Clientele Relationships,” Law and Contemporary Problems 44: 148-77.
429. Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scott Mainwaring and Matthew S. Shuggart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 225-8.
430. Weyland, Kurt. 2008. “The Latin American Left: Destroyer or Savior of the Market Model?” Mimeo. Austin, TX.
431. Weyland, Kurt. 2006. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
432. Weyland, Kurt. 2005. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform,” World Politics 2: 262.
433. Weyland, Kurt. 2004. “Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform: An Introduction.” In Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform, ed. Kurt Weyland. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1-34.
434. Weyland, Kurt. 2002a. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
435. Weyland, Kurt. 2002b. “Limitations of Rational-Choice Institutionalism for the Study of Latin American Politics,” Studies in Comparative International Development 37, no. 1 (Spring): 57-85.
436. Weyland, Kurt. 1999. “Economic Policy in Chile’s New Democracy,” Journal of Interamerican. Studies and World Affairs 41, no. 3: 67-96.
437. Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “Swallowing the Bitter Pill: Sources of Popular Support for Neoliberal Reform in Latin America,” Comparative Political Studies 31, no. 5 (October): 539-68.
438. Williamsom, John. 1994. The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
439. Wilson, Bruce. 1999. “Leftist Parties, Neoliberal Policies, and Reelection Strategies: The Case of the PLN in Costa Rica,” Comparative Political Studies 32, no. 6: 752-79.
440. Wilson, James Q. 1980. “The Politics of Regulation.” In The Politics of Regulation, ed. James Q. Wilson. New York: Basic Books, 357-447.
441. Winograd, Carlos. 2002. “Infraestructura y Servicios Públicos. Crisis Económica y Agenda Regulatoria.” Mimeo. París: DELTA-Ecole Normale Superieure (September 11).
442. Wise, Carol. 2003. “Mexico’s Democratic Transition: The Search for New Reform Coalitions.” In Post-Stabilization Politics in Latin America, ed. Carol Wise and Riordan Roett. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 159-98.
443. World Bank. 2005. “Infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean: Recent Development and Key Changes.” Washington, DC: World Bank.
444. World Bank. 1991. “The Evolution, Situation, and Prospects of the Electric Power Sector in the LAC Countries.” Washington, DC: World Bank and OLADE, August.
445. Yashar, Deborah. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
446. Zedillo, Ernesto. 2000. Sexto Informe de Gobierno. Mexico City: Presidencia de la República.